logo
Mike Lindell Ordered To Pay $2.3 Million For Defaming Ex-Dominion Exec Eric Coomer

Mike Lindell Ordered To Pay $2.3 Million For Defaming Ex-Dominion Exec Eric Coomer

A federal jury in Colorado found that Mike Lindell, the founder of MyPillow and a prominent election conspiracy theorist, defamed Eric Coomer, a former employee of Dominion Voting Systems, after the 2020 presidential election and ordered him to pay $2.3 million in damages, according to Reuters. Coomer had initially sought $62.7 million in damages, but the jury awarded a lower amount.
The verdict stems from a lawsuit filed by Coomer, who claimed that Lindell's false statements ruined his ability to work in the elections industry and destroyed his career and life. Lindell had called Coomer a "traitor" and accused him of "treason" in statements made in May 2021, as reported by CBS News.
Coomer's lawsuit alleged that Lindell's false statements subjected him to frequent death threats, and his lawyers argued that their client's life was devastated by the conspiracy theories spreading about him. Coomer was the security and product strategy director at Dominion Voting Systems, a Denver-based company whose voting machines became the target of conspiracy theories among allies of former President Donald Trump.
Following the verdict, Lindell expressed his intention to appeal the judgment, claiming that Coomer's lawyers did not prove that Coomer had been harmed. "This is a huge victory for our country," said Lindell, according to Reuters. He also noted that the jury's finding that MyPillow, his company, was not liable was a positive outcome.
Lindell, a steadfast supporter of Trump, was among many of his allies who advanced unfounded claims of fraud in the 2020 election. Reviews, recounts, and audits in battleground states affirmed Biden's victory, and Trump's attorney general at the time said there was no evidence of widespread fraud.
During the trial, Lindell stood by his false claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen but did not call any experts to present evidence of his claims, as reported by ABC News. He stated that his beliefs were influenced by watching the 2020 HBO documentary "Kill Chain" and by the views of Trump's former national security adviser, Michael Flynn. Lindell said he had no reason to doubt Flynn's claims since Flynn had worked for both political parties in intelligence.
Coomer's lawyers argued that Lindell either knew the statements were lies or conveyed them recklessly without knowing if they were true. They contended that Lindell's statements crossed the line into defamation and that he targeted Coomer in particular. "This is hurting democracy. This is misinformation. It's not been vetted and it needs to stop," said Charles Cain, one of Coomer's attorneys, according to ABC News.
Coomer testified that the conspiracy theories cost him his job, his mental health, and the life he'd built. He said that Lindell's statements were the most distressing of all. Despite the jury awarding less than the amount sought, Cain said his client was "thrilled" with the verdict, as reported by The Daily Beast. He added that the verdict serves as a deterrence for individuals working on elections from being targeted.
Lindell's online media platform, formerly known as FrankSpeech, broadcast claims about Coomer that his lawyers argued were defamatory. Lindell's attorneys denied liability for statements made by others, as reported by CBS News. The jury found that eight other statements made by Lindell and others appearing on his platform were not defamatory.
Lindell maintained that he would continue to speak out about election security, including criticizing the makers of election equipment like Dominion. He said the lawsuit was meant to suppress his voice and that he would not stop fighting the use of electronic voting machines in U.S. elections.
Dominion Voting Systems has filed separate defamation lawsuits against several Trump allies, including Lindell. The company's lawsuit against him is proceeding in a Washington D.C. federal court. Dominion has won large settlements after suing Trump allies for defamation, including a $787 million settlement in a lawsuit against Fox News over the network's airing of false claims against the company.
Lindell stated that he used to be worth about $60 million before he started speaking out about the 2020 election and is now $10 million in debt, according to The Daily Beast. He also said his financial troubles were partly due to right-wing cable network Newsmax's 2021 settlement with Coomer. Lindell told Rolling Stone, "The settlement has cost MyPillow in sales over $20 million because Newsmax will never have me on to talk about MyPillow products anymore!"
Coomer denied that there was any agreement to block Lindell under his settlement with Newsmax. In 2021, Newsmax apologized to Coomer for airing false allegations against him.
Coomer acknowledged that his Facebook posts disparaging Trump were "hyperbolic" and had been a mistake, as reported by CBS News. Lindell's attorneys argued that Coomer's reputation was already damaged before Lindell mentioned him, partly due to Coomer's own social media posts.
Earlier this year, Lindell announced that two law firms defending him in his lawsuits with Dominion and Smartmatic had quit because he couldn't pay them.
In February, a federal judge upheld an arbitration panel's determination that Lindell had to pay $5 million to a man who successfully disproved his claims that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump, as reported by The Daily Beast.
Coomer's attorneys argued that Lindell's false statements caused harm, subjecting him to threats and damaging his reputation. They said that Lindell's claims were made recklessly and without regard for the truth.
The jury found that two of Lindell's statements about Coomer, including calling him a traitor and accusing him of stealing the election, were defamatory, as reported by CBS News. However, they found that eight other statements made by Lindell and others appearing on his online media platform were not defamatory.
Lindell's attorneys argued that the statements were about a matter of public concern—elections—and therefore protected by the First Amendment. They contended that Coomer's reputation was already in tatters by the time Lindell mentioned him.
Coomer said he hopes the verdict will send a message discouraging attacks on election workers. "Individuals who are singled out can get vindication in the courthouse," said Cain, according to The Daily Beast.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kenyan police officer held over brutality protest shooting – DW – 06/17/2025
Kenyan police officer held over brutality protest shooting – DW – 06/17/2025

DW

timean hour ago

  • DW

Kenyan police officer held over brutality protest shooting – DW – 06/17/2025

DW captured the incident on camera during protests in Nairobi over the death of blogger Albert Ojwang. A Kenyan police officer has been arrested over the shooting Tuesday of an unarmed civilian during a demonstration against the death of a blogger in police custody. DW's Nairobi correspondent, Felix Maringa, witnessed and filmed the trader being shot in the head at close range. His video shows two policemen repeatedly striking the man on his head before one of them fired at him with what appeared to be a shotgun. Kenyan police shoot dead trader at protests in Nairobi To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Police say the man was taken to hospital to be treated for his wounds. It happened as a group of whip and club-wielding motorcyclists — known in Kenya as "goons" — assaulted protesters who were calling for an end to police brutality and demanding the resignation of a senior officer they blame for the death of blogger Albert Ojwang on June 8. Protesters accused police of siding with their attackers In a post on X, Amnesty International's Kenya chapter reported the presence of dozens of motorbikes carrying hooded passengers, who were seen whipping protesters and members of the public. "The goons attacked us. They cornered us and beat us with whips and the police were just watching them do it," Hanifa Adan, one of the leading voices from last year's massive Gen Z-led protests in Kenya, told the AFP news agency. Armed with whips and clubs the counter-protesters attacked demonstrators upset over the death of Albert Ojwang in police custody Image: Thomas Mukoya/REUTERS "Police, shame on you, stop siding with the goons, side with the citizens who pay your salary through our taxes," one protester told Reuters. Pictures taken by press photographers show counter-protesters running alongside police officers as they disrupted the demonstrations over Ojwang's death. Unknown attackers run with clubs to attack protesters Image: Thomas Mukoya/REUTERS Blogger's death in custody due to assault Ojwang, a blogger, was arrested earlier this month for allegedly defaming the country's deputy police chief, Eliud Lagat. Police initially claimed he died "after hitting his head against a cell wall." However, an autopsy revealed injuries consistent with assault as the likely cause of death. Since then, President William Ruto has acknowledged that Ojwang died "at the hands of the police." Two officers were arrested last week in connection with the death, but the investigation is ongoing. Clashes erupt in Kenya's capital Nairobi To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video On Monday, Lagat announced he had temporarily stepped down from his position as investigations into Ojwang's death continue. The protests over Ojwang's death reflect broader public concerns that little has changed since more than 60 people were killed during demonstrations last year, which were initially sparked by proposed tax increases. Edited by: Alex Berry

Escalation Or Diplomacy? Outcome Of Iran-Israel Conflict Uncertain
Escalation Or Diplomacy? Outcome Of Iran-Israel Conflict Uncertain

Int'l Business Times

timean hour ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Escalation Or Diplomacy? Outcome Of Iran-Israel Conflict Uncertain

Israel has inflicted damage on strategic sites and killed key figures within Iran's military leadership during five days of aerial attacks that showed no sign of abating Tuesday, but whose ultimate outcome is unclear, analysts say. Israel says its offensive aims to eliminate Iran's nuclear programme and ballistic missile production capabilities. The Israeli government has not ruled out triggering a wholesale removal of the clerical system set up after the 1979 Islamic Revolution that has remained implacably opposed to Israel's existence. Yet even if Israel succeeds in ousting Ayatollah Ali Khamenei or killing him, the supreme leader will not necessarily be replaced by more moderate forces and the risk exists of further escalation, analysts warn. Diplomacy, meanwhile, remains at a standstill as Israel pounds Iranian targets and Iran hits back with its own strikes on its foe, heightening fears of a wider and prolonged conflict. In television interviews, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has not ruled out killing Khamenei, although a US official said President Donald Trump had vetoed assassinating the supreme leader. Israel, whose intelligence service is widely acknowledged to have deeply penetrated Iran, has killed a host of key figures including the head of the Revolutionary Guards and armed forces in a huge blow. "This is existential, the most profound of all the crises the Islamic republic has faced," said Sanam Vakil, director of the Middle East and North Africa programme at the London-based Chatham House think tank. "This is designed to decapitate the leadership of the Islamic republic and degrade the nuclear and broader capabilities of the regime," she said. Rather than an immediate turnaround, what could result is "an unravelling over time" with the Israeli action putting an "accelerant" on a process of change already happening within Iran due to dissatisfaction with the authorities, she said. For Jeffrey Lewis, director of the East Asia Non-proliferation Program at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, Israel's military operation "is about regime change and not eliminating the nuclear programme". "If the regime falls, then it will be an enormous success," he said of the operation Israel dubbed "Rising Lion" -- a likely reference to the beast which adorned the pre-revolutionary Iranian flag. Even in the event of a change in leadership, Gregory Brew, senior analyst for Iran and energy at risk analysis firm Eurasia Group, said Khamenei could be replaced with a figure who may be even more hardline and pose a greater danger to Israel in the conflict's aftermath. "Kill Khamenei, make him a martyr to the hardliners and empower a new supreme leader who may be much less risk averse. Or leave him to die or resign in likely disgrace after the war, his credibility in ruins. Which move produces a government better suited to Israel's interests?" Brew said. Iran's ability to cause regional mayhem through its proxies Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in the Gaza Strip has been severely degraded by Israeli operations since October 2023. But Tehran still backs the Huthi rebels in Yemen who have attacked Gulf shipping, while Iran can strike energy facilities or undertake cyberattacks. "It remains to be seen if Iran will seek to engage in grey zone activities, including cyberattacks," said analysts at US-based think tank Soufan Center. Israel's air strikes have put an end, for now, to the latest track of talks seeking to end the standoff over the Iranian nuclear programme, which the West and Israel fear is aimed at making the atomic bomb. Analysts say the future of any diplomatic progress lies with the United States and Trump, who has so far resisted Israeli pressure to become directly involved in the conflict. "Netanyahu's goal is to bring Trump into the war," said David Khalfa, co-founder of the Atlantic Middle East Forum think tank. "But I think he will stand back and let Israel continue to weaken Iran to force it to negotiate" with the Islamic republic in a weaker position, Khalfa said. Israel has hit the Natanz nuclear site during its attacks, but has not been able to strike the Fordo enrichment facility, which is located deep underground. Analysts believe Israel could only damage it with the help of American bunker-busting bombs. Ali Vaez, Iran analyst at the International Crisis Group, argued in an article for Foreign Affairs that Israel would be unable to wipe out the Iranian nuclear programme even in a prolonged conflict. "A diplomatic settlement represents the best and most sustainable way for Trump to avoid both a nuclear Iran and a protracted military entanglement," Vaez said. Iran has also hit Israel AFP Israel has not ruled out seeking to kill the supreme leader AFP Key figures in the Iranian military have been killed AFP

Is North Korea boosting its nuclear capabilities? – DW – 06/17/2025
Is North Korea boosting its nuclear capabilities? – DW – 06/17/2025

DW

time3 hours ago

  • DW

Is North Korea boosting its nuclear capabilities? – DW – 06/17/2025

North Korea is building a new facility at its Yongbyon nuclear complex that is similar to a known uranium enrichment site, says the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said it is monitoring the construction of a new facility in North Korea's Yongbyon nuclear complex. In a statement released last week, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi said the agency is "monitoring the construction of a new building at Yongbyon which has dimensions and features similar to the Kangson enrichment plant." He said the "undeclared enrichment facilities" in North Korea "are of serious concern," adding that, "The continuation and further development of the DPRK's nuclear program are clear violations of relevant UN Security Council resolutions and are deeply regrettable." 'Paranoid about regime survival' Analysts say that despite a functioning nuclear deterrent, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un sees an even greater atomic weapons capability as critical to the survival of his regime. "North Korea has long been paranoid about its regime survival," said Erwin Tan, a professor of international politics specializing in security dilemma theory at Hankuk University of Foreign Studies in Seoul. S. Korean bombs hit near N. Korea border in military drill To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Kim has inherited his father's belief that an operational nuclear arsenal would serve as an "insurance policy," he added. "The current moment is also something of a 'window of opportunity' for the North Koreans to develop an operational nuclear arsenal, due to the policy naivete of President Donald Trump's administration and its lack of geostrategic foresight." An analysis of satellite images published on June 13 by 38 North, a publication of the Washington-based Stimson Center think tank, supports the IAEA's assessment, including that the facility under construction is 120 meters long and 47 meters wide, almost identical to a plant at Kangson built to house high spin-rate centrifuges. Other developments include the construction of what appears to be an underground radioactive waste storage facility, it said. An expanding stockpile The reports also coincide with a study published on Monday by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute that examined the state of the world's nuclear arsenals. The institute estimated that North Korea "had assembled approximately 50 nuclear warheads and had sufficient fissile material to potentially produce up to 90 warheads" as of January this year. It added that Pyongyang's stockpile of nuclear warheads is "projected to expand in the coming years." Analysts say North Korean leader Kim Jong Un sees an even greater atomic weapons capability as critical to the survival of his regime Image: KCNA/KNS/AP Andrei Lankov, a professor of history and international relations at Seoul's Kookmin University, said the North could be following one of two trajectories; one optimistic in terms of greater regional security and the other pessimistic. "A decade ago, the North reached the level of technical capability to deploy both nuclear warheads and the ICBMs required to deliver them," he said. "They did not, however, halt their development work and now they have reached the point where they can deliver a warhead anywhere in the world." The "implied scenario," Lankov said, is for the North to menace the US by threatening to attack its cities with nuclear weapons if it interferes with an invasion of South Korea. The North could then use tactical battlefield nuclear weapons to "overcome the massive superiority that South Korea holds in conventional weapons systems." "The result would likely be a North Korean victory over the South," he added. The more optimistic reading of the present situation, Lankov suggested, would be that the North is constructing new facilities "in plain sight" at Yongbyon to send a very different signal. "This could be a very good sign that they are building this in full knowledge that it will be seen and understood as a sign that Pyongyang wants to negotiate." Regional proliferation concerns Professor Tan said Kim's security alliance with Russian President Vladimir Putin has certainly given him additional power to resist international pressures, although there are tensions between the two sides. "Russia and North Korea — and, for that matter, China — all distrust and dislike each other, but all of them also recognize that they have shared interests in opposing the US," he said. Why Russia and North Korea can't quit each other (for now) To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "Kim Jong Un has apparently calculated that he can 'piggy-back' on his cooperation with Putin to rely on Russian military protection to undertake further development of his nuclear arsenal.' This raises once again the specter of nuclear proliferation in Northeast Asia including, potentially, South Korea developing and deploying its own nuclear deterrent. "Towards the end of Trump's first term in office, there already were discussions in South Korea about an independent nuclear arsenal, but these did not materialize," he said. "My impression is that whilst members of the public in South Korea might have a knee-jerk response that is in favor of a nuclear arsenal, such willingness diminishes when they become aware of the level of increased taxation and defense spending, along with the prospective international fallout for the South's international reputation," he concluded. Edited by: Srinivas Mazumdaru

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store