
Despite tariffs, it's still America first for Asia's legacy automakers
Trump's tariffs on imported automobiles have upended the outlook for the global industry, yet the US remains by far the most important market for Japan's Toyota, South Korea's Hyundai and Asian rivals, including Honda and Nissan. North America accounts for at least 40 per cent of the revenue at both Toyota and Hyundai, filings show.
The market's importance is unlikely to change any time soon, industry insiders and analysts said, especially with China, now the world's biggest auto market, dominated by homegrown electric vehicle makers such as BYD.
Those Asian legacy carmakers with more robust margins and a strong hybrid lineup - such as Toyota, Hyundai, Kia Corp and to a lesser extent Honda - are more likely to weather the US tariffs storm, and potentially take market share from weaker players like Nissan, analysts said.
"The environment that we're in now is becoming increasingly harsh and uncertain, starting with US tariffs," Mazda executive officer Noriyuki Takimura told reporters at an event in Tokyo last week. Mazda aims to strike a balance between "defensive" measures like cost-cuts and "offensive" ones like strengthening its product lineup, he said.
Two Hyundai insiders and two Japanese auto executives separately told Reuters they had no intention of downsizing their US businesses in response to tariffs, even as they acknowledged the difficulties ahead. All four spoke on condition of anonymity.
The US is Toyota's biggest market in terms of vehicles. It sold 2.3 million vehicles there in 2024, including its Lexus brand, accounting for more than a fifth of its global total. As a source of revenue, North America was second only to Japan in the last financial year.
Hyundai's North American revenue was the highest in almost a decade last year. Kim Chang-ho, an analyst at Korea Investment & Securities, estimated it generates around 60 per cent of its profits from the US, thanks to higher vehicle prices.
Mocked in the US in the 1980s for its perceived shoddy quality, Hyundai doubled down there around a decade ago, especially after tensions between Beijing and Seoul and the rise of domestic electric vehicle (EV) makers saw it start to lose ground in China.
"After years of putting in effort, our brand is finally gaining recognition in the US," one of the Hyundai insiders said. "So we will not take our hands off the US"
"GAME OF CHICKEN"
The US has seen a surge in demand for hybrids as consumers have become more concerned about the battery range, price and charging hassles of EVs. Fuel-efficient models such as hybrids will be a key driver to gaining market share, said Morningstar analyst Vincent Sun. Toyota, Hyundai and Kia have particularly strong hybrid offerings.
So far, most legacy Asian automakers have avoided raising prices in the US, and stronger players are likely to continue to hold off doing so, despite lower profitability, analysts said. Instead, the focus will likely be on taking market share from lower-margin rivals like Nissan and Stellantis, analysts said.
'It will shape up like a game of chicken," said Kim Sung-rae, an analyst at Hanwha Investment & Securities. "Those who will hold up well will emerge as winners.'
Over time, tariffs could be a catalyst to help drive consolidation in the industry, or at least deepen existing tie-ups. Investors wonder if tariffs could push Nissan to revive merger talks with Honda that fell apart this year. Mazda, which is 5.1 per cent owned by Toyota, and Subaru, which is 21 per cent owned by Toyota, could become more reliant on the bigger company.
MORE INVESTMENT?
While Hyundai and Kia have three US factories, they still import about two-thirds of the vehicles sold there. Toyota manufactured 1.3 million vehicles in the US last year, equal to 54 per cent of the vehicles it sold there. Japanese automakers have invested more than US$66 billion in US manufacturing since the 1980s, building some two dozen plants, according to the JAMA auto lobby group.
At a White House event attended by Trump in March, Hyundai announced a US$21 billion investment plan, including a new steel factory, and a plan to boost US production capacity to 1.2 million vehicles a year.
The tariffs are likely to encourage Japanese and South Korean automakers to invest more into expanding production capacity and localising supply chains to protect their positions, said Justinas Liuima of research firm Euromonitor International.
They will also continue to benefit from one aspect of US protectionism: higher tariffs on Chinese EVs, which means they don't face the same Chinese competition in the US that they do in emerging Asian markets, Liuima said.
China ships very few cars to the US, which imposed a 100 per cent tariff on imported Chinese EVs under the previous administration of President Joe Biden.
One of the Japanese executives said it was not a matter of simply boosting US production, as high costs, especially of labour, would also weigh on profitability.
"It is really a game-changer," Julie Boote, analyst at Pelham Smithers Associates in London, said about the potential longer-term tariff impact.
Some automakers have held off giving guidance that takes into account tariffs for the full year, meaning investors may be in store for a rude awakening as companies adjust forecasts as they report quarterly earnings, she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNA
33 minutes ago
- CNA
Trial begins as Meta investors try to recoup $8 billion over privacy claims payout
WILMINGTON, Delaware :Facebook's board was not trying to protect founder Mark Zuckerberg in 2019 when it agreed to pay a $5 billion regulatory fine to resolve claims over its privacy practices, but was instead focused on growth, a former company director testified on Wednesday. Jeffrey Zients, White House chief of staff under President Joe Biden and a Meta Platforms director for two years starting in May 2018, was the first defendant to take the stand on Wednesday in the $8 billion non-jury trial before Kathaleen McCormick, chief judge of the Delaware Chancery Court. Facebook changed its name to Meta in 2021. Zients testified that the Federal Trade Commission initially sought "tens of billions of dollars" but was willing to accept $5 billion and the company felt it was important to reach a deal that did not name Zuckerberg as a defendant. "There was no indication he did anything wrong," Zients told the court. He said Zuckerberg was a "driving force" as chief executive for the company and "it was important he continued in that role." The trial began on Wednesday and is scheduled to last until July 25. A group of Meta shareholders, mostly union pension funds, allege Zuckerberg and former Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg ran the company as an illegal data harvesting operation and the board completely ignored their duty to oversee top management. Shareholders want McCormick to order the 11 defendants to reimburse Meta for more than $8 billion in fines and legal costs that Facebook paid to resolve claims that it had violated users' privacy in violation of a 2012 agreement with the Federal Trade Commission. The case was brought following revelations that data from millions of Facebook users was accessed by Cambridge Analytica, a now-defunct political consulting firm that worked for Donald Trump's successful U.S. presidential campaign in 2016. Other defendants include venture capitalist and current board member Marc Andreessen as well as former board members Peter Thiel, Palantir Technologies co-founder, and Reed Hastings, co-founder of Netflix. A lawyer for the defendants, who have denied the allegations, declined to comment. The defendants have said in court filings that Facebook was the victim of Cambridge Analytica's "deceit." McCormick, the judge who last year rescinded Elon Musk's $56 billion Tesla pay package, is expected to rule on liability and damages months after the trial concludes. On Wednesday morning, Neil Richards of Washington University Law School, an expert for the plaintiffs, described what he called "gaps and weaknesses" in the company's privacy program. But under cross-examination, Richards acknowledged that he could not say if the company had violated the 2012 agreement with the FTC - a central claim to the case. Meta, which is not a defendant, declined to comment. On its website. The company has said it has invested billions of dollars into protecting user privacy since 2019. The lawsuit is considered the first of its kind to go to trial that alleges that board members consciously failed to oversee their company. Known as a Caremark claim, such lawsuits are often described as the hardest to prove in Delaware corporate law. Four months ago, Delaware lawmakers overhauled the state's corporate law to make it harder for shareholders to challenge deals struck with controlling shareholders like Zuckerberg. The bill, which did not address Caremark claims, was drafted after the state's governor met with representatives of Meta. Andreessen Horowitz, the venture capital fund co-founded by Andreessen, said this month it was reincorporating in Nevada from Delaware and encouraged other companies to do the same. The company cited the uncertainty of the state's courts and referenced the Musk pay ruling.


CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Amazon.com defeats lawsuit by Prime Video subscribers over commercials
A federal judge on Wednesday dismissed a proposed class action over decision to begin showing commercials on its Prime Video service unless subscribers paid a $2.99 monthly opt-out fee. Subscribers who paid $139 a year for Prime Video said Amazon had led them to believe the service would remain ad-free. They said the ads amounted to a price increase that breached their subscriber agreements and violated Washington state consumer protection laws. U.S. District Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein in Seattle concluded, however, that the ads were a "benefit modification" specifically contemplated and authorized by Amazon and the subscribers. The change went into effect in January 2024.


CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Trump administration seeks extra US$19 billion to overhaul air traffic control
WASHINGTON: The Trump administration has asked Congress to approve an additional US$19 billion to fully modernise the United States' ageing air traffic control system, bringing the total cost of the overhaul to US$31.5 billion. US Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy made the request on Wednesday (July 16) at a House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee hearing, where he said the administration had the support of airlines and other aviation stakeholders. "We are going to need more money from the Congress," Duffy said. "We're talking US$31.5 billion to do the full project." NEAR-MISSES AND DEADLY CRASH SPUR PUSH Concerns over the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) outdated systems have been rising amid a series of high-profile incidents, including near-collisions and a January crash involving a US Army helicopter and a regional American Airlines jet that killed 67 people. The US$12.5 billion already approved earlier this month includes US$2 billion for the first new en-route air traffic centre since the 1960s. The administration plans to name a private company to help manage the modernisation, with firms such as Raytheon and IBM under consideration, according to President Donald Trump. TECHNOLOGY AND STAFFING UPGRADES PLANNED The Department of Transportation aims to replace 618 radar systems, install anti-collision tarmac technology at 200 airports, upgrade telecommunications networks and rebuild towers and other facilities. The plan also includes new hiring and retention incentives to address staffing shortfalls. The FAA is currently 3,500 air traffic controllers below its target. A recent report by the National Academies of Sciences found that overtime hours logged by FAA air traffic staff had surged, with 2.2 million hours recorded in 2024 alone. The agency spent US$200 million on overtime pay that year, up more than 300 percent since 2013. Duffy said a key priority is securing funding for equipment to prevent runway incursions and to stabilise the workforce managing US skies.