logo
It's hard to take Britain seriously if we can't even build a railway

It's hard to take Britain seriously if we can't even build a railway

Telegraph8 hours ago
One of the great unknowables about our increasingly tortured life in Britain today (and there are many) concerns HS2, the proposed high-speed rail link from London to Birmingham. Will it be finished? If it is, will it be useful? Or will its significance prove to be the waste of a vast amount of taxpayers' money (the exact figure is anyone's guess, but predictions of over £100bn do not seem wild), and the enrichment of various firms of engineers, contractors, conservationists and, inevitably, lawyers?
These and other questions form the basis of Sally Gimson's exhaustive book – the first detailed account of the project – on the chaotic conduct of the project since its godfather, Lord Adonis, announced it during the last phase of the Labour government in 2009. Gimson does not conceal her affiliation to the Labour party, so it is no surprise that the Conservatives get much of the kicking for the chaos – but then they were in power for 14 of the intervening 16 years and, to be fair to the author, she does smack her fellow leftists when necessary.
It seems that Adonis's original conception was to empower the north of England – Labour's heartland, though one wonders for how much longer – by improving their transport links. But the problem seems to have stemmed, as the author points out, from the pitiful guesswork behind the original estimate of costs at £34bn.
She says this was based on the cost of supposedly similar European grands projets, notably the French TGV. However this raises an obvious problem that seems not to have occurred to the creators of HS2. A visit to Google confirms that the landmass of France is 126 per cent bigger than the United Kingdom's, or two and a quarter times as large. Any visitor to France, outside its post-industrial north, will have seen the vast tracts of open country between its cities.
Therefore, developing lines for TGVs was far simpler than driving one through densely-populated areas such as the north-western home counties or even the south-west midlands. Also, Gimson does not mention, in her admiration of the French rail network, that SNCF, the national operator, had a debt of 24bn euros in 2023; and is only that small because an embarrassed French government assumed 35bn euros of SNCF's debt in 2021. Going faster is expensive, and even more so in Britain than across the Channel.
Here, the disruption and the cost of displacing and compensating blighted householders and businesses were, by comparison with France, enormous. And then there was the question of preventing noise to appease those near enough to hear it but too distant to be compensated. So much of the route would as a consequence be submerged either in hugely expensive tunnels or in cuttings so deep that the passengers would only be able to admire the surviving landscape for the smallest fraction of the journey.
As those who have travelled by TGV know, passengers prepared to pay for the privilege can avoid such a dystopian journey, staring at concrete or darkness, by sitting upstairs on double-deck trains. Sadly, no-one on HS2 proposed double-deck trains or the engineering that might have accommodated them; just trains that will be too long for any conventional platform, ordered in numbers now too large for what is to be built, but largely unsuitable for use elsewhere on the network.
Adonis envisaged a high-speed network running to Manchester and Leeds: but that was cancelled by Rishi Sunak as costs became unsustainable, supposedly taking with it the regeneration of the two cities (both of which looked pretty good when I last saw them, but never mind) and an expensively-designed project to rejuvenate Crewe, which could certainly do with it. However, there still remained, and remain, questions about the stretch that will be built – Sir Keir Starmer has promised it will be, at any rate, and we know he always stands by his promises – between London and Birmingham.
The infrastructure costs for this part of the line alone had already become astronomical, and this is where the conservationists came in. As part of the penance for violating some of the finest countryside in England, through the Chilterns, and for not giving much of a stuff for the inhabitants, HS2 is ostentatiously determined to be super-wonderful to the wildlife. At vast expense it is building a bat tunnel in Buckinghamshire, with all sorts of landscaping to try to ensure that rare bats are directed away from trains travelling at 250mph and towards safer pastures.
This insane expense has been undertaken despite there being no evidence that the bats will respond to the new signposting (which depends on their following the line of new hedgerows), or that any train has ever had a bat splattered over its front end in the history of rail travel. That, however, is but one indication of the absurdity of how HS2 is being executed.
Another is the farrago surrounding Euston, its (supposed) London terminus. This revolting station (and anyone who ever has the misfortune to use it will know that adjective is not hyperbole) is a monument to the worst cheap-and-nasty architecture of the 1960s. The idea, the author reminds us, was to pull it down and replace it with a more handsome station that had some sort of link to St Pancras, the home of HS1 and thence via the Channel Tunnel a gateway to Europe. The lives of numerous people in that part of Camden (where Gimson has served has a councillor) have been disrupted by pile drivers, and houses and flats compulsorily purchased in a stop-start process that now appears to be on again: but as with every other aspect of HS2, nothing is entirely clear.
Sunak withdrew the funding for the new station when he was prime minister in 2023; the line from Birmingham was to end instead in a dismal part of west London, Old Oak Common, between those renowned international destinations, Acton and Willesden Junction. One felt when he suggested this that Sunak was revealing a magnificent sense of humour: no one in his or her right mind would want to use a high speed train that dumped passengers in a remote and unappealing suburb in outer London. It makes little odds that Old Oak Common is not too far from the nearly-new Elizabeth Line; it would still wipe out any time gains from the faster trip from Birmingham.
The present government recognised this and restored funding for the expensive tunnel to take HS2 to Euston. However, Euston itself would not be redeveloped, Sir Keir Starmer has said, except with private capital. So far there are no takers; and nor is there a plan to link it to St Pancras. The project is a shambles, as the author points out. There is no doubt that successive Conservative-led administrations treated it as a permanent afterthought.
However, as Gimson intimates in the prolix 22-point plan with which she ends the book – designed to instruct future governments about massive infrastructure projects – the fault really lay with the Brown administration, and Adonis. They never set out clearly the rationale for the project, consulting properly all those affected, and not attempting to fix a realistic budget until it was properly understood what was entailed. But as she also intimates, the real problem was that ministers who had to take the decisions affecting the project and civil servants who had to advise them generally hadn't a clue what they were doing.
The book is deeply researched and consequently highly detailed, though not well-written. At times it seems the author has but a casual relationship with English grammar and idiom, and cliché is her first resort too often: she would benefit from avoiding the 'cup of cold sick' metaphor in her writing. She seems to favour the project, though is outraged by the way it has been conducted. Yet from the evidence she presents, the Birmingham to London stretch was entirely unnecessary. A high speed line from Birmingham to Manchester and Leeds would have been a different matter – and because of the terrain, less expensive – and the much-discussed link, frequently mentioned by Gimson, from Hull to Leeds, Manchester and Liverpool to jump-start the so-called 'northern powerhouse'.
She mentions, too, the alternative uses for the tens of billions squandered on HS2, such as improving the existing rail network. Indeed, it could have been used to re-open some of the lines myopically closed in the 1960s after the Beeching report, which left many now sizeable towns with no railway and, therefore, no option but to use the roads. The book often mentions that investment is focused on the London area and the north is deliberately starved of it; but had some railway lines in the south-east not been ripped up 60 years ago the roads there would be less overloaded, because the area is so densely populated. Also, there is insufficient recognition that had HS2 gone to Manchester and Leeds as well as Birmingham, it would have been easier for people to escape those cities for London, and not just the opposite. The economic benefits might not have emerged where expected.
How HS2 evolves from now is anyone's guess. The scope for failure remains enormous, and the way this Government is managing the economy means nothing is certain. This book describes the nature of the mess; but it does (whether intentionally or not) reinforce the perception that HS2 is a mess, and the depressing notion that Britain lacks the direction and wit to undertake anything serious. God help us if, one day, we have to embark on a project more important than a railway.
★★★★☆
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Badenoch suggests migrants held in ‘camps' as crossings near 50,000 under Labour
Badenoch suggests migrants held in ‘camps' as crossings near 50,000 under Labour

North Wales Chronicle

time19 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Badenoch suggests migrants held in ‘camps' as crossings near 50,000 under Labour

The Conservative Party leader warned that some communities 'don't feel safe', as she visited Epping in Essex, where protesters have gathered in recent weeks opposing the decision to house asylum seekers in local hotels. Latest Home Office figures show that 49,797 people have arrived on British shores by small boat since Labour won last year's general election. Children were seen wrapped in blankets as they arrived into the Port of Ramsgate, Kent, by a lifeboat vessel following a small boat incident in the Channel on Monday. The Conservative Party has claimed the figure has surpassed 50,000 following Monday's arrivals, but the official numbers are yet to be confirmed. At Epping's Black Lion pub, Mrs Badenoch told members of the community: 'We've got to turn things around very quickly. We cannot use rules from 1995, or 2005, or even 2015 for 2025. 'Our world is changing very quickly, and we need to adapt to it.' She added: 'Is it possible for us to set up camps and police that, rather than bringing all of this hassle into communities?' Asked what she meant by the suggestion, Mrs Badenoch told the PA news agency: 'We need to make sure that communities like Epping are safe. What a lot of the parents – the mothers and even some of the children – have said to me is that they don't feel safe. 'It is unfair to impose this burden on communities.' The MP for North West Essex said that 'lots of people here have been talking about being harassed by a lot of people in the hotels' and continued: 'Not everyone here is a genuine asylum seeker. People are arriving in our country illegally and that is why we have a plan to make sure that people who arrive here illegally are deported immediately. 'We need to close down that pathway to citizenship that means that lots of people get here not making any contributions, claiming welfare, claiming benefits. 'And we also need a deterrent.' The Government has previously set out its intention to close asylum hotels by the end of the Parliament. 'My worry is that things are actually going to get worse as Labour tries to move people out of hotels and into private accommodation – I think that is going to be a much worse situation,' Mrs Badenoch said. She had earlier told members of the community: 'As a party, we need to also hear from the community about what you think the solutions are. We don't have all the answers; it's important that we make sure that the community is part of the problem solved.' Referring to protests outside the Bell Hotel in Epping, Mrs Badenoch said: 'I think there can be a balance. 'There is a big difference between local people protesting about something that's happening in their midst and 'professional protesters' who turn up at lots of different events. 'They are not equivalent, and I think that there needs to be some recognition that people can be in their neighbourhood talking about something there, and other people who have an academic or a theoretical or political belief joining that to have a counter-protest. 'Also this is your home, this is your community, and that in my view is quite important. People should have some kind of precedence in their own communities versus other people randomly passing through, otherwise we start to change the nature of what protest is.' Demonstrations began on July 13 after an asylum seeker was charged with allegedly attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, denies sexual assault and is due to stand trial this month. A group of refugee organisations and charities have urged party leaders to take a 'strong and united stand' after a wave of anti-migrant protests on the weekend. Hundreds of protesters in Nuneaton marched through the Warwickshire town on Saturday after two men, reported to be Afghan asylum seekers, were charged over the rape of a 12-year-old girl. Signatories to an open letter, published on Monday, told politicians they hold a responsibility to 'end the divisive politics, racist rhetoric and demonising language of the past'. The letter, co-ordinated by campaign coalition Together With Refugees and signed by groups including Oxfam and Amnesty, said: 'Many of the people targeted have already suffered unimaginably, having fled for their lives from countries such as Afghanistan, Eritrea, Iran, Sudan and Syria. 'Now, due to unacceptable delays and a broken system, they are housed in hotels, a collective target of hostility, banned from working, with limited control over their lives or futures.' The coalition added that an 'outpouring of support from communities condemning the hatred is a powerful reminder that these views do not represent the vast majority'. Some protesters, also protesting against asylum hotels and houses of multiple occupation, held signs reading 'What about our girls' human right to safety' at the Nuneaton demonstration. The End Violence Against Women Coalition – another signatory to the open letter – said the 'far-right has long exploited the cause of ending violence against women and girls to promote a racist, white supremacist agenda' and added the 'attacks against migrant and racialised communities are appalling and do nothing to improve women and girls' autonomy, rights and freedoms'.

Badenoch suggests migrants held in ‘camps' as crossings near 50,000 under Labour
Badenoch suggests migrants held in ‘camps' as crossings near 50,000 under Labour

Glasgow Times

time19 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

Badenoch suggests migrants held in ‘camps' as crossings near 50,000 under Labour

The Conservative Party leader warned that some communities 'don't feel safe', as she visited Epping in Essex, where protesters have gathered in recent weeks opposing the decision to house asylum seekers in local hotels. Latest Home Office figures show that 49,797 people have arrived on British shores by small boat since Labour won last year's general election. Children were seen wrapped in blankets as they arrived into the Port of Ramsgate, Kent, by a lifeboat vessel following a small boat incident in the Channel on Monday. The Conservative Party has claimed the figure has surpassed 50,000 following Monday's arrivals, but the official numbers are yet to be confirmed. At Epping's Black Lion pub, Mrs Badenoch told members of the community: 'We've got to turn things around very quickly. We cannot use rules from 1995, or 2005, or even 2015 for 2025. 'Our world is changing very quickly, and we need to adapt to it.' She added: 'Is it possible for us to set up camps and police that, rather than bringing all of this hassle into communities?' Asked what she meant by the suggestion, Mrs Badenoch told the PA news agency: 'We need to make sure that communities like Epping are safe. What a lot of the parents – the mothers and even some of the children – have said to me is that they don't feel safe. 'It is unfair to impose this burden on communities.' The MP for North West Essex said that 'lots of people here have been talking about being harassed by a lot of people in the hotels' and continued: 'Not everyone here is a genuine asylum seeker. People are arriving in our country illegally and that is why we have a plan to make sure that people who arrive here illegally are deported immediately. 'We need to close down that pathway to citizenship that means that lots of people get here not making any contributions, claiming welfare, claiming benefits. 'And we also need a deterrent.' Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch called for a deterrent (Lucy North/PA) The Government has previously set out its intention to close asylum hotels by the end of the Parliament. 'My worry is that things are actually going to get worse as Labour tries to move people out of hotels and into private accommodation – I think that is going to be a much worse situation,' Mrs Badenoch said. She had earlier told members of the community: 'As a party, we need to also hear from the community about what you think the solutions are. We don't have all the answers; it's important that we make sure that the community is part of the problem solved.' Police outside the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex where there has been a number of demonstrations (Yui Mok/PA) Referring to protests outside the Bell Hotel in Epping, Mrs Badenoch said: 'I think there can be a balance. 'There is a big difference between local people protesting about something that's happening in their midst and 'professional protesters' who turn up at lots of different events. 'They are not equivalent, and I think that there needs to be some recognition that people can be in their neighbourhood talking about something there, and other people who have an academic or a theoretical or political belief joining that to have a counter-protest. 'Also this is your home, this is your community, and that in my view is quite important. People should have some kind of precedence in their own communities versus other people randomly passing through, otherwise we start to change the nature of what protest is.' Protesters outside the former Bell Hotel in Epping (Jordan Pettitt/PA) Demonstrations began on July 13 after an asylum seeker was charged with allegedly attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, denies sexual assault and is due to stand trial this month. A group of refugee organisations and charities have urged party leaders to take a 'strong and united stand' after a wave of anti-migrant protests on the weekend. Hundreds of protesters in Nuneaton marched through the Warwickshire town on Saturday after two men, reported to be Afghan asylum seekers, were charged over the rape of a 12-year-old girl. Signatories to an open letter, published on Monday, told politicians they hold a responsibility to 'end the divisive politics, racist rhetoric and demonising language of the past'. The letter, co-ordinated by campaign coalition Together With Refugees and signed by groups including Oxfam and Amnesty, said: 'Many of the people targeted have already suffered unimaginably, having fled for their lives from countries such as Afghanistan, Eritrea, Iran, Sudan and Syria. 'Now, due to unacceptable delays and a broken system, they are housed in hotels, a collective target of hostility, banned from working, with limited control over their lives or futures.' The coalition added that an 'outpouring of support from communities condemning the hatred is a powerful reminder that these views do not represent the vast majority'. Some protesters, also protesting against asylum hotels and houses of multiple occupation, held signs reading 'What about our girls' human right to safety' at the Nuneaton demonstration. The End Violence Against Women Coalition – another signatory to the open letter – said the 'far-right has long exploited the cause of ending violence against women and girls to promote a racist, white supremacist agenda' and added the 'attacks against migrant and racialised communities are appalling and do nothing to improve women and girls' autonomy, rights and freedoms'.

What will happen to people arrested on Palestine Action demonstration?
What will happen to people arrested on Palestine Action demonstration?

The Guardian

time19 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

What will happen to people arrested on Palestine Action demonstration?

The consequences of being arrested for expressing support for Palestine Action could be 'life-changing', one of those detained during Saturday's protests, Sir Jonathon Porritt, has admitted. While the former government adviser said that he had carefully deliberated over a decision to take part, the road ahead for the more than 500 people arrested on Saturday involves possible criminal charges, court cases and convictions. Ultimately, custodial sentences of as much as 14 years could be imposed. Those whose details could be confirmed were released on bail to appear at a police station at a future date. The police will be sending case files to the Crown Prosecution Service, as it has already done in the case of at least 26 others who were arrested at previous protests in support of Palestine Action. All those arrested have now been released under police bail, with the main condition being not to attend any future demonstrations aiming to overwhelm the criminal justice system in protest at the proscription of Palestine Action by the British government. They will be asked how they plead and if it is not guilty they can elect for a trial before a magistrate or, more likely, a district judge. The majority of the 522 people arrested in Parliament Square – in most cases after displaying pieces of cardboard saying 'I opposed genocide, I support Palestine Action' – were detained under section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000. This is the 'lower level' part of the act, which means those who are charged will be tried in a magistrates court rather than a crown court. Some have been charged under the more serious section 12, which means they could seek to have their case heard in front of a jury of their peers at a crown court. The prosecution could also seek to have the trial heard there. Defend Our Juries, the organising group behind the protest, has said it won't be recommending what people do, as they have already participated 'at huge personal cost' but it will be 'providing the information'. There is a scenario in which court trials do not happen, if the co-founder of Palestine Action is successful in a legal challenge against the home secretary's decision to ban the group under anti-terrorism laws. Given that most those arrested on Saturday will be investigated under section 13 of the terrorism act, they could well walk free from court. They face a maximum sentence of six months' imprisonment or a fine of up to £5,000 or both, while magistrates will also take into account factors such as good character. More than half of those arrested on Saturday were also aged 60 or over. Those arrested under the more serious section 12 of the Terrorism Act face a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison if convicted. However, such individuals could end up being tried before a jury in a crown court. In recent cases under section 13, people charged with supporting Hamas, including displaying pictures of hang gliders such as those used in the 7 October 2023 attack on Israel, were given absolute or conditional discharges. Will a jury drawn from their peers be more likely to sympathise with those arrested on Saturday? Those involved in organising the protest are confident that the British public is on the same page as them. The impact of such a conviction would be felt in everything from employment to travel. Many of those arrested are retired and, while they do not have a job to lose, the possibility of being unable to get a visa to go abroad might weigh. However, the consequences are starker for others arrested on Saturday including health workers and doctors. There was an organised 'health block' of 13 medical professionals – including an obstetrician and gynaecologist, three other working doctors, a number of nurses, and retired doctors. Alice Clack, a senior obstetrician and gynaecologist in the NHS, said: 'If doctors are charged with a crime we have to self-report to the GMC [General Medical Council], who then have a look at the crime in question and decide whether to refer it to the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service. 'Then, someone could expect to be suspended or they could be erased from the register. That is the possibility.' As for seeking future employment, recent legislation largely reduced the period of time during which those convicted of most crimes must declare a conviction. However, while it reduced the period of time during which an individual must declare a conviction, it does not apply to terrorist offences – which never become spent.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store