
HC acquits DRDO officer in rape case, citing major lapses in probe
1
2
Hyderabad: The Telangana high court has acquitted an administrative officer at DRDO, Shameerpet, who was previously convicted of rape and criminal intimidation.
A division bench, comprising Justices P Sam Koshy and N Tukaramji, overturned the special sessions court's Sept 2024 verdict, finding the prosecution's case riddled with inconsistencies and lacking credible evidence.
The allegations dated back to Jan 2017, when a minor girl accused the officer—a close friend of her divorced mother—of sexually assaulting her in her mother's absence. Based on her claims, he was convicted under IPC sections 376(2)(f)(n) (rape of a minor by a person in authority) and 506 (criminal intimidation) and sentenced to life imprisonment for impregnating the minor.
However, the high court found the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt.
The foetal sample submitted for forensic analysis was too decomposed for conclusive DNA testing. Further weakening the case, the officer produced a 2005 sterilisation certificate indicating he had undergone a vasectomy—casting serious doubt on his biological ability to father a child.
Medical documentation essential to corroborate the pregnancy and abortion claims, including ultrasound reports and compliance with the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, were notably absent.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Dermatologista recomenda: simples truque elimina o fungo facilmente
Acabe com o Fungo
Undo
The court also highlighted the victim's contradictory statements about her mother's whereabouts at the time of the alleged incident and the unexplained delay of seven days in filing the FIR.
Criticising the investigation as lackadaisical, the high court bench noted procedural lapses such as failure to examine the doctor who allegedly performed the abortion and poor handling of forensic evidence. The prosecution's reliance on uncorroborated circumstantial evidence, in violation of established legal standards (as per Sharad Birdhi Chand Sarda versus state of Maharashtra), was also condemned.
The bench emphasised that conviction cannot rest solely on the female prosecutor's inconsistent testimony without supporting evidence of 'sterling quality.' The court ordered Sharma's immediate release and called for urgent reforms in investigative procedures, including specialised training, independent supervision, and continuous professional development.
Justice Tukaramji, in a separate note, urged the formation of dedicated investigative teams for sensitive cases and the establishment of independent oversight bodies to ensure transparency, accountability, and public trust in the criminal justice system.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
44 minutes ago
- NDTV
Delhi High Court Allows Family Of Minor Sex Abuse Survivor To Close Case
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court quashed a Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act case after the survivor and her family requested the court to close the case as they were seeking a marriage prospect for the girl and now wish to move on. While quashing the case, the court has directed the accused to do community service for a month at Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Narayan Hospital, while also asking him to pay Rs 50,000 towards "Army Welfare Fund Battle Casualties". The court noted that ordinarily, allegations of this nature, particularly those involving the sexual harassment of a minor, would not merit quashing. The accused, along with another minor boy (recognised as child in conflict with the law), had blackmailed the minor girl with her private pictures, which she had shared with the accused during their relationship in school. The accused, who was her senior in school, had allegedly extorted money from the girl. It was alleged that after the accused shared her pictures with another schoolmate of hers, he (child in conflict with law) hacked her Instagram and uploaded her private pictures on her account. The court noted that the allegations against the accused are serious, involving the harassment of a minor girl through exploitation. "The facts narrated disclose a pattern emblematic of the darker undercurrents of the social media age, where technology is misused to exert control, induce fear, and compromise dignity. Considering this, at the outset, the Court was not inclined to quash the FIR in a perfunctory manner. However, after a detailed and careful interaction with the complainant and her mother, it emerged that they have consciously chosen to move on from the incident," the order read. The high court noted that the survivor's parents said that the complainant is currently exploring matrimonial prospects, and that the pendency of a criminal case may pose as a serious impediment to her future opportunities and personal relationships. "Her mother specifically submitted that ongoing criminal proceedings of this nature are likely to create social stigma and could undermine the family's efforts to secure a suitable match for the complainant," the order read. A bench of Justice Sanjeev Narula quashed the case, stating that, "It is true that while offences under Sections 354, 354C, 384 of the IPC and Section 12 of the POCSO Act are classified as non-compoundable, those under Sections 506 and 509 IPC are compoundable with the permission of the Court, being offences affecting an identifiable individual." "However, the law is equally cognizant of the victim's right to privacy, dignity, and closure. In appropriate cases, the Court, while exercising its inherent powers under Section 528 of the BNSS (earlier Section 482 CrPC), may quash proceedings involving non-compoundable offences where the parties have voluntarily and meaningfully settled the dispute, and where the continuation of the prosecution would serve no useful purpose and would instead prolong trauma," the order read. The FIR was registered for the offences under Sections 354, 354C, 506, 509, 384 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. A settlement deed was entered into between the parties, as per which the complainant voluntarily resolved all her disputes with the accused and agreed to give no-objection to the quashing of the FIR. It was recorded that she had neither received any monetary compensation from the accused, nor intended to claim any.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Who is Izz al-Din al-Haddad? Hamas' likely new chief after IDF eliminated Muhammad Sinwar
Izz al-Din al-Haddad is emerging as the key figure expected to lead Hamas after a series of deadly Israeli airstrikes wiped out almost all of the group's senior commanders, reports the Jerusalem Post. Among those killed was Muhammad Sinwar, the head of Hamas's military wing, who had taken over following the deaths of top leaders Yahya Sinwar and Muhammad Deif in 2024. Al-Haddad is a longtime member of Hamas's Military Council, and now appears to be the most senior commander left from the group's pre-war Gaza leadership. Senior role in Hamas military leadership According to the European Council on Foreign Relations, al-Haddad has long been a member of Hamas's Military Council. He has led the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades in Gaza City since 2021 and, as of November 2023, also commanded Hamas's northern Gaza brigade. Al-Haddad is now believed to be the last surviving member of the five original brigade commanders in Gaza, The Jerusalem Post has reported, making him the most senior figure left to oversee Hamas's military operations. Sinwar's killing in Khan Younis The Israeli defence forces confirmed that Muhammad Sinwar was killed in a May 13 airstrike carried out on the grounds of the European Hospital in Khan Younis. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar The operation also killed Muhammad Shabana, commander of Hamas's Rafah Brigade, and Mahdi Quara, who led the South Khan Younis Battalion. The IDF said more than 50 precision munitions were fired within 30 seconds during the attack, hitting an underground Hamas command centre without damaging the hospital above. Sinwar had taken charge of Hamas's military wing after the assassination of Muhammad Deif in July 2024. He was described by Israeli officials as 'among the most senior and long-serving members of Hamas's military wing,' and had been a key figure in the planning of the October 7, 2023, attacks. Al-Haddad's growing influence The Times reported that al-Haddad was involved in the planning of the October 7 assault on Israel, distributing written instructions to commanders the night before the operation. He also played a key role in handling hostages and infrastructure during ceasefires, reportedly overseeing both civilian and military rebuilding efforts in Gaza. Al-Haddad is said to have survived six Israeli assassination attempts and is known to keep a low profile. A $750,000 bounty had previously been placed on him, and he reportedly limits his communications to avoid being tracked. The Times said he holds veto power over hostage release proposals, including those currently on the table, and controls the group responsible for holding the Israeli hostages. A vacuum of leadership After the killings of Yahya Sinwar, Muhammad Deif, and now Muhammad Sinwar, Hamas finds itself with very few senior figures remaining. Yahya Sinwar, the mastermind of the October 7 attack, was killed in combat in late 2024. His younger brother, Muhammad Sinwar, became the de facto leader until his death in May. Israeli defence minister Israel Katz commented on Sinwar's death, saying: 'Now it is official: The murderer Muhammad Sinwar has been eliminated with the Rafah Brigade commander Muhammad Shabana and the wicked gang who were with them under the European Hospital in Gaza, and he was sent to meet his brother at the gates of hell.' Katz also issued a stark warning: 'Izz al-Din Haddad in Gaza and Khalil al-Hayya abroad, and all their partners in crime, you are next in line.'


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Ukraine drone attack in Russia was really Pearl Harbor moment or overhyped? Know the truth
Russia-Ukraine war took a sensational twist after Kyiv conducted surprise drone attacks targeting multiple Russian air bases hosting nuclear-capable strategic bombers. Ukraine said over 40 bombers, or about a third of Russia's strategic bomber fleet, were damaged or destroyed on Sunday, although Moscow said only several planes were struck. The conflicting claims couldn't be independently verified and video of the assault posted on social media showed only a couple of bombers hit. While some Russian military bloggers compared it to another infamous Sunday surprise attack — that of Japan's strike on the U.S. base at Pearl Harbor in 1941 — others rejected the analogy, arguing the actual damage was far less significant than Ukraine claimed. The bold attack demonstrated Ukraine's capability to hit high-value targets anywhere in Russia, dealing a humiliating blow to the Kremlin and inflicting significant losses to Moscow's war machine by reaching as far as Siberia. Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Mistura chinesa faz cabelo crescer e homem fica irreconhecível Suplemento | Folix Undo For decades, long-range bombers have been part of the Soviet and Russian nuclear triad that also includes land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles and atomic-powered submarines carrying ICBMs. The strategic bombers have flown regular patrols around the globe showcasing Moscow's nuclear might. During the 3-year-old war in Ukraine, Russia has used the heavy planes to launch waves of cruise missile strikes across the country. Before Sunday's drone attacks, Russia was estimated to have a fleet of about 60 such aircraft. Live Events U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was briefed on the attack, which represented a level of sophistication that Washington had not seen before, a senior defense official said on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. The Russian Defense Ministry said the attack set several warplanes ablaze at air bases in the Irkutsk region in eastern Siberia and the Murmansk region in the north, but the fires were extinguished. It said Ukraine also tried to strike two air bases in western Russia, as well as another one in the Amur region of Russia's Far East, but those attacks were repelled. The drone strikes produced an outcry from Russian military bloggers, who criticized the Defense Ministry for failing to learn from previous strikes and protect the bombers. Building shelters or hangars for such large planes is a daunting task, and the military has tried some impromptu solutions that were criticized as window dressing. FAQs Q1. Which types of aircraft were targeted by Ukraine? A1. Ukraine said 41 aircraft — Tu-95s, Tu-22Ms and A-50s — were damaged or destroyed Sunday in the attack that it said was in the works for 18 months in which swarms of drones popped out of containers carried on trucks that were parked near four air bases. Q2. How many aircraft Russia had? A2. Before Sunday's drone attacks, Russia was estimated to have a fleet of about 60 such aircraft.