With a new Pope, an understanding of Catholicism in India
Upon the passing of Pope Francis, Chicago-born Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost was elected to succeed him as Pope Leo XIV.
The conclave to elect the new pontiff began on May 7. The election of the Pope takes place through an electoral college composed of Cardinals from around the world. This time, the electoral college included 135 Cardinals from 70 countries, with four Cardinals from India, the country's highest-ever tally.
Among all Christian denominations, Catholics comprise the largest population, forming 15.9% of the global population and a large share of the Indian Christian population as well. The Vatican is a spiritual symbol for this denomination. In this context, this is an analysis of the Catholic denomination, its religious behaviour, and its demographic share among Indian Christians.
Chart 1 shows the denomination-wise share of Christians in India
According to data from the PEW Research Center, about 37% of Christians in India are Catholic, 17.9% are Baptist, 9.5% are Presbyterian, and 24.3% belong to other denominations. About 10% of Christians do not affiliate with any denomination.
Chart 2 shows the distribution of Catholics among Christian social groups.
It shows that nearly 75% of general category Christians, 16.8% of Scheduled Caste Christians, 23.7% of Christian tribal people, 55.5% of Other Backward Classes Christians, and 23.5% of Christians from the Most Backward Classes are Catholic.
Though the majority of Indian Catholics belong to upper castes, for the first time, a Dalit, Anthony Poola, the Archbishop of Hyderabad, was among the four Indian cardinals who voted for the new Pope. He was appointed as a cardinal in 2022 by Pope Francis.
Map 3 shows the State-wise share of Catholics within the total Christian population of each State.
A State marked as zero indicates that it has Christians, but no Catholics. A majority of the Christian population in Nagaland and Mizoram is Catholic. In Meghalaya, it is 90.8% and in Goa, it is 58.7%.
To measure aggregate religiosity in India, I developed an Aggregate Religiosity Index that captures the religiosity of all major religious groups in India from 1989 to 2023, based on 15 indicators. The findings reveal that all religious groups in India exhibit high levels of religiosity. Tables 4 and 5 provide a breakdown of the most recent religiosity levels (in % terms) among Christian denominations across selected indicators.
Table 4 presents the religious behaviour of Christian denominations in India. Figures in %
More than 90% of Catholic respondents consider religion important, believe in God and participate in religious festivals.
Public expressions of faith, such as wearing a religious pendant (74.6%) and attending services (59.9%), are also common. However, only a small proportion (11.2%) actively follows religious leaders. This suggests that while personal religiosity remains high, institutional influence may be limited.
Table 5 presents the social, democratic, and economic behaviour of Indian Christians. The first column corresponds to Catholics.
Within Christianity, Catholics exhibit a comparatively softer attitude towards religion than Presbyterians and Christians who do not affiliate with any denomination. Even Baptists and Christians from other denominations are stricter than Catholics when it comes to opposing inter-religious marriages. Catholics tend to have higher literacy levels compared to members of all other Christian denominations except Presbyterians.
Mohd Arshid is a research scholar studying the political economy of religion in India at the Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, JNU, New Delhi
mohdarshid01@gmail.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Apple WWDC 2025: After Microsoft, Tim Cook-led tech giant's annual software event interrupted by protest; Watch video
Days after Microsoft, Apple saw interruption during its annual software developer conference on Monday by a protester who marched in and unzipped his jacket to reveal a keffiyeh. The protester spoke for about 30 seconds before security walked him out, reported The Verge. The incident comes after a former Microsoft employee ignited controversy during the company's 50th anniversary celebration, confronting top executives including CEO Satya Nadella and former heads Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer. The employee, Vaniya Agrawal, an Indian-American software engineer, accused the tech giant of aiding violence in Gaza through its technologies.'Fifty thousand Palestinians in Gaza have been murdered with Microsoft technology. How dare you. Shame on all of you for celebrating on their blood,' she declared before being escorted out of the event. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Dubai villas | search ads Get Deals Undo Watch video here: Agrawal, who has since resigned from the company, described Microsoft as a 'digital weapons manufacturer' and condemned its alleged collaboration with the Israeli military. In a pointed critique, she called on Microsoft to end its ties with Israel, highlighting what she claimed was a $133 million agreement with Israel's Ministry of Defense involving AI and Azure tools. Live Events
News18
20 minutes ago
- News18
Political Row Erupts After Man Linked To 2024 Bangladesh Protests Found On Bengal Voter List
Last Updated: The man, identified as Newton Das, reportedly took part in the 2024 protests in Bangladesh that triggered a regime change. He was found on the voter list in West Bengal's Kakdwip. A fresh political storm erupted in West Bengal after a person allegedly involved in last year's student-led protests in Bangladesh that resulted in the ouster of then-Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina turned out to be a voter from the state's Kakdwip area. The man, identified as Newton Das, appeared in several images circulating on social media showing him taking part in the 2024 protests in Bangladesh, which triggered a regime change. The protests were triggered by a controversial quota system for government jobs. However, Newton insisted that he was an Indian citizen and showed documents, including a PAN card and Aadhaar card, to support his claim. However, he did not clarify on whether he lived in India or Bangladesh. 'Unexpectedly Got Caught Up' 'I had travelled to Bangladesh in 2024 for some issues related to our ancestral property, but I unexpectedly got caught up in the revolution there. I have been a voter in Kakdwip since 2014," he was quoted by news agency PTI as saying in a video message. 'Although I lost my voter card in 2017, I managed to get a new one the following year with help from the local MLA, Manturam Pakhira. I also cast my vote during the 2016 West Bengal Assembly elections." However, Newton's cousin Tapan offered a contradictory account, saying Newton was born in Bangladesh and exercises voting rights in both countries. 'Niutan was born in Bangladesh and holds voting rights in both countries. He came to India after the pandemic to sell some ancestral land and has stayed here since. He should be held responsible for registering as a voter in both places, that's clearly not right," Tapan told reporters. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) seized on the controversy, accusing the ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC) of encouraging illegal immigration to manipulate electoral outcomes. 'This is the TMC blueprint — flood Bengal's voter rolls with illegal infiltrators and secure elections with ghost votes," the West Bengal BJP said on X. Union Minister and BJP leader Sukanta Majumdar said, 'Another shining example of the so-called 'Egiye Bangla Model"! The same Newton who was seen wielding a stick during Bangladesh's quota reform movement is now a registered voter in Kakdwip, West Bengal!" 'Thousands of Bangladeshi 'Newtons" voting in Bengal—courtesy of Mamata Banerjee's infiltration theory and appeasement politics. With illegal voters and these lathi-wielders miscreants as her support base, she's not running West Bengal… she's scripting a blueprint for Greater Bangladesh," he added. Another shining example of the so-called 'Egiye Bangla Model"!The same Newton who was seen wielding a stick during Bangladesh's quota reform movement is now a registered voter in Kakdwip, West Bengal! Thanks to the special encouragement of the failed Chief Minister… — Dr. Sukanta Majumdar (@DrSukantaBJP) June 7, 2025 His statements were echoed by the Leader of Opposition in the West Bengal Assembly, Suvendu Adhikari, who said there are lakhs of Bangladeshi nationals who are included in the voter rolls of West Bengal. BJP Mathurapur organisational district secretary Sanjay Das alleged that 'the Trinamool Congress is actively helping Bangladeshi infiltrators to enter India. In response, the TMC rejected the allegations, shifting the blame to the Centre and the Border Security Force (BSF), which guards the Indo-Bangladesh border. 'Our state government will do its part, but it's up to the Union government to ensure security," TMC spokesperson Kunal Ghosh said. Debashis Das, TMC's Sundarbans organisational district student wing president, was seen cutting cake with Das in a viral birthday party photo. " had no idea he was involved in the Bangladesh protests. The photo going around was taken at a birthday celebration with many people present. If someone like him managed to cross the border, it just shows the BSF isn't doing its job properly," he clarified. Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : bangladesh protests bjp vs tmc West Bengal Location : Kolkata, India, India First Published: June 09, 2025, 23:04 IST News politics Political Row Erupts After Man Linked To 2024 Bangladesh Protests Found On Bengal Voter List
India Today
30 minutes ago
- India Today
Operation Bluestar: Is a quiet anniversary a turning point in Sikh politics?
On June 6, something unusual happened at the Akal Takht in Amritsar. For the first time since 1999, the anniversary of the June 1984 Operation Bluestar passed without the jathedar of the Akal Takht addressing the Sikh annual message—typically a mix of homage to the 'martyrs' of Bluestar, a reaffirmation of Sikh identity, and often, veiled or open criticism of the Indian state—conspicuously did not come. The moment, hushed but loaded, has thrown into sharp relief the silent churn underway in Sikh religious politics. It was not the absence of noise that made the day historic—it was the withdrawal of the voice that has traditionally defined the community's moral decision of acting Jathedar Giani Kuldeep Singh Gargaj to not deliver a 'sandesh' was reportedly voluntary, a conscious act amidst pressure and protest. Ever since his controversial appointment in December 2023 by the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC), he has faced stiff resistance from key panthic groups and rival religious factions, Damdami Taksal, and various bodies that see themselves as protectors of Sikh orthodoxy have refused to recognise his authority. In their eyes, he is not a leader of the panth but a political nominee with little theological or moral standing. Gargaj's silence on June 6, then, was not just about respect for decorum or restraint. It was an admission that the Akal Takht, once the undivided pulpit of the Sikh world, is today a contested scene at the Golden Temple complex was otherwise familiar. Portraits of Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale adorned the walls, slogans calling for 'justice' and 'Khalistan' rang out from pockets of the crowd, and the SGPC facilitated tributes to those killed in the 1984 operation by security Punjab police maintained an unusually large presence in and around the shrine, a precautionary measure given the history of clashes and radical posturing associated with the anniversary. But in a rare departure from previous years, there was no violence, no public scuffles, no visible crackdown. The choreography of memory played out—intense, symbolic but curiously subdued. The vacuum at the top shaped everything meaning of this moment cannot be divorced from the deeper institutional crisis in Sikh religious life. The Akal Takht jathedar, in theory, is meant to embody collective spiritual authority. In practice, the position has been hollowed out by opaque appointments, politicisation and diminishing community the past decade, multiple jathedars have been appointed, removed or boycotted by different factions, leading to an unprecedented erosion of the institution's moral clarity. The current acting jathedar is merely the latest in a series of contested figures, lacking both grassroots endorsement and panthic legitimacy. His decision to step back on June 6 may have been the wisest possible course—but it is also a sign of how rudderless the institution has the SGPC tried to step into this void. While Gargaj did not issue a message, the SGPC held its own tributes and honoured families of those who died during Operation Bluestar. This subtle power play reflects the current recalibration within Sikh institutions—between symbolic authority and administrative SGPC, led by president Harjinder Singh Dhami, has been attempting to reassert its influence in religious matters even as it continues to be accused of political partisanship and encroaching upon decisions meant for the Akal Takht. But with no credible jathedar in place, the SGPC is clearly positioning itself as a proxy religious authority—an evolution that has alarmed traditionalists and reformists silence of the mainstream Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) this year also stands out. Once the dominant political force in Punjab and the principal claimant to Sikh leadership, the SAD has been a pale shadow of its former self since the 2020-21 farmer protests and its electoral drubbing in the 2022 assembly the Bluestar anniversary, its leaders kept a low profile, perhaps wary of reigniting controversies or provoking criticism from either radicals or moderates. This caution is symptomatic of the party's current identity crisis—caught between reclaiming panthic relevance and appealing to a broader, more pragmatic Punjabi electorate. The space it has vacated is being occupied, unevenly, by groups, particularly the SAD (Amritsar), led by Simranjit Singh Mann, and outfits such as Dal Khalsa, used the anniversary to project defiance and repeat separatist claims. The iconography of Bhindranwale was used as it has been every year—a symbol of resistance for some, of unresolved anger for others. Yet, even these groups, for all their noise, seemed to understand the limits of provocation this were no flashpoints, no incitements that could turn symbolic protest into street confrontation. It was as though everyone—radical, moderate, institutional—was operating under an unspoken understanding that the community is in no position for fresh strife. The wounds of the past have not healed but neither is there appetite for reopening them with fresh to this changing dynamic is the emergence of a stronger, more vocal cohort of moderate Sikh voices from within India, who are increasingly challenging the monopolisation of the Bluestar narrative by Khalistani groups. Diplomats, professionals, academics and Sikh veterans of public life have begun pushing back against what they see as the hijacking of a tragic chapter in Sikh history for separatist agendas. Their view is that the memory of Operation Bluestar must be observed, but it cannot be allowed to become a Trojan horse for reviving militancy or distorting Sikhism's fundamentally inclusive Indian diplomat Amarjit Singh's recent comments calling out 'vultures who keep feeding off 1984' reflect a growing sentiment among India-based Sikhs who want to protect both the sanctity of their religion and the integrity of the Indian voices are not always amplified, particularly in contrast to the loud social media campaigns run by diaspora groups abroad. But they are gaining traction, especially among Sikh youth disillusioned with both the politics of grievance and the inaction of established institutions. In cities like Delhi, Chandigarh, and Ludhiana, young Sikh professionals are increasingly rejecting the binaries of radicalism versus silence. They want spaces for dialogue, memorialisation without radicalisation, and a panthic leadership that does not cede its voice to fringe nurtured, this could be a pivotal generational shift—one that reorients Sikh discourse away from exile-driven extremism toward grounded, democratic engagement with India's muted tone also reflects a deeper generational shift. For many older Sikhs, especially those who lived through the 1984 operation and its aftermath, the anniversary remains sacred and painful. But for younger generations, both in Punjab and in the diaspora, the memory does not carry the same political concerns are shaped less by historical grievance and more by present-day anxieties—drug abuse, unemployment, farm distress, and cultural alienation. The institutions that speak the language of 1984 often find themselves unintelligible to those born after it. Even in the diaspora, where pro-Khalistan sentiment still finds expression, the idioms of identity are changing—from calls for sovereignty to cultural revivalism, from slogans to social media influence. The Akal Takht jathedar's silence, in this context, may have been more in tune with the moment than any speech could have the absence of a message does not mean the absence of meaning. In fact, it may mark the beginning of a quiet reckoning. Many in the Sikh intelligentsia and civil society believe the time has come to reform the process by which jathedars are years, there has been talk of convening a Sarbat Khalsa, the traditional assembly of Sikh representatives empowered to take panthic decisions and restore legitimacy to institutions. Such calls have repeatedly faltered due to lack of consensus, fears of state reprisal and internal divisions. But the events of June 6 may lend fresh urgency to the idea. A leaderless community cannot remain so forever. Silence can be powerful, but it cannot be the Indian state, the peaceful conduct of the Bluestar anniversary is likely to be read as a positive sign—an indicator that normalcy has returned to Punjab and that radical sentiments are on the wane. But this would be a superficial reading. The underlying issues—of representation, institutional trust and generational drift—are far from resolved. If anything, the crisis of leadership within Sikhism presents a different kind of challenge: not one of militancy but of vacuum. Not a rebellion, but a recession of coherence. And in such spaces, uncertainty the most striking aspect of the 2025 observance was its emotional ambiguity. It was not marked by catharsis or confrontation. It was, in a sense, a holding pattern—an uneasy truce between memory and modernity, between tradition and transition. The community did not speak through a single voice because it no longer has one. The institutions did not guide the moment because they are still finding their way. And yet, the day passed peacefully. That, in itself, is worth remains to be seen is whether this moment of quiet becomes a turning point or merely an interlude. Will Sikh religious institutions seize the opportunity to reform, reconnect and regain credibility? Will the SGPC resist the temptation to entrench its control and instead build consensus? Will the political class, both in Punjab and in Delhi, learn to read the signals from Amritsar not just as law and order inputs but as reflections of a complex community in transition?The silence of the Akal Takht on June 6 was not a void. It was a mirror—showing a fractured religious polity, a disillusioned youth, a contested past and an uncertain future. But it was also a chance. A rare one. For reflection, and perhaps, for to India Today Magazine
