Scientists suspect lethal virus behind countless fish washing up dead in Lake Huron
People living in coastal communities have been posting pictures of the dead fish on social media, showing pale and ghostly carcasses, some of them with bloody lesions, half-buried in sand on beaches, or floating among the debris at marinas and docks along the coast.
While the bulk of the deaths are gizzard shad, a species known for large natural seasonal die-offs, there are also dead rainbow smelt, rainbow trout, yellow perch, log perch, northern pike, longnose gar, largemouth bass and even mudpuppies — a species of salamander that isn't known for die-offs associated with temperature changes in the spring.
Federal authorities said the deaths are likely natural and part of a routine spring die-off, but biologists who study Great Lakes marine life said the sheer volume of dead fish and the breadth of species affected raises the alarm over a possible outbreak of viral hemorrhagic septicemia, or VHS.
'Nasty fish disease'
"[This is] a really nasty fish disease," said Jennifer Powell, a University of Toronto PhD candidate who studies endangered fish on the Ausable River near Grand Bend. "It can wipe out a huge number of fish."
First reported in Lake Ontario in 2005, VHS has since spread to Lake Huron, including Georgian Bay, Lake Erie and Lake Simcoe. While the virus is deadly to fish, it cannot infect humans or other mammals, even if they eat fish infected by the virus.
Powell said concerned citizens have been sending her pictures of dead fish since late April and the reason she suspects VHS is behind the fish die-offs is because many of the images show fish, particularly gizzard shad, that are bleeding on their sides and mouths.
"It's consistent with some of the hemorrhages that can be seen with VHS. These spots don't show up all the time but they can be a sign," Powell said.
"Most of the residents I've spoken to in the Lambton Shores area say they've never seen it this bad," she said. "The sheer volume of it this year is quite unusual."
'Perceived lack of action' by governments
What's also unusual, according to scientists, has been the response to the outbreak from provincial and federal governments, which have yet to confirm whether VHS is responsible for the unusual number of dead fish this spring in coastal communities on Lake Huron.
"I know that VHS is what is known as an internationally reportable disease, that is, if it occurs in your country, you have an obligation to report it to an international agency," said Nick Mandrak, a professor of biology at the University of Toronto who studies fish conservation.
Mandrak, who lives in Grand Bend, Ont., said provincial and federal governments have an obligation, to not only test for and report the disease, but also to inform the public, who are left with little information about the cause of an unusual number of dead fish that have been washing ashore since late April.
"There's quite a few concerned members of the community here," Mandrak said. "They're concerned for, 'is this a human health issue? Can my dog be impacted by this if they were on the beach and played with dead fishes? Is it a water quality issue?' These are questions people are concerned about.
"The perceived lack of action is only magnifying these concerns."
A spokesperson from the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency could not immediately respond for a request for comment Wednesday.
In an email, a spokesperson from Fisheries and Oceans Canada said it was notified of a fish kill event on Lake Huron near Kincardine on April 26.
"DFO reviewed the available information and at this time we believe the incident is due to natural causes and consistent with other fish kill events that routinely occur during the spring in Ontario."
The Ontario Ministry of Environment Conservation and Parks said in an email Monday to CBC News that it "has not had any reports of spills or observations of smells or water conditions (ie rainbow sheens, unusal cloudiness or colour, etc)."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
16 minutes ago
- CTV News
Provinces have different measles vaccine schedules. Is it time to harmonize them?
Elementary students coats and boots are seen in a school in Edmonton on Tuesday, April 1, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Christinne Muschi TORONTO — Moving from Ontario to New Brunswick didn't just mean Jade Medeiros had to navigate a new province with two babies, she also had to figure out a new vaccination program. When her family moved to Moncton in 2020, she learned her two and three-year-old were already behind on routine vaccinations because New Brunswick has a different schedule than Ontario. 'She had to get a whole bunch all at the same time, whereas in Ontario, it's more spaced out,' said Medeiros, speaking about her younger daughter. Each province and territory has its own vaccine schedule based on factors such as when a child would benefit from higher immunity from the shot, and what childhood vaccinations can be grouped together. Amid a measles outbreak that's led to nearly 5,000 cases across the country, some parents might notice the second shot to prevent the communicable disease is given at 18 months in some places, and between the ages of four and six in others. The Canadian Paediatric Society has wanted to harmonize the vaccine schedule across the country since 1997, when it published a paper on the subject. Its relevance has resurfaced as the country scrambles to strengthen public health messaging in the face of the measles outbreak, which threatens to end Canada's elimination status in a matter of months. Parents and health experts also worry that confusion around vaccine schedules and poor record keeping can contribute to lower vaccination rates, especially in light of a growing sentiment of vaccine skepticism in North America. Childhood vaccination rates have tumbled over the last several years as mistrust and misinformation on immunization caught wind during the COVID-19 pandemic. Only 76 per cent of seven-year-olds in Canada received both shots of the measles vaccine in 2023, compared to 86 per cent in 2019. Ninety-five per cent is needed to acquire herd immunity. Dismantling roadblocks to childhood immunization has long been deemed an essential way to eliminate vaccine-preventable diseases such as measles. A vaccine schedule that's easy to understand and follow can help streamline that process for families. 'I absolutely think they need to harmonize it across the board for all vaccines,' Medeiros said. Vaccine schedules In most provinces and territories the measles, mumps, rubella and varicella (chickenpox) vaccine, MMR-V, is given at 12 months and 18 months. That's the case in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Quebec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories and Nunavut. However, in British Columbia babies get separate MMR and varicella shots at 12 months, and the combined MMR-V shot at around the age they enter school — at four to six years old. In Yukon, they get separate MMR and varicella doses at 12 months and a second round of the two vaccines between ages four to six. In Ontario, the MMR shot is at 12 months, followed by a varicella shot at 15 months, and then a combined MMR-V at four to six years old. Why do provinces have different schedules? Each province's vaccine schedule has evolved based on the patterns and distribution of disease in a population, said Dr. Arlene King, a former Chief Medical Officer of Health in Ontario. When King was Ontario's top doctor, the province changed the childhood immunization schedule. The National Advisory Committee on Immunization recommended an additional chickenpox shot for better protection, and a combined MMR-V was introduced. At the time, Ontario's second dose was at 18 months, separate from a varicella vaccine. But in 2011, the province added a combined MMR-V dose at four to six years old, in addition to the varicella shot given to babies. 'The advantage of providing vaccine at four to six years, the second dose, is that you know that there is going to be full protection against the disease in a setting where they're going to be a lot of opportunities for transmission, for instance, school,' King said. Dr. Vinita Dubey, an associate medical officer of health in Toronto, said there is likely more scientific evidence in favour of spacing out the two measles doses, which gives the body more time to build robust immunity before the second dose. 'Especially as a child, and as infants and toddlers, their immune system develops more as they get older,' Dubey said. But there's also evidence that a closer schedule will protect the youngest and most vulnerable members of the population from getting sick. That's because some infants don't respond to the first dose, said Dr. Joan Robinson, a pediatric infectious diseases physician in Edmonton. 'So if that is the case, giving a second dose as close as possible to the first dose might result in a larger percentage of children being protected,' Robinson said. She said no one really knows which schedule is better because Canada only introduced a second dose of measles in 1996, and its elimination status was achieved in 1998. 'Ever since then, we've not had enough measles anywhere across the country to be able to figure out which is the better schedule,' Robinson said. 'Distant dream' of shared record keeping The Canadian Paediatric Society has repeatedly called for a harmonized immunization strategy, as is the case in the United States and United Kingdom. Both take a similar approach to Ontario, vaccinating kids with a second dose around the age they start school. A position paper in 1997, which was echoed in a 2011 call to action, warned that children could be slipping through the cracks of a disharmonized schedule. 'Some diversity among provincial and territorial immunization programs would be harmless if all jurisdictions had and shared comprehensive record-keeping systems that could be easily accessed by providers,' Dr. Noni MacDonald, a pediatrician and a member of the group's infectious diseases and immunization committee at the time, wrote. 'For most jurisdictions such systems are but a distant dream.' Her words, written almost 30 years ago, still ring true today. Dr. Jeffrey Pernica, co-chair of the Ontario Immunization Advisory Committee, has been outspoken on the need for an electronic vaccine registry, which would store a child's immunization information, identify when they are due for a shot, and alert parents in advance. The federal government's website lists six provinces that have vaccine registries, including Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Nova Scotia, Quebec and Saskatchewan. None of these systems are connected to one another. 'Ideally, the structure of the health system would be such that everyone got a reminder before their vaccines,' he said. In Alberta, public health nurses use the vaccine registry to identify kids who are behind on their shots. Those children get a personalized letter and consent form for parents to sign that allows them to catch up on their vaccinations at school. Jen Slater, a mother of two in Edmonton, said she can access her kids' vaccination history on the government portal. 'If you're running behind, the government would reach out and remind you that your kids are due.' The remaining provinces rely on family doctors, parents, or local public health offices to keep track, a disjointed system that some parents say they would be lost navigating on their own. Pernica notes that millions of people in Ontario don't have a family doctor, and even those that do are not necessarily reminded when it's time to get a shot because the physicians don't necessarily have the time or resources. 'The primary beneficiaries of a vaccine registry are not even public health. I think that the primary benefit would be people who don't know whether they or their children are up to date with vaccines,' he said. Nakita Buenbrazo, a mother of a four and a seven-year-old just outside of Hamilton, Ont., said she would have been lost without a family doctor keeping tabs on her kids' vaccinations. Like many other parents, Buenbrazo is busy, juggling the day-to-day life of a parent with two kids, also running a business, and trusting the health-care system to keep kids up-to-date on their shots. 'I wouldn't have stayed on top of it,' she said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 19, 2025 Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content. Hannah Alberga, The Canadian Press
CBC
41 minutes ago
- CBC
Community inoculates elms in Wolseley to preserve canopy
About 10 blocks worth of trees in Wolseley will be inoculated over the next two weeks as part of an initiative funded by community members that hopes to prevent the trees from being infected with Dutch elm disease. They're calling on the city to do more to protect the decades-old trees.
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Young soccer players who 'head' the ball face cognitive decline, new research shows
Social Sharing A new study from Western University found the practice of hitting a soccer ball with the head leads to noticeable cognitive decline in young players, and researchers are now calling for more restrictions in the sport. Over the course of a five-month season, the study tracked a U13 London soccer team made up of male players around 11 and 12 years old. Researchers fitted each player with a custom mouth guard to track head impacts, and had them do regular cognitive tests. One of the main findings that stuck out to Rachel Watson, a PhD student at Western, was that every time a player hit the ball with their head, their reaction time slowed down by about six milliseconds. "Each time it was a small amount that it slowed down," Watson said. "But, by the end of the season, this all accumulated or snowballed into a much larger effect." Many more head hits occurred during practices compared to games, Watson and her team observed. With the team practicing four times per week, there were far more opportunities for head impacts than at weekly game, but some practice drills led to hundreds of these impacts, she said. Currently, policies are in place in Ontario to provide guidelines for coaches, stating how often players of different age groups should be hitting the ball with their heads. Kids under 11 should not be heading the ball at all, players aged 12 to 13 should have a maximum of one session per month with up to five head hits with a lightweight ball, and 14- to 17-year olds should have one session with up to 10 hits. These guidelines were not being followed when researchers were following the team's season, Watson said. Every coach needs to rethink what they're doing. "Coaches have a really great ability to limit this in practice and focus on emphasizing other alternative methods of controlling the ball," she said. "And what the athletes are practicing in practice will come out in the game." The team's coach, Jonathan O'Neill, was surprised by the results of the study, he said. While the study showed the majority of head impacts were occurring at practices, the team doesn't actually practice a lot of heading, he explained. Most of it would have happened on recovery days, when the team played soccer tennis or Teqball, which are variations of the sport with very low impact on the head, he said. "But obviously the low impact still had a cumulative effect on the players' nervous systems and their ability to respond to football interactions," O'Neill said. Heading will happen as a byproduct of the game, because players cannot control the opponent and the chaos that sometimes causes the ball to go into the air, he said. But the safety of players is paramount and now that the effects of heading on cognitive ability is better understood, every coach is going to have to rethink what they're doing, he added While heading the ball is just one of many technical skills in soccer, Watson said, young athletes are likely not thinking about the short or long term effects of their actions—whether they are unaware of them, or simply don't care. Even if banning the practice of heading is not fully attainable yet, Watson believes coaches and parents should emphasize the findings of this study to really get it across to the players that it can be harmful. "Then when the athletes are older, stronger and more developed and more aware of the effects of head impacts, they can choose to make an informed decision themselves if they want to head the ball or not."
