EuroLeague CEO says NBA's plans of forming new European league 'would create confusion'
'We'd be an independent league, what we're contemplating operating in Europe, but the fact that we would be creating new basketball teams in Europe is related [to NBA expansion],' Silver said. 'It's separate but related to this notion around building additional organizations in the league.'
This would be a direct competition to the existing EuroLeague, and its CEO, Paulius Motiejunas, spoke to Mike Vorkunov of The Athletic, saying a new league would create more confusion than anything else.
"[The NBA has] a really strong image. They can help with TV deals. They can help with sponsorship. We can grow the pie bigger if we go and work together. This is always the same message... But we have a huge fan base. We have 25 years of history. This is what we said to them. Why not sit down and see how we go and make decisions together, rather than just creating a new league and for them to start over?...
'This new league would create confusion. It would create division and on simple terms, you go to the sponsor, and you say, 'I'm now this new, you know, NBA League.' And then we go, 'Well, we are EuroLeague.''
The EuroLeague is set up differently from, for example, soccer's Champions League, where teams have to earn the right to play in it annually. There are 11 'A-license' clubs that are part owners and managers of the EuroLeague and whose teams are automatically in the tournament every year. Those teams include powerhouses Barcelona, CSKA Moscow, Maccabi Tel Aviv, Olympiacos Piraeus, and Real Madrid.
The NBA is a couple of years out from starting a league on the continent, but its broad strokes idea is to poach a handful of those A-license clubs as well as forming a couple of new ones — in locations such as Manchester, England — plus having the opportunity for some teams to play their way into the competition. The NBA, with reason, believes its marketing arm and brand power can have this league making money that the existing EuroLeague system leaves on the table.
The NBA and EuroLeague working together is not totally out of the question, but the NBA is working closely with the international basketball governing body FIBA, which has a history of tension with the existing EuroLeague.
Silver and the NBA are not going to slow their European plans down — again, there is a reason Silver kept bringing that up while talking about the current NBA owners pumping the brakes on expansion stateside. There seems to be a real taste for a European league from NBA owners, who have long understood that the biggest growth in the association and their franchise values was going to come from international growth.
If that means competing with the EuroLeague, NBA owners are not going to back away from it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kaylee McKeown tops rival Regan Smith for another major title at swimming worlds
Australia's Kaylee McKeown edged American Regan Smith to win gold in the women's 100-meter backstroke final Tuesday at the swimming world championships in Singapore, a blistering-fast edition of the rivalry between two of the best in the sport. McKeown won in 57.16 seconds, just missing the world record, with Smith just behind in 57.35 for silver. Both were among the top five times in the event's history. American Katharine Berkoff took bronze in 58.15. Smith was a fraction ahead at the 50-meter mark, but McKeown passed her in those final meters for her second world title in the event. It's the fourth time in four tries that McKeown has outpaced Smith in the event at either the Olympics or world championships. Smith also took silver behind McKeown at the Paris Olympics and the 2023 worlds and earned bronze in the Tokyo Olympics behind McKeown and Canada's Kylie Masse. Smith won gold at the 2022 worlds, which McKeown did not compete in. Smith's time was her third-best ever and is now the fifth best in the event's history. However, one of those four superior times was McKeown's in the lane next to her on Tuesday. 'What more can you do? I have no control over how fast Kaylee swims,' Smith said in an interview on Peacock. 'I'm going to choose not to be frustrated — 57.35 is pretty fantastic.' Though McKeown has owned the biggest meets, the rivalry is still one of the best in swimming. Smith is the current world-record holder, setting the mark of 57.12 at last year's U.S. Olympic trials. She also set the Olympic record of 57.28 in Paris — the event's second-best time ever before Tuesday — but it came in the women's medley relay, in which the U.S. beat McKeown's Australian squad for gold. In the individual 100-meter final, McKeown beat Smith 57.33 to 57.66. McKeown now has five world championship golds and 13 overall medals. This article originally appeared in The Athletic. Olympics, Global Sports, Women's Olympics 2025 The Athletic Media Company
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Andurand Pulls Back From Cocoa Misadventure After ‘Extreme' Volatility Drives Losses
(Bloomberg) -- Famed oil trader Pierre Andurand has pulled back from a bullish bet on cocoa after a series of mistimed trades led to deep losses, according to a letter sent to investors that was seen by Bloomberg. The World's Data Center Capital Has Residents Surrounded An Abandoned Art-Deco Landmark in Buffalo Awaits Revival We Should All Be Biking Along the Beach San Francisco in Talks With Vanderbilt for Downtown Campus Seeking Relief From Heat and Smog, Cities Follow the Wind The gyrations underscore the risk for fund managers that drift away from their core expertise into other markets that carry unfamiliar risks. Andurand, whose main fund was down over 57% through the end of June, began trading cocoa in early 2024 after more than a decade focused primarily on oil. 'Recent performance has been very disappointing,' the recent letter to investors said. 'Pierre Andurand has further reduced long cocoa exposure in all Andurand funds.' A spokesperson for Andurand declined to comment. Andurand's ill-fated foray into cocoa began in January 2024, when an analyst from his firm approached him and proposed a new trade. 'Pierre, you should look at cocoa,' the analyst said, according to a retelling by Andurand on the Odd Lots podcast in May last year. 'Okay, I don't know anything about it, tell me,' Andurand replied. Until that point, Andurand was primarily known for trading energy. He found initial success buying and selling oil at commodities trading house Vitol Group, before leaving to start hedge fund BlueGold Capital Management in 2008 with the firm's former head of trading Dennis Crema. Their new venture returned over 200% in its first year thanks to lucrative bets on the price of oil. BlueGold lasted only a few years, suffering steep losses and returning money to its investors in 2012. Andurand launched his eponymous firm the following year, making bets on oil that drove double-digit gains in its early years. Andurand branched out from oil to invest in other commodities, including metals. His firm also made profitable bets in recent years on a sharp rise in the price of European carbon allowances. Cocoa Strategy The cocoa-trading strategy suggested by the analyst at Andurand's firm was a basic story of a mismatch in supply and demand. A majority of the commodity is grown in just two countries, the Ivory Coast and Ghana. Supplies there looked set to decline for a variety of reasons, such as adverse weather conditions and a fungal disease called Black Pod. Any supply scarcity could have an outsized impact on cocoa futures, because typically demand for chocolate doesn't respond much to shifts in the price of the raw commodity, Andurand said. Chocolate consumption keeps rising 'when you have a recession or not, when prices go up a lot or not,' he said on Odd Lots. Initially, the analyst's assessment of the market proved to be correct. By the end of February 2024, cocoa futures were already up some 50% for the year. Andurand's firm initiated a small position in cocoa the following month, according to a letter sent to investors. By the end of 2024, bets on cocoa helped drive a 50% gain in his flagship Andurand Commodities Discretionary Enhanced Fund. Those profits were short-lived. The fund dropped some 17% in January 2025 and nearly 25% in February, with losses driven by falling cocoa prices due to worries about demand, according to information sent to investors. The less volatile Andurand Commodities Fund is also down 26% through June. In April, Andurand increased the fund's bullish cocoa position in expectation that figures on bean processing set to be published later that month would drive up prices. The prediction proved to be correct, but the trading strategy nevertheless foundered amid the chaos caused by Trump's so-called Liberation Day tariff announcement on April 2. As the US president launched his trade war, Andurand took a short position on the S&P 500 as a hedge against the risk that tariffs posed to the price of commodities. At first it worked, as stocks fell and cocoa rose, but the trend was quickly reversed when Trump announced a 90-day tariff pause. Amid the volatility, Andurand sought to stem losses by unwinding both positions. The bullish cocoa-bean processing data was eventually confirmed, but Andurand's fund missed out on the subsequent price rally and his fund slumped some 18% in April. 'In hindsight, if we had maintained the same positions throughout the month and not traded following Trump's various announcements, the funds could have generated positive performance,' Andurand explained to investors in a letter. 'At the time it was extremely difficult not to react to Trump's tariff announcement.' With Andurand's prediction of bullish cocoa-processing data vindicated, he put his bullish bet back on. 'Our top conviction today is that we will see higher cocoa prices,' according to the letter sent to investors that detailed April's performance. 'The majority of our risk remains in cocoa given our fundamentally bullish view.' While cocoa prices did rise again in May, they slumped in June and July, often with huge intraday swings, as a slowdown in demand from Europe's cocoa factories deepened. Unfamiliar Market Some of Andurand's losses may stem from fundamental differences in the market for cocoa and the much larger oil trade. Cocoa is a relatively small market, so if you make a big bet and the market moves against you there may not be enough buyers to shrink your exposure without drastically reducing prices, said Ole Gjolberg, a professor at the School of Economics and Business at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences. 'Cocoa is not like the markets that Andurand has been in before, like oil and gas and metals. So that's also part of the risk picture,' said Gjolberg, who teaches about hedging and speculation in commodities. 'If you're going in big you can be stuck with your positions.' It appears that Andurand has come to the same conclusion — even if his thesis is correct that there's a fundamental mismatch between the supply and demand of cocoa, that doesn't make it a profitable trade. 'We still believe in the constructive cocoa story,' a recent letter to investors said. 'But the price action and volatility has been too extreme.' --With assistance from Mumbi Gitau. How Podcast-Obsessed Tech Investors Made a New Media Industry Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Russia Builds a New Web Around Kremlin's Handpicked Super App Cage-Free Eggs Are Booming in the US, Despite Cost and Trump's Efforts ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How to avoid expensive airport ‘kiss and fly' charges
If you're giving someone a lift to the airport this summer, watch out for 'kiss and fly' fees – the charges airports impose for dropping passengers near the terminal. More than half of UK airports have increased these fees since last July, with some now demanding as much as £7 for a 10-minute stop, according to research by the RAC. Fortunately, there are ways to avoid these charges, or at least keep them to a minimum – but you may need to be prepared to walk a little further with their luggage. Here, Telegraph Money explains how kiss and fly fees work, why they have been introduced and what you can do to keep costs down. What are 'kiss and fly' fees? Why have so many airports introduced kiss and fly fees? Who pays kiss and fly fees and how much do they cost? How can you avoid kiss and fly fees? What are 'kiss and fly' fees? 'Kiss and fly' fees refer to the charges that airports apply when someone drops off a passenger outside the terminal, typically in a designated short-stay or drop-off zone. In most cases, you'll be charged a flat fee simply for stopping outside the airport for five to 10 minutes. Stay longer, and you'll likely be charged even more. On top of this, many airports are now switching to a barrier-less drop-off and pick-up system to help traffic flow more freely and reduce waiting times. However, this means that instead of paying there and then, drivers must remember to pay for parking either online or by phone once they are home. Failing to do so could result in penalty fees of up to £100. Why have so many airports introduced kiss and fly fees? One of the reasons airports say they have introduced these fees is to reduce congestion at terminal entrances. However, the charges also serve as a significant source of revenue, helping airports to cover rising operational costs. Patrick Bettle, from the aviation team at law firm Burges Salmon, said: 'Ultimately airports are businesses like any other. 'Kiss and fly' fees provide them with another valuable revenue stream, something that has become increasingly important in the wake of the disruption caused to the travel industry by the Covid-19 pandemic. 'Airports, particularly those that are subject to economic regulation by the Civil Aviation Authority, are limited in the amount of revenue they can generate through things like landing charges; 'kiss and fly' fees provide a useful non-aeronautical supplement to that.' But the disappearance of free drop-offs at UK airports is in sharp contrast to other major European airports, says the RAC analysis. Of the top 10 airports in the EU by passenger numbers, eight airports still permit free drop-offs, including Paris Charles de Gaulle, Madrid, Frankfurt, Barcelona and Rome. Who pays kiss and fly fees and how much do they cost? Kiss and fly fees must be paid by anyone dropping off a passenger outside the airport terminal. This includes friends and family members, as well as taxi and private hire drivers. Taxi drivers often incorporate the fee into the overall taxi fare but be sure to check. Drop-off charges can range anywhere from £3 to £7 for a five-to-30-minute stay. The table below outlines how these fees can vary, depending on the airport. Note that if you exceed the time allowed, you'll often be charged extra for each minute you stay. You'll also need to check how and when the payments need to be made – whether that's on-site or within 24 hours online or by phone. Missing this deadline could result in penalty charges. For drivers carrying out regular drop-offs, it may be worth setting up an auto pay account. How can you avoid kiss and fly fees? Some airports, including Heathrow, Edinburgh, Liverpool and Birmingham, waive drop-off fees altogether for Blue Badge holders. For everyone else, the best tip is to plan ahead, according to Nicholas Smith, holidays digital director at Thomas Cook online travel agency. He said: 'Ask someone to drop you off at a long-stay car park – many airports offer free or cheaper short-term access there – and then take the shuttle to the terminal.' Most airports outline their parking options on their websites. But if you're parking further away, remember to factor in the extra time it will take to get to the terminal – either by foot or shuttle bus. This won't always be practical for those with mobility issues, lots of luggage, or anyone rushing for their flight. Here are a number of free parking options available at some UK airports: London Heathrow: Free parking is available for up to 29 minutes in one of Heathrow's 'park and ride' car parks (previously called long stay parking). A free shuttle bus will transfer passengers to the terminal. London Gatwick: You can park for free in the long stay car park, provided your stay doesn't exceed two hours. The shuttle bus takes five to 10 minutes for the South Terminal and seven to 12 minutes for the North Terminal. London Stansted: There's a free drop-off or pick-up option at the mid stay car park for up to 60 minutes. The shuttle bus takes seven minutes to get to the terminal. Luton: You can park at Luton airport's mid stay car park for up to 15 minutes free of charge. It's then a 10-minute walk to the terminal or a five-minute shuttle bus ride. Alternatively, you can park for up to an hour free of charge at the long stay car park. From there, the free shuttle bus takes 10 minutes to get to the terminal. Birmingham: Instead of paying to drop-off at Birmingham airport's Premium Set Down area, you can park for free at the Drop-Off zone for up to 10 minutes. It's a five- to 10-minute walk to the terminal or there is a free bus service. Manchester: There's a free drop-off area which, according to the airport's website is clearly signposted from the M56, where passengers can take a six-minute shuttle bus ride to the terminal. Edinburgh: You can park in the long stay car park for 30 minutes free of charge. The walk to the terminal is 10 minutes. Cardiff: Free parking is available for the first 20 minutes in Car Park 2. It's a short walk to the terminal, or there is a special assistance vehicle for those with reduced mobility. Belfast International: You can park free of charge for up to 15 minutes in the long stay car park. There is a six-minute walk to the terminal. Although you may be tempted to park on a road just outside the airport, this is not advisable. As well as potentially being unsafe, many airports enforce no-stopping zones and have CCTV to catch those who don't follow the rules. Mr Smith added: 'If you really have to drop someone off at the terminal, do so as quickly as possible to avoid racking up per-minute costs.' Of course, you can avoid drop-off fees altogether by using public transport. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Solve the daily Crossword
