Zero tolerance for students breaking law, says Laura Williams: How America's immigration rules are redefining ‘law' for international students
Speaking to attendees, U.S. Consul General Laura Williams underscored Washington's hardening stance on compliance. 'Qualifying for a U.S. student visa includes demonstrating an intent to comply with U.S. laws. The United States has zero tolerance for people, including students, who violate the law
,'
she said.
Her warning comes against a sharp backdrop: More than 1,800 international students have lost their F-1 or J-1 status in 2025 alone, thanks to immigration crackdown and alleged antisemitism, reports
Inside Higher Ed
.
The figures reflect a year in which visa enforcement has increasingly intersected with campus speech and digital conduct, reshaping the stakes for those planning to study in the United States.
Cases in point: Visa crackdowns on international students
In 2025, the United States is still a magnet for students from across the globe. But alongside its world-class universities and promises of academic freedom, a different reality is taking root — one where immigration enforcement bleeds into campus politics, and where speaking out can cost you not just your reputation, but your legal right to remain.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Learn More - How Donating Sperm May Boost Your Income
SpellRock
Undo
A series of high-profile arrests and visa revocations this year has sent an unmistakable message to the international student community: dissent comes with a price.
In mid-March, Badar Khan Suri, an Indian postdoctoral fellow at Georgetown University, was detained outside his home in Rosslyn, Virginia. His visa had been revoked days earlier after immigration officials accused him of 'spreading Hamas propaganda and promoting antisemitism' on social media and pointed to his marriage to a relative of a senior Hamas adviser.
Suri had no criminal record, and his lawyers argued that his online posts — expressions of solidarity with Palestinians and criticism of U.S.
foreign policy — were protected speech, not evidence of extremism. Three days later, a federal judge blocked his deportation, restored his right to work, and granted temporary status to his family. Georgetown publicly defended him, stating he had done nothing illegal.
Eight days later, on March 25, Rümeysa Öztürk, a Turkish PhD student at Tufts University, was confronted by masked Homeland Security agents outside her Somerville, Massachusetts home. Her SEVIS record showed she was in good standing, but her F-1 visa had been abruptly cancelled, reportedly over an op-ed she co-authored in
The Tufts Daily
criticising the university's response to the Israel–Gaza conflict and calling for divestment.
Federal officials claimed her words could have 'potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences.' In May, U.S. District Judge William Sessions III ruled her detention unlawful, noting that the government had presented no evidence beyond the op-ed itself, and warned that such actions risked chilling speech among 'millions and millions' of non-citizens.
She was released on bail, her case still pending.
For each of these students, the official accusations varied — from alleged extremist propaganda to 'foreign policy consequences' to unspecified security risks. But the pattern is unmistakable: Visa revocations and detentions have become a tool for policing political boundaries on US campuses.
Social media and the activism test
Under recent rules, consular officers are required to review student visa applicants' social media and online activity.
Posts that appear politically controversial, critical of U.S. policy, or connected to protest movements can be flagged and used as grounds to deny or revoke a visa. Applicants are required to keep their profiles public during the process; sudden deletion or privatization of accounts can itself be treated as suspicious.
This policy shift is amplified by the 'Catch and Revoke' program, introduced in Donald Trump's second term, which uses artificial intelligence to scan students' digital footprints for signs of activism or support for causes deemed controversial — from Palestinian human rights to political reform in China.
Advocacy groups say hundreds of students, particularly from India and China, have already been affected.
Broader discretion for revocation
If the arrests of students like Badar Khan Suri and Rümeysa Öztürk show the human cost of visa crackdowns, the machinery driving those cases is equally alarming. One of the most consequential changes for international students in 2025 has been the expansion of what the US government considers a legitimate reason to revoke a student visa.
According to an Associated Press report, new directives from the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security now allow consular officers and immigration enforcement agents to run names through the FBI's National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database as a primary screening tool. The problem, immigration lawyers told AP, is that NCIC does not distinguish between serious convictions and far more minor or irrelevant records — it can include arrests where charges were dropped, decades-old misdemeanors, minor traffic violations, and even mistaken identity entries.
In the past, such low-level incidents would rarely, if ever, have triggered a visa review — let alone immediate cancellation. But in 2025, any 'flag' in NCIC can be treated as grounds for action. That has meant students losing their F-1 or J-1 status over infractions as trivial as a speeding ticket from years earlier, a dismissed shoplifting charge from adolescence, or being wrongly listed as a 'person of interest' in a police database.
What makes the system more troubling is its lack of nuance. Once a student is flagged, their SEVIS record — the database that underpins legal student status in the US can be terminated automatically, often without the student being told in advance or given the chance to explain. For many, the first warning came not from a university adviser but from discovering mid-semester that their SEVIS record was marked 'terminated' and that they were suddenly subject to removal.
From visa revocation to
SEVIS termination
The structural rules governing student status have also been rewritten. Previously, only Designated School Officials (DSOs) at universities could terminate a student's SEVIS record, and only for clear-cut violations such as unauthorized employment, criminal convictions, or a breach of visa terms. In 2025, new guidelines gave US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) the power to terminate SEVIS records directly if a student's visa is revoked — even if no actual legal violation is found.
That change is not just bureaucratic; it is immediate and devastating. Termination of a SEVIS record strips a student of work authorization, blocks re-entry to the US, and can trigger deportation proceedings.
Bottom line
For a country that sells itself as the global gold standard for academic freedom, America is becoming remarkably creative in defining the boundaries of that freedom. The new playbook doesn't just punish those who break the law — it decides what the 'law' is on the fly, folding in social media posts, decades-old misdemeanours, or a protest placard into the same category as actual crimes. For international students, the message is clear: in the land of the free, your right to speak, study, and stay is only as secure as the politics of the moment.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
here.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
6 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Landmarks of freedom struggle face monumental neglect in Lucknow
The rich history of Lucknow contains a treasure trove of incidents and memories associated with the Independence movement but major sites connected with the freedom struggle in the city present a picture of neglect, so much so that many of them do not even have proper plaques to mark their presence. The Rifa-e-Aam club in Lucknow. (Mushtaq Ali/HT) While some of these structures were razed during colonial rule with only their ruins remaining today, a few were converted into government offices after Independence. Some are protected while the rest are in a pitiful state and continue to face the onslaught of time, waiting for attention from the authorities. The Rifa-e-Aam club in Wazirganj is one such site. One would have to look thrice to find the weathered structure standing tall behind temporary shops run by several carpenters. At the entrance, there are a number of old doors behind shops and there is a pool of stagnant water at the location. The structure, which once witnessed a meeting of Annie Besant's Home Rule League and the first convention of the Progressive Writers' Association chaired by Munshi Premchand, has lost all its doors and windows. Dastango Himanshu Bajpai said, 'The Home Rule League and Progressive Writers' Association both played an important role in the freedom struggle but the Rifa-e-Aam club continues to be in a sorry state. However, there is a misconception among people that the Lucknow Pact was signed at the club. But as per the proceedings of the joint session of Indian National Congress and the Muslim League, it was signed in Qaiserbagh.' The Jhandewala Park in Aminabad was the epicentre of major political activities during the freedom struggle and hosted most of the prominent politicians of that time. Today, it lies in neglect. It would take at least 10 minutes for someone who does not frequently visit Aminabad to figure out where entry gates to the park are. It is encroached on all four sides with garment vendors at its periphery. It is also littered inside. 'It was at Jhandewala Park that Gulab Lodhi, a freedom fighter from Unnao, was shot dead in 1935 for defying the government's order by climbing a tree with a flag. It also witnessed speeches from prominent individuals, including Subhas Chandra Bose,' said former head of the modern history department, Lucknow University, Prof Aroop Chakravarti. The condition of Neil Gate, also known as Sher Darwaza, is no better. The first glance reveals posters of office bearers and runner-ups in the Central Bar Association election. Several vehicles are parked across the gate. A board that has tilted after facing several collisions from vehicles parked everyday around it says 'Centrally Protected Monument' Neil Gate. 'The (Sher) Darwaza or gateway got its name from the statues of a pair of lions installed on top. General Neil, who was leading the colonial forces outside the Residency, was surrounded and killed behind the gateway by the Indian forces led by Mahmood Mirza. With this, Mirza, who was also an officer of the Royal Army of the Nawabs, avenged the death of his son Agha Mirza Kambhalposh, who was hanged by the English forces,' said historian Roshan Taqui. Alambagh Darwaza stood witness to how Indian soldiers prevented the colonial troops from entering the city from November 1857 to March 1858. Today, it is also encroached and vehicles are parked around it. Many buildings in Alambagh were destroyed by the British after the battle, but the Alambagh Darwaza still stands tall. According to historians, it was also called Phansi ka Darwaza for a long time as several rebels were hanged at Alambagh Darwaza. The Qaiserbagh complex (a witness to the siege of 1857) is an example where the structure might be absent but stories of its association with the freedom struggle live on. The Tarowali Kothi was used as the headquarters by Maulvi Ahmmadullah Shah and other leaders of the masses to plan a rebellion against the British rulers. Now, it has no trace of even a plaque outside the building, which is currently the headquarters of State Bank of India in Lucknow. However, the ruins of the Residency, which the Indian forces captured after the Battle of Chinhat during the First War of Independence following an 87-day siege from July to November 1857, have been conserved and restored by the Archeological Survey of India. 'Experts among the Indian forces had dug up several mines from outside the Residency to the buildings inside. Soldiers used these mines to carry out attacks through explosives,' said historian and author Roshan Taqui. Despite attempts to rescue those trapped inside, the siege ended in defeat for the British forces and the death of over 2,000 people, including Henry Lawrence. When one enters the GPO, a cenotaph near the Mahatma Gandhi statue narrates the history of the court proceedings and the death sentence awarded to revolutionary freedom fighters associated with the Kakori Train Action plan. The Rumi Darwaza has also been restored and conserved by ASI. It was at Rumi Darwaza that the British hanged Agha Mirza Kambalposh, the son of Mahmood Mirza, an officer in the Nawab's Royal army, because Kambhalposh and his companions had attacked the force led by Captain Ommanney before the start of the First War of Independence. Musa Bagh, where the Indian forces had put up a brave front but were defeated during the 1857 war, is also undergoing restoration. Begum Hazrat Mahal and her son Birjis Qadar, who was on the throne, left for Nepal. Maulvi Shah killed a couple of British officers and escaped, but was betrayed by the king of Payawan (Shahjahanpur) and beheaded, said historian Roshan Taqui. The Dilkusha garden and Kothi saw a major battle between the Indian and colonial forces in November 1857 where Indian forces lost because they were heavily outnumbered, according to Subhash Kushwaha, a historian and author. Only a few towers and external walls of the Kothi were left after the battle. They are currently in a satisfactory state. Charbagh, a witness to the arrival of several freedom fighters, continues to stand tall though a board about Gandhi and Nehru's meeting is not very visible due to encroachment. Experts suggest there should be bigger boards, which can grab the attention of passers by narrating stories related to various incidents associated with freedom struggle. In the 20th century, Charbagh became a staging ground for the nationalistic forces, said Devesh Pandey, LU research scholar who has researched the role of Charbagh in the freedom struggle, 'Two prominent leaders of the Indian national movement, Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru, first met at the Charbagh station in December 1916, when they came to attend the Congress session in Lucknow. When Lokmanya Tilak arrived by a special train to participate in this session, massive crowds swelled at the station to get his glimpse,' Pandey said. It was at the Lucknow station that freedom fighter Ramprasad Bismil saw how the iron boxes containing government funds were taken out unchained, he said. This gave him the confidence to carry out the Kakori Train Action to fund revolutionary activities. 'During the protests against the Simon Commission in 1928, Charbagh had become an important congregation ground for the protestors. In these protests, Dalit members of the Adi Hindu Samaj also raised their voice for securing their community's legitimate demands. The high point was reached during the Quit India Movement of 1942 which generated intense political activity in Lucknow,' Pandey added. Similarly, the Farangi Mahal lacks any cenotaph or plaque at the main entrance about its contribution to the freedom struggle. 'The main figure of the institute, Maulana Abdul Bari, collected grants from Muslims from across the country for the independence struggle and even invited Gandhi quite a few times. The visits of Gandhi to Farangi Mahal helped ease the Hindi-Muslim riots at that time and played a role in decreasing animosity between communities. Other prominent figures, including Jawaharlal Nehru, Sarojini Naidu and Abdul Kalam Azad, also visited it at various times. I have asked the Islamic Centre of India to add a cenotaph related to the contribution of Farangi Mahal outside the main gate,' said Imam Eidgah Maulana Khalid Rasheed Farangi Mahali.
The Hindu
6 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Independence Day LIVE: PM Modi to address the nation as India marks 79th Independence Day with ‘Naya Bharat' theme
Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to hoist the national flag and deliver his 12th consecutive address to the nation from the Red Fort on Friday (August 15, 2025). Also Read | 78 Years of Freedom The theme of this year's celebrations is Naya Bharat, as the nation makes giant strides toward realising the Government's vision of Viksit Bharat by 2047. Upon his arrival at the Red Fort, Mr. Modi will be received by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, MoS Defence Sanjay Seth, and Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh. The Defence Secretary will introduce Lieutenant General Bhavnish Kumar, General Officer Commanding (GOC), Delhi Area, to PM Modi. Also Read | Keep alive ideals for which countless lives were given President Droupadi Murmu, in her address to the nation on Thursday (August 14) on the eve of the country's 79th Independence Day, called on citizens to 'buy and use Indian-made products' to strengthen the spirit of the Swadeshi Movement. Follow the live updates here
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
6 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Impose Trump's illogical tariff on China, US importers too: Amitabh Kant
Former NITI Aayog CEO and G20 Sherpa Amitabh Kant on Thursday termed the additional 25 per cent tariff imposed by US President Donald Trump on Indian goods as "totally arbitrary" and lacking "any logic," urging that India should consider imposing similar duties on other countries, including US, which still imports critical minerals from Russia. "India should never bend. We should look at a long-term perspective. The Prime Minister has invested a lot in this relationship with the United States over the last decade. We should adopt a long-term perspective and ultimately win the game against the United States," Kant told ANI. He pointed out that other major economies, such as Turkey, the EU, and China, also import significant quantities of energy and minerals from Russia or China. "A 25 per cent tariff is arbitrary. It is not comprehensible to me because then you should also be imposing a 25 per cent tariff on China and Turkey. But you should also be imposing it on Europe, which is a very major importer of gas from Russia, and you should also be imposing it on many of the importers in the United States, as the United States is importing a lot of critical minerals from Russia; all critical minerals are still being imported from China. So it doesn't stand to any logic," he said. Kant also urged India to maintain its strategic autonomy and energy security in the face of proposed US tariffs, saying that India should prioritise its national interests and not compromise on its energy security, especially considering that India's oil imports from Russia are significantly lower than those of China or Turkey. The US has imposed a 50% tariff on Indian goods, citing India's continued purchase of Russian oil. "I'm a believer that India should not compromise on its energy security or its strategic autonomy. We are here for a long-term game, and we must win the long-term war. My belief is that we built up a relationship with the United States over two and a half decades, which was bipartisan. And this attempt to put a 50 per cent duty does not stand to logic because we import oil," he said. Earlier, Trump signed an executive order imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on imports from India, citing matters of national security and foreign policy concerns, as well as other relevant trade laws. He claimed that India's imports of Russian oil, directly or indirectly, pose an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to the United States. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) had termed the US move "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable," and said New Delhi will take "all actions necessary to protect its national interests. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
