logo
MultiChoice acquisition by French company: Go-ahead suggested but with 3-year halt on job cuts

MultiChoice acquisition by French company: Go-ahead suggested but with 3-year halt on job cuts

The Citizen26-05-2025
MultiChoice acquisition by French company: Go-ahead suggested but with 3-year halt on job cuts
The Competition Commission has recommended that the Competition Tribunal approve the proposed acquisition of MultiChoice by Groupe Canal+ SAS, subject to certain conditions such as halting any possible job losses because of the merger by three years.
This recommendation comes after the commission's investigation into the large merger notification submitted last year on September 30. The investigation was launched to determine whether the merge will lessen or prevent competition in the concerned market.
The commission, an agency of the of the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition, is one of three independent statutory bodies established in terms of the Competition Act to regulate competition between firms in the market.
The proposed merger explained
Canal+, along with its ultimate controllers and the companies they control (the acquiring group) is a French media and entertainment company involved in the production, commissioning, and supply of audiovisual content, the provision of advertising services, development of video games and publication of books.
LicenceCo is a proposed company within the merged group, containing local license rights and subscribers, which will broadcast content through DStv.
Meanwhile, the Target Group provides audiovisual content via its streaming service, Showmax.
'The commission is of the view that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially lessen or prevent competition in any market.
Conditions recommended for merger
'However, in recognition of the important role played by the Target Group within the broader audiovisual ecosystem in South Africa, and to address public interest concerns raised by various stakeholders, the commission has recommended approval of the merger subject to a number of conditions,' the commission said.
The conditions include, but are not limited to:
addressing employment concerns,
increasing the shareholding of historically disadvantaged persons (HDP) and workers in Orbicom and LicenceCo committing to supplier development,
ensuring the merged entity continues to operate from South Africa,
promoting a diversity of television news,
and encouraging export activities.
According to the commission, the parties involved in the merger have agreed to a three-year moratorium on layoffs following the merger implementation date.
Involved parties commits to keeping MultiChoice in SA
'The merger parties have also committed that the majority of LicenceCo's shareholders will be HDPs and workers. Moreover, the parties have agreed to continue certain corporate social responsibility initiatives such as skills development in the audiovisual industry and sports development.'
Canal+ has committed to ensuring that MultiChoice remains incorporated and headquartered in South Africa, promotes exports, and seeks a secondary inward listing on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange.
The merged entity has also made supplier development commitments that include expenditure on local audiovisual content, the promotion of South African audiovisual content in new markets, and procurement from HDPs and small, medium and micro enterprises.
'Finally, the parties have agreed that LicenceCo will continue to procure local news content for DStv and will ensure the diversity of the news content it broadcasts.'
Multi-billion rand value projected
The total value of all the public interest commitments advanced by the merger parties based on past spend by MultiChoice is projected at a total amount of about R26b over the next three years.
'In large mergers, the commission is required to assess and to ultimately make a recommendation to the tribunal. The commission is satisfied that the conditions attached to this merger sufficiently address the concerns raised during the investigation.
'The matter is now before the tribunal for a final determination,' Deputy Commissioner Hardin Ratshisusu explained. – SAnews.gov.za
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Court halts TotalEnergies South African oil exploration
Court halts TotalEnergies South African oil exploration

Eyewitness News

time26 minutes ago

  • Eyewitness News

Court halts TotalEnergies South African oil exploration

JOHANNESBURG - A South African court has refused environmental authorisation for planned offshore drilling by French energy giant TotalEnergies near the foot of Africa, in a ruling seen by AFP Thursday. The High Court said Wednesday that the environment ministry's 2023 go-ahead for the exploratory operations in the roughly 10,000-square-kilometre (3,860-square-mile) block near Cape Town had been "reviewed and set aside". Environmental lobby groups had launched a legal challenge against the project, saying it would harm marine life. The block is jointly owned by South Africa's state oil company PetroSA, TotalEnergies and British oil heavyweight Shell, with the French firm serving as the operator. In overturning the environmental permit, Judge Nobahle Mangcu-Lockwood said TotalEnergies could reapply for authorisation after public consultation. Green Connection, one of groups that filed the legal challenge, said the ruling was a major victory for coastal communities and small-scale fishers. "Oil spill and blowout contingency plans were kept from the public until after approval, denying communities a chance to comment," its legal advisor, Shahil Singh, said in a statement. Interest in oil and gas exploration off South Africa's coast has surged in recent years, driven in part by major discoveries across the maritime border in Namibia and broader energy activity in southern Africa, including Mozambique. The Natural Justice group of environmental lawyers said Wednesday's judgment affirmed that all companies needed to follow due process before seeking the green light for oil exploration off South Africa. "We will continue to turn to our courts to not only stop the takers who parade under the guise of growth and development, but to ensure that impacts of oil and gas exploration and production are properly scrutinised and that our people and our resources are not exploited," it said.

Court blocks TotalEnergies' South African offshore drilling plan
Court blocks TotalEnergies' South African offshore drilling plan

The Citizen

timean hour ago

  • The Citizen

Court blocks TotalEnergies' South African offshore drilling plan

Environmental groups have won a court battle to stop TotalEnergies from exploring for oil off South Africa's coast, A South African court has refused environmental authorisation for offshore drilling in a venture led by French energy giant TotalEnergies near the foot of Africa, in a ruling seen by AFP Thursday. The High Court said Wednesday the environment ministry's 2023 go-ahead for exploratory operations in the roughly 10 000-square-kilometre (3,860-square-mile) block near Cape Town had been 'reviewed and set aside'. Lobby groups launch legal challenge Environmental lobby groups that launched a legal challenge against the project said it would harm marine life. The block is jointly owned by South Africa's state oil company PetroSA, TotalEnergies and British oil heavyweight Shell, with the French firm serving as the operator. In a statement to AFP, TotalEnergies said the venture complied with all required local regulations, including environmental and social, from the outset and it would assess the judgement. Although it had already announced its exit from exploration in the block, it remains 'fully committed to respecting the judicial process to its term', the company said. ALSO READ: Activists protest against offshore drilling along SA coast by TotalEnergies In overturning the environmental permit, the judge Nobahle Mangcu-Lockwood said TotalEnergies could reapply for authorisation after public consultation. Environmental groups react to ruling Green Connection, one of the groups that filed the legal challenge, said the ruling was a major victory for coastal communities and small-scale fishers. 'Oil spill and blowout contingency plans were kept from the public until after approval, denying communities a chance to comment,' it said in a statement. Interest in oil and gas exploration off South Africa's coast has surged in recent years, driven in part by major discoveries across the maritime border in Namibia and broader energy activity in southern Africa, including Mozambique. The Natural Justice group of environmental lawyers said Wednesday's judgement affirmed that all companies needed to follow due process before seeking the green light for oil exploration off South Africa. 'We will continue to turn to our courts to not only stop the takers who parade under the guise of growth and development, but to ensure that impacts of oil and gas exploration and production are properly scrutinised and that our people and our resources are not exploited,' it said. NOW READ: TotalEnergies hit with lawsuit over 2021 Mozambique jihadist massacre

High court rescinds permit for Shell, TotalEnergies to explore for oil off west coast
High court rescinds permit for Shell, TotalEnergies to explore for oil off west coast

TimesLIVE

time4 hours ago

  • TimesLIVE

High court rescinds permit for Shell, TotalEnergies to explore for oil off west coast

The Western Cape High Court has rescinded an environmental authorisation granted to TotalEnergies and its joint-venture partner Shell to explore for oil in a block off the Cape coast. However, the court said TotalEnergies should be given a chance to rectify deficiencies identified, including a failure to properly assess the potential socioeconomic impacts of oil spills or take climate change into consideration. 'TotalEnergies must be afforded the opportunity to submit new or amended assessments to cure the deficiencies identified,' judge Nobahle Mangcu-Lockwood said in her August 13 ruling. A TotalEnergies spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The French company said last year it intended to exit the concession, Block 5/6/7 between Cape Town and Cape Agulhas, leaving the operatorship to Shell, with PetroSA holding a minority share. The order is the latest in a series of court challenges between environmentalists and oil companies looking to explore along South Africa's coast.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store