
Trump said he wanted to protect ‘Dreamer' immigrants with DACA. Now, officials say they should self-deport
In response to questions about a recent case, in which DACA recipient Erick Hernandez accidentally drove across the U.S.-Mexico border from California in June without permission then was put in deportation proceedings, the Department of Homeland Security said it was encouraging Dreamers to self-deport.
"Illegal aliens who claim to be recipients of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) are not automatically protected from deportations," DHS assistant press secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement, encouraging Dreamers to accept the administration's $1,000 incentive to self-deport on a government-funded flight. "DACA does not confer any form of legal status in this country."
Valerie Sigamani, an attorney for Hernandez, expressed alarm at the apparent immigration policy shift.
'This administration assured DACA recipients that something should be done to cement their status in the United States,' she told NBC San Diego. 'It's unfortunate that this DHS would encourage DACA recipients to self-deport.'
Others argued the administration was not correctly applying the law regarding the DACA program, which was created in 2012 to protect immigrants who arrived illegally as children before 2007.
"The notion that it does not provide protection is simply false," Thomas A. Saenz, president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, told NPR, which first reported on the change in DACA priorities.
President Trump has vacillated for years over the fate of the Dreamers, a group for whom a majority of Americans support creating some form of lasting residency or citizenship. DACA recipients, who receive work permits, currently have to re-apply for their protections every two years.
During his first term, he tried to end the program, but the Supreme Court found in 2020 that the administration had not put forth an adequate justification to justify ending the initiative.
As Trump plotted his political comeback, advisor Stephen Miller, now White House deputy chief of staff, told reporters in 2023 the president would try again to end the program.
However, a year later, after winning the 2024 election, Trump seemed to flip again, telling NBC News that he wanted the Dreamers to stay in the country after all.
'They have great jobs,' he said on Meet The Press. 'In some cases, they have small businesses, some cases they might have large businesses. And we're going to have to do something with them.'
'I want to be able to work something out,' he added.
Now that Trump is back in the White House, that priority seems to have evaporated, and agencies have moved to further restrict DACA recipients' access to the federal health insurance marketplace, while investigating universities that offered financial aid to Dreamers.
Some immigrants with DACA have already chosen to self-deport, including Patricia Vázquez Topete, who came to the U.S. from Mexico at age 12, fleeing sexual abuse.
'I want people to understand that if we had a pathway, so many of us would have taken advantage of it,' said Topete, who left the U.S. in May, speaking with The Fresno Bee. 'We looked at the options, we are proactive, and we remain undocumented because there's still not an option.' '
The fate of DACA not the first time the president has wavered over the status of a sensitive category of immigrants.
In June, the president conceded his mass deportation agenda was hurting the U.S. farm labor and hospitality labor force and reportedly planned a pause in enforcement against these sites while seeking some kind of reprieve, though immigration officials disagreed, and by July the president was saying there was no ' amnesty ' planned.
'We've got to give the farmers the people they need, but we're not talking amnesty,' Trump said earlier this month.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump says Republicans are ‘entitled' to five more congressional seats in Texas
Donald Trump said on Tuesday that Republicans are entitled to the five more seats they could pick up if congressional maps proposed by Texas Republicans are passed. Trump called in for an interview with CNBC Tuesday morning, less than a day after Texas Democrats denied a legislative quorum by fleeing the state, with many decamping to Chicago, Illinois where the Democratic governor, JB Pritzker, has vowed to protect them. 'We have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats,' Trump said. 'We have a really good governor, and we have good people in Texas. And I won Texas. I got the highest vote in the history of Texas, as you probably know, and we are entitled to five more seats.' 'In Illinois, what's happened is terrible what they're doing,' the president added. 'And you notice, they go to Illinois for safety, but that's all gerrymandered. California is gerrymandered. We should have many more seats in Congress in California. It's all gerrymandered.' Trump did not provide any evidence of gerrymandering in the Democratic-controlled states. California voters approved an independent redistricting commission to draw the state's congressional maps for the first time in 2010, but the Democratic governor Gavin Newsom has indicated he will play hardball and call a special election to undo that commission so that California Democrats can gerrymander the state maps ahead of the 2026 midterms as well. Pritzker in Illinois has also said that the state may respond to Texas's efforts by redrawing its own map in Democrats' favor, given that 'everything has to be on the table'. 'Trump came up with a new scheme to rig the system by ramming through a corrupt, mid-decade redistricting plan that would steal five congressional seats, silencing millions of voters, especially Black and Latino voters,' Pritzker said. The Texas house is scheduled to reconvene at 1pm local time on Tuesday, but enough Democrats remain outside the state to deny quorum for a second day. Democratic Representative Lulu Flores told CNN that she and several other Democratic members who traveled to Illinois 'plan to stay as long as it takes' to stall the Republicans' redistricting plans. The current special legislative session, called by Texas's Republican governor Greg Abbott, lasts until 19 August. 'That's the very least time that we expect to be out here,' Flores added. Abbott could continue to call additional special sessions, and it's not clear how long Democrats could stay outside the state. Each lawmaker that has absconded faces a $500 for day fine, and Abbott has ordered the Texas department of public safety to 'locate, arrest and return to the House chamber any member who has abandoned their duty to Texans'. Flores told CNN that the legal threats were 'upsetting', but she added: 'I don't know that he has anything to back that up.'


Reuters
33 minutes ago
- Reuters
Zelenskiy says he discussed Russia sanctions, drone deal with Trump
KYIV, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Tuesday that he spoke with his U.S. counterpart Donald Trump in a conversation that covered sanctions on Russia and the finalisation of a U.S.-Ukraine drone deal. "The draft agreement on drones has already been prepared by the Ukrainian side, we are ready to discuss it in detail and conclude it," he wrote on X.


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Some travelers to the US will have to pay $15,000 bonds for visa - money they could lose if they overstay
The State Department announced Monday that some travelers to the U.S. will have to pay $15,000 bonds for a visa, money they could lose if they overstay their allotted time. The Trump administration claimed to be addressing what it referred to as 'a clear national security threat.' The State Department was planning on testing a similar program towards the end of the first Trump administration, but didn't act on it as foreign travel came to a stop amid the Covid-19 pandemic, The New York Times noted. Those coming from countries with high visa overstay rates looking to enter the U.S on a tourist or business visa would be expected to pay a bond of at least $5,000, the department added. Those who don't leave on time forfeit the funds, while those complying with their visas will get the money back. The public notice, which is set to go into effect on August 20, was issued by the State Department and didn't state which countries would be affected. It did say that it would be based on visa overstay data collected and shared by the Department of Homeland Security. 'The applicant on any canceled bond will be entitled to a full refund. There will be no accrued interest on visa bonds that are issued and canceled as part of this pilot program,' the notice said. This comes as the Trump administration continues its broad crackdown on illegal immigration after President Donald Trump promised mass deportations during the 2024 campaign. As the new rule was announced, a notice in the Federal Register said it was 'a key pillar of the Trump administration's foreign policy to protect the United States from the clear national security threat posed by visa overstays and deficient screening and vetting.' Pointing to data collected by DHS in 2023, the notice stated that more than half a million people coming into the U.S. via air and sea ports of entry most likely overstayed their visas. Visitors required to pay the bonds would have to arrive and depart from the U.S. via airports selected to be a part of the program. The State Department said it would make the revelation 15 days before the bonds were enacted. The notice also said that the year-long pilot program would also apply to foreigners from countries where 'screening and vetting information is deemed deficient.' It would also apply to those granted citizenship based on pledged investments or those without a residency requirement. The consular officers granting the visas will be able to decide the amount of the bond, the notice said. It added that the program is intended to test the State Department's previous belief that bond payments are 'too cumbersome to be practical.' While consular officers already have the power to put in place bond requirements on those applying for visas, the notice stated that the State Department's official Foreign Affairs Manual said that 'such bonds will rarely, if ever, be used.' It said that the practical considerations were 'untested.'