
Free for all: Democratic socialist's policy pitches face tough fiscal reality in New York
NEW YORK — Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani has catapulted into second place in this year's New York City mayoral race by promising free buses, no-cost childcare and city-run grocery stores.
He'll have a tough time paying the tab.
To fund his vision, the state legislator wants to conjure up $10 billion in new revenue through higher taxes on businesses and wealthy New Yorkers. But beneath the sheen of that populist platform is a morass of necessary state approvals that threaten his plans coming to fruition.
Standing in his way: Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul, who does not seem keen on raising taxes.
The governor, a moderate Democrat, has expressed steadfast opposition to hiking taxes on high-income earners. She will be facing reelection next year too, just as Mamdani would need her blessing to begin accomplishing his goals during his first year in office — adverse conditions that stand to imperil nearly half of the state assemblymember's $10 billion bonanza.
A POLITICO review of his proposals found Mamdani has likely underestimated the cost of his housing construction and school rehab plans by tens of billions of dollars, making it that much harder for the charismatic, 33-year-old politician to breathe life into them. Additionally, his sales pitch to levy Big Apple corporations significantly downplays their existing tax burden.
'He articulates his points very well, and they make sense. You understand exactly what he's saying,' former Gov. David Paterson said in an interview. 'The problem is: Nobody told him there's no such thing as Santa Claus.'
The questions around how Mamdani will fund his sweeping agenda underscore a fundamental question of the mayor's race: Whether a socialist lawmaker can effectively serve as an executive, a position that demands compromise.
While mayoral candidates often pitch municipal proposals that require the state's blessing, Mamdani is unique in tying multiple marquee planks of his campaign to the whims of Albany — a political bog that has swallowed more seasoned negotiators than the three-term legislator.
The gambit has helped in the short run. Mamdani has roared ahead of a pack of left-leaning hopefuls chasing frontrunner Andrew Cuomo by running a savvy campaign powered by viral social media moments, stage presence and the promise of cash added back into New Yorkers' pocketbooks.
He's the chosen candidate of the hyper-online, activist left, but offline — and in Gracie Mansion — the bigger the idea, the less likely a mayor has the power to pull it off alone.
New York City is a bureaucratic vassal of the state, meaning mayors need sign off from the governor and bicameral Legislature for everything from policing illegal cannabis shops to retaining control over the nation's largest public school system. In Mamdani's case, he would need to convince Albany to significantly expand the city's debt capacity and green-light free buses, in addition to passing the tax hikes necessary to realize his most buzz-generating visions. He is also pushing for an increase of the state-mandated $16.50-an-hour minimum wage to $30 by 2030.
Success, of course, would deliver a substantial payoff.
Former Mayor Bill de Blasio staked his 2013 campaign on creating universal prekindergarten with funding from Albany. The program is now the signature legacy of his rocky eight-year tenure.
De Blasio hoped to pay for his proposal with a tax on the wealthy before being thwarted by then-Gov. Cuomo, his political nemesis who delivered funding for the plan without raising taxes in an election year. But de Blasio believes Mamdani has a better shot in today's political climate.
'The difference now is the millionaires and billionaires have gotten massive tax cuts since the first [President Donald Trump] term, and they are about to get even more,' de Blasio said in an interview, noting the state Legislature is now entirely controlled by Democrats. 'So calling for higher taxes on the wealthy is an entirely different enterprise now than it was in 2014.'
For a sense of scale, de Blasio's Pre-K plan was priced at less than $500 million annually when the funding was included in the state budget. Mamdani is looking to raise 20 times that sum, almost all through tax hikes.
The assemblymember wants to collect $5 billion each year by increasing the state's corporate tax rate from 7.25 percent to 11.5 percent. He is looking to generate another $4 billion by hitting the top percentile of New York City income earners with a 2 percent flat tax. The last bit of revenue would come from a combination of procurement reform and collecting fines and fees owed to the city.
'Together, these approaches would raise $10 billion and would transform this city into one where New Yorkers can afford their rent, can afford public transit, can afford their child care, can afford their groceries — one where New Yorkers can do more than worry each and every hour of each and every day whether or not they can continue living in the wealthiest city in the wealthiest country in the world,' Mamdani said during an April press briefing explaining his approach.
State lawmakers have routinely supported increasing taxes on the wealthy. The governor would be a much harder sell.
'I'm not raising income taxes,' Hochul said in March, citing a desire to stem an exodus of the wealthy to lower-tax states. 'I will cut income taxes instead. That's how I'm going to keep people here.'
Hochul is up for reelection in 2026, the first year of Mamdani's term if he were elected. Rendering her cooperation even less likely is the prospect of a competitive Republican challenger eager to cast the state as unaffordable and hostile to commerce.
As for business taxes, the governor has supported hiking them as recently as this year. The assemblymember has pitched his corporate tax increase as a way to bring New York's rate on par with the top business tax bracket in New Jersey.
But the comparison is not exactly apt.
Big Apple businesses pay well above the New York state rate. New York City charges its own corporation tax, and companies located in the five boroughs must make additional offerings to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. That translates to a total tax rate of more than 18 percent for major corporations, roughly seven points higher than the largest corporations pay across the Hudson River.
'The kind of tax increase he is proposing would hollow out New York City in terms of jobs and its tax base,' said Kathy Wylde, head of the Partnership for New York City, a nonprofit representing the interests of major corporations in the five boroughs. 'The idea that he would net raise an additional $10 billion is fantasy because those taxpayers and the jobs that they provide would be moving out faster than he could collect.'
Wylde cautioned the city has already posted a net loss of 1,000 private-sector jobs for the first four months of the year, according to an internal report shared with POLITICO, and she noted that many of the city's biggest employers will not benefit from the proposed Trump tax cuts because of how their businesses are structured. Additionally, a recent report from the Citizens Budget Commission showed New York State already had the highest income and business taxes in the country as of 2022, the latest year available for analysis.
A more practical issue for Mamdani? The city has no claim to state corporate tax collections, which flow into a multibillion-dollar sea of revenue controlled by the state.
The candidate does not seem fazed.
When asked during a recent forum how he will convince Albany, Mamdani pointed to the Legislature's push to raise income taxes in 2021, which he said was accomplished in part by getting broad support from the public — suggesting that if he were to build such a strong coalition, Hochul would have no choice but to relent.
'The mayor of New York City has been described as having the second-largest bully pulpit in America,' he said. 'There is an opportunity to use that bully pulpit in a manner other than what [incumbent New York City Mayor Eric Adams] has done.'
In particular, Mamdani plans to sell the increase of the corporate tax as the vehicle to fund universal childcare — a benefit he argues would accrue across socioeconomic lines and make the city more competitive. His team said he would work with state officials to route the spoils of that levy directly to New York City.
Campaign spokesperson Andrew Epstein disputed the notion of a corporate exodus as a result: Not only are major firms in line for a federal tax cut, but the corporate rate Mamdani wants to hike — unlike the MTA surcharges — is based on an entity's business activity in New York, not where it is located. In other words, he argued, anyone wanting access to the city's 8.5 million consumers will ante up.
Epstein also pointed to polling that shows higher taxes on the wealthy have broad support in New York.
'The Mamdani revenue plan is necessary in order to Trump-proof New York City, and we are confident that Zohran will use his experience in advocating for smart tax policy in Albany — where he won major tax increases on billionaires and corporations in 2021 — to deliver a New York that protects its people from the Trump administration's attacks on the working class,' Epstein said in an email.
James Parrott, a fiscal policy expert with The New School, said high-income earners do not make decisions about where to live primarily based on taxes — meaning a hike would not automatically spur them to flee. He said there's room to increase rates on the highest earners in the five boroughs. But even they, along with New York City corporations, have their limits. The key to successfully leveraging more money, Parrott said, is to tie tax increases to specific policies that have broad public support.
'If this was for something that was widely seen as enhancing the attractiveness of New York City to potential employers, like universal childcare would, then I don't think it's going to be a big push factor driving corporations out,' he added.
Mamdani's plan to provide childcare for all New York City children under 5 would indeed consume much of the new revenue he is hoping to obtain. His campaign has pegged the cost at between $5 billion and $7 billion. The group Prenatal to Five Fiscal Strategies, which has provided fiscal estimates for childcare programs, predicted in a 2023 study the cost would be $6.6 billion with current salaries for childcare workers and up to $9.6 billion if those workers are paid living wages.
Mamdani's proposal for free buses would run the cash-strapped MTA around $900 million in annual revenue, according to the latest projections, though the legislator has suggested the governor-controlled transit authority board might be enticed by a cost-sharing agreement with the city. The tab for a new Department of Public Safety would entail $450 million in new spending, per the campaign, while the cost of piloting five city-run grocery stores would come out to $60 million, an estimate his team arrived at by doubling the projected costs of a similar effort in Chicago.
The democratic socialist's biggest ticket items — and the ones most likely to exceed his cost estimates — would be included in the capital budget, rather than the annual expense plan.
New York City is already set to borrow around $173 billion over the next 10 years to finance major infrastructure projects like the construction of four new jail facilities. Mamdani is proposing to more than triple the $30 billion dedicated to housing in the hopes of, in turn, tripling the city's production of affordable homes.
That would almost certainly require permission to exceed a state-imposed debt limit — another major ask from the state. And even then, the math doesn't pencil out.
The city typically uses up the annual supply of federal subsidies underwriting significant affordable housing costs. That means Mamdani would have to make up the difference with more taxpayer dollars, making any serious production boost much more expensive than the units being financed today.
And his pledge to build with union labor would drive up expenses even more. In 2016, the Independent Budget Office found prevailing wage rates — less costly than full union construction — would increase the price tag of city-subsidized housing projects by 23 percent.
Mamdani has also pledged to renovate 500 schools by replacing pipes, heating and air-conditioning systems, and removing mold and lead paint. He has pegged the cost of those upgrades and other green initiatives at $3.27 billion over a decade.
Jeremy Shannon, an architect and former director of sustainable design and resiliency at the city's School Construction Authority, said such an undertaking would exceed Mamdani's estimates by an order of magnitude. The Adams administration, for example, recently allocated $4 billion for green upgrades at just 100 schools, said Shannon, who was previously a volunteer for one of Mamdani's rivals, city Comptroller Brad Lander.
'As a sustainable design architect, I would love to see the level of school and housing decarbonization that both candidates are proposing done over the next five years because we are in the middle of an ecological crisis,' he said, adding he was not speaking on behalf of Lander's camp. 'Zohran's climate action plan, however, is not helpful.'
Taken together, that means Mamdani would likely need to borrow tens of billions of dollars more than his plans call for, increasing the stakes for relaxing the city's debt limit and increasing annual repayment obligations if he were to get it.
Epstein, the campaign spokesperson, said Mamdani would use the mayor's bully pulpit to advocate for more debt capacity from the state, along with additional federal subsidies. For his housing plan, the lawmaker also plans to leverage the supply of city-owned property, upzone areas that have not contributed to housing production and fast-track affordable projects.
And he did not budge on higher construction wages.
'Union labor is essential to this plan,' Epstein said. 'Shortcuts that stiff workers are antithetical to our city's values and bound to fail.'
Despite the significant political roadblocks ahead of him, Mamdani has one thing working in his favor: The electorate's attention tends to be captured by bold ideas, not how to pay for them.
'If a plan speaks to voters' aspirations and it addresses some of their concerns, they don't care how a candidate pays for it,' said Democratic consultant Trip Yang, who is unaffiliated with any mayoral campaign. 'Democratic primary voters vote off emotion.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A US territory's colonial history emerges in state disputes over voting and citizenship
WHITTIER, Alaska (AP) — Squeezed between glacier-packed mountains and Alaska's Prince William Sound, the cruise-ship stop of Whittier is isolated enough that it's reachable by just a single road, through a long, one-lane tunnel that vehicles share with trains. It's so small that nearly all its 260 residents live in the same 14-story condo building. But Whittier also is the unlikely crossroads of two major currents in American politics: fighting over what it means to be born on U.S. soil and false claims by President Donald Trump and others that noncitizen voter fraud is widespread. In what experts describe as an unprecedented case, Alaska prosecutors are pursuing felony charges against 11 residents of Whittier, most of them related to one another, saying they falsely claimed U.S. citizenship when registering or trying to vote. The defendants were all born in American Samoa, an island cluster in the South Pacific roughly halfway between Hawaii and New Zealand. It's the only U.S. territory where residents are not automatically granted citizenship by virtue of having been born on American soil, as the Constitution dictates. Instead, by a quirk of geopolitical history, they are considered 'U.S. nationals' — a distinction that gives them certain rights and obligations while denying them others. American Samoans are entitled to U.S. passports and can serve in the military. Men must register for the Selective Service. They can vote in local elections in American Samoa but cannot hold public office in the U.S. or participate in most U.S. elections. Those who wish to become citizens can do so, but the process costs hundreds of dollars and can be cumbersome. 'To me, I'm an American. I was born an American on U.S. soil,' said firefighter Michael Pese, one of those charged in Whittier. 'American Samoa has been U.S. soil, U.S. jurisdiction, for 125 years. According to the supreme law of the land, that's my birthright.' Confusion over voting is not just an Alaska problem The status has created confusion in other states, as well. In Oregon, officials inadvertently registered nearly 200 American Samoan residents to vote when they got their driver's licenses under the state's motor-voter law. Of those, 10 cast ballots in an election, according to the Oregon Secretary of State's office. Officials there determined the residents had not intended to break the law and no crime was committed. In Hawaii, one resident who was born in American Samoa, Sai Timoteo, ran for the state Legislature in 2018 before learning she wasn't allowed to hold public office or vote. She had always considered it her civic duty to vote, and the form on the voting materials had one box to check: 'U.S. Citizen/U.S. National.' 'I checked that box my entire life,' she said. She also avoided charges, and Hawaii subsequently changed its form to make it more clear. Is U.S. citizenship a birthright? Amid the storm of executive orders issued by Trump in the early days of his second term was one that sought to redefine birthright citizenship by barring it for children of parents who are in the U.S. unlawfully. Another would overhaul how federal elections are run, among other changes requiring voters to provide proof of citizenship. Courts so far have blocked both orders. The Constitution says that 'all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.' It also leaves the administration of elections to the states. The case in Whittier began with Pese's wife, Tupe Smith. After the couple moved to Whittier in 2018, Smith began volunteering at the Whittier Community School, where nearly half of the 55 students were American Samoan — many of them her nieces and nephews. She would help the kids with their English, tutor them in reading and cook them Samoan dishes. In 2023, a seat on the regional school board came open and she ran for it. She was the only candidate and won with about 95% of the vote. One morning a few weeks later, as she was making her two children breakfast, state troopers came knocking. They asked about her voting history. She explained that she knew she wasn't allowed to vote in U.S. presidential elections, but thought she could vote in local or state races. She said she checked a box affirming that she was a U.S. citizen at the instruction of elections workers because there was no option to identify herself as a U.S. national, court records say. The troopers arrested her and drove her to a women's prison near Anchorage. She was released that day after her husband paid bail. 'When they put me in cuffs, my son started crying," Smith told The Associated Press. "He told their dad that he don't want the cops to take me or to lock me up.' A question of intent About 10 months later, troopers returned to Whittier and issued court summonses to Pese, eight other relatives and one man who was not related but came from the same American Samoa village as Pese. One of Smith's attorneys, Neil Weare, grew up in another U.S. territory, Guam, and is the co-founder of the Washington-based Right to Democracy Project, whose mission is 'confronting and dismantling the undemocratic colonial framework governing people in U.S. territories.' He suggested the prosecutions are aimed at 'low-hanging fruit' in the absence of evidence that illegal immigrants frequently cast ballots in U.S. elections. Even state-level investigations have found voting by noncitizens to be exceptionally rare. 'There is no question that Ms. Smith lacked an intent to mislead or deceive a public official in order to vote unlawfully when she checked 'U.S. citizen' on voter registration materials,' he wrote in a brief to the Alaska Court of Appeals last week, after a lower court judge declined to dismiss the charges. Prosecutors say her false claim of citizenship was intentional, and her claim to the contrary was undercut by the clear language on the voter application forms she filled out in 2020 and 2022. The forms said that if the applicant did not answer yes to being over 18 years old and a U.S. citizen, 'do not complete this form, as you are not eligible to vote.' A dispute entangled with a colonial past The unique situation of American Samoans dates to the 19th century, when the U.S. and European powers were seeking to expand their colonial and economic interests in the South Pacific. The U.S. Navy secured the use of Pago Pago Harbor in eastern Samoa as a coal-refueling station for military and commercial vessels, while Germany sought to protect its coconut plantations in western Samoa. Eventually the archipelago was divided, with the western islands becoming the independent nation of Samoa and the eastern ones becoming American Samoa, overseen by the Navy. The leaders of American Samoa spent much of the late 19th and early 20th centuries arguing that its people should be U.S. citizens. Birthright citizenship was eventually afforded to residents of other U.S. territories — Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands. Congress considered it for American Samoa in the 1930s, but declined. Some lawmakers cited financial concerns during the Great Depression while others expressed patently racist objections, according to a 2020 article in the American Journal of Legal History. Supporters of automatic citizenship say it would particularly benefit the estimated 150,000 to 160,000 nationals who live in the states, many of them in California, Hawaii, Washington, Oregon, Utah and Alaska. 'We pay taxes, we do exactly the same as everybody else that are U.S. citizens,' Smith said. 'It would be nice for us to have the same rights as everybody here in the states.' Legal questions over status to be tested anew But many in American Samoa eventually soured on the idea, fearing that extending birthright citizenship would jeopardize its customs — including the territory's communal land laws. Island residents could be dispossessed by land privatization, not unlike what happened in Hawaii, said Siniva Bennett, board chair of the Samoa Pacific Development Corporation, a Portland, Oregon-based nonprofit. 'We've been able to maintain our culture, and we haven't been divested from our land like a lot of other indigenous people in the U.S.,' Bennett said. In 2021, the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to extend automatic citizenship to those born in American Samoa, saying it would be wrong to force citizenship on those who don't want it. The Supreme Court declined to review the decision. Several jurisdictions across the country, including San Francisco and the District of Columbia, allow people who are not citizens to vote in certain local elections. Tafilisaunoa Toleafoa, with the Pacific Community of Alaska, said the situation has been so confusing that her organization reached out to the Alaska Division of Elections in 2021 and 2022 to ask whether American Samoans could vote in state and local elections. Neither time did it receive a direct answer, she said. 'People were telling our community that they can vote as long as you have your voter registration card and it was issued by the state,' she said. Finally, last year, Carol Beecher, the head of the state Division of Elections, sent Toleafoa's group a letter saying American Samoans are not eligible to vote in Alaska elections. But by then, the voting forms had been signed. 'It is my hope that this is a lesson learned, that the state of Alaska agrees that this could be something that we can administratively correct,' Toleafoa said. 'I would say that the state could have done that instead of prosecuting community members.' ___ Bohrer reported from Juneau, Alaska, and Johnson from Seattle. Claire Rush in Portland, Oregon, and Jennifer Sinco Kelleher in Honolulu contributed to this report.

Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Brooklyn Center attorney suspended by Minnesota Supreme Court
The Minnesota Supreme Court has indefinitely suspended attorney Susan Shogren Smith, who authorities say filed legal challenges in the November 2020 election without permission of the plaintiffs. The suspension from practicing law came Thursday, on the heels of a petition for disciplinary action against Shogren Smith filed by the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility saying that she has conducted professional misconduct. The Brooklyn Center attorney was given a $10,000 sanction in 2021 after a judge found she 'bamboozled' voters into signing on as plaintiffs without their knowledge or permission to file legal challenges against the election of five congressional Democrats. Calls to Shogren Smith on Friday were not returned. The petition for disciplinary action noted that a three-judge panel had determined she had committed a 'fraud on the court' and gave her an additional $15,000 sanction. The petition claims that Shogren Smith has failed to pay the $25,000, according to court documents. 'Respondent's misconduct is serious,' the state Supreme Court document said, 'and involved not just lack of competence and failure to communicate with clients, but dishonesty to the courts and disregard for the discipline process.' The court documents said her actions were 'not a brief lapse of judgement' but something that occurred for several years. Shogren Smith is a member of the MN Election Integrity Team, a conservative group that sought to prevent the state from certifying its election results while President Donald Trump and his allies promoted unfounded claims of election fraud. On Dec. 1, 2020, she filed five complaints in Ramsey County District Court, naming as defendants Secretary of State Steve Simon and the Democratic candidates who won their Congressional races. Those legal challenges were filed in the names of 14 separate voters, at least four of whom had no idea they were participating. 'Susan Shogren Smith … perpetrated a fraud against this court and, more importantly, perpetrated a fraud against these plaintiffs,' Ramsey County Chief District Judge Leonardo Castro said at the time the first sanction was imposed. In February of 2021, Republican activist Corinne Braun discovered her name was connected to one of the cases. 'To my horror, I saw that I had sued Steve Simon and Ilhan Omar. It was a surreal moment for me,' she said, likening the discovery to finding her car had been broken into. Braun testified she had received an anonymous email asking to add her name to a list of disgruntled voters. She filled out the form and signed her name and then forwarded the email to about 5,000 people on her mailing list. As Shogren Smith explained in court, what Braun had signed was an affidavit that agreed she 'will be joining with other voters across Minnesota to contest Minnesota election results.' Braun, though, said she didn't understand the implications. Shogren Smith acknowledged she never spoke with the plaintiffs or informed them of the outcome of the case, even when Braun and two other unwitting plaintiffs were ordered to pay $3,873 to the defendants at the conclusion of the case. Shogren Smith said at the time, she believed someone else with the MN Election Integrity Team was having those conversations with plaintiffs. 'I absolutely believed that those conversations were happening with these plaintiffs,' she said. U.S. Customs Border Protection officer charged with possessing child porn Man once convicted in Minnesota of supporting al-Qaida is now charged in Canada for alleged threats Jury finds Milwaukee man guilty of killing and dismembering 19-year-old woman 'We feel relief': Derrick Thompson found guilty in Minneapolis crash that killed five young women Man charged with hate crime in Boulder attack on 'Zionist people' appears in federal court


Los Angeles Times
41 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Let the countdown begin: One year until the California governor and L.A. mayor primaries
It's June in California, which means the jacarandas are magnificently in bloom, joyous graduates overfill school auditoriums and the weather is utterly unpredictable. Oh and one more thing: As of this week, we are exactly a year out from the 2026 primary election. Here's what you need to know. California is a country within a country — a cultural and economic behemoth where the future happens first. And with term limits forcing Gov. Gavin Newsom out, the world's fourth-largest economy will be picking a new leader at the end of 2026. There is already a crowded field of prominent Democrats vying to replace Newsom. They include former state Senate President Pro Tem Toni Atkins, former U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra, businessman Stephen J. Cloobeck, Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, former state Controller Betty Yee, former Rep. Katie Porter, state Supt. of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond and former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa). Two notable Republicans are also in the fight: Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco and former Fox News commentator Steve Hilton. The biggest question mark remains whether former Vice President Kamala Harris will enter the race, a decision she plans to make by late summer. That waiting game has stalled the Democratic field: Candidates are continuing their frenetic campaigning, but many activists, donors and elected officials are holding off on further endorsements until Harris makes up her mind. (Though some are growing more frustrated with Harris, and the implicit message that governing California is a consolation prize that she can toy with for months.) California's affordability crisis — and varying views on how to solve it — will probably dominate the long slog of campaigning ahead. But given the wilderness the national Democratic Party currently finds itself in, competition for California's top job will also probably double as a referendum on the broader question of what a winning Democratic leader should sound like. Registered Democrats outnumber Republicans nearly 2 to 1 in California. And what about billionaire Angeleno Rick Caruso, a relatively recent entrant to the Democratic Party? The Grove developer has been flirting with both a gubernatorial bid and another run at the Los Angeles mayor's race but remains undecided. His personal fortune affords him the luxury of some extra time, though self-funding a statewide campaign will be far more expensive than a mayoral one. Still, there could be a lane for a business-friendly centrist running California's sclerotic political system. And speaking of Caruso, he also looms large over the 2026 Los Angeles mayor's race. As of now, incumbent Mayor Karen Bass is the only serious candidate in the race, meaning the first-term mayor could glide to reelection. But the former congresswoman has also taken a political beating in recent months. A catastrophic firestorm put her leadership under a national microscope, a bruising budget crisis left her in a no-win political puzzle and her strong-arm authority on homelessness has been threatened. Which is a long way of saying that Bass could certainly be vulnerable if a real challenger gets into the race, be it Caruso, or someone else. But that remains a big if. The nightmare scenario for Bass is a landscape that looks less like her predecessor Eric Garcetti's reelection romp in 2017 — where he ran virtually unchallenged and leapt to victory with more than 80% of the vote — and more like then-Mayor James K. Hahn's reelection dogfight in 2005. Hahn, a badly wounded incumbent, only barely eked his way into second place in the primary and ultimately rode a wave of voter discontent right out of City Hall, losing to Antonio Villaraigosa that May. Beyond Caruso, a few other names have been bandied about as potential challengers to Bass. As my colleague David Zahniser and I reported a few months ago, that list includes Councilmember Monica Rodriguez (an iconoclastic force who has been openly critical of Bass), L.A. County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath (another politician who has sparred with the mayor) and City Controller Kenneth Mejia (a digitally savvy leftist who, you guessed it, has also taken shots at the city's current direction). Whether any take the leap remains to be seen. Read some of the best stories from our archives Few stories published by the Times in recent years have hit a nerve as forcefully as Julissa James' essay from 2021, 'Lonely in L.A.? These 21 places and experiences will help you embrace it.' Julia Wick, staff writerKevinisha Walker, multiplatform editorAndrew J. Campa, reporterKarim Doumar, head of newsletters How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@ Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on