logo
Thai construction magnate surrenders to police over building collapse in quake

Thai construction magnate surrenders to police over building collapse in quake

A construction magnate, builders, designers and engineers have surrendered to police on criminal negligence charges for the deadly collapse of a Bangkok high-rise in the March 28 earthquake that hit Myanmar.
Premchai Karnasuta, the president of Italian-Thai Development Co, the main Thai contractor for the building project, as well as designers and engineers were among 17 charged with professional negligence causing death, Bangkok deputy police chief Noppasin Poonsawat said.
Mr Noppasin said those who met police on Friday formally denied the charges.
Several have previously issued public denials in response to allegations in the media.
Ninety-two people were confirmed dead in the rubble of the building that had been under construction and a small number of other people remain unaccounted for.
The building, which was to become a new state audit office, was the only one in Thailand to collapse in the earthquake that was centred in neighbouring Myanmar.
The search for victims at the site has been halted, though efforts to identify remains through DNA will continue.
Mr Noppasin said at a news conference that evidence and testimony from experts suggested the building plan did not meet standards and codes.
The Bangkok Post newspaper said police had also determined the project showed 'structural flaws in the core lift shaft and substandard concrete and steel'.
Thai media have reported allegations of wrongdoing in the project almost every day since the building's collapse, many of them involving irregular documentation for the project.
Their reports have highlighted the role of Italian-Thai's Chinese joint venture partner, the China Railway No 10 company, which is involved in projects around the world.
One of the 17 charged on Friday was Chinese executive Zhang Chuanling, a director at China Railway No 10's joint venture with Italian-Thai Development.
He was previously arrested last month on a charge of violating Thai business law by wrongly using Thai nominees to serve as the Chinese firm's proxies to allegedly control the joint venture.
Three Thai executives were also arrested on the charge.
A Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for the 17 on the negligence charge on Thursday.
Mr Noppasin said 15 turned themselves in at a police station in the morning and the remaining two were expected to do so later on Friday.
The epicentre of the quake was in central Myanmar, where it killed more than 3,700 people and caused major damage in Mandalay, the country's second biggest city, and the capital Naypyitaw.
Premchai's case is his second major tangle with the law.
In 2019, he was convicted of wildlife poaching and served about three years in prison.
He was found guilty of killing protected animals and illegal possession of weapons after park rangers found a hunting party at a wildlife sanctuary in 2018 with carcasses of a rare black panther, a kalij pheasant and a barking deer.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

One month until TikTok could be banned (again). What you need to know
One month until TikTok could be banned (again). What you need to know

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

One month until TikTok could be banned (again). What you need to know

In late July, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a CNBC interview that if China did not approve a U.S.-drafted deal to sell the platform's American assets, the app would go dark again, once the next ban extension expires on Sept. 17. "If that deal gets approved by the Chinese, then that deal will happen. If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark," Lutnick previously said. "And those decisions are coming very soon, so let's see what the Chinese do. They've got to approve it. The deal is over to them right now." The White House did not immediately respond for comment when contacted by USA TODAY on Aug. 15. When could TikTok go dark (again) in the US? The next deadline for TikTok to be sold by ByteDance is Sept. 17. Why is TikTok at risk of getting banned? Some government officials are concerned that TikTok poses a national security threat, believing that ByteDance, which is based in Beijing, is sharing U.S. user data with China. TikTok has repeatedly denied these claims. In January, the platform went dark for less than 24 hours under federal legislation signed into law by former President Joe Biden in 2024. Trump has signed executive orders three times now that push back the deadline for when TikTok must be sold, promising that deals with China are on the horizon. The latest was in early July, when Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that he was hopeful Chinese President Xi would agree to a deal to see the platform to the U.S. Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@

MAGGIE PAGANO: We are all paying the price for Labour
MAGGIE PAGANO: We are all paying the price for Labour

Daily Mail​

time10 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

MAGGIE PAGANO: We are all paying the price for Labour

Eating cake rather than bread is not an option. Blame my Viking-cum-Italian genes. But there are two household staples that we are never without: tealights and olive oil. My addiction is such that I'm eagle-eyed about hunting down the best prices. But here's the rub. It doesn't seem to matter whether you are shopping for candles at Homebase or B&M, or Waitrose or Tesco for liquid gold – prices are soaring again having fallen back after inflation peaked nearly three years ago. As any regular shopper will tell you, so are the prices of most foods and household products. June's annual food inflation rate was up at 4.5 per cent, the third month in a row that prices rose, and the highest since the beginning of last year. Inflation figures for July out next Wednesday are expected to show further jumps. So it's hardly surprising that 85 per cent of adults surveyed by the Office for National Statistics say that the cost-of-living crisis is the most important issue facing the UK today – ahead even of the NHS. About six in ten adults also report that costs have risen in the last month – that's more people citing price rises than in July last year when Labour took office. This time around, rising prices can't be blamed on either the after-effects of the pandemic, which crippled supply chains around the world, or indeed Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which saw the price of wheat and sunflower oils, as well as energy, rocket into the stratosphere. Today's price rises, however, are mainly home-grown, the direct result of Labour's tax hikes. Prices have further to climb because of the Budget tax rises, as even the Bank of England has admitted. The British Retail Consortium (BRC) has also warned that the full impact of the last Budget has yet to fully filter through to prices. Labour's policies will add £7billion to retailer costs this year, ranging from higher employment costs to the new packaging tax. The BRC also says that if this autumn's Budget attacks retailers again, with its planned higher business rates threshold on 4,000 larger stores, then it will be poorer families which will be hit hardest. At the same time, the UK's farming industry is being whacked on all fronts, threatening the country's food security. The latest smack in the face is Labour's decision not to give any financial aid to the bioethanol industry after President Donald Trump's tariff hike. Smaller farm owners are being devastated by the new inheritance tax rules and are shutting down. Dairy farmers are closing because of higher costs and worker shortages, opening the door to more imports and less competition. Even the price of bread is now in question. The planned merger between ABF's Kingsmill and Hovis is going to be an interesting test for Labour to chew on. Both Kingsmill and Hovis lose money. Together they would lead the market in sliced bread, putting them ahead of sector leader Warburtons. What's Labour to do? On the one hand the Government will want to show its support for business, giving a nod to the Competition and Markets Authority to pass the takeover. But that means big job losses and a potential monopoly position for its breads, the price of which they may be mindful of has so often led historically to riots. Telling people to eat cake is not an option.

What might Trumpian meddling mean for Intel?
What might Trumpian meddling mean for Intel?

Economist

time11 hours ago

  • Economist

What might Trumpian meddling mean for Intel?

WHEN LIP-BU TAN was summoned to the White House on Monday, he was ostensibly there to explain his investments in Chinese startups. After the meeting Donald Trump, who just a few days earlier had called for the boss of Intel to resign, was full of praise for his 'amazing story'. Mr Tan has kept his job. But he probably had not reckoned on gaining a co-CEO. Mr Trump is now reported to be considering an investment in the chipmaker on behalf of America's government.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store