
Iran plots Israel retaliation that would hit the world 'worse than Putin's war and Covid-19 combined'
Iran 's plot to retaliate against Israel for starting the latest round of escalating violence in the Middle East may hit the world worse than Vladimir Putin 's invasion of Ukraine and Covid-19 combined, an economist has warned.
This weekend saw Iran and Israel fire wave after wave of missiles and drones at each other, beginning on Friday when Benjamin Netanyahu ordered the IDF to target Iran's nuclear infrastructure, as well as densely populated parts of Iranian cities.
Though the two nations have largely kept the latest violence between themselves, experts fear Iran may soon take actions that could draw the whole world into the conflict.
Over the weekend, Islamic Revolutionary Guard commander Sardar Esmail Kowsari told local media that closing the Strait of Hormuz 'is under consideration, and Iran will make the best decision with determination.'
The Strait is a pivotal trade route for the world. Around 20% of the world's oil flows through the tiny sea passage, along with a fifth of all Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), making it the 'world's most important oil transit chokepoint', according to the the US Energy Information Administration.
But Kowsari said Iran was not limiting its options in dealing with Israel, telling local media: 'Our hands are wide open when it comes to punishing the enemy, and the military response was only part of our overall response.'
Trade Gerrit Heinemann told Bild that should Iran choose to close the Strait, which borders the country, the results would be 'catastrophic.'
'[It would be] worse than Corona and Putin combined! The second episode of the ongoing crisis would be even more severe than what we experienced at the beginning of the Ukraine war and during the Corona years. A disaster.'
He told the newspaper: 'A large part of the global supply chains runs through the affected region. This not only dramatically impacts energy supplies, but also the flow of goods.'
'All of a sudden, all the crises we had just overcome would return: the energy crisis, inflation, disrupted supply chains, and now the threat of mass unemployment.'
At its thinnest, it is just 21 miles wide, and the shipping lanes in the Strait are even smaller.
This makes it incredible vulnerable to attacks, which international leaders have already warned.
Iraq's foreign minister Fuad Hussein warned of a 'global energy crisis' if the Strait is closed.
It isn't the first time a rogue group has threatened international trade this year. Since Israel began its invasion of Ukraine, the Yemeni Houthi group have been attacking ships in the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, the entry into the Red Sea, in an effort to pressure the West, which has largely backed Israel throughout its history.
But ships that ordinarily use the Bab al-Mandeb Strait can still avoid it by sailing round Africa.
In the case of the Strait of Hormuz, there is no way to get anything out of the Gulf of Persia, the single biggest source of petroleum in the world.
Cutting the world off from such a large source of energy would massively affect economies across the world, which still largely rely on non-renewable sources like oil for their needs.
There is precedent for this type of move from Iran. In April 2024, Iranian armed forced seized a container near the Strait of Hormuz following rising tensions across the Middle East after Israel launched a missile at its consulate in Damascus, Syria.
For now, Iran and Israel appear to be escalating their attacks on each other.
Iran fired a new wave of missile attacks on Israel early on Monday, killing at least eight people, while Israel warned residents of part of Tehran to evacuate ahead of new strikes.
The warning came on the fourth day of the conflict, as the Israeli military claimed to have achieved 'aerial superiority' over Iran's capital.
The military says it has degraded Iranian air defences and missile systems to the point that its planes can now operate over Tehran without facing major threats.
It says Israel now controls the skies from western Iran to Tehran.
Later, the Israeli military warned residents of part of Tehran to evacuate ahead of strikes on military sites in the city.
It came after Iran fired a new wave of missile attacks on Israel early on Monday, triggering air raid sirens across the country as emergency services reported at least five killed and dozens more wounded in the fourth day of open warfare between the regional foes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why does Britain have a role in the Israel-Iran conflict?
Britain has ordered RAF aircraft into the Middle East 'for contingency support across the region'. At the G7 summit, Keir Starmer also stressed that 'the constant message is de-escalate' and said he will bring whatever influence he can to encourage the entire group, and crucially the United States, to adopt such a stance. In recent weeks, notably at the United Nations, the UK has also taken a more critical attitude towards Israel's actions, especially over the conduct of the war in Gaza, while continuing to state that Israel has a right to defend itself. How much influence Britain still has on events in the region, however, is debatable… What does Keir Starmer want? He is conflicted. Sir Keir certainly doesn't want to see tensions in the region escalate, with all that implies for even more geopolitical instability and the spread of the current conflicts, both in the Middle East and in Ukraine, spreading further. Like the other G7 leaders, he will also be conscious that Taiwan remains highly vulnerable to an attack by China, which could take opportunistic advantage of the chaos to reunify the Chinese nation – a top priority for Beijing. There's also the ever-present internal instability in Syria and Iraq, in Yemen and Iran itself, and, less likely, Saudi Arabia. Economically as well as geopolitically, there's a lot at stake for a medium-sized open European economy dependent on the free passage of marine cargo through the Strait of Hormuz and on to the Suez Canal. Can Britain act unilaterally? Not really. UK arms exports to Israel are minimal, and to Iran, non-existent. The government has ruled out an embargo on spare parts for Israeli air force fighter jets. The cancellation of free trade talks with Israel was more symbolic than anything, and the same goes for the Israeli individuals sanctioned by the British government. Does Britain matter? To a surprising degree. Long past its imperial prime, the legacy of that era lives on in the minds of Israeli and Iranian leaders. Britain, in other words, looms larger in their consciousness than it has any right to, for mostly purely historical reasons. Why does Britain matter to Israel? Because it was the last imperial power in the former Palestine Territory, taken over from the Ottoman Empire after the First World War, and under British administration granted as a mandate from the League of Nations, then the United Nations. The proto-Israelis fought a war of independence against the British until they hurriedly withdrew and the UN partitioned it terribly. Only a few weeks ago, the Israeli foreign ministry made scornful reference to this background when it rejected British criticism of its government: 'The British Mandate ended exactly 77 years ago. External pressure will not divert Israel from its path in the struggle for its existence and security against enemies seeking its destruction.' It's also fair to say that events in the region have also affected British politics, notably in the internal affairs of the Labour Party, and the election of five independent MPs elected last July on a 'pro-Gaza' manifesto. Why does Britain matter to Iran? Also, for mainly historical reasons. For decades, certainly since 'Persia' emerged as a buffer between the Russian Empire and the Indian Ocean and the British Empire, and when oil became of strategic importance, the UK has sought to interfere in Iranian affairs. A key moment came when the American CIA and the British organised a coup against the then-prime minister of Iran in 1953, to protect Western oil interests with the help of the pro-Western Shah. However, there had been almost constant British military and political intervention for decades before. When the Islamic Revolution overthrew the Shah in 1979, America was called 'the Great Satan' and the UK 'the Little Satan', which denoted status for the British, at best. Naval skirmishes with Iranian-backed Houthi rebels, the imprisonment of Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, and long-running disputes over money kept by the British after an aborted arms deal further poisoned relations in recent times. Where are the British popular? The Gulf kingdoms: close royal links, their taste for life in London, and the lingering legacy of Lawrence of Arabia have helped to foster a degree of warmth. And the future? Memories tend to run back a long way in the Middle East. Given that the British have had some sort of a colonial role in Cyprus, Egypt (especially in the Suez crisis), Sudan, Palestine/Israel, Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, Aden/Yemen, Iran and Afghanistan, sometimes reprised in more recent times, and not always recalled fondly, the UK will be a prisoner of its past just as much as any nation in the region for a long time to come.


Economist
an hour ago
- Economist
Israel is racing to deliver a killer blow to Iran's nuclear dream
ISRAEL'S WAR on Iran is now in its fourth day. Militarily, Iran is on its knees. Israel has wiped out much of the country's senior military leadership and its air defences. Israeli aircraft are conducting daylight raids over Tehran, the capital. On June 16th the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) said that they had destroyed more than 120 of Iran's ballistic missile launchers, about a third of the total. Iran is still firing ballistic missiles at Israel, and these are killing Israelis. But the salvoes are less serious than those seen in the clashes between Israel and Iran in April and October last year, and they have been getting smaller. The IDF also said it had destroyed the headquarters of the Quds Force, the expeditionary arm of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.


Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Operation Rising: will Trump get dragged into the Israel-Iran conflict?
Relations between Iran and Israel are deteriorating rapidly, with comparisons being drawn to Israel's 1981 strike on Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appears to be advocating for regime change in Tehran, reportedly encouraging the United States to take military action. Donald Trump, who previously came close to authorising a strike, is now said to be more cautious – mindful of the risks of exposing American forces abroad and being drawn into another protracted conflict, contrary to the non-interventionist platform on which he was elected. The Iranian regime, built on a foundation of resistance, is responding to Israel's attacks while also expanding its network of regional proxies, which now extends as far as South America and east Africa. Iran is believed to be only weeks away from producing weapons-grade uranium, meaning that failure to institute regime change may lead Tehran to accelerate its nuclear ambitions – particularly if tensions are eased while the current regime remains in power. Russia, meanwhile, has positioned itself as a strategic disruptor. By maintaining dialogue with both Tehran and Jerusalem, Moscow retains influence over developments without aligning itself fully with either side. Although it has refrained from supplying Iran with its most advanced military technology, its ambiguous stance offers it significant leverage. While global energy prices have thus far remained stable, the possibility of disruption cannot be discounted. Cautious but alert, the Gulf states are keen to avoid direct involvement. The broader question now facing the international community is whether diplomacy can contain the crisis – or whether the region is edging closer to a far more serious and destabilising confrontation. To discuss the conflict, Freddy Gray speaks to Owen Matthews and Charlie Gammell.