Inside Germany: Can we change the conversation on immigration?
Inside Germany is our weekly look at some of the news, talking points and gossip in Germany that you might've missed. It's published each Saturday and members can receive it directly to their inbox by going to their newsletter preferences or adding their email to the sign-up box in this article.
Can Germany change the conversation on immigration?
What a week it's been.
After just over two months of political limbo, an intense campaign and a war of words, Germans voted in a nationwide election on Sunday.
The conservative alliance (CDU/CSU) won 28.5 percent of the vote, followed by the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) which snagged its best ever showing with just over 20 percent. The SPD came third with just over 16 percent of the vote, followed by the Greens (11.6 percent) and Die Linke (Left Party) with 8.7 percent.
There were no huge surprises (except perhaps Die Linke' s last minute surge); we expected the conservatives to win, and for the AfD to make gains.
But with an election campaign marked by anti-immigration rhetoric, it's not hard to see why many people - especially those with a foreign background - in Germany feel worried about these results.
Although the AfD is excluded from a future coalition government due to the 'firewall' by mainstream parties, the party has still spread racist and xenophobic hate speech and is helping to shape the political agenda.
Let's not forget the AfD in Karlsruhe campaigned with fake flyers designed to look like 'deportation tickets' aimed at sending illegal migrants home. The party also embraced the term 'remigration' - understood to refer to the mass "return" or deportation of certain migrants - in its election programme.
In a survey conducted by our team this week, some foreign residents in Germany told us their concerns.
" I don't feel safe and frankly have no plans to travel anywhere near the East German states," said David, after the AfD won the majority of votes in nearly every constituency in the former East German states.
Another reader, Dmitry in Düsseldorf, said: 'At least one fifth of the voters hate me and want me gone."
Tape calling for a ban of Germany's far-right AfD is attached to a fence closing off a construction site in front of the Reichstag. Photo: John Macdougall / AFP
But it's not just about the AfD. The CDU/CSU alliance has moved further to the right and headlined its campaign on an immigration crackdown.
This wasn't only in reaction to horrific attacks perpetrated by individuals with a migrant background. The CDU/CSU has long been pushing to reverse the previous government's citizenship reform, with soon-to-be chancellor Friedrich Merz recently saying that reduced residency requirements and dual citizenship for all "creates too many problems in Germany".
What does any of this achieve?
German politicians should be talking about immigration differently. The country is in desperate need of hundreds of thousands of skilled workers from abroad each year to fill jobs and contribute to social security.
This is not to say that there should not be difficult conversations about the rules around how people from abroad can come to Germany. There are decisions to make and resources to think about on how best to support refugees, for example.
But there are better ways to do it.
Personally, I can't think of a time when embracing diversity has not enriched my life.
Moving to Berlin, a city brimming with people from different backgrounds and countries, from a smaller city in Scotland has been truly amazing. I learn all the time about different cultures and ways of doing things.
Looking at the bigger picture, we are in turbulent times. Political leaders and people across the world, including in Germany, are worried about the future of democracy and the rise of authoritarian regimes.
With so much at stake - both at home and abroad - it makes sense that Merz and the SPD are trying to pull a new German coalition government together at lightning speed.
I just wish that German leaders would recognise the contribution of immigrants to the country instead of playing into far-right narratives. As research has showed time and time and again, anti-migrant rhetoric like this only benefits the far right.
Hamburg votes
The voting spell isn't quite over, at least for one city!
Hamburg, a Social Democrats' stronghold, goes to the polls on Sunday, March 2nd, to vote for a new state parliament.
According to polls, the Social Democrats are still clearly ahead with around 33 percent of the vote, followed by the CDU with 18 percent and the Greens with 17 percent.
In 2020, the SPD won the parliamentary elections with 39.2 percent of the vote, followed by the Greens with 24.2 percent, while the CDU achieved its worst result in the Hanseatic city with 11.2 percent.
People walk no a rainy day in Hamburg. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Marcus Brandt
Thank you and auf Wiedersehen!
I'm writing this letter to you on my last day at The Local as I step down as Editor of the Germany site.
I joined the company six and a half years ago when things looked quite a bit different. Angela Merkel was still chancellor and the full force of events like Brexit, a global pandemic and Russia's war on Ukraine was yet to hit us.
Immigration was, of course, still a big talking point. Dual citizenship for all had not yet come into force. One of the high points of my time at The Local has been covering the citizenship reform along with my fantastic colleagues.
I have been so lucky to be able to bring you articles over the years about life in Germany and I am truly thankful for every opportunity.
For those of you who I've spoken to directly, I have appreciated your feedback and I have loved listening to your stories.
It is time for me to take a pause and reset. But I very much hope we meet again.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
a day ago
- DW
Stymied French politicians turn to sins of the past – DW – 06/07/2025
Amid parliamentary deadlock, the politics of remembrance has gained momentum in France. Three new initiatives attempt to recognize and heal historical injustices — at least symbolically. On Thursday, two years after France's controversial retirement age increase, the National Assembly voted to withdraw the reform. While the news was politically explosive because the far-right National Rally helped the left-wing opposition gain a majority in the vote, the decision hasn't yielded any actual legal results. The situation reflects the country's ongoing failure to address structural reforms since the parliamentary elections last summer, which left the government won without an absolute majority. But in the area of remembrance policy there has been significant movement. In the same week as the toothless retirement resolution, parliamentarians adopted three texts that reclassify historical events or offer the prospect of reparations. Alfred Dreyfus, shown here in the 1930s, is considered a national hero by many French people today Image: epa/AFP/dpa/picture alliance Alfred Dreyfus posthumously promoted On June 2, the French parliament voted unanimously to posthumously appoint Alfred Dreyfus to the rank of brigadier general. The Jewish officer was wrongly accused of high treason in 1894, based on falsified evidence that he revealed military secrets to the German embassy in Paris. Dreyfus subsequently spent four years in the notorious Devil's Island penal colony off the coast of French Guiana. The Franco-German dimension of the case had explosive foreign policy implications even then. The suspect's Jewish origins and his family background in the Alsace-Lorraine region, which came under German rule after the Franco-Prussian War, and strained relations with Germany, made him an ideal target for the nationalist mistrust many French people harbored at the time. Writer Émile Zola famously sided with Dreyfus in his essay "J'accuse…!", which played a critical role in the officer's exoneration and military rehabilitation in 1906. Nevertheless, after serving in the First World War as a lieutenant colonel, Dreyfus was only reinstated at a lower rank. This posthumous promotion for Dreyfus still has to pass the Senate. Alsatian MP Charles Sitzenstuhl, a member of French President Emmanuel Macron's center-right Renaissance Party, who introduced the initiative, offered a link to the present as a warning: "The anti-Semitism that plagued Alfred Dreyfus is not a thing of the distant past," he said. In June 1954, Indochinese conscripts hastily erect new fortifications for French colonial forces in Phu Ly, south of Hanoi, Vietnam Image: AP/picture alliance Recognizing returnees from Indochina Just one day after the Dreyfus vote, the National Assembly also passed a law to recognize and compensate former returnees from French Indochina after the colonial rule of territories including Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia ended in 1954. Around 44,000 people were repatriated to France, among them colonial officials, soldiers and their families, the descendants of French colonizers and local women, as well as local collaborators. Between 4,000 to 6,000 returnees ended up in temporary camps, which were often outfitted with wooden barracks that lacked heating and plumbing. Returnees were also subject to degrading policies that included bans on going out and owning cars or other luxury goods. The new law introduced by the left-wing Socialist Party now provides for financial support based on someone's length of stay in the camps. It is estimated that up to 1,600 people could claim compensation. Haiti is one of the world's poorest countries today Image: Java Reparations for Haiti? On June 5, the Assembly adopted a resolution addressing a "double debt" to Haiti that goes back to 1825. That was the year that France forced Haiti, which had declared independence in 1804, to pay compensation of 150 million gold francs. This was intended as a recognition of independence that would also compensate for the loss of French colonial possessions, including income from slaves. Haiti was forced to settle this "independence debt" over decades — a considerable economic burden that contributed to long-term poverty and instability on the island. The resolution, initiated by the Communist Party, calls for recognition, repayment and reparations for Haiti. But the text does not include concrete political steps or financial agreements. Nevertheless, the far-right National Rally voted against it. The "Senegalese riflemen," or "tirailleurs sénégalais," were a colonial infantry recruited by the French army during the First World War Image: The Print Collector/Heritage-Images/picture alliance A history of remembering Remembrance politics have some tradition in France. In 2001, the "Taubira" law, named after the parliamentarian who introduced it, recognized the slave trade and practice of slavery as crimes against humanity. The topic has been a part of school curricula in France ever since. In October 2006, the National Assembly passed a bill to criminalize the denial of the Armenian genocide of 1915 in the Ottoman Empire with a year in prison or fine of €45,000 ($51,300). The bill never came into force after it failed to pass in the Senate, and was followed by a similarly doomed initiative introduced under President Nicolas Sarkozy. That draft law passed both chambers of parliament, but was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Council in February 2012, which said that it amounted to unlawful interference with freedom of expression and research. Another example is the treatment of the so-called "Senegalese riflemen," the colonial soldiers from Africa who fought for France in the two world wars. For decades, many received significantly lower pensions than their French comrades, especially if they lived outside of France after decolonization. It was not until 2009 that President Sarkozy decreed an equalization of pension benefits, a step that held great symbolic significance. Social maturity or empty gestures? The latest spike in such initiatives has been met with mixed interpretations by political scientists. Some experts see the willingness to take historical responsibility as a form of social maturity. But others point out that in a politically paralyzed legislature, symbolic initiatives are easier to pass than structural reforms in areas such as pensions, education or the budget. This article was originally written in German.
DW
a day ago
- DW
German govt to ask EU court to rule on migrant turnbacks – DW – 06/07/2025
06/07/2025 June 7, 2025 German interior to seek EU verdict on border turnbacks Germany's Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said the German government would seek a ruling from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the legality of migrant turnbacks at the border. Dobrindt's comments to the Funke media group follow a ruling by a court in Berlin on Monday that the refusal to allow three Somali nationals to enter last month was unlawful. The court ruled that on May 9, border guards failed to initiate proper asylum procedures and returned the trio to Poland. According to the court, Germany should have applied the European Union's so-called Dublin Regulation, establishing which country is responsible for the asylum claim of the migrants, before they were sent back. The Dublin rule specifies which EU state should process an asylum application, partly to prevent arrivals from making claims in wealthier countries rather than the first EU nation that they entered. Dobrindt said the government would provide its rationale for invoking Article 72 — a special clause under EU law that permits exceptions to the Dublin rule in emergencies. "We will submit sufficient justification, but the European Court of Justice should decide on the matter," Dobrindt said, adding: "I am convinced that our actions are in line with European law." Dobrindt insisted that Germany had to crack down on illegal migration, which he said would prevent the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party from pushing more radical solutions. German Chancellor Merz rejects criticism of border controls To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Germany introduced tougher border checks on May 7, including new rules allowing asylum seekers to be turned away at the border for the first time. In the first days of the new rule, 19 people who sought asylum in Germany were denied entry, along with nearly 300 other migrants, local media reported. Following this week's court ruling, the cabinet approved even stricter measures.
DW
a day ago
- DW
Germany: Car drives into crowd in Passau – DW – 06/07/2025
06/07/2025 June 7, 2025 German interior to seek EU verdict on border turnbacks Germany's Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said the German government would seek a ruling from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the legality of migrant turnbacks at the border. Dobrindt's comments to the Funke media group follow a ruling by a court in Berlin on Monday that the refusal to allow three Somali nationals to enter last month was unlawful. The court ruled that on May 9, border guards failed to initiate proper asylum procedures and returned the trio to Poland. According to the court, Germany should have applied the European Union's so-called Dublin Regulation, establishing which country is responsible for the asylum claim of the migrants, before they were sent back. The Dublin rule specifies which EU state should process an asylum application, partly to prevent arrivals from making claims in wealthier countries rather than the first EU nation that they entered. Dobrindt said the government would provide its rationale for invoking Article 72 — a special clause under EU law that permits exceptions to the Dublin rule in emergencies. "We will submit sufficient justification, but the European Court of Justice should decide on the matter," Dobrindt said, adding: "I am convinced that our actions are in line with European law." Dobrindt insisted that Germany had to crack down on illegal migration, which he said would prevent the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party from pushing more radical solutions. German Chancellor Merz rejects criticism of border controls To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Germany introduced tougher border checks on May 7, including new rules allowing asylum seekers to be turned away at the border for the first time. In the first days of the new rule, 19 people who sought asylum in Germany were denied entry, along with nearly 300 other migrants, local media reported. Following this week's court ruling, the cabinet approved even stricter measures.
