logo
Gov. Dunleavy vetoes bipartisan education bill as lawmakers say override possible

Gov. Dunleavy vetoes bipartisan education bill as lawmakers say override possible

Yahoo19-05-2025

May 19—Gov. Mike Dunleavy on Monday vetoed a bipartisan education package in a step against permanently increasing the education budget, which has largely stagnated during his tenure.
Lawmakers convened earlier this year under a shared commitment to significantly increase the education budget for the first time in nearly a decade. Dunleavy also said he would support an increase to education spending, but stipulated his support on the passage of policy demands that lawmakers said were untenable.
Educators have said that Alaska's public education system is in crisis due to years of virtually flat funding. Multiple school districts had planned steep cuts to programs, staff and more. But the Anchorage School District recently reversed many of those cuts on the assumption a funding boost would be approved this year.
Dunleavy already vetoed one education bill passed by lawmakers earlier this year. Legislators returned to the drawing table and passed House Bill 57, which would raise the $5,960 Base Student Allocation — the state's per-student funding formula — by $700. That would translate to a roughly $180 million increase to the state's $1.2 billion education budget.
The sweeping measure also has policies intended to improve student outcomes, including by limiting cellphone use in schools and creating a new task force to study some of Dunleavy's policy demands.
Lawmakers and the governor last year agreed to a one-time increase in the education budget by an amount equivalent to a $680 BSA increase. The year before that, lawmakers also approved a one-time $680 increase, half of which was vetoed by the governor.
"There is no evidence that a permanent increase in the Base Student Allocation will improve educational outcomes. Therefore, this bill in its current form does not serve the best interest of Alaskans," Dunleavy wrote in a letter delivered to the House and Senate on Monday afternoon.
Lawmakers and education advocates have countered that an increase in education funding would allow districts to retain qualified and experienced teachers, and keep class sizes smaller — policies they say correlate to improved educational outcomes.
House Bill 57 passed the Legislature on April 30 in a combined 48-11 vote. Opposition came from Republican lawmakers in minority caucuses.
Since then, Dunleavy told school superintendents that he would veto the measure unless his preferred education policies were approved by the Legislature. Superintendents said Dunleavy also told them he was prepared to veto a school funding increase from the budget.
House Minority Leader Mia Costello, an Anchorage Republican, on Monday declined to comment about the veto. But majority members say that the Legislature may be able to muster the 40 votes needed to override the governor.
Legislators have thrice failed to override Dunleavy's vetoes of education funding.
Rep. Justin Ruffridge, a Soldotna Republican, said Monday that over the past several days, he and other House members had spoken to members of Dunleavy's staff about the education bill in an effort to find common ground that would stave off a veto. But majority lawmakers also said they were not willing to consider Dunleavy's policy demands.
"The message is: We have to find a way to get wins, and I think going to war with both each other and our school system isn't a good plan," said Ruffridge.
Dunleavy's policy demands include a provision to allow students across the state to enroll in the public school of their choice, regardless of where they live. Legislators have said that the open enrollment plan Dunleavy is seeking has been described as unworkable by educators.
Lawmakers are planning to hold a veto override session on Tuesday. The regular legislative session must end by midnight on Wednesday.
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Protesters rally against ICE for second day in Los Angeles
Protesters rally against ICE for second day in Los Angeles

CNBC

time17 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Protesters rally against ICE for second day in Los Angeles

Federal agents in Los Angeles on Saturday faced off against demonstrators protesting immigration raids following Friday's protests that senior White House aide Stephen Miller condemned as an "insurrection" against the United States. The security agents on Saturday engaged in a tense confrontation with protesters in the Paramount area in southeast Los Angeles, where one demonstrator was seen waving a Mexican flag and some covered their mouths with respiratory masks. A live video feed showed dozens of green-uniformed security personnel with gas masks lined up on a road strewn with overturned shopping carts as small canisters exploded into gas clouds. A first round of protests kicked off on Friday night after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents conductedenforcement operationsin the city and arrested at least 44 people on alleged immigration violations. The Department of Homeland Security said in a statement that "1,000 rioters surrounded a federal law enforcement building and assaulted ICE law enforcement officers, slashed tires, defaced buildings, and taxpayer funded property." Reuters was unable to verify DHS's accounts. Miller, an immigration hardliner and the White House deputy chief of staff, wrote on X that Friday's demonstrations were "an insurrection against the laws and sovereignty of the United States." The protests pit Democratic-run Los Angeles, where census data suggests a significant portion of the population is Hispanic and foreign-born, against Trump's Republican White House, which has made cracking down on immigration a hallmark of his second term. Trump has pledged to deport record numbers of people in the country illegally and lock down the U.S.-Mexico border, with the White House setting a goal for ICE to arrest at least 3,000 migrants per day. But the sweeping immigration crackdown has also included people legally residing in the country, including some with permanent residence, and has led to legal challenges. In a statement on Saturday about the protests in Paramount, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Office said: "It appeared that federal law enforcement officers were in the area, and that members of the public were gathering to protest." ICE, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Los Angeles Police Department did not respond to a request for information about the protests or potential immigration sweeps on Saturday. Television news footage earlier on Friday showed unmarked vehicles resembling military transport and vans loaded with uniformed federal agents streaming through Los Angeles streets as part of the immigration enforcement operation. The Democratic mayor of Los Angeles, Karen Bass, in a statement condemned the immigration raids. "I am deeply angered by what has taken place," Bass said. "These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city. We will not stand for this." The LAPD did not take part in the immigration enforcement. It was deployed to quell civil unrest after crowds protesting the deportation raids spray-painted anti-ICE slogans on the walls of a federal court building and gathered outside a nearby jail where some of the detainees were reportedly being held. In a statement, DHS criticized Democratic politicians including Mayor Bass, saying their anti-ICE rhetoric was contributing to violence against immigration agents. "From comparisons to the modern-day Nazi gestapo to glorifying rioters, the violent rhetoric of these sanctuary politicians is beyond the pale. This violence against ICE must end," said Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. FBI deputy director Dan Bongino posted on X that they were reviewing evidence from the protests. "We are working with the U.S. Attorney's Office to ensure the perpetrators are brought to justice," Bongino said.

Ted Cruz was with president when Musk's barrage of attacks started: ‘Trump was pissed'
Ted Cruz was with president when Musk's barrage of attacks started: ‘Trump was pissed'

New York Post

time23 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Ted Cruz was with president when Musk's barrage of attacks started: ‘Trump was pissed'

Sen. Ted Cruz was with a fuming President Trump as Elon Musk viciously attacked his former ally online Thursday — with the Texas Republican saying the spat made him feel like he was a kid in the middle of a divorce. 'I was sitting in the Oval as this unfolded. Trump was pissed. He was venting,' the Republican senator revealed on his podcast 'Verdict with Ted Cruz' Friday. 'I was sitting there, and the tweets were coming…. Elon was saying some really harsh things.' The SpaceX and Tesla billionaire went on a multi-day social media offensive against Trump, panning the president's 'big, beautiful' reconciliation bill 'disgusting' and urging Congress to kill it. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk fumed after Trump spoke out about the simmering feud. Cruz, who's friends with both former bros, called their very public break-up this week 'incredibly painful.' 'These are two men whom I know very well, they're both good friends of mine,' he said. 3 President Trump and Tesla billionaire Elon Musk came to blows on social media this week, ending their bromance. AFP via Getty Images 'I feel like the kids of a bitter divorce where you're just saying, 'I really wish mommy and daddy would stop screaming.'' 3 Ted Cruz talked about the break-up this Friday on his podcast 'Verdict with Ted Cruz.' Verdict with Ted Cruz/Facebook Trump and Musk's tiff escalated later in the week — with Trump threatening to cancel billions of dollars in government contracts to Musk's companies and Musk claiming Trump was holding out on making the Jeffrey Epstein files public because he's in them. 3 Trump and Musk's tiff escalated later in the week. Getty Images 'It just went from zero to 11 instantaneously,' said Cruz. 'These are two alpha males who are pissed off. And unfortunately, they're unloading on each other … They're angry, it's not complicated.' Cruz and his co-host commented that they thought both men are right — Trump's big beautiful budget bill has to get passed but the government has to tackle the deficit more as Musk argued. 'Unfortunately, Elon is working under the assumption that Congress actually wants to do the job and save our country,' said podcast co-host Ben Ferguson. 'And I think Trump is working under the reality that there's a lot of people in Congress that actually aren't looking out for the American people.' Musk on Saturday deleted his post about the Epstein files in a sign he was ready to throw in the towel. But Trump made it clear he wasn't interested in kissing and making up anytime soon. 'I have no intention of speaking to him,' he told NBC News.

Trump threatens 'very serious consequences' if Elon Musk finances Republican challengers
Trump threatens 'very serious consequences' if Elon Musk finances Republican challengers

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Trump threatens 'very serious consequences' if Elon Musk finances Republican challengers

Trump threatens 'very serious consequences' if Elon Musk finances Republican challengers The threat culminated a week of clashes between Trump and Musk over federal policy. Show Caption Hide Caption Six takeaways from the President Donald Trump, Elon Musk feud From disappointment to threats, here are six takeaways from the public spat between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. Trump told NBC News there would be 'very serious consequences' if Musk financed challenges to Republicans who support his legislative priorities. Musk, who contributed nearly $300 million to help Republicans including Trump win the 2024 election, has harshly criticized the legislative package. President Donald Trump said his former adviser, billionaire Elon Musk, would face 'very serious consequences' if he financed candidates to challenge Republicans who support the president's legislative package for tax cuts and border security. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News on June 7. He declined to share what those would be. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that.' The rupture between the world's most powerful man and the world's richest man reaches far beyond their own relationship. Musk contributed nearly $300 million to help Republicans, including Trump, win the 2024 elections. He was a special White House adviser recommending ways to dismantle federal agencies and lay off workers. Trump thanked him repeatedly for his service and presented him with a gold key in the Oval Office on May 30. But in the week after, Musk harshly called the House-passed legislative package of Trump's top priorities a "disgusting abomination" and urged lawmakers to kill it, as the Senate debates the measure. In response, Trump has already threatened to cancel Musk's government subsidies for electric carmaker Tesla and contracts for rocket company SpaceX. Trump said he thought Musk turned on him because the legislation would end subsidies for electric vehicles and because Trump discarded Musk's choice to lead NASA. Musk replied by threatening to shut down the Dragon spacecraft program that helps the U.S. transport astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station. Trump has seemingly tried to temper his public comments about Musk, wishing his companies well. But he told reporters on Air Force One on June 6 that retaliation was possible. 'He's got a lot of money. He gets a lot of subsidy, so we'll take a look at that,' Trump said. 'Only if it's fair for him and for the country, I would certainly think about it. But it has to be fair.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store