Mike Lindell Ordered To Pay $2.3 Million For Defaming Ex-Dominion Exec Eric Coomer
The verdict stems from a lawsuit filed by Coomer, who claimed that Lindell's false statements ruined his ability to work in the elections industry and destroyed his career and life. Lindell had called Coomer a "traitor" and accused him of "treason" in statements made in May 2021, as reported by CBS News.
Coomer's lawsuit alleged that Lindell's false statements subjected him to frequent death threats, and his lawyers argued that their client's life was devastated by the conspiracy theories spreading about him. Coomer was the security and product strategy director at Dominion Voting Systems, a Denver-based company whose voting machines became the target of conspiracy theories among allies of former President Donald Trump.
Following the verdict, Lindell expressed his intention to appeal the judgment, claiming that Coomer's lawyers did not prove that Coomer had been harmed. "This is a huge victory for our country," said Lindell, according to Reuters. He also noted that the jury's finding that MyPillow, his company, was not liable was a positive outcome.
Lindell, a steadfast supporter of Trump, was among many of his allies who advanced unfounded claims of fraud in the 2020 election. Reviews, recounts, and audits in battleground states affirmed Biden's victory, and Trump's attorney general at the time said there was no evidence of widespread fraud.
During the trial, Lindell stood by his false claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen but did not call any experts to present evidence of his claims, as reported by ABC News. He stated that his beliefs were influenced by watching the 2020 HBO documentary "Kill Chain" and by the views of Trump's former national security adviser, Michael Flynn. Lindell said he had no reason to doubt Flynn's claims since Flynn had worked for both political parties in intelligence.
Coomer's lawyers argued that Lindell either knew the statements were lies or conveyed them recklessly without knowing if they were true. They contended that Lindell's statements crossed the line into defamation and that he targeted Coomer in particular. "This is hurting democracy. This is misinformation. It's not been vetted and it needs to stop," said Charles Cain, one of Coomer's attorneys, according to ABC News.
Coomer testified that the conspiracy theories cost him his job, his mental health, and the life he'd built. He said that Lindell's statements were the most distressing of all. Despite the jury awarding less than the amount sought, Cain said his client was "thrilled" with the verdict, as reported by The Daily Beast. He added that the verdict serves as a deterrence for individuals working on elections from being targeted.
Lindell's online media platform, formerly known as FrankSpeech, broadcast claims about Coomer that his lawyers argued were defamatory. Lindell's attorneys denied liability for statements made by others, as reported by CBS News. The jury found that eight other statements made by Lindell and others appearing on his platform were not defamatory.
Lindell maintained that he would continue to speak out about election security, including criticizing the makers of election equipment like Dominion. He said the lawsuit was meant to suppress his voice and that he would not stop fighting the use of electronic voting machines in U.S. elections.
Dominion Voting Systems has filed separate defamation lawsuits against several Trump allies, including Lindell. The company's lawsuit against him is proceeding in a Washington D.C. federal court. Dominion has won large settlements after suing Trump allies for defamation, including a $787 million settlement in a lawsuit against Fox News over the network's airing of false claims against the company.
Lindell stated that he used to be worth about $60 million before he started speaking out about the 2020 election and is now $10 million in debt, according to The Daily Beast. He also said his financial troubles were partly due to right-wing cable network Newsmax's 2021 settlement with Coomer. Lindell told Rolling Stone, "The settlement has cost MyPillow in sales over $20 million because Newsmax will never have me on to talk about MyPillow products anymore!"
Coomer denied that there was any agreement to block Lindell under his settlement with Newsmax. In 2021, Newsmax apologized to Coomer for airing false allegations against him.
Coomer acknowledged that his Facebook posts disparaging Trump were "hyperbolic" and had been a mistake, as reported by CBS News. Lindell's attorneys argued that Coomer's reputation was already damaged before Lindell mentioned him, partly due to Coomer's own social media posts.
Earlier this year, Lindell announced that two law firms defending him in his lawsuits with Dominion and Smartmatic had quit because he couldn't pay them.
In February, a federal judge upheld an arbitration panel's determination that Lindell had to pay $5 million to a man who successfully disproved his claims that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump, as reported by The Daily Beast.
Coomer's attorneys argued that Lindell's false statements caused harm, subjecting him to threats and damaging his reputation. They said that Lindell's claims were made recklessly and without regard for the truth.
The jury found that two of Lindell's statements about Coomer, including calling him a traitor and accusing him of stealing the election, were defamatory, as reported by CBS News. However, they found that eight other statements made by Lindell and others appearing on his online media platform were not defamatory.
Lindell's attorneys argued that the statements were about a matter of public concern—elections—and therefore protected by the First Amendment. They contended that Coomer's reputation was already in tatters by the time Lindell mentioned him.
Coomer said he hopes the verdict will send a message discouraging attacks on election workers. "Individuals who are singled out can get vindication in the courthouse," said Cain, according to The Daily Beast.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
6 hours ago
- DW
US suspends medical visas for Gazans after far-right posts – DW – 08/17/2025
The US says it is halting medical-humanitarian visas for people from Gaza after a far-right figure claimed they were a threat to the country. The move will prevent wounded Palestinians coming to the US for treatment. The US government said on Saturday it was halting all visitor visas for people from from Gaza while it conducts "a full and thorough" review. "All visitor visas for individuals from Gaza are being stopped while we conduct a full and thorough review of the process and procedures used to issue a small number of temporary medical-humanitarian visas in recent days," the State Department, headed by Marco Rubio, wrote on X. The move comes after far-right influencer Laura Loomer posted claims on social media that some Palestinians issued with medical-humanitarian visas to the US were "pro-HAMAS ... affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood and funded by Qatar," without providing evidence. Her posts were written after the US-based charity HEAL Palestine last week said it had brought 11 critically wounded Gazan children, together with their caregivers and siblings, to the US for medical treatment. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Loomer holds no official position but has shown a significant power to influence the Trump administration and the Republican party, among other things bringing about the sacking of several senior US security officials after claiming they were disloyal to the president. She is known for spreading far-right conspiracy theories, such as claiming that the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the US were an inside job and that the Parkland high school shooting and the Santa Fe High School shooting were staged. "Truly unacceptable," Loomer wrote of the issued visas in one X post. "Someone needs to be fired at @StateDept when @marcorubio figures out who approved the visas." "Qatar transported these GAZANS into the US via @qatarairways," she said, adding that Qatar was "literally flooding our country with jihadis." She also shared videos of badly wounded Palestinian children arriving in the US this month with their families, claiming that they were uttering "jihadi chants," whereas they seemed rather to be shouting out with joy that they had arrived safely. Several of the posts targeted HEAL Palestine, which said it had carried out "the largest single medical evacuation of injured children from Gaza to the US" with its transport. Republican Congressman Randy Fine praised Loomer after the visa change was announced. "Massive credit needs to be given to @LauraLoomer for uncovering this and making me and other officials aware. Well done, Laura," Fine wrote on X. However, the Palestine Children's Relief Fund, another US-based charity, called on the Trump administration to "reverse this dangerous and inhumane decision." "This policy will have a devastating and irreversible impact on our ability to bring injured and critically ill children from Gaza to the United States for lifesaving medical treatment — a mission that has defined our work for more than 30 years," it said in a statement. "Medical evacuations are a lifeline for the children of Gaza who would otherwise face unimaginable suffering or death due to the collapse of medical infrastructure in Gaza," it said. The Council on American-Islamic Relations also condemned the move to suspend visas, calling it another sign of the "intentional cruelty" of the Trump administration. Gaza's medical infrastructure has been devastated amid the Israeli offensive triggered by a Hamas-led attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, in which 1,200 people were killed and 251 hostages were taken. According to Gaza health officials, more than 61,000 Palestinians have been killed in the offensive.
DW
a day ago
- DW
Syria: Hundreds demonstrate for Druze 'self-determination' – DW – 08/16/2025
Hundreds of Druze took to the streets of Sweida in Syria's south, with some waving Israeli flags. It comes after deadly clashes between Druze militias and Bedouin Sunni tribes. Hundreds of people demonstrated in the southern Syrian city of Sweida on Saturday, demanding the right for self-determination for the Druze minority. It comes after deadly clashes between Druze militias and armed Bedouin Sunni tribes that erupted on July 13. Syrian government forces intervened in the clashes in July, with Damascus saying it aimed to restore order in the Sweida region. But Druze groups and a UK-based war monitor have accused Damascus of siding with Bedouin Sunni and committing atrocities against members of the Druze community. Around 1,600 people were killed in the clashes, many of them Druze civilians, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. The Syrian military declared a ceasefire in Sweida days after the clashes erupted. Syria's new interim government under President Ahmed al-Sharaa has convened an investigative committee tasked with looking into the sectarian violence in the Sweida region and is to present a report in three months. Some demonstrators waved the Israeli flag in the Saturday protest in order to thank Israel for its intervention in Syria. Israel bombed Syrian government forces in July, saying it was acting to demilitarize southern Syria and protect the Druze minority. Druze activist Rayyan Maarouf told the Associated Press news agency that the protests were the first to use the slogan of self-determination. "This is an unprecedented change for the Druze in Syria," he said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video While the Druze branched off from the Ismaili sect of Shiite Islam in the 10th Century, members of the religious group do not identify as Muslim. The largest Druze population is found in Syria, with substantial communities also found in Israel and Lebanon. Druze also make up the majority of the Arab population of the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights.
DW
2 days ago
- DW
Starvation is a war crime, but will justice ever be done? – DW – 08/15/2025
Experts say that food is increasingly being used as a weapon in conflicts in places like Sudan, Syria and Gaza. But there's never been a war crimes case about it in an international court. That may soon change. Calls to prosecute the war crime of starvation are becoming louder and more frequent. "[Famine] is a weapon of war being wielded across the globe at the moment. But this has to stop, it's against international humanitarian law," Shayna Lewis, senior adviser on Sudan for the US-based group PAEMA (Preventing and Ending Mass Atrocities) told DW recently. She was talking about the Sudanese city of El Fasher, which has been under siege for a year now and where food is running out for around 30,000 people trapped there. "It is a crime internationally and it needs to be prosecuted as such," Lewis argued. Human rights groups, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have said similar about Israel's blockade of aid and food into the Gaza Strip. "Israel is starving Gaza. It's genocide. It's a crime against humanity. It's a war crime," Michael Fakhri, the United Nations' special rapporteur on the right to food, told UK newspaper the last week. Experts say that part of the reason there are now more calls to prosecute starvation of civilians as a war crime, is that there is more famine being caused by conflict. Over the first decade of this century, there was very little famine, researchers at the World Peace Foundation, or WPF, wrote in a 2022 collection of essays, "Accountability for Starvation." But more recently that has changed. "This is an ancient phenomenon, fighting parties have been using it for centuries," Rebecca Bakos Blumenthal, a legal adviser with the Starvation Accountability project run by Netherlands-based law foundation, Global Rights Compliance, or GRC, says. " I think prior to 2015, we were doing quite well in terms of food security. But there's been a resurgence of this kind of conduct." Over the past decade, there have been conflict-related famines in Nigeria, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. Food security experts suggest Russian attacks on Ukraine's agricultural sector could also be seen as criminal attempts to weaponize food. Basically there's just more of this war crime happening again, they argue. "Even while global food security is improving, the incidence of famines is increasing," Alex de Waal, a professor at Tufts University in the US and head of the WPF's research into mass starvation, wrote last week. "This tells us that the global food security is more volatile and unequal. That's consistent with hunger being used as a weapon." The deliberate withholding of food or other essentials needed for civilians' survival is categorized as a war crime by many nations as well as in various iterations of international law, including the Geneva Conventions and the Rome Statute (which is applied by the International Criminal Court, or ICC). But so far, those who wield that "weapon" have never been brought to trial: The war crime of starvation has never been prosecuted in an international court on its own, only as a part of around 20 other war crimes cases. And just because civilians are going hungry in a conflict, doesn't mean a crime was committed. "One of the issues in law is the question of intent," de Waal told DW. "The war crime of starvation requires that the perpetrator is acting with intent." Starvation happens over the longer term, de Waal points out, and some legal scholars have argued it must be proven that a perpetrator intended to starve people from the very beginning of, for example, a siege or blockade. But most legal experts believe there could also be "indirect intent," de Waal explains. That is, it's clear that starvation will occur "in the normal course of events," and the perpetrator knows that, they've had opportunities to prevent it, but didn't do so. Another issue for any legal case involving starvation is the lack of precedent, and which international or national courts have jurisdiction over the alleged war criminals. Up until a couple of years ago, starvation was often seen as a developmental or humanitarian issue, GRC's Blumenthal explains. But now there is more attention being paid to its criminal aspects. "I've worked on this issue for quite a few years now and these things do move slowly," concedes Blumenthal, who's been looking at the issue since 2017. "But I do think the needle is moving and there have been some consequential steps taken over the past 10 years." In 2018, the UN Security Council unanimously passed Resolution 2417, "condemning the starving of civilians as a method of warfare." In 2019, changes were made to the Rome Statute, making starvation a war crime in non-international armed conflicts too, rather than just international. There have also been UN commissions on conflicts in South Sudan and Ethiopia-Tigray specifically focusing on the topic of starvation as a war crime, Blumenthal points out. "We're seeing a lot more international organizations calling this out and certain striking examples, like the case of Gaza today, have really amplified awareness around the crime as well," she notes. In fact, the ICC warrants issued against Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli defense minister Yoav Gallant in November 2024, which specifically mention starvation, are a "historic milestone," Blumenthal notes. It's the first time that international warrants have been issued for starvation as a stand-alone crime. The ICC also has an open investigation into Sudan going, she adds. "The issue has undoubtedly gained more attention over the last 10 years," de Waal confirms. "The legal frameworks are all in place. What's lacking is the political will to act." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video There are still jurisdictional challenges, de Waal told DW. "But I am confident that there are many cases for which conviction is possible. It just requires getting the accused in court." Blumenthal agrees. "There are misconceptions around this and so many people think [starvation] is an inevitable part of war," she says. "But during our in-depth investigations, it's surprising how quickly it becomes clear that actually these patterns are very stark and in many situations, you can discern a deliberate strategy." Blumenthal is cautiously optimistic that one day soon those who deliberately starve civilians will face justice. "That is certainly the hope," she concludes. "That's what we are all working towards."
