Same old NIMBY excuses are threatening to hold Hyde Park Square back
The increased density will help existing businesses in the Square by driving more traffic. The project will create space for new businesses and, therefore, more jobs. Over 100 units of housing will be added to the city's supply, which is strained. The agglomeration effects of higher density, especially of high-wage earners, will promote activity in an area well beyond the Square itself and generate higher tax revenue into perpetuity.
The virtues of the project hardly need to be stated. It's textbook good urbanism.
But the age-old enemy of every ambitious development project has reared its head: NIMBYism (Not In My Back Yard). The NIMBYs have forcefully made their case against the project in City Council meetings, street protests, and in the Enquirer. Now that council has approved rezoning the NIMBYs are even mobilizing to field a ballot initiative to kill the project.
I've read their objections and find them thoroughly unpersuasive.
More: Cincinnati council ignored Hyde Park. Your neighborhood could be next. | Opinion
They think the project's too tall. Really? Eighty-five feet is hardly a skyscraper.
They're concerned they weren't listened to in the planning process. But City Council did listen to them; they just decided (correctly) that they were wrong.
Some NIMBYs are opposed to the project because it doesn't include subsidized housing. But if opponents want more subsidized housing, they should go support subsidized projects, not obstruct good market-rate projects.
The Hyde Park NIMBYs say the same thing NIMBYs say everywhere. They're in favor of development, just not this development. They support housing, just not this housing. They support local businesses, just not these local businesses.
Notice a pattern? NIMBYs who approve of development in general but never in particular are standing athwart progress yelling "Stop!" They're also standing athwart housing costs yelling "Higher!"
The opponents of the Hyde Park Square project need to be honest with themselves. This is a perfectly reasonable development, and their opposition to it amounts to supporting stasis and decay.
More: We walk Hyde Park Square every day, and we know how badly this project is needed | Opinion
There is one concern I share with some of this project's skeptics. That is the aesthetic quality.
Hyde Park Square is one of our city's better public spaces. That is why so many people are understandably concerned about changing it. It's natural to want to steward beautiful things. If a project wants to contribute to Hyde Park Square rather than detract from it, the project should be a pleasing aesthetic addition.
The bar isn't that high. Hyde Park is far from perfect. It contains one of the city's rather lesser examples of Art Deco. The eclectic mix of architectural styles has its weaker points. Somebody's already built a bland, single-tone brick apartment complex on the east end, one of those with the tiny jutting balconies that look like they were stuck on as a hasty afterthought.
The new project must rise above that. It must be pleasing to look at. Beautiful buildings on the scale that are planned can be a centerpiece for the Square. They can concentrate the gaze and enliven the experience of walking or eating, or simply sitting anywhere in Hyde Park Square.
While it is possible to create a beautiful building in a modern style, the developers should look to Cincinnati's rich architectural past if they want to greatly increase their chances of success. It will be much better if whatever they build recalls Over-the-Rhine row houses or Concert Hall, or the Richardson Romanesque of the San Marco building and City Hall, or the classical facades of the early 20th century mid-rises downtown, literally anything other than the bland, placeless 5-over-1 style that gets thrown up everywhere these days.
More: Proposed redevelopment of Hyde Park Square would damage beauty of neighborhood | Opinion
If they can do that, if they can both increase the amenities of the neighborhood as well as the beauty of Hyde Park Square, then the project's developers will win over many of their critics, who, once the dust settles, will concede it looks great, is good for the neighborhood, and move on with their lives.
But if they don't, if they announce they're planning something that looks like one of the more slapdash student housing projects that have sprung up around the University of Cincinnati recently (I'm looking at you Central Parkway and McMillan at Auburn!) then I'd be happy to join the NIMBYs at the barricade.
Let's hope it doesn't come to that.
Christopher Wood is a neurologist who lives in Clifton.
This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: The future of Hyde Park Square shouldn't be held hostage | Opinion
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Muscatine voters, candidates, prepare for upcoming November election
Voters in Muscatine will elect a mayor and three city council members during the municipal election on Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2025. Seats on the ballot include: Mayor (two-year term), Second Ward Council Member (four-year term), Fourth Ward Council Member (four-year term), and one At-Large Council Member (four-year term). Nomination petitions are available from the Muscatine County Auditor's Office or the Iowa Secretary of State's website. The filing period opens Aug. 25, 2025, and closes at 5 p.m. Sept. 18, 2025. Each candidate must collect at least 25 signatures from eligible voters—Ward seats require signatures from residents of that Ward, while citywide seats require signatures from residents across Muscatine. City council members must be residents of the City of Muscatine and shall maintain his or her primary residence in the Ward they are elected to represent at the time a petition for election is filed, at the time of election, and continuing throughout the term of office. The following information is available for eligible residents who would like to be on the ballot for one of the four offices: ·Nominating petitions and affidavits are available from the Muscatine County Auditor's office or the Iowa Secretary of State website. The first day to file nomination papers is Monday, Aug. 25, 2025, with the deadline to file nomination papers at 5 p.m. on Thursday, Sept. 18, 2025. Nominations can only be filed at the Muscatine County Auditor's office. A minimum of 25 signatures of eligible electors is required per office. For Ward specific positions, signers must reside in the appropriate Ward. For the At-Large position and for mayor the signers must be city-wide residents. Click on Election Information to visit the City of Muscatine website and learn more about the City of Muscatine election process, or to view the Precinct and Ward map for the City of Muscatine. Additionally you can click on Auditor's Office to visit the Muscatine County website where you can also find links to register to vote, learn how to apply for an absentee ballot, or to review past election results. You can also click on this link (Elections and Voting) to visit the Iowa Secretary of State website for more information. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mayor Adams vetoes bills boosting NYC grocery delivery worker wages after lobbying by Amazon, Instacart
Mayor Adams vetoed two City Council bills late Wednesday that would boost minimum wages for grocery delivery workers to more than $20 an hour — a move that came after his top aide, Randy Mastro, launched an internal advocacy effort against the measures, according to sources familiar with the matter. The mayor, whose own Department of Consumer and Worker Protection commissioner lauded the bills as recently as late last year, had until midnight Wednesday to veto the measures or they would have lapsed into law. With just over six hours to go until the deadline, Adams announced he had used his veto pen to block both bills, arguing they would result in higher grocery prices — an issue that has become a big focus on this year's mayoral campaign trail. In a statement, Adams argued the increased wage requirements would result in grocery delivery companies jacking up prices on their customers, which he said includes seniors, people with disabilities and SNAP beneficiaries. 'Grocery prices are already too high, so now is not the right time to do anything to drive these prices even higher. Unfortunately, Intro. 1135-A and Intro. 1133-A would do just that at a time when too many working-class New Yorkers are struggling,' the mayor's statement said, using the index numbers for the measures. Sources familiar with the matter, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told the Daily News that Adams has in recent weeks been advised by Mastro, his first deputy mayor, to use his veto pen to block the bills. The sources said Diane Savino, a senior adviser to Adams at City Hall, has also been involved in the talks with Mastro and the mayor. The internal convos came after Amazon and Instacart, two major grocery delivery companies, launched an aggressive lobbying campaign urging Adams to block the bills. Targeting officials in Adams' office and at the Department of Consumer and Worker Protection, Amazon and Instacart have made the same argument that the measures would result in higher grocery prices for their customers and also warned of potential layoffs of delivery workers. 'We thank Mayor Adams for recognizing this reality,' Tom McNeil, Instacart's senior government affairs manager, said after his vetoes. Council Democrats passed the two bills with veto-proof majorities, meaning they could move to override the mayor's attempt to block them. Julia Agos, a spokeswoman for Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, said after the vetoes that the chamber's Dems are 'considering our next steps' and 'will always stand up for workers in our city.' Agos also accused the mayor of 'parroting inaccurate talking points' about increased grocery costs. Supporters of the bills have argued third-party delivery platforms would face increased costs, not grocery stores. 'This veto demonstrates that the mayor's claims to care about working-class New Yorkers and a sustainable delivery industry for New York City are hollow, because he is undermining the workers who make the sector possible,' Agos said. 'Without fair wages and protections for delivery workers, there is no sustainable industry, just exploitation.' One of the two bills, Introduction 1135, would over time require third-party companies like Instacart to pay grocery delivery workers a minimum wage of $21.44. That level matches the minimum wage the city set for restaurant delivery workers earlier this year — a reform that the mayor supported. The second bill, Introduction 1133, would ensure that any companies with 'contracted' workers performing delivery services are protected by the same wage requirements. The 1133 bill was specifically designed to ensure Amazon would be covered by the new wage rules. Amazon owns WholeFoods, the grocery store chain, so their delivery workers could be defined as closer than third-parties, leading the Council to enact the second bill to plug any potential loophole. The vetoes come after a December 2024 Council hearing, in which Adams' Department of Consumer and Worker Protection Commissioner Vilda Vera Mayuga, whose agency oversees wage laws for delivery employees, said she wanted to 'enthusiastically commend' the Council for advancing the bills. 'There are many more New York City delivery workers in need of DCWP protections,' she testified. Adams spokesman Zachary Nosanchuk said the administration's views have changed since the December testimony as grocery prices have continued to increase. Grocery prices, and cost-of-living concerns more broadly, have been hotly debated during this year's mayoral race. Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic mayoral nominee who's polling as the favorite to replace Adams, has vowed to if elected open city government-run grocery stores to try to bring down costs of essentials. In a press conference before the mayor's vetoes, Mamdani said he hoped he wouln't try to block the bills. 'I think it goes against what so many New Yorkers are calling for, which is a wage they can actually live off of,' he told reporters. To date, the Council has overridden Adams three times on legislative vetoes, including when he tried to block a bill placing new transparency requirements on NYPD officers. The Council is gearing up to override yet another veto Adams issued earlier this month to kill a bill decriminalizing unlicensed street vending. Mastro's involvement in pushing the mayor to veto the grocery delivery bills comes as he has become known at City Hall for his aggressive management style. Since becoming Adams' top deputy this spring, Mastro has pushed to reverse several Adams administration initiatives, including a plan to build affordable housing in Manhattan's Elizabeth Street Garden as well as a new composting fine structure on landlords. (With assistance by Josephine Stratman.)
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Concerned Regina citizens host open mic on homeless encampment strategy at city hall
People gathered in front of Regina City hall Wednesday to discuss solutions to homelessness and strategies around encampments to take to council later this month. A group of concerned Regina citizens hosted the open-mic "lunch n learn" at the city hall courtyard, following up on city council tabling its citizen's encampment strategy. The gathering was also intended to raise awareness for an upcoming encampment strategy vote. Tanya Fleury, who is currently staying at a homeless shelter in Regina, spoke at the gathering. She said there's not enough space for everyone and the city needs to spend its funds differently. "We don't need another pool, we need to put some people that live on the streets in a place that treats them like humans, because that's what we are. We're human." In flyers passed out at the event, the group advocated for a commitment to not removing an encampment unless all of its residents have been provided with permanent, adequate, appropriate housing. They also said support should be provided to encampments until residents have somewhere permanent to stay. That includes bathrooms with handwashing capability, potable water, garbage disposal and collection, and access to public transportation. "Hearing the voices of residents is important in all of our decision making," said Ward 8 Coun. Shanon Zachidniak, who also spoke at the event. "An event like this, where folks come out and they give their ideas for changes they would like to see, is really important. I'd like to see more of these kinds of events. This is democracy in action." The group is also seeking to repeal laws and policies that criminalize homelessness in the city, including prohibition from being in parks late at night and erecting tents in public spaces without permits. Mandla Mthembu, one of the organizers of the gathering, said that it was a chance for people to be heard. "We just think there needs to be a co-ordinated strategy to meet those needs and involve the voices of the people that are living in these conditions, or else we're gonna keep pushing it off year after year," Mthembu said. "These strategies aren't going to do anything but make a lot of people feel like we're doing something, but leave people who are actually experiencing this out of the conversation." The City's executive committee will meet to discuss the encampment strategy on August 20, and will vote on it at the city council meeting on August 27.
