China defends Tonga loans amid rising debt concerns: A call for fair representation
By
PMN
The destruction from the 2006 riots, pictured, led Tonga to secure a major Chinese loan to fund reconstruction of the capital. Additional loans were later used for road upgrades and the International Dateline Hotel.
Photo:
Photo/John Ewen via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 2.5)
China's embassy in Tonga has taken to Facebook to defend its loans to the Kingdom, following fresh media coverage and concerns about the country's rising debt.
The
Facebook post
, shared on 24 April, says China gave the loans to help Tonga during a difficult time.
"Recently, there were news reports on the loans provided by China to Tonga many years ago," the post says.
"China offered concessional loans to Tonga based on the principles of bilateral friendship and equal cooperation.
"When Tonga was in trouble and asked for loans to ease economic pressure, China was the only country to lend a helping hand."
The embassy says China's Export-Import Bank has provided three concessional loans.
One of them has already been paid off for the International Dateline Hotel.
The other two, for rebuilding Nukuʻalofa's CBD and upgrading national roads, are still being repaid. The remaining debt is about USD$58 million (about NZD$97 million).
China says the loans helped Tonga's economy and were similar to those offered by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
The embassy also says China has given Tonga more time to repay through debt rollovers and grace periods, including under the G20 debt relief programme.
"We hope an objective and fair position could be observed on this matter without misleading the public with groundless speculation," the Facebook statement concludes.
China's response follows recent media reports highlighting concerns about Tonga's debt.
ABC Pacific
reported
on 21 April that Tonga still owes around US$190 million (about NZ$318 million) in external debt, two-thirds of which is to China.
Former Prime Minister Siaosi Sovaleni told ABC Pacific, "We took the loan, benefited from it, so we must pay it back. Otherwise, we are just passing this burden on to our children and their children."
Republishing and expanding on the ABC Pacific story,
PINA reported
on 22 April that the Lowy Institute warned the debt has become "a millstone around Tonga's neck."
The original loan was taken out to help Tonga recover after the 2006 riots, which damaged 80 per cent of central Nukuʻalofa.
In 2007, Tonga and China signed a concessional loan deal worth about TOP 118 million (about NZD$83 million). The money was disbursed from 2009 to 2012.
The loan had an interest rate of two per cent and was meant to be repaid over 21 years. It included a five-year grace period, which was later extended. Management and commitment fees also applied.
Most funds were used for government projects; the rest were lent to private businesses. However, many of those businesses struggled to repay the loans.
Work included rebuilding buildings like the Tungi Colonnade, fixing streets and drains, and building the Vuna Wharf. Chinese construction firms China Civil Engineering Construction Corporation (CCECC) and China Railway Construction Corporation (CRCC) carried out the project.
A joint IMF and World Bank debt sustainability analysis says Tonga is still at high risk of debt distress.
The 2024 report shows Tonga's external debt was USD$ 189 million (about NZD$ 316 million), or 38 per cent of GDP. More than half of it is owed to China.
Debt repayments jumped to 3.5 per cent of GDP in 2024 and will likely stay high until 2027.
The World Bank says Tonga's debt could pass safely by 2034 without more grants or tighter budgets.
Both institutions say Tonga needs to manage its debt carefully and work to bring in more financial support.
China has already allowed Tonga to delay repayments twice. The grace period was extended to 10 years in 2013 and again to 15 years in 2018.
This means Tonga only started repaying the principal in September 2023 and will finish in 2028.
While the loans were intended to help rebuild the capital, support businesses, and build infrastructure, some worry they have made Tonga too dependent on outside help.
Political commentator and community leader Melino Maka, writing for the Tonga Independent News, defends the former government's decision to forgive 25 per cent of the loans owed by four private companies.
He says the buildings were poorly built, and the businesses couldn't repay loans on defective properties.
"The Sovaleni government made a pragmatic decision ... In return, the businesses agreed to fix the problems and paid back $5 million (about NZD$8.4 million)," Maka writes.
He says the government also worked out a deal to repay the debt to China by 2030.
"The reality is simple: the government acted in good faith to protect the public interest... The bigger issue now is not just the loan, but the quality of governance and public discourse in our nation."
-This article was first published by
PMN
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
6 hours ago
- Scoop
China: Immediately And Unconditionally Free Human Rights Defender Dr. Wang Bingzhang
Press Release – Fortify Rights Eight Parliamentarians Urge U.K. Foreign Secretary David Lammy to call for the release of Dr. Wang Bingzhang (LONDON, June 3, 2025)–The People's Republic of China should immediately and unconditionally free Chinese human rights defender Dr. Wang Bingzhang, said Fortify Rights today, on the eve of the 36th anniversary of the Tiananmen massacre of pro-democracy protesters in 1989. In a letter to British Foreign Secretary David Lammy, eight British Parliamentarians call for the release Dr. Wang Bingzhang, who was abducted in Vietnam in 2002 and sentenced to life imprisonment in China for his pro-democracy activities. He has spent 23 years in solitary confinement. Now aged 77, concerns are growing about Dr. Wang's physical and mental health. 'We warmly welcome these initiatives by British Parliamentarians to highlight the appalling case of Dr. Wang Bingzhang, who has endured solitary confinement in a Chinese jail for 23 years and whose abduction from Vietnam and forced rendition to China is widely recognised as arbitrary and in violation of international law,' said Benedict Rogers, Senior Director at Fortify Rights. 'Governments worldwide should condemn this egregious case of transnational repression.' On June 27, 2002, Dr. Wang was in Mong Cai, a city in Vietnam bordering China, meeting Chinese labor activists. A group of men reportedly accosted him and forced him into a waiting van, which then transported him by boat to China. The Guangxi Public Security Bureau then took him into custody, and he was later charged with 'offenses of espionage' and 'the conduct of terrorist activities.' He was tried by the Intermediate People's Court in Shenzhen, and sentenced to life imprisonment. His trial lasted only half a day and was closed to the public, and he was denied the right to due process, access to a lawyer, and a fair trial. Eight U.K. Parliamentarians have written to the British Foreign Secretary David Lammy this week to ask him and all U.K. ministers and officials to raise Dr. Wang's case with the Chinese government and call for his immediate release. The letter urges the U.K. government 'at every opportunity, public and private, to call on the government of the People's Republic of China to release Dr Wang Bingzhang and permit his return to the United States to be reunited with his family, immediately and unconditionally.' The Parliamentarians include the Chair of the U.K. Parliament's Joint Human Rights Committee Lord Alton of Liverpool, the Director of the International Bar Association's Human Rights Institute Baroness Helena Kennedy KC, the Chair of the All Party Parliamentary Groups (APPG) on the Uyghurs and Hong Kong Blair McDougall MP, the Chair of the APPG on International Freedom of Religion or Belief Jim Shannon MP, and Luke Taylor MP, urge the Foreign Secretary also to consult and coordinate with the United States, where he lived for over twenty years and where his family still resides. Dr. Wang's family members welcome the support from British Parliamentarians. In a statement provided to Fortify Rights on May 26, his daughters Qingyan and Tianan Wang, his son Times Wang, his brother Bingwu Wang, and his sisters Jinhuan, Yuhua and Mei Wang, said: We are the family of Wang Bingzhang. Every June 27th is a very sad day for us because this is the day when our relative Wang Bingzhang was illegally abducted from Vietnam to China by the Chinese government. Later Wang Bingzhang was illegally sentenced to life imprisonment by China and lost his freedom forever. For 23 years, countries in the world with freedom democracy human rights and rule of law have long spoken out for Wang Bingzhang's freedom. Today we see British MPs speaking out for Wang Bingzhang again, calling on the Chinese government to release Wang Bingzhang. We believe that this voice of justice will spread throughout the world. Thank you to the British people for their call for justice! Blair McDougall MP and Lord Alton have also recently tabled written Parliamentary Questions in the House of Commons and House of Lords, respectively, and Jim Shannon MP has tabled an Early Day Motion on the case. Dr. Wang is an internationally respected leader of the overseas Chinese pro-democracy movement and a distinguished medical practitioner. He founded China Spring, a publication Time magazine described as 'the voice of a movement among Chinese inside and outside the country to restore democracy and resume liberal reforms begun by Deng Xiaoping in 1978 and discontinued in 1980.' He later founded the Chinese Alliance for Democracy, and in May 2024, he was honoured with Freedom House's Freedom Award. In 2003, soon after his unfair trial resulting in a life sentence, the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention declared that 'the detention of Wang Bingzhang is arbitrary, being in contravention of articles 9, 10 and 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.' Under international law, arrest and detention are unlawful when individuals are engaging in a protected activity, such as exercising their rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of expression. Dr. Wang's family continue to pursue his release, having recently established a new alliance to free Wang Bingzhang. Although Dr. Wang is permitted to receive one visit per month from immediate family members, lasting only 30-40 minutes, monitored by prison guards, his family members have been unable to obtain visas to enter China as a result of their advocacy on his behalf which puts them at risk of being detained and jailed as well if they travel to China. The most recent visit Dr. Wang received was from his youngest sister Mei Wang, in May 2024. She reported that he was in very poor physical and mental health. 'At Fortify Rights, we are deeply concerned about Dr. Wang's continued imprisonment, and add our support to his family's campaign for his release,' said Benedict Rogers. ' After 23 years in solitary confinement, it is vital that Dr. Wang's case is not forgotten. We call on China to immediately and unconditionally release Dr. Wang, and on the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada and the international community to do everything possible to put pressure on China to free him.'
Scoop
10 hours ago
- Scoop
China: Immediately And Unconditionally Free Human Rights Defender Dr. Wang Bingzhang
(LONDON, June 3, 2025)–The People's Republic of China should immediately and unconditionally free Chinese human rights defender Dr. Wang Bingzhang, said Fortify Rights today, on the eve of the 36th anniversary of the Tiananmen massacre of pro-democracy protesters in 1989. In a letter to British Foreign Secretary David Lammy, eight British Parliamentarians call for the release Dr. Wang Bingzhang, who was abducted in Vietnam in 2002 and sentenced to life imprisonment in China for his pro-democracy activities. He has spent 23 years in solitary confinement. Now aged 77, concerns are growing about Dr. Wang's physical and mental health. 'We warmly welcome these initiatives by British Parliamentarians to highlight the appalling case of Dr. Wang Bingzhang, who has endured solitary confinement in a Chinese jail for 23 years and whose abduction from Vietnam and forced rendition to China is widely recognised as arbitrary and in violation of international law,' said Benedict Rogers, Senior Director at Fortify Rights. 'Governments worldwide should condemn this egregious case of transnational repression.' On June 27, 2002, Dr. Wang was in Mong Cai, a city in Vietnam bordering China, meeting Chinese labor activists. A group of men reportedly accosted him and forced him into a waiting van, which then transported him by boat to China. The Guangxi Public Security Bureau then took him into custody, and he was later charged with 'offenses of espionage' and 'the conduct of terrorist activities.' He was tried by the Intermediate People's Court in Shenzhen, and sentenced to life imprisonment. His trial lasted only half a day and was closed to the public, and he was denied the right to due process, access to a lawyer, and a fair trial. Eight U.K. Parliamentarians have written to the British Foreign Secretary David Lammy this week to ask him and all U.K. ministers and officials to raise Dr. Wang's case with the Chinese government and call for his immediate release. The letter urges the U.K. government 'at every opportunity, public and private, to call on the government of the People's Republic of China to release Dr Wang Bingzhang and permit his return to the United States to be reunited with his family, immediately and unconditionally.' The Parliamentarians include the Chair of the U.K. Parliament's Joint Human Rights Committee Lord Alton of Liverpool, the Director of the International Bar Association's Human Rights Institute Baroness Helena Kennedy KC, the Chair of the All Party Parliamentary Groups (APPG) on the Uyghurs and Hong Kong Blair McDougall MP, the Chair of the APPG on International Freedom of Religion or Belief Jim Shannon MP, and Luke Taylor MP, urge the Foreign Secretary also to consult and coordinate with the United States, where he lived for over twenty years and where his family still resides. Dr. Wang's family members welcome the support from British Parliamentarians. In a statement provided to Fortify Rights on May 26, his daughters Qingyan and Tianan Wang, his son Times Wang, his brother Bingwu Wang, and his sisters Jinhuan, Yuhua and Mei Wang, said: We are the family of Wang Bingzhang. Every June 27th is a very sad day for us because this is the day when our relative Wang Bingzhang was illegally abducted from Vietnam to China by the Chinese government. Later Wang Bingzhang was illegally sentenced to life imprisonment by China and lost his freedom forever. For 23 years, countries in the world with freedom democracy human rights and rule of law have long spoken out for Wang Bingzhang's freedom. Today we see British MPs speaking out for Wang Bingzhang again, calling on the Chinese government to release Wang Bingzhang. We believe that this voice of justice will spread throughout the world. Thank you to the British people for their call for justice! Blair McDougall MP and Lord Alton have also recently tabled written Parliamentary Questions in the House of Commons and House of Lords, respectively, and Jim Shannon MP has tabled an Early Day Motion on the case. Dr. Wang is an internationally respected leader of the overseas Chinese pro-democracy movement and a distinguished medical practitioner. He founded China Spring, a publication Time magazine described as 'the voice of a movement among Chinese inside and outside the country to restore democracy and resume liberal reforms begun by Deng Xiaoping in 1978 and discontinued in 1980.' He later founded the Chinese Alliance for Democracy, and in May 2024, he was honoured with Freedom House's Freedom Award. In 2003, soon after his unfair trial resulting in a life sentence, the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention declared that 'the detention of Wang Bingzhang is arbitrary, being in contravention of articles 9, 10 and 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.' Under international law, arrest and detention are unlawful when individuals are engaging in a protected activity, such as exercising their rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of expression. Dr. Wang's family continue to pursue his release, having recently established a new alliance to free Wang Bingzhang. Although Dr. Wang is permitted to receive one visit per month from immediate family members, lasting only 30-40 minutes, monitored by prison guards, his family members have been unable to obtain visas to enter China as a result of their advocacy on his behalf which puts them at risk of being detained and jailed as well if they travel to China. The most recent visit Dr. Wang received was from his youngest sister Mei Wang, in May 2024. She reported that he was in very poor physical and mental health. 'At Fortify Rights, we are deeply concerned about Dr. Wang's continued imprisonment, and add our support to his family's campaign for his release,' said Benedict Rogers. ' After 23 years in solitary confinement, it is vital that Dr. Wang's case is not forgotten. We call on China to immediately and unconditionally release Dr. Wang, and on the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada and the international community to do everything possible to put pressure on China to free him.'
Techday NZ
16 hours ago
- Techday NZ
US-China chip export debate highlights risks for AI leadership
DeepSeek. TikTok. Taiwan. And a White House shake-up on AI rules. The spiralling US-China technology rivalry landed at the heart of Johns Hopkins University last week, as a panel of top experts and policymakers took to the stage to debate whether restricting exports of advanced semiconductors to China can help the US maintain its edge in the race for artificial intelligence. The discussion, hosted by Open to Debate in partnership with the SNF Agora Institute, comes at a critical time. In Washington, the Trump administration has announced plans to roll back the Biden-era AI Diffusion Rule and introduce new chip export controls targeting China – a move seen by many as a signal that the technology contest between the two superpowers is only intensifying. On one side of the Johns Hopkins debate were Lindsay Gorman, managing director at the German Marshall Fund's Technology Program, and former CIA officer and congressman Will Hurd. They argued the answer is yes: semiconductor controls can give the US a real advantage in the AI race. Gorman pointed to DeepSeek, a Chinese AI model whose CEO has publicly lamented the impact of advanced chip bans. "Money has never been the problem for us. Bans on shipments of advanced chips are the problem. And they have to consume twice the power to achieve the same results," she quoted, highlighting how China's AI advances still depend heavily on imported hardware. "The United States has significant hard computing power advantages – the ability to produce high-end chips, designed specifically for training AI models," Gorman told the audience. She argued that, together with its allies, the US controls a "strategic choke point" on computing power. "Properly implemented controls can have an effect and also have an increasing and compounding effect over time in retarding China's AI advantages and giving the United States a head start," she explained. Will Hurd, who also served on OpenAI's board before running for US president, compared the AI contest to the nuclear arms race. "Artificial intelligence is the equivalent of nuclear fission. Nuclear fission controlled gives you nuclear power… uncontrolled, nuclear weapons can kill everybody," he said. Hurd emphasised the importance of first-mover advantage, warning that the US cannot afford to lose its technological lead. He also highlighted a lack of reciprocity in the tech relationship between the two countries. "Chinese companies like Baidu, DJI, and TikTok operate freely in the US, but American companies are not allowed to operate in China," Hurd pointed out. "If there was a level of reciprocity between our two countries, we wouldn't be here having this debate about chip controls." Yet, on the opposing side, former senior US diplomat Susan Thornton and technology strategist Paul Triolo insisted the US could not outpace China in AI simply by tightening export controls. Triolo argued that the controls are "not working and will not lead to US dominance in AI", describing them as a blunt instrument that creates confusion for industry and disrupts global supply chains. "Most experts believe that Chinese companies are only three months behind US leaders in developing advanced AI models," Triolo said, suggesting any technological gap is vanishingly slim. Thornton, who spent decades at the heart of US-China diplomacy, warned of unintended consequences. "The main thing we should be asking ourselves about this question… is what is the cost benefit of US policy actions?" she said. "We have to face the reality that China is already building AI… a third of the world's top AI scientists are Chinese. China is one third of the entire global technology market. So it's clearly a player." She cautioned that blocking China from critical technology could backfire, hurting US companies, alienating allies and raising the risks around Taiwan, the global centre of advanced chip manufacturing. "Certainly, the one thing we need to do is avoid going to war," Thornton warned. "Taiwan, the most sensitive issue in US-China relations, has now been dragged right into the middle of this AI issue because they're the place that produces all the cutting-edge chips that we're trying to control." Audience members pressed the panel on whether international collaboration on AI safety was possible, and whether the US could ever match China's data advantage, given the size of the Chinese population and its permissive data environment. Hurd conceded that "the US will always have less data because we have a little thing called civil liberties," but argued that superior algorithms and privacy-protective machine learning could level the playing field. For Triolo, the dynamic nature of the technology means that attempts to wall off China are self-defeating. "There are many ways to get to different ends. The controls have forced Chinese companies to work together, develop innovations, and become more competitive both domestically and globally," he said. Gorman, in closing, rejected what she called "a defeatism that says America can't out-compete China or slow its progress". "Our companies are doing well. There isn't an issue here with demand, it's with supply. Doing better means that we have to throw what we can at this problem now with a smart application of tools," she argued. But Thornton had the last word, urging caution. "Making the AI competition with China a zero-sum game, not only will not work, it is dangerous," she said. "We should focus on the things that are going to matter to our children and their children, which is the long-term AI competition, which if not constrained and bounded by international agreements and by cooperation among countries… it'll be a very dangerous world."
