Local body election nominations open - Here's how to become a candidate
Photo:
RNZ / Isra'a Emhail
Explainer
- Have you ever wanted to stand for local office?
Now is your chance, as the nomination period for this year's local body elections opens Friday.
But how do you stand, and how does the job work? Here's what you need to know.
Local elections are held
for city, district and regional council seats,
as well as some local boards, licensing trusts and other organisations.
They are held every three years by postal vote.
These aren't the elections that will determine control of Parliament and the next government - those won't happen until 2026.
Susan Freeman-Greene, left, heads up Local Government New Zealand.
Photo:
RNZ / Krystal Gibbens
A lot.
Susan Freeman-Greene is the chief executive of Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ), a membership body that advocates for and supports local government.
"This year we will have 1465 seats available across 66 councils - Tauranga City Council being the exception - which includes 66 mayoral seats and 683 community board seats," she said.
"There will also be 127 seats up for election across the 11 regional councils."
Nominations open Friday 4 July and you just need to complete an official nomination form and send it to your local council's electoral officer before midday on 1 August.
You've got to be nominated by two people - can't nominate yourself, sorry - and the people who nominate you must be over 18 and enrolled to vote in the area you plan to stand in.
Candidates must pay a $200 deposit, which can sometimes be refunded depending on the election results.
You need to be on the electoral roll and have lived at your current address for at least a month. You do not need to live in the area in which you wish to stand. Just in case you were wondering, you also can't run if you happen to be in prison for a term of three years or more.
Lastly, you must be a New Zealand citizen.
Elected members do receive salaries, which
vary depending on the size of each council.
Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown, who is standing for a second term, receives an annual salary of about $300,000, while councillors in rural regions can earn as little as around $20,000.
LGNZ has also put together a
candidates guide
filled with tips on the process.
"At the 2022 local elections we had 3119 people standing across 1607 seats across the country," Freeman-Greene said.
"Obviously we'd like to have more candidates standing, and it's just as much about the quality of the candidates as it is the quantity.
"We know that some rural and provincial councils in particular can struggle to attract candidates; people with the right skills for the role, who are also able to fully commit themselves to a demanding position, are sometimes in short supply."
Nelson Deputy mayor Rohan O'Neill-Stevens was first elected to office at just 19.
Photo:
RNZ / Samantha Gee
Two local body politicians who are retiring this year shared their experiences of the job.
Rohan O'Neill-Stevens is the deputy mayor of Nelson and was first elected to the council at age 19. He is
stepping down this year
at the venerable age of 24.
"Walk into every conversation and every room with the intention of learning something," he advises future office-holders.
"Entering politics at a young age inherently brings a level of self-doubt, a knowledge that you don't have all the answers, and that can be turned into an incredibly strong asset if you harness it."
Meanwhile, former primary school principal Malcolm Dixon is stepping down after 12 years on the Hastings District Council. He said it is important candidates know the job isn't just going to the occasional meeting.
"There is a lot more to being a councillor than just attending meetings," he said. "You need to be able to read, absorb and analyse a huge amount of reading material."
Dixon said listening to constituents is also important.
"You have been elected to serve those who elected you, the ratepayer, to be successful you must keep in touch with them."
Freeman-Greene said standing for office "requires someone who is both willing and able to listen to a range of community views, and be able to make the tough decisions when required".
She also said that at the end of the day, you're just one vote around the table.
"So the role is as much about working together as a team, finding compromise and being able to look at different points of view, as it is about making decisions."
"Being a successful candidate involves promoting yourself, your vision, and your position on issues that matter," LGNZ's guide states. "One of the most common reasons people don't vote is because they don't know who the candidates are or what they stand for."
Tips include door-knocking, meeting the public and doing media interviews, holding huis and using your own personal contacts to get the word out.
Freeman-Greene said social media can be a valuable tool, especially in reaching younger audiences.
"Social media gives candidates the ability to potentially reach a massive, targeted audience with their campaign messaging, often in a cost-effective way."
The Local Electoral Act 2001 sets out how much you can spend on campaigns, which LGNZ says is based on population in your area, ranging from just $3500 for a council population under 5000 to up to $100,000 if your council population is more than 1 million people.
Most elections use the 'First Past the Post' system (FPP) where the candidate with the most votes wins, but in 2022, 15 councils used the Single Transferable Voting system (STV) where voters rank candidates in order of preference.
Election hoardings line Auckland streets at the 2022 election.
Photo:
The Detail/Sarah Robson
If the number of candidates is less than the number of available positions, then the candidates who did get nominated are declared elected unopposed, Freeman-Greene said.
"The remaining vacancies (the ones with no candidates) are treated as extraordinary vacancies; the council or local authority must then hold a by-election to fill those vacant seats as soon as practicable after the election.
"If there are zero candidates for a position, then no one is elected to that role, and the position is left vacant. The local authority must then hold a by-election to try again to fill the position."
In 2022, women made up 38 percent of candidates, according
to the Department of Internal Affairs
.
Many also tend to be older, but Nelson's O'Neill-Stevens, as one of the youngest candidates to hold office, said young people are starting to see themselves as possible politicians too.
"For generations local government has been dominated by a relatively un-diverse representation, where young people haven't seen themselves reflected in their elected members, and when you can't see people like you in a space, it's hard to picture it as a place where you belong.
"In my first term I was the youngest elected member by nearly 30 years, so there was a very real sense of being the odd one out, because I was."
That soon changed, he said.
"I was very clear that I wasn't there to simply be a youth voice on issues, but as an unapologetically progressive representative for our community and I quickly found respect from colleagues as a diligent and effective councillor."
While TikToks, Instagram posts and YouTube may be useful in getting your name out, it can also be difficult to run in the world of online trolls and threats - and of course your old posts could come back to haunt you.
"Social media also leaves candidates open to abuse and harassment; a growing trend in the political space," Freeman-Greene said. "The rise of fringe groups, anonymity of online forums and polarising coverage is feeding increasing abuse of people elected to both central and local government."
LGNZ launched
a "how to stay safe" guide earlier this year
to help elected officials navigate online harm.
"One tip: we recommend to candidates they create new social media accounts for their local campaign, instead of using their existing personal accounts - we also advise their personal accounts are locked from public view," Freeman-Greene said.
"This helps protect the candidate's privacy and limits unwanted interactions with anyone who has bad intentions."
Here's the timeline:
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
16 minutes ago
- RNZ News
NCEA overhaul concerns Kura Kaupapa Māori, opportunity to consider own qualifications
A student's book at Te Kura Kaupapa Maori O Takapu Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly Kura Kaupapa Māori have expressed concern about the government's proposal to replace NCEA with a new qualification model, saying kura kaupapa students have only just mastered the current system. Co-chairperson of Te Rūnanga Nui o ngā Kura Kaupapa Māori o Aotearoa Rawiri Wright said he supports the establishment of an assessment framework that ensures integrity and mana for Māori learners, but the current proposal fails to accommodate the proven strengths of Kura Kaupapa Māori. "My gut reaction is it's a return to the bad old days of the school certificate regime and that didn't do us any favours as Māori people." But Wright said there could be an opportunity for kura to consider their own qualifications. "Perhaps the time has come for Kura Kaupapa Māori and Te Aho Matua schools to consider establishing our own qualifications and assessment strategies, aligned with the learning programmes of the Māori wānanga across the country." Education Minister Erica Stanford told Nine to Noon there was "too much credit counting" with NCEA. "I can see the system is being gamed... Credits are being used to get students across the line, like participating in a group activity or filling out a form," she said. Rawiri Wright says the proposed replacement was a monocultural, Eurocentric approach to education, he said. Photo: Te Rawhitiroa Bosch But Wright said the NCEA model has provided greater flexibility for Kura Kaupapa. He questioned why the game was being changed now. "It seems to us that our Kura Kaupapa Māori kids and kaiako (teachers) and kura, we got really familiar, we learnt how to play the NCEA game really well, to the point where the ministry now has 15 years of data which shows that our kids have outperformed all other schooling options in the country in terms of NCEA achievement." A Qualifications Authority report from 2024 showed that students at kaupapa Māori schools achieved better NCEA results than their peers at comparable English-medium schools. They had NCEA achievement rates of 63 percent at level 1, 72 percent at level 2 and 73 percent at level 3. Achievement rates for all students in the comparator group of English-medium schools were 54, 66 and 61 percent and for Māori students in those schools the rates were 50, 64 and 56 percent. Wright said the consultation process, which closes 15 September, is a very short window to pull together a high quality meaningful response to the governments proposal. "The minister and the prime minister have said themselves that they want to get something in place before the end of the year so it just means that we all have to be on our game and get our submissions together quickly." The proposed NCEA replacement was a monocultural, Eurocentric approach to education, he said. "The process of education that they're still insisting on foisting upon us is that of a mono-cultural Eurocentric education system which has been in place in the country for 269 years. It has not worked for thousands of Māori and Pasifika students, why on earth would they think these changes are going to make any significant difference to that."

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Fiji's anti-corruption watchdog charges top prosecutor, initiates extradition proceedings
Fiji's suspended chief prosecutor, New Zealander Christopher Pryde Photo: Christopher Pryde Fiji's anti-corruption watchdog has charged the country's top prosecutor, who is in self-imposed exile in New Zealand, with corruption. The Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) has also initiated "extradition proceedings" against New Zealander Christopher Pryde. In a press statement on Tuesday, FICAC said Pryde had been charged in absentia on three counts by the Suva Magistrates Court. FICAC claims that while serving as director of Office of Public Prosecutions, Pryde "approved and received" approximately NZ$102,000 without obtaining the necessary approvals from the President's Office and the Judicial Services Commission. "He is charged with causing a loss, on the basis that he dishonestly caused financial loss to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions by accepting these unauthorised payments." FICAC said Pryde faces a second count of abuse of office for allegedly approving and receiving eight reimbursements for airfares for his wife and child (worth approximately NZ$35,000), and has been charged with obtaining a financial advantage by knowingly receiving payments to which he was not entitled. The anti-corruption office is also alleging that, on or about 16 September 2022, Pryde was reimbursed almost NZ$6000 for unused air tickets by Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions. It alleged that, although the airline refunded him directly, he failed to return the amount. The court has adjourned the case to 15 September for an update on the status of the extradition process. Pryde had been reinstated to the role in January of this year following a 21-month suspension. In a statement to reporters, Pryde said he is "dismayed" at FICAC's decision "without giving me the right to speak in my defence". "This is a clear violation of my civil and constitutional rights. I categorically deny any wrongdoing," he said. "The decision by FICAC to charge me in absentia lead me to the conclusion that there is a concerted effort to keep me out of Fiji and prevent me from resuming my duties as the Director of Public Prosecutions." Earlier this year, Pryde had written to Foreign Minister Winston Peters to intervene in his case after his salary was cut of by the Fiji government. Pryde is a New Zealand citizen and held Fiji's top prosecutor position from 2011. He was suspended in April 2023, midway into his seven-year contract, over allegations of misconduct. A three-judge Tribunal appointed by the President later cleared him of any wrongdoin, and reinstated on 7 January. However, just two days after this reinstatement, his deputy - who had been serving as the acting director public prosecutions - filed a fresh complaint against him with FICAC. Pryde maintains his innocence and says he has not returned to Fiji because he has not received assurance by the Judicial Services Commission that they would not suspend him upon his return. "And I would be forced to, once again, defend myself whilst being deprived of my income".

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Government forges ahead with foreshore and seabed law
Paul Goldsmith has welcomed Cabinet's move to press ahead with the law change. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii The government is forging ahead with plans to change the law governing New Zealand's foreshore and seabed, despite a Supreme Court ruling last year that appeared to undercut the rationale for the change. The proposed legislation stems from a clause in National's coalition deal with NZ First, which promised to revisit the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act. That commitment was driven by fears that a 2023 Court of Appeal decision could have made it significantly easier for Māori groups to win recognition of customary rights over parts of the coastline. The government introduced a bill to Parliament last year to prevent that, but it hit pause in December after the Supreme Court effectively overturned the earlier ruling. At the time, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith welcomed the development and said ministers would take time to reassess their plans. On Tuesday, Goldsmith confirmed to RNZ that Cabinet had agreed to press ahead with the law change regardless and to pass it before October. "Everybody in New Zealand has an interest in what goes on in the coastline, and we're trying our best to get that balance right." Goldsmith said he was not convinced that last year's Supreme Court ruling had set a high enough test for judging whether customary rights should be granted. "We've had a couple of cases that have been decided since then - which have shown almost 100 percent of the coastline and those areas being granted customary marine title - which confirmed to us that the Supreme Court test still didn't achieve the balance that we think the legislation set out to achieve." Asked whether he expected an upswell of protest, Goldsmith said that had been an earlier concern but: "time will tell". "There's been a wide variety of views, some in favour, some against, but we think this is the right thing to do." The legislation was one of the key objections raised by Ngāpuhi leaders last year when they walked out on a meeting with Prime Minister Christopher Luxon in protest. More than 200 applications for customary marine title are making their way through the courts. Under the amendment bill, any court decisions issued after 25 July 2024, will need to be reconsidered. That would appear to cover seven cases, involving various iwi from around the country. "I understand their frustration over that," Goldsmith said. "But we believe it is very important to get this right, because it affects the whole of New Zealand." Goldsmith said the government had set aside about $15 million to cover the additional legal costs. The Marine and Coastal Area Act was originally passed by the National-led government in 2011, replacing the controversial Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004, which had extinguished Māori customary rights in favour of Crown ownership. The 2004 law - introduced by Helen Clark's Labour government - provoked widespread protest and led to the creation of the Māori Party, now known as Te Pāti Māori. National's 2011 replacement declared that no one owned the foreshore and seabed but allowed Māori groups to seek to recognition of their rights - or "Customary Marine Title" - through the courts or in direct negotiations with the Crown. Customary title recognises exclusive Māori rights to parts of the foreshore and seabed, provided certain legal tests are met, including proving continuous and "exclusive" use of the area since 1840 without substantial interruption. The 2023 Court of Appeal ruling, however, declared that groups only needed to show they had enough control over the area that they could keep others from using it, and that situations where the law itself had prevented them from doing so could be ignored. The Supreme Court subsequently overturned that and said the Court of Appeal had taken an unduly narrow approach in its interpretation. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.