Congo gold miner says M23 rebels force staff to work without pay
Burundian volunteers prepare food for Congolese families at Rugombo Stadium, after Congolese fled from renewed clashes between M23 rebels and the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (FARDC), in Rugombo commune of Cibitoke Province, Burundi February 18, 2025. REUTERS/Evrard Ngendakumana/File Photo
Gold miner Twangiza Mining SA has accused Rwanda-backed M23 rebels of forcing its employees to work against their will and without pay after seizing its mine in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.
M23 staged a lightning advance earlier this year in eastern Congo, taking control of more land than ever before in North and South Kivu provinces. The Twangiza Mining site is located in South Kivu province.
In May, the company said it had been ordered to suspend operations at the mine after M23 accused it of not paying taxes.
In a new statement dated Friday, Twangiza Mining, which is headquartered in Congo and describes itself as a Chinese firm, said its workers were being "held in captivity, forced to work in inhuman conditions, without any security measure, remuneration or medical coverage."
Reuters could not independently verify the company's assertions.
M23 and Congo's government did not respond to requests for comment.
The statement from Twangiza Mining also said production had been "paralyzed" and that the site was "entirely controlled" by a group of Rwandan nationals who, working with M23 and claiming to be new investors, have been exploiting the mine "for their own profit by treating our employees like slaves deprived of all protection".
Congo, the United Nations and Western powers say Rwanda is supporting M23 by sending troops and arms.
Rwanda has long denied helping M23, saying its forces were acting in self-defence against Congo's army and ethnic Hutu militiamen linked to the 1994 Rwandan genocide.
Yolande Makolo, Rwanda government spokesperson, said on Monday that Rwanda had nothing to do with the dispute with Twangiza Mining.
"Rwanda is not involved in this situation, and the accusations against Rwandan citizens are without basis - there is no record or information of any Rwanda citizens involved in such activities," Makolo said.
"This is a local issue that should be taken up with the authorities in the area."
On Friday, the foreign ministers of Rwanda and Congo signed a U.S.-brokered peace deal, raising hopes for an end to fighting that has killed thousands and displaced hundreds of thousands more so far this year.
U.S. President Donald Trump's administration aims to attract billions of dollars in Western investment to Congo, which is rich in tantalum, gold, cobalt, copper and lithium.
Qatar has been hosting talks between Congo and M23. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
8 hours ago
- Business Times
How cryptocurrencies accelerate geopolitical shifts
MONEY is power, and power is money, as everyone knows. So it's worth paying special attention to the technological revolution that is about to disrupt the world's money flows at the very moment global political power is shifting from familiar foundations. Cryptocurrencies won't change the global balance of power alone, but they will speed and distort the changes underway. This revolution is the simple promise that decentralised ledgers, sophisticated algorithms and massive computing power will allow the transfer of money, stocks and other property at the cost of an e-mail and with the security of an armoured truck. These technologies will spread fastest in tyrannies, where they become tools of government control as central bank digital currencies; and in failed states where, as private cryptocurrencies, they offer savings and payment mechanisms that do not otherwise exist. If liberal democracies don't encourage faster innovation, develop more balanced regulations and reinforce the strengths behind their markets, then economic and political power will flow elsewhere. There is a version of the future in which not much changes. The world's largest economies continue to host the largest flows of these new financial assets, setting the rules for transfers, reporting and taxation. Old intermediaries, custodians and payments systems wither away in the extreme vision, and new mechanisms take their place under the watchful eyes of the current regulators. But that does not feel quite right, because the assault on legacy financial infrastructure is also an assault on government control in general and the dollar in particular. The emergence of these technologies fuels shifts in political power that are already under way within and among countries, especially among the world's largest economies. Challenges to liberal democracy In many Western democracies, the emergence of digital assets coincides with a moment of greater political populism. The earliest 'crypto-bros' pushed a deliberate agenda to protect against government and corporate intrusion, and their anger dovetailed nicely with President Donald Trump's case that the 'Deep State' is rigged. Together, they now embrace bitcoin as 'digital gold' as the dollar weakens, even as they block the Federal Reserve from developing a central bank digital currency (CBDC). BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Elsewhere, governments struggle to strike a balance between El Salvador's embrace of bitcoin as legal tender and the Taliban's outright crypto ban. Most regulators have been cobbling together rules that preserve their control of financial stability and tools to track criminals, while hoping they leave enough flexibility for innovation and privacy protection. If cryptocurrencies chip away at the traditional prerogatives of all regulators, however, they pose special challenges to the regulators of the world's dominant currency. Even as the Chinese government cracks down on cryptocurrencies at home, the digital renminbi is key to its agenda abroad to promote an alternative to the dollar. The European Central Bank has similar ambitions for its currency, in hopes that broad adoption of a digital euro will reduce borrowing costs and reinforce the continent's 'monetary sovereignty'. Monetary sovereignty is the polite term for undercutting Washington's extensive use of financial sanctions against criminals and rogue governments. Russia, Iran and Venezuela have all experimented with their own digital currencies to avoid sanctions. The most promising effort, however, is Project mBridge, a prototype to settle payments in CBDCs and avoid dollar settlements altogether. China, Hong Kong, Thailand, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia are among its principal sponsors after the Bank for International Settlements withdrew. The Trump administration's launch of a strategic bitcoin reserve in March fulfilled an election promise and was justified in part as a hedge against the likely weakening of America's own currency. If others follow America's lead, countries may scramble to control the computational power that validates bitcoin transactions. A plan for the future Just how much all these forces may erode government power or undercut the dollar's reserve status remains unclear. But with dictatorships tempted to use digital currencies to reinforce their authority and weak states forced to surrender to these powerful technologies altogether, liberal democracies must find ways to get the design right of these new currencies. Above all, research programmes and market incentives need to support faster innovation in digital assets that remain in their infancy. At the same time, regulators must develop frameworks that balance reliability and innovation, security and convenience, law enforcement with privacy. But these frameworks must not be allowed to raise doubts about financial stability. Most important, however, will be the reinforcement of the traditional institutions that make the US, Europe, Japan and other advanced democracies such attractive long-term investments. Currencies reflect the business models that stand behind them, whether they are in leather wallets, bank accounts or distributed ledgers. Especially amid the populism that drives much of the enthusiasm around cryptocurrencies, governments need to redouble their commitments to reinforce entrepreneurial ecosystems, advanced research laboratories, independent courts and all the democratic institutions that support innovation and growth, but also reliability and transparency. Without a deliberate agenda to guide and shape the crypto revolution, it's difficult to see a happy next chapter in the world's shifting geopolitical balance. OMFIF The writer is managing partner of Arbroath Group
Straits Times
14 hours ago
- Straits Times
Hong Kong democrat Jimmy Lai trial delayed over heart problems
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A prison van believed to be carrying Jimmy Lai arrives at the West Kowloon Magistrates' Courts building for the closing submissions in the national security collusion trial of Jimmy Lai, founder of the now-defunct pro-democracy newspaper Apple Daily, in Hong Kong, China, August 15, 2025. REUTERS/Lam Yik HONG KONG, August 15 - The closing submissions in a national security trial against Hong Kong pro-democracy businessman Jimmy Lai were delayed on Friday after his lawyer said he had suffered heart palpitations. The closing submissions will recommence on Monday after the court adjourned to allow Lai, 77, to obtain medication and a heart monitor. Lai, who founded the Apple Daily newspaper that was forced to close after a police raid and asset freeze in June 2021, has pleaded not guilty to two charges of conspiracy to collude with foreign forces, and a charge of conspiracy to publish seditious material. Some Western governments, including the U.S., have called for Lai's immediate release, saying the trial is politically motivated under a years-long national security crackdown in the China-ruled financial hub. U.S. President Donald Trump said in a media interview on Thursday that he would "do everything I can to save him." REUTERS
AsiaOne
15 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Israel's Smotrich launches settlement plan to 'bury' idea of Palestinian state, World News
MAALE ADUMIM, West Bank/TEL AVIV — Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich announced that work would start on a long-delayed settlement that would divide the West Bank and cut it off from East Jerusalem, a move his office said would "bury" the idea of a Palestinian state. The Palestinian government, allies and campaign groups condemned the scheme, calling it illegal and saying the fragmentation of territory would rip up peace plans for the region. Standing at the site of the planned settlement in Maale Adumim on Thursday (Aug 14), Smotrich, a settler himself, said Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump had agreed to the revival of the E1 development, though there was no immediate confirmation from either. "Whoever in the world is trying to recognise a Palestinian state today will receive our answer on the ground. Not with documents nor with decisions or statements, but with facts. Facts of houses, facts of neighbourhoods," Smotrich said. Asked about his remarks, a US State Department spokesperson said: "A stable West Bank keeps Israel secure and is in line with this administration's goal to achieve peace in the region," and referred reporters to Israel's government for further information. The spokesperson said Washington remained primarily focused on ending the war in Gaza. The United Nations urged Israel to reverse its decision to start work on the settlement. "It would put an end to prospects of a two-state solution," UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric told reporters. "Settlements go against international law… (and) further entrench the occupation." Israel froze construction plans at Maale Adumim in 2012, and again after they were revived in 2020, amid objections from the US, European allies and other powers who considered the project a threat to any future peace deal with the Palestinians. Restarting the project could further isolate Israel, which has watched some of its Western allies condemn its military offensive in Gaza and announce they may recognise a Palestinian state. Palestinians fear the settlement building in the West Bank — which has sharply intensified since the 2023 Hamas attack on Israel that led to the Gaza war — will rob them of any chance to build a state of their own in the area. In a statement headlined "Burying the idea of a Palestinian state," Smotrich's spokesperson said the minister had approved the plan to build 3,401 houses for Israeli settlers between an existing settlement in the West Bank and Jerusalem. In Maale Adumim, Smotrich, an ultra-nationalist in the ruling right-wing coalition who has long advocated for Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank, told Reuters the plan would go into effect on Wednesday. Breaking the Silence, an Israeli rights group established by former Israeli soldiers, said what it called a land grab "will not only further fragment the Palestinian territory, but will further entrench apartheid". Nabil Abu Rudeineh, the Palestinian president's spokesperson, called on the United States to pressure Israel to stop settlement building. "The EU rejects any territorial change that is not part of a political agreement between involved parties. So annexation of territory is illegal under international law," European Commission spokesperson Anitta Hipper said. British Foreign Minister David Lammy said the plan must be stopped. "The UK strongly opposes the Israeli government's E1 settlement plans, which would divide a future Palestinian state in two and mark a flagrant breach of international law," Lammy said in an emailed statement. House building 'in a year' Peace Now, which tracks settlement activity in the West Bank, said there were still steps needed before construction but infrastructure work could begin within a few months, and house building in about a year. "The E1 plan is deadly for the future of Israel and for any chance of achieving a peaceful two-state solution. We are standing at the edge of an abyss, and the government is driving us forward at full speed," Peace Now said in a statement. Consecutive Israeli governments have initiated, approved, planned and funded settlements, according to Israeli rights group Yesh Din. Some settlers moved to the West Bank for religious or ideological reasons, while others were drawn by lower housing costs and government incentives. They include American and European dual citizens. Palestinians are already demoralised by the Israeli military campaign which has killed more than 61,000 people in Gaza, according to local health authorities, and fear Israel will ultimately push them out of that territory. About 700,000 Israeli settlers live among 2.7 million Palestinians in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Israel annexed East Jerusalem in 1980, a move not recognised by most countries, but has not formally extended sovereignty over the West Bank. Most world powers say settlement expansion has eroded the viability of a two-state solution by fragmenting Palestinian territory. The two-state plan envisages a Palestinian state in East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza, existing side by side with Israel. Israel cites historical and biblical ties to the area and says the settlements provide strategic depth and security. Most of the global community considers all settlements illegal under international law. Israel rejects this interpretation, saying the West Bank is "disputed" rather than "occupied" territory. Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand imposed sanctions in June on Smotrich and another far-right minister who advocates for settlement expansion, accusing both of them of repeatedly inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank. [[nid:721192]]
