It's normal to be a renter in Nevada. But in the state legislature? Not so much.
(Photo courtesy of Nevada Housing Justice Alliance)
Housing is often touted as a crucial 'kitchen table' issue, but for the vast majority of state lawmakers 'home' means a single-family residence they own.
That's true nationally, according to researchers at Boston University and the University of Georgia, who used property records and voter registration data to estimate that at least 93% of officeholders nationwide either own their homes or likely own their homes. It's also true in the Silver State, according to a Nevada Current review of campaign finance reports and property records.
The Current found at least 90% of the 63 members of the Nevada State Legislature are homeowners, and at least 58% own additional real estate, most of them rental units.
That lived experience, combined with the lobbying strength of industries focused on realty and landlords, contributes to the difficulty of passing even modest tenant protections, say advocates.
Homeowners are also more likely to vote, national election surveys and academic studies have found. Politicians worried about their next election cycle no doubt know that.
Before last year's general election, the Nevada Housing Justice Alliance organized a tenant march to the polls. Their message, written on poster boards and running like an undercurrent as they advocated for summary eviction reform and rent stabilization, was clear: 'Your landlord is voting. Are you?'
Nevada's rate of homeownership is lower than the national average, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau. Four out of 10 housing units are occupied by renters. But renters are not evenly distributed across the state.
The Current compiled available data from 2023 and found that the percentage of renters in Nevada's 63 state legislative districts ranges from 21% to 79%.
Senate District 10, located in the central part of the Las Vegas Valley, has the highest percentage of renters: 70% of occupied units have renters in them and 30% are owner occupied.
Not far behind are Senate District 2, covering much of east Las Vegas, and Senate District 13, covering much of central Reno and Sparks. They have renters living in 67% and 63% of their respective occupied housing units.
All three districts are represented by Democrats: state Sens. Fabian Doñate, Edgar Flores and Skip Daly, respectively.
At the other extreme is Senate District 20, a Henderson district that includes Sun City Anthem and Laughlin. Renters represent only 23% of its occupied units there.
Only slightly better for renters: Senate District 14, which includes a large swath of Northern Nevada's rural counties as well as North Valleys in Reno, and Senate District 19, which covers the rural counties of eastern Nevada and parts of Clark and Nye counties. Those districts have renters in 24% and 26% of respective occupied units.
All three of the most homeowner-heavy districts are represented by Republicans: state Sens. Jeff Stone, Ira Hansen and John Ellison, respectively.
That partisan breakdown of Republicans representing districts with low percentages of renters and Democrats representing districts with high percentages of them is consistent across nearly all state senate districts.
The only outlier in the upper chamber is Senate District 5, a competitive Southern Nevada district covering part of Henderson and Paradise. SD5 is currently represented by Republican Carrie Buck. It ranks in the middle of the pack when it comes to its percentage of renters, with 45% of occupied units containing renters and 55% being owner occupied.
Because each Nevada State Senate district is composed of two Assembly districts, the partisan breakdown of renters largely holds true for the lower chamber. Assembly District 15, covering part of the center of the Las Vegas Valley, has the highest percentage of its housing units occupied by renters: 79%. Assembly District 36, which covers much of Pahrump and a sliver of Clark County, has the mirror opposite: 79% are owner occupied and 21% are occupied by renters.
Pew Research last year released an analysis of national data finding that 'about half of voters who own a home (51%) align with the GOP, while slightly fewer (46%) are Democrats or Democratic leaners.' Meanwhile, voters who rent favor Democrats 2-to-1.
State Sen. Jeff Stone, the Henderson Republican whose district has the lowest percentage of renters, has referred to himself as a 'compassionate landlord' while opposing rent stabilization legislation. He and his wife own nearly seven dozen rental units, according to his most recent financial disclosure form. Most of those units are a part of Enclave Apartments in Las Vegas.
Nevada requires elected officials and political candidates to submit annual financial disclosure forms that list any real property they or someone in their household owns besides their personal residence, but only in states adjacent to Nevada.
Stone is, according to these forms, the most prolific landlord in the Legislature, but he is hardly alone. The Current's review of financial disclosure forms found that one-third of state legislators are rental property owners. That is significantly higher than the population at large where 6.7% of individual tax filers in 2018 reported owning rental properties, according to Pew Research.
The Current found that a majority of Nevada state legislators -- 12 of 21 senators and 25 of 42 assemblymembers -- own some kind of property not used as their personal residence. Because elected officials are only required to disclose property in Nevada and adjacent states, this could be an undercount.
Most of the properties disclosed by legislators are described by them simply as rentals. Five lawmakers list vacation homes or timeshares. A few list homes occupied by a parent, child or other family member. One assemblymember owns two commercial shopping centers. Another owns several plots of undeveloped land.
Being a landlord and supporting pro-tenant legislation are not mutually exclusive. During the 2019 and 2022 Legislative Sessions, then-state Sen. Julia Ratti, a Democrat who represented a renter-heavy district in Reno, championed legislation to give renters more rights and protections. She spoke about being a landlord herself, and her financial disclosure forms from those years list her owning two rental properties.
Still, having more lived and current experience could help elevate such issues, say advocates.
Assemblymember Cecelia González, a Las Vegas Democrat whose district is 60% rental units, is one of few legislators who doesn't own their own home. She has been outspoken about the impact of rapidly rising rent prices since the covid pandemic -- an issue housing advocates say has gotten worse since temporary protections for renters ended.
In 2023, she posted on social media: '3 years ago I first signed my lease for $950. Today it is $1450…. And I truly don't know how I am going to afford rent.'
Last year, González, a K-12 educator and doctoral candidate, mused about doing gig work for a food delivery company: 'I can't believe I am door dashing right now to afford rent. Just, wow.'
'I've been very vocal about my lived experience,' she told the Current. 'I'm not from a wealthy family, not from generations of wealth. I talk about DoorDashing to supplement income, or trying to buy a home and being priced out.'
She elaborated: 'I was asked, 'How much are your parents gifting you?' Like that was just a normal thing, to give you $50,000 as a downpayment. It was unreal to me.'
González said she believes the Legislature is getting more diverse and is welcoming of informed perspectives. She points to the election of Democratic Assemblymember Jovan Jackson, who last year became the first formerly incarcerated person elected to the body.
'Those conversations change' when those voices are included, she added.
But whether that will lead to actual policy changes is a far more complicated equation. González points to renter protection bills, such as rent stabilization for seniors, that were vetoed by Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo in 2023.
'The Legislature did their work,' she said. 'He vetoed. He'll have to answer to that in the 2026 election.'
Many of those policy proposals are expected to return in this year's session.
Tenant advocates know they'll have to compete for attention against housing bills that focus on homeownership and not renters.
'(There is) a push for homeownership as the end all, be all, the whole path and the whole expectation,' says Ben Iness, the coalition coordinator for the Nevada Housing Justice Alliance. 'Embedded within that is the perpetuation of the supply narrative. That (struggles are) only happening because there is a shortage and if we can just build then things will level out and be fine.'
It is a myopic view, he adds, and pushing for pro-tenant policies can sometimes 'feel like the pariah or black sheep of housing work' because of it.
Iness believes that renter protections are important regardless of whether a housing market that centers single-family homes is hot or cold.
'Being a renter or tenant is not fringe,' he says. 'I hope that there's a lot of power in recognizing that.'
Nevada Current reporter Michael Lyle contributed to this article.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
26 minutes ago
- Newsweek
LA's Only Elected Republican Reacts to National Guard Troops, ICE Raids
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The only elected Republican in Los Angeles, Kathryn Barger, warned that there must be close coordination between federal, state, and local agencies if President Donald Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to quell the city's riots is to work. Her warning, in an email to Newsweek, comes as Trump clashes with California Gov. Gavin Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass, both Democrats, over his deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines. Newsom and Bass oppose the moves, accusing the Republican president of fueling the disorder. Barger, a Los Angeles County Supervisor, is the sole Republican elected to office at the local government level in the LA area. There are no other Republicans on the LA County Board of Supervisors, and none at all elected to the LA City Council. She also called for "transparency, accountability, and respect" from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) as it conducts raids across LA, operations that sparked the unrest. Protests in the city against raids by ICE over the weekend have descended into riots and looting. The raids are part of the Trump Administration's effort to deport all illegal immigrants from the U.S., with an emphasis on violent criminals. Newsom and Bass said state and local authorities can handle the situation without National Guard troops. But Trump says he is reestablishing law and order after failures by local and state leadership. "The deployment of National Guard troops is a significant action that must be approached with great care and coordination," Barger told Newsweek. "While I understand the urgency that may prompt federal involvement, I believe any such deployment must be done in close partnership with state and local agencies to ensure the safety and well-being of our communities. "Effective use of this powerful resource depends on clear communication, mutual goals, and a unified command structure. "My focus remains on making sure that all efforts—federal, state, and local—are aligned to deliver real support where it's needed most." This picture taken on June 8, 2025 shows a protestor raising their fist while holding a Mexican flag in front of a Waymo vehicle that was set on fire during a demonstration following federal immigration... This picture taken on June 8, 2025 shows a protestor raising their fist while holding a Mexican flag in front of a Waymo vehicle that was set on fire during a demonstration following federal immigration operations in Los Angeles. More BLAKE FAGAN/AFP via Getty Image Barger also urged ICE to minimize "fear and disruption among law-abiding residents." "Immigration enforcement is a deeply complex and sensitive issue, especially in a diverse region like Los Angeles County," Barger told Newsweek. "Federal agencies like ICE are tasked with upholding the law and I believe it's critical that their operations are conducted with transparency, accountability, and respect for the communities they affect. "My priority is ensuring that all enforcement actions are carried out in a way that upholds public safety while minimizing fear and disruption among law-abiding residents. "Local and federal agencies must work together thoughtfully to maintain trust, protect civil liberties, and ensure due process is respected at every level." This is a developing article. Updates to follow.

32 minutes ago
New Jersey holds primaries for governor, setting up a key 2025 race
Voters head to the polls on Tuesday for New Jersey's primary elections, which will set up the state's 2025 gubernatorial election -- the results of which could be a potential harbinger for the mood of the country ahead of 2026's critical midterm elections. The Democratic candidates are sparring over how to best respond to President Donald Trump's agenda in the Garden State and each hopes to keep the state's governorship in Democratic hands. The state's current governor, Democrat Phil Murphy, can't run again after serving two terms. There are six candidates in the Democratic primary. Polling has shown that Rep. Mikie Sherrill, a former Navy helicopter pilot who represents the state's 11th Congressional District, leads the crowded Democratic field, but the race could still be anyone's to win. The other Democratic candidates are Rep. Josh Gottheimer, who represents the state's 5th District; Newark Mayor Ras Baraka; Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop; New Jersey Education Association President Sean Spiller; and former state Senate president Steve Sweeney. Republicans, meanwhile, hope to flip New Jersey's governorship red in November and also have a crowded primary field. President Donald Trump has endorsed former state assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli, who ran for governor in 2021, narrowly losing to Murphy. 'This year's election for governor is critical for New Jersey's future. You'll decide whether New Jersey is a high tax, high crime, sanctuary state,' Trump said during a rally held by telephone last week. 'New Jersey is ready to pop out of that blue horror show.' Ciattarelli faces conservative radio personality Bill Spadea, state Sen. Jon Bramnick, former Englewood Cliffs Mayor Mario Kranjac, and contractor Justin Barbera. The contest is on track to become the priciest election in New Jersey history, with over $85 million spent on advertising as of last Wednesday, according to a report from media tracking agency AdImpact. Among Democrats, Gottheimer has the most ad spending supporting him ($22.8 million), followed by Fulop ($17.8 million). Ciattarelli leads among Republicans with $5.9 million in ad spending or reservations supporting him, dwarfing Spadea's $2.2 million and Bramnick's $1.2 million. About 70% of broadcast ad airings have mentioned Trump, according to AdImpact.


USA Today
35 minutes ago
- USA Today
Can you be legally punished for misgendering someone? Colorado says yes.
Can you be legally punished for misgendering someone? Colorado says yes. | Opinion Colorado has threatened to sic the thought police on anyone who doesn't comply by using state-approved language about transgender people. Show Caption Hide Caption Jennifer Sey talks about starting the XX-XY Athletics company Jennifer Sey talks about starting the XX-XY Athletics company USA TODAY staff You'd think that after two significant losses at the U.S. Supreme Court, Colorado would tread more carefully with its anti-discrimination laws. No such luck. A new law, signed by Democratic Gov. Jared Polis in May, expands the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act to make deadnaming and misgendering transgender individuals a punishable offense. California, not surprisingly, has tried something similar but on a more limited basis. The updated Colorado provisions have already attracted lawsuits on the grounds that the law violates the U.S. Constitution, including the First Amendment. Much like two other Colorado cases involving a cake baker and a web designer that reached the Supreme Court, this law pits free speech rights against public accommodation protections. At the heart of those cases, as well as this one, is the fact that the government – no matter how well-intentioned – cannot compel speech or chosen messages. Opinion: Democrats waste $20 million to learn why they lost men. Here's my free advice. And that's what Colorado's trans rights law would do, by claiming 'it is now a 'discriminatory practice' under Colorado law to refer to transgender-identifying individuals by their birth name (i.e., not their 'chosen name') or to use biological pronouns (i.e., not their preferred pronouns) in a place of public accommodation,' according to the first lawsuit, filed by a group of national and Colorado parental-rights organizations, including Defending Education. Forced gender ideology adherence? Here come the thought police. The law describes 'gender expression' as including someone's 'chosen name' and 'how an individual chooses to be addressed.' That is troublesome to the groups involved because a lot of the work they do centers on pushing back against gender ideology. Using biologically accurate terms is integral to their work. For instance, when discussing whether transgender students should participate in girls' sports, the debate is rooted in the biological differences between boys and girls. Now, the groups are at risk of violating the law when speaking in public spaces in Colorado. Opinion: Trump is right. Transgender athletes turn girls' track meets into a farce. 'H.B. 25-1312 was passed for the very purpose of suppressing traditional views on sex and gender and punishing those who refuse to address transgender-identifying individuals using so-called chosen names and preferred pronouns,' the lawsuit states. Those punishments could include investigations, lawsuits and fines, in addition to the possibility of 'participation in mandatory educational programs' if deemed necessary by the Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Thought police, anyone? 'I think it's the first time that we've seen a state actually try to cement in its own anti-discrimination canon a requirement to violate the First Amendment,' Sarah Parshall Perry, Defending Education's vice president and legal fellow, told me. She said the Supreme Court has made clear that in addition to the government forcing someone to communicate a message, forcing someone to silence themselves – essentially creating a heckler's veto – is a free speech violation. Businesses like XX-XY Athletics should be able to speak the truth The second federal lawsuit against Colorado's law was filed by Alliance Defending Freedom on behalf of XX-XY Athletics, which was founded in Denver in 2024 by former Levi's executive Jennifer Sey. As the name implies, XX-XY Athletics is an athletic brand that unapologetically defends women's sports and spaces and has been outspoken about why biological men shouldn't be competing with women athletically. So using correct language is vital to the company's branding and advertising. 'Colorado continues to place itself on the wrong side of the law by forcing Coloradans to speak against their conscience,' said Hal Frampton, ADF senior counsel, in a statement. ADF is the law firm that secured wins for its Colorado clients – baker Jack Phillips and web designer Lorie Smith – in two cases that reached the Supreme Court. So it's well-positioned to intervene now. Opinion: Activists have made baker Jack Phillips' life miserable. Please leave him alone. Colorado wants to mandate 'kindness' for the LGBTQ+ community through its anti-discrimination laws. Yet, what state officials refuse to learn is that no law is above the Constitution. And in this case, requiring citizens to use language that's simply not true or accurate will never pass muster when squared with the First Amendment. Ingrid Jacques is a columnist at USA TODAY. Contact her at ijacques@ or on X: @Ingrid_Jacques