A VIEW OF THE WEEK: When will the ground fall beneath us?
Three years ago this week, President Cyril Ramaphosa told the nation his government had declared war on illegal mining – but we are still just minutes from disaster.
Illegal mining had been an issue for decades prior to his promise of a new special task team to fight zama zamas, but was forced by the gang rape of eight women near a mine dump in Krugersdorp that had stoked international outrage and protest.
Women, who will this weekend honour the heroes of 1956 who fought for equality and liberation, took to the streets to plead for protection from illegal miners who target them. A call that largely fell on deaf ears.
There has been action by the government, like Ramaphosa deploying the military in 2023 and the police's harsher hand with miners in Stilfontein last year.
However, the problem persists with reports this week that more than 1 000 miners have been arrested in Mpumalanga so far, with the police in another tense stand-off that will no doubt have human rights bodies rushing to court.
Children and women at risk
Many of those underground were reportedly underage, which shows the scope of the problem, especially when their activities affect those the same age as them.
According to the Gauteng education department, 13 schools in the province have been placed on rehabilitation programmes in fear of their collapse. So, as a solution, children are taught environmental education and first aid to detect and then respond to a possible disaster, like the ground falling out from under them.
Where math, science, and language learning should be the priority, lessons on basic survival now dominate.
And the dangers go beyond the classroom, with children and women at risk of being shot at any time by warring factions of zama zamas.
While formalising and regulating the practice may slow down the infection, turf wars and mass arrests show the cancer of illegal mining has already spread too far.
The war against illegal mining has gone beyond political speech, army deployment, police resistance, and economic misdirection, when communities are battlegrounds that could give in at any time.
ALSO READ: A VIEW OF THE WEEK: We need a ceasefire in the war on children
Unity needed but not found
It will only take a complete and unified effort between all South Africans, the state, and our neighbouring countries to try to eradicate it.
No looking the other way when your neighbour is involved, no glamorising the 'jobs' they create, no putting the lives of illegal miners over law-abiding citizens, no more red tape that prevents arrests and prosecutions when a miner crosses the border.
No more shielding high-profile individuals whose fingerprints are all over the illegal mining practice, and no more excuses.
Central to this is political will, accountability, and a clear mutual plan across the region. A unity that is seldom, if ever, seen.
Don't hold your breath waiting for this from those who are out for their own interests, but maybe do plug your nose for the impending plunge below.
NOW READ: A VIEW OF THE WEEK: We live in cities stolen piece by piece
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
11 minutes ago
- IOL News
EFF urges inquiry to avoid lavish venue costs, warns against repeat of Zondo Commission spending
Acting Deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, Adv Terry Motau SC as chief evidence leader, Dr Nolitha Vukuza as the commission secretary, Adv Sandile Khumalo SC, Dr Peter Goss as chief investigator, are just some of the high profile legal minds to lead the Madlanga Commission. Image: IOL GRAPHICS The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) is calling for the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Criminality, Political Interference and Corruption in the Criminal Justice System to avoid costly venue arrangements and instead use publicly owned facilities for the duration of its work. The hearings are expected to commence in August. The Commission has been established to investigate the facilitation of organised crime, the targeting of officials who opposed criminal activities within the security cluster or government, and the involvement of state officials who may have aided criminals. Its establishment follows alarming allegations of misconduct within law enforcement, brought to light by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner, Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. The party has raised concerns on what it calls 'a costly precedent' set by the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Allegations of State Capture, known as the Zondo Commission, where nearly R1 billion was spent, much of it on venue costs. EFF pointed to the use of the Hill on Empire building in Parktown, Johannesburg, as one of the largest cost drivers during the Zondo Commission. The party said that leasing private, upmarket venues contributed unnecessarily to ballooning costs, while many government-owned halls and facilities stood unused. 'This is not just a question of high expenditure,' the EFF said. They warned against inflated pricing, the absence of transparent procurement processes, and the use of venues that are inaccessible to ordinary South Africans, which undermines the constitutional principle of openness in such inquiries. The party noted that it was through its formal questions in Parliament that the public learned the financial details of the Zondo Commission's lease agreements. According to a written reply from the Department of Public Works in 2019, Tiso Black Star was paid R72,846.52 per month for offices and R796,950.00 per month for the auditorium. Redefine Properties was paid R374,900.61 per month for additional offices. At that stage alone, more than R14.8 million had already been spent. EFF said the awarding of contracts to Tiso Black Star and Redefine Properties raised doubts about whether proper procurement processes were followed. The party argues that such expenditures are indefensible given the country's tight fiscal environment. 'We therefore make a direct and unequivocal demand that the Commission secure and commit to a municipal hall or similar public venue for its hearings and operational base for the full duration of its work. ''This is the most appropriate and responsible course of action, both financially and in terms of public accountability,' said EFF secretary general Marshall Dlamini. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The party said that the government, through the Department of Public Works and various municipalities, has numerous suitable venues that can be used at a fraction of the cost, and which would also improve public accessibility to the Commission's proceedings. 'Our objection to private, upmarket venues is not simply about the numbers,' the EFF said. 'Such locations send a message, whether intentional or not, that commissions are elite exercises conducted behind closed doors, far from the communities most affected by the matters under investigation.' Dlamini warned that choosing a private venue under similar terms to the Zondo Commission would be 'financially reckless and contrary to the public interest.' He added that such a decision could damage the credibility of the new Commission before a single witness is even heard. 'In the current fiscal climate, where government departments are under severe budget constraints and critical services are being cut, it is morally indefensible to allow such waste to recur. ''The EFF cannot and will not accept a repeat of the Zondo Commission's venue expenditure pattern,' Dlamini said. The party has urged Deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga to ensure that public trust in the Commission is preserved and that its operations reflect the values of openness, transparency, and fiscal discipline. Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL Politics
Daily Maverick
41 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
‘Dialogue cannot be built on haste' — Key organisations withdraw from National Convention
Organisations, including the Thabo Mbeki Foundation and Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation, cited a litany of concerns such as the rushed timeline, inadequate preparation, disagreements within the Preparatory Task Team and 'government control' as the reason for their withdrawal from the precursor to the National Dialogue. A week before the start of the National Convention, which is expected to set the agenda for the broader National Dialogue, key organisations behind the initiative have withdrawn, citing concerns over 'cutting corners', 'centralising power' and a rush to host the gathering on 15 August. 'It is with deep regret, but with unwavering conviction, that we have resolved to withdraw our participation from the structures of the Preparatory Task Team [PTT] and the First National Convention of the National Dialogue scheduled for 15 August 2025. 'This is due to our belief that core principles meant to underpin the whole National Dialogue have been violated in the rush to host a gathering on 15 August. 'We do so not out of apathy or disengagement, but because we remain committed to the belief that all aspects of the National Dialogue must be credible, principled and anchored in public trust,' the non-profit groups said in a joint statement on Friday, 8 August. The organisations include the Steve Biko Foundation, Thabo Mbeki Foundation, the Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, the Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation, the FW de Klerk Foundation, the Oliver and Adelaide Tambo Foundation and the Strategic Dialogue Group. They said that prior to making their announcement, they had informed both President Cyril Ramaphosa and the Eminent Persons Group of their position. Statement From the Foundations on the National Dialogue 8 Aug 2025 by on Scribd The groups said their decision to withdraw from participating in the PTT, and the First National Convention on 15 August, does not represent a withdrawal from the National Dialogue process itself. 'We remain committed to the principles under which we have been working – to its vision and its urgent necessity,' they stated. Ramaphosa announced the first National Convention in early June this year. A National Dialogue PTT was set up and began mobilising civil society and establishing various working committees. A second National Convention is planned for 2026, which will consolidate the proposals from the various engagements into a national vision and implementation programme, Daily Maverick reported. The initiative – meant to tackle a wide range of South Africa's pressing issues including unemployment, poor governance and gender-based violence – was met with immediate opposition, owing largely to its R740-million price tag, a figure the Presidency disputed. In June, Government of National Unity (GNU) partner, the DA, announced it would not participate in the National Dialogue following the axeing of party member Andrew Whitfield as deputy minister of trade and industry. Last month, former president Thabo Mbeki – whose organisation was among those that have withdrawn – warned that the National Dialogue process risked being meaningless, without capable leadership. 'Sake of expediency' The organisations, in their statement, have proposed that the National Convention be rescheduled to after 15 October, to allow for 'adequate preparation, coherence and participatory integrity'. Daily Maverick understands that the feeling among those in the organisations involved in the process is that the 15 August gathering would not constitute a meaningful engagement because there has not been adequate preparation. According to a source who spoke to Daily Maverick about the background to the issue, the groups are concerned that this will be a 'performative gathering' because the Presidency is set on the 15 August date. The source said concerns over the lack of critical resourcing, operations and systems had been flagged with the Presidency in the weeks leading up to the National Convention. However, the pursuit of the 15 August date appeared to override these concerns. 'We can't have the convention in its current form go ahead in our names, but if things change, we would support the endeavour of the National Dialogue. But it must be meaningful, citizen-led and build a platform that is transformative for the country,' the source said. The groups, in their statement, cautioned that the National Dialogue 'cannot be built on haste'. 'Deadlines cannot override substance,' they said. This is due to our belief that core principles meant to underpin the whole National Dialogue have been violated in the rush to host a gathering on 15 August. In their statement, the groups listed a series of reasons for their withdrawal from the PTT and the National Convention, including, what they called, the 'erosion of citizen leadership'. 'What began as a citizen-led initiative has unfortunately in practice shifted towards government control. In pushing forward for a convention on 15 August at the will of government officials and against the advice of the sub-committee chairs, we believe that a critical moment in which citizens should be leading will be undermined. The principles and important nature of being a citizen-led process are being sacrificed for the sake of expediency,' read the statement. They said that the 'rushed timeline, constrained logistics and limited interactive design' meant that the convention no longer offers a platform for meaningful engagement. 'The structure risks becoming symbolic rather than substantive – more performance than participation. We cannot lend our names to a gathering that does not allow for genuine dialogue. Furthermore, the National Convention was envisaged as a kick-off event for the real heart of the National Dialogue – community, sectoral and citizen-led engagement. As yet, there is no agreed plan for the roll-out of the real Dialogue, and as such the National Convention is premature,' they added. 'Strategic misalignment within the PTT' According to the groups, the 'continued absence of a confirmed, approved budget allocation and a last-minute commitment of initial funds' has made adequate preparation for the gathering impossible. 'This raises real risks of a poorly organised and unaccountable process. The push to proceed has created pressure to engage in emergency procurement, which may violate the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA),' they said. They added that there were 'deep disagreements' within the PTT over the nature of the National Dialogue, readiness, governance and risks. 'Without shared clarity and alignment at the core of the process, moving ahead would be destabilising to the national effort. Unfortunately, this strategic misalignment revolves around the move away from a citizen-led National Dialogue to a government-led process,' the organisations said.
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Ramaphosa responds to Zuma's letter of demands
The president would not meet Zuma's demands. President Cyril Ramaphosa has, through his legal representative, reportedly responded to former president Jacob Zuma's letter of demands sent to the president this week. In the letter, Zuma, through his legal representative, KMNS Attorneys, said he had acted in his capacity as a 'concerned citizen, voter, taxpayer and former president.' He sought answers from the resident on the processes followed when he placed Police minister Senzo Mchunu on leave of absence and appointed Wits law professor Firoz Cachalia as acting minister. 'When exactly (date and time) was your decision to appoint Professor Cachalia as Acting Minister of Police taken, communicated to him and communicated to the public?' 'What exactly is a 'Minister Designate', from a constitutional point of view? Immediately after the swearing-in ceremony (i.e. from around 9:30am on 1 August 2025), what was the exact correct description of Professor Cachalia? Was he a minister, acting minister or minister designate?' ALSO READ: Zuma demands Ramaphosa resign by Friday, or else… Another demand was for Ramaphosa to step down from the Presidency by Friday, 10am, or face legal action. The letter followed Zuma and the MK party's Constitutional Court loss regarding the same matter. The court said the two parties' application does not engage the court's jurisdiction and consequently, refused them direct access in their matter. Ramaphosa responds In a letter shared by broadcaster Newzroom Afrika on Friday, Ramaphosa responded, saying while some of the answers to their questions were already in the public domain, others needed Zuma to follow proper procedure for asking questions to the president. 'To the extent that your client seeks information that is not already available to him, he will be aware, as the leader of the Umkhonto weSizwe Party, of the procedure under Chapter 10 of the National Assembly Rules to address a request for oral or written questions to the president,' reads the letter. ALSO READ: MK party and Zuma suffer blow as ConCourt rules in Ramaphosa's favour [VIDEO] 'That is the appropriate manner for a political party, and its leader, to address questions to the president. When the president receives questions through those proper procedures, he deals with them in accordance with the requirements of the Rules.' Where he could have answered, he implied it would be a futile exercise as Zuma 'has already concluded that his conduct was unlawful.' The president would not meet Zuma's demands, it continued. 'Furthermore, the president shall not comply with the demands in paragraph five of your letter. He stands by the reasons for his decisions as recorded in his answering affidavit in the proceedings before the Constitutional Court. The decisions were lawful, rational and consistent with the president's constitutional duties.' If Zuma and the MK party do approach the courts over the president's decisions, their application will be opposed, reads the letter. Zuma is expected to hold a media briefing on Friday afternoon, 'on the outcomes of the latest meeting of the national officials and will share the [MK] party's latest developments.' READ NEXT: Zuma and MK party case should've started in High Court, ConCourt hears [VIDEOS]
