logo
The Incompetence of DOGE Is a Feature, Not a Bug

The Incompetence of DOGE Is a Feature, Not a Bug

WIRED20-02-2025

Feb 20, 2025 7:00 AM A series of mistakes by DOGE shows just how arbitrary and destructive this slash-and-burn strategy can get. Photo-illustration: WIRED Staff; Getty Images
Within just the last week or so, Elon Musk's DOGE hit team of mostly young, almost exclusively male engineers and executives have done the following: Pushed a website live to track 'savings' that showed no savings for several days, and made it trivially easy for random people on the internet to make changes to it.
Published classified information on that same website.
Got called out for accidentally inflating that savings amount by $7,992,000,000, and doubled down on their inaccuracy before they fixed it.
Fired hundreds of people who work on nuclear security, then scrambled to rehire them, except they had nuked all the work email addresses and personnel files so they didn't know how to get in touch.
Basically the same deal, except with the US Department of Agriculture employees working to protect the country from a looming bird flu crisis.
Rehired a 25-year-old engineer with a stack of racist tweets to his name.
Spouted a bunch of nonsense conspiracy theories about who's getting Social Security benefits. (Okay, that was all Musk.)
That's just a sampling. It doesn't include the damage born of purging thousands of workers across multiple government agencies, the consequences of which will reverberate in both obvious and unexpected ways for a generation—not to mention the near-term impact that arbitrarily spiking the unemployment rate will have on the US economy. It doesn't include the opportunity cost of tossing hundreds of government contracts and programs into a bonfire.
This is just the truly dumb stuff, the peek behind the veil of DOGE, the confirmation that all of this destruction is, in fact, as specious and arbitrary as it seems. When in doubt, tear it all down, see what breaks, assume you can repair it—maybe with AI? It's the federal government; how hard can it be?
This is incompetence born of self-confidence. It's a familiar Silicon Valley mindset, the reason startups are forever reinventing a bus, or a bodega, or mail. It's the implacable confidence that if you're smart at one thing you must be smart at all of the things.
It doesn't work like that. Michael Jordan is the best basketball player of all time; when he turned to baseball in 1994, Jordan hit .202 in 127 games for the AA Birmingham Barons. (For anyone unfamiliar with baseball stats, this is very bad. Embarrassing, honestly.) Elon Musk is the undisputed champion of making money for Elon Musk. As effectively the CEO of the United States of America? Very bad. Embarrassing, honestly.
Just look at all of those firings. DOGE has targeted so-called probationary employees first, often without regard for their skill or necessity of their roles. Do you know what a probationary employee is? It's people who have been in their position for less than a year, or in some cases less than two years. That means new hires, sure, but also experienced workers who recently transferred departments or got promoted.
Not only does DOGE not seem to understand this, it has given no indication that it wants to understand. These are the easiest employees to fire, legally speaking, so they're gone. It even changed the length of the probationary period—from one year of service to two—in order to super-size its purge of the National Science Foundation.
It takes a certain swashbuckling arrogance to propel a startup to glory. But as we've repeatedly said, the United States is not a startup. The federal government exists to do all of the things that are definitionally not profitable, that serve the public good rather than protect investor profits. (The vast majority of startups also fail, something the United States cannot afford to do.)
And if you don't believe in the public good? You sprint through the ruination. You metastasize from agency to agency, leveling the maximum allowable destruction under the law. DOGE's costly, embarrassing mistakes are a byproduct of reckless nihilism; if artificial intelligence can sell you a pizza, of course it can future-proof the General Services Administration.
Worse still, none of this will actually help DOGE make a dent in its purported mission. What's efficient about firing people you have to scramble to hire back? What are the cost savings of a few thousand federal employees compared to the F-35 program? What are we even doing here, actually?
There are two possible explanations for this mess. One is that Musk and DOGE have no interest in the government, or efficiency, but do care deeply about the data they can reap from various agencies and revel in privatization for its own sake. The other is that a bunch of purportedly talented coders have indeed responded to a higher civic calling, but are out here batting .202.
Musk did have a rare moment of self-awareness late last week, during an Oval Office appearance with his four-year-old son and President Donald Trump. 'We will make mistakes,' he said. 'but we'll act quickly to correct any mistakes.'
So far he's half right. The Chatroom
Are any of the changes DOGE has made for the better? WIRED Reads
Want more? Subscribe now for unlimited access to WIRED. What Else We're Reading
🔗 DOGE Claimed It Saved $8 Billion in One Contract. It Was Actually $8 Million: Further reading on the DOGE savings tracker fiasco. (The New York Times)
🔗 'Help Us:' Hundreds deported from US held in Panama hotel: A bracing look at the conditions under which immigrants are being held abroad. (BBC)
🔗 Trump administration yanks CDC flu vaccine campaign: Robert F. Kennedy is now sworn in, and it appears the vaccine pullback has already begun. (NPR)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk's public dispute sparks interest in Tesla from short sellers
Elon Musk's public dispute sparks interest in Tesla from short sellers

Miami Herald

time11 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Elon Musk's public dispute sparks interest in Tesla from short sellers

Last week, a social media post from Elon Musk caused many people to stop what they were doing and look down at their phones. Even for the Tesla (TSLA) CEO, known for his controversial and bold opinions, what they saw seemed surprising. Musk had previously announced plans to cease his political spending. But only a few days later, he accused Trump of having direct ties to notorious criminal Jeffrey Epstein and alleged that without his help, the Republican president would not have won last year's election. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Since then, Tesla has been in the spotlight, as the dispute between two of the world's most powerful men continues. While TSLA stock initially plunged on news of the argument, it has since regained some of its momentum. Even as shares slowly trend upward, though, experts speculate that short sellers may regard the Musk-Trump fallout as an opportunity to bet against the stock. Over the past few months, Musk's behavior has sparked a global backlash against Tesla's brand, causing sales to fall across the U.S. and Europe. This clear indication of consumer sentiment toward him has caused some financial experts, including Tesla shareholder and fund manager Ross Gerber, to call for him to step down. Related: Elon Musk company reveals major leap forward When Musk announced that he would be stepping back from his role with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), TSLA stock surged, and some investors speculated that the company's troubles were over. But now his falling out with Trump has generated further uncertainty. When a prominent company starts showing signs of weakness or instability, short sellers are likely to start closing in. So far, Tesla's recent declines have been highly profitable for those willing to bet against it. The Wall Street Journal reports that as TSLA stock plunged last week, short sellers pocketed up to $4 billion, noting: Betting against an industry-leading company like Tesla will always carry some risk, regardless of how bleak its prospects may appear. But experts see a case for shorting TSLA stock, provided investors understand its volatile nature, which includes surging unexpectedly. "I think Musk dragged Tesla into a political spectacle," Galileo FX CEO David Materazzi tells TheStreet. "That creates perceived instability. Short sellers don't need real damage, just the illusion of it. Volatility invites them in. When the CEO becomes the story, the stock turns into a target." Financial education platform First Information's CEO Vince Stanzione holds a short position in TSLA. He says his reasons are "business not personal," however, citing the company's high valuation and questionable market share over the feud between Musk and Trump. More Tesla News: The 'anti-Tesla' gives American buyers more good newsAnalyst sets eye-popping Tesla stock price targetElon Musk's feud with Trump is hurting an unexpected investment "The P/E ratio is over 100 and growth the last few years has been near zero," he says of Tesla. "The bulls will say you're paying for the future and Elon Musk's brilliance, and I am not disputing that Tesla could have some future hits in the pipeline, but Elon Must is very good at promising "jam tomorrow" which never seems to materialize, or if and when it does, it's not the flavour he promised." Stanzione also raises a concern regarding Tesla's foray into robotics, something on which Musk has hinged a lot of the company's prospects. This part of Tesla's business just became more complicated due to the abrupt departure of one of its leaders. Related: Heavily shorted AI stock is rapidly climbing the Fortune 500 "Unless robotaxis start showing up en masse by the end of this year, then investors will keep selling," states Stanzione. "I am very bullish on robotics. It's something I have been investing in for over a decade, especially in medical and military uses, however, Tesla is not the only game in town." He names rivals such as Hyundai Motor Group and Boston Dynamics, both of which are making notable advances in the robotics field that could threaten Tesla's progress. Chief Analyst Dan Buckley also highlights the potential valuation problem, stating "Tesla short sellers may see their edge in the long-term mismatch between its ~$1 trillion valuation and the current reality of its business – i.e., nearly all auto-based revenue – and the uncertain viability of its highly speculative emerging tech bets." That said, Buckley advises investors considering a Tesla short to "treat political feuds as a volatility amplifier rather than a directional signal" and highlights the importance of caution when betting against such an unpredictable stock. Related: Billionaire fund manager, skeptical of AI, backs shocking stock The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

CEO who sees Bitcoin hitting $1M now favors Tesla
CEO who sees Bitcoin hitting $1M now favors Tesla

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

CEO who sees Bitcoin hitting $1M now favors Tesla

CEO who sees Bitcoin hitting $1M now favors Tesla originally appeared on TheStreet. ARK Invest's CEO, Cathie Wood, conservatively estimates that Tesla's (TSLA) stock will reach $2,600 per share by 2030, representing a 744% increase from its current price. Wood's prediction is primarily tied to the forthcoming robotaxi platform, on a podcast called The Diary of a CEO. She refers to Tesla as potentially redefining its original model of selling electric vehicles for a one-time fee to customers who may rarely or never recharge, a major source of revenue. Instead, Wood argues that the major source of revenue for Tesla will now come from its autonomous vehicles, generating active recurring revenue. Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, stated on a recent earnings call that Tesla's self-driving cars could function like Airbnb, allowing owners to generate passive income by renting out their cars when they're not in use. Owners could list their vehicles for short-term rentals, converting their idle assets into money-making machines. This model aligns well with the concept of decentralization underlying blockchain, which suggests that the two could work together. Crypto-based payments and smart contracts could facilitate the easy management and automation of transactions on this type of sharing platform, resulting in precise and quick settlements. Tesla could generate even more revenue by incorporating blockchain technology and utilizing cryptocurrency for ride payments or subscriptions. Tesla CEO Elon Musk also partnered with Polymarket, a cryptocurrency-based prediction market, for his other company, X. Wood sees Tesla and its customers having the potential to generate revenue in two ways: through subscription or pay-as-you-go models, depending on the vehicle's usage. If blockchain is incorporated, crypto could exist with both payment structures. "You could subscribe to the network. It could be either or subscription or à la carte if you don't think you're going to use it that much," said Wood. Cathie Wood's ARK Invest has made big crypto predictions in the past. She predicts Bitcoin will be worth $1.5 million by 2030 and supports a base case of $700,000. In the most optimistic scenarios, it could be worth $1 million. ARK's spot Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) now manages over $2.2 billion, indicating that large institutions are very interested in it. Wood's company also invested $373 million in Circle's initial public offering, which provided access to USDC and blockchain payments. Interestingly, Kraken has announced that users can now access tokenized stocks of Tesla around the clock, providing investors outside the U.S. with the chance to purchase stocks, bridging the gap between traditional finance and cryptocurrency. At press time, Tesla is trading at 318.35, up 3.17% over the last 24 hours. CEO who sees Bitcoin hitting $1M now favors Tesla first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 10, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 10, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Elon, Inc: What's Elon's Next Move?
Elon, Inc: What's Elon's Next Move?

Bloomberg

time39 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Elon, Inc: What's Elon's Next Move?

On this week's episode, host David gathers Max Chafkin and Dana Hull to go through the latest developments in the aftermath of the Elon Musk-Donald Trump explosion last week. After two (!) emergency episodes in as many days last week, things seem to have calmed down between the South Africa native and the US president—but there are still signs of friction. Will Trump ever be able to forgive the insults Musk hurled at him on social media (as in, Trump should be impeached a third time)? Can he afford not to? In the midst of all the drama, it's easy to forget that this week will reportedly see a milestone event for Tesla: the June 12 launch of a robotaxi service in Austin, Texas. The operation will be small to start, with just 10-20 cars serving a limited area, according to the company. But the timing of the event is eyebrow raising. Not only does it come on the heels of Musk's tweet-storm meltdown, it also happens a mere week after a Bloomberg story outlining a lethal crash involving a self-driving Tesla. The crew discuss just how long the odds are for robotaxi success. To end, Chafkin has brought a feud to the program. This week it's Musk against his own chatbot, Grok. Why is he so disappointed with his digital companion this time? The answer includes a screen short, a left wing meme and an artificial intellgence with a surprising lack of digital critical thinking.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store