Community pushes back on city proposal to declare Mission Bay Park properties as surplus land
The move would allow the city to lease or sell the land for longer than 15 years, and it's raising alarm among the local community members who don't trust the city's plans.
'We've never seen the Surplus Act applied to park land before,' said local Scott Andrews.
The city council considered this proposal during a meeting last week, but chose to hold off on voting so that the Mission Bay Park Committee could host a meeting to include this topic.
'The public doesn't trust the city council or the mayor and there's a belief that no matter what you decide on the two issues, the city is going to go forward with it anyway,' said Clifford Weaver, who voiced his opposition to the committee.
San Diego faces lawsuit over 136-unit ADU project proposal
The properties include Sportsmen's Seafood and Dana Marina Landing, which both currently have expired leases. The third and largest property is Marina Village, where the lease is set to expire in 2027. There, the city wants to include a hotel and updated conference center as outlined in the Mission Bay master plan.
Locals who came to give public comment all opposed the idea, worried about the procedure following a surplus land designation that requires an entity to negotiate in good faith to allow affordable housing first.
'This is not about building housing on Mission Bay,' said Council President Joe LaCava.
The city says it even pushed for an exemption, but the state's Department for Housing and Community Development denied the effort, meaning affordable housing proposals would still need to be considered.
A housing project would have to pass several hurdles that the city believes no developer would want to go through.
'Public vote, coastal commission approval that they would never get. It is just so unlikely, but it's just a step we have to take,' explained city of San Diego Communications Director Rachel Laing.
Laing explained other routes like seeking an amendment to the Surplus Land Act or getting the state to designate Mission Bay as state park land have been discussed, but they are uncertain and could take years.
Ultimately, the committee in Mission Bay Park voted 6-to-2, with one member abstaining to not support the three properties becoming surplus land. Council LaCava says the plan is to bring the proposal back before the council sometime in September.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Deserted 'litter trap' Post Office up for sale for £500k
A deserted Post Office and yoga studio previously branded a "litter trap" has hit the market for half a million pounds. The old Post Office at 117 West Street in Fareham was called a "destination for anti-social behaviour" by Fareham Borough Council planning officers. It has stood vacant since March 2017. But it is hoped the building can get a new lease of life as it is now up for sale for £500,000, with developers able to transform the building due to fresh planning permission being granted. Potential buyers can turn the first floor into five one-bedroom flats, while also retaining the downstairs space for further commercial activity. It would be the first time in eight years that the building would be actively trading commercially. READ MORE: Beloved Grade II restaurant in former church up for sale In their report to the application, a Fareham Borough Council planning officer said the vacant property had previously become a "litter trap" and a "destination for anti-social behaviour" due to the set back of the ground floor. The concrete 1960s building "does not respond well to the character and appearance of West Street", the officer continued. But the property's listing, advertised by estate agents Primmer Olds BAS, said the building is in a location of high footfall with a "prominent road side position". The estate agents said the property is "suitable for a variety of uses" and it is a neighbour to nearby occupiers like McDonalds, Cex and Nationwide. READ MORE: Grade II-listed pub in national park is up for sale The closure of the Post Office in March 2017 was controversial at the time, as operations moved into a branch of WHSmith, now called TGJones, on the same road. A spokesperson for the Post Office reassured customers that the same products and services would still be available. Fareham Borough Council had formally written to the organisation at the time to ask them to "hold off" from the move which went ahead regardless. The executive leader of the local authority at the time, Councillor Sean Woodward, called the move a "scandalous waste of public money to pay a lease for another five years on the existing post office while moving it to an inconvenient upstairs location in WH Smith".
New York Post
9 hours ago
- New York Post
NYC officials walk faster than M34 bus in rush-hour race victory lap over controversial plans for busway
City leaders on foot cruised to victory in a race against a Midtown MTA bus during Thursday evening's rush as they celebrated renewed plans to limit or ban cars on 34th Street for a controversial busway along the traffic-jammed route. A handful of local lawmakers, including Councilman Erik Botcher, Comptroller Brad Lander, and state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal and mayoral front-runner Zohran Mamdani, speed-walked across 34th Street from First to Eighth avenues, beating out the M34 bus by seven minutes. 3 Mayoral front-runner Zohran Mamdani, Councilman Erik Botcher, NYC Comptroller Brad Lander, and Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal led the late afternoon race against the M34 bus, speed walking to victory Stephen Yang for the New York Post Advertisement The race was held a day after the City Council Subcommittee on Zoning and Franchises and the Committee on Land Use signed off on the busway — part of a larger Midtown South rezoning plan — after it had reportedly hit a roadblock. The busway, different from a bus lane in that it would limit private vehicles along the busy crosstown thoroughfare, was first proposed in May with the goal of speeding up the normally sluggish M34 and M34A buses. But Council members grew concerned that Mayor Eric Adams left the plan dead in the water until it was revived Wednesday. Advertisement 'There was some back and forth. That's why people were calling it the Miracle on 34th Street because this was taken off the table … we got it back, so I'm very grateful for that,' Holyman-Sigal told the Post at the race. Adams sent out a statement Wednesday touting the rezoning plan after it was approved the Council committees. 'With today's vote, we're taking another step forward in helping to create a more dynamic Midtown South where New Yorkers of all income levels can live, work, and play,' he said. 'This agreement underscores our commitment to pairing housing with investments in our infrastructure — including the transformation and reconstruction of Broadway and 34th Street busway,' Hizzoner added. Advertisement The rezoning plan will be sent off for a vote in the full Council next week Twenty-eight thousand commuters ride the bus on 34th Street every day. Buses often run slower than 5.5 mph in rush hour traffic, officials said. 3 Mayor Eric Adams announced his backing of the 34th Street busway under a larger Midtown rezoning proposal. Stephen Yang for the New York Post During Thursday evening's race, Councilman Keith Powers, DOT Commissioner Ydanis Rodriguez, and about 30 volunteers rode the losing bus. Advertisement The triumphant 'Pedestrian Prancers' were handed the 'Busway champion' medals after completing the fast-paced walk alongside 50 volunteers. Hecklers on the street also followed Mamdani as he was the first to cross over the orange finish line. 3 The triumphant 'Pedestrian Peddlers' were handed the 'Busway champion' medals after completing the fast-paced speed walk alongside 50 volunteers Stephen Yang for the New York Post
New York Post
16 hours ago
- New York Post
New NYC Council proposal will tie up businesses in red tape, additional costs to post job notices: critics
Groups representing New York City industries are sounding the alarm about a new City Council proposal aimed at businesses, saying it will tie up firms in unnecessary red tape and additional costs when posting job notices. The bill introduced by Queens Councilwoman Selevena Brooks-Powers would go way beyond the law that took effect in 2022, requiring companies to reveal salary ranges on job postings, aimed at helping close the gender wage gap. The new measure, Intro 808-B, would force employers to document the reason for offering a job applicant a salary amount outside the listed range — and retain such records for three years. Advertisement 3 Groups representing New York City industries are opposing Council legislation, saying it will tie up firms in unnecessary red tape and additional costs when posting job notices. Bloomberg via Getty Images 'New York already has one of the nation's most heavily regulated business environments and most expensive litigation environments,' business advocates said in an Aug. 4 letter to the Council, obtained by The Post. 'Continuing to impose legal and regulatory burdens without regard to their impact on employers will have significant consequences for economic activity in the city.' Advertisement The legislation would require that job listings, aside from providing a description of the position, also detail information on promotions or transfer opportunities, along with the benefits available for the gig. Compensation information required to be included in the posting would also include bonuses, benefits, stocks, bonds, options, and equity or ownership, if any. Employers would be forced to disclose compensation information to current workers annually and upon request, for any equal or substantially similar positions to their current one, according to the bill. 3 The bill introduced by Queens Councilwoman Selevena Brooks-Powers would require companies to reveal salary ranges on job postings, aimed at helping close the gender wage gap. Paul Martinka Advertisement 'Many small businesses do not maintain formal job descriptions and, in industries like restaurants, employees are often expected to perform multiple roles based on daily needs,' the letter said. 'It is unclear how these mandates would advance gender pay equity,' the missive continued. 'All of these requirements would be impossible to implement without human resources professionals and legal counsel. Many small businesses have neither, and requiring them to consult these professionals is cost-prohibitive and unrealistic.' Advertisement The letter was signed by the chambers of commerce, the NYC Partnership, NYS Restaurant Association, Hotel Association of NYC, Real Estate Board of NY, the Building Congress, and the Retail Council, among others. Nonprofit employers oppose the bill as another unfunded government mandate, sources said. The legislation is scheduled to be voted on in September, a source briefed on the measure said. Brooks-Powers defended the bill and intends to pass it after getting input from the business community and others. 3 Brooks-Powers defended the bill and intends to pass it after getting input from the business community and others. Dan Herrick 'We've spent the past several months engaging a broad range of stakeholders to carefully shape and revise Introduction 808. Our goal has always been to strike the right balance: advancing pay equity for workers while ensuring the bill is clear and implementable for businesses of all sizes,' Brooks-Powers said. 'We have made numerous amendments to address concerns raised by the business community, and the current version of the bill includes specific provisions designed to ease compliance for small businesses.' Advertisement She said the legislation builds on the city existing wage transparency law and 'moves us closer to closing racial and gender pay gaps that persist in our economy.' The councilwoman thanked the Partnership for New York City for hosting roundtable discussions to get input from business interests as well as advocates for their support. 'We are proud of the thoughtful, collaborative process that brought us here, and we are committed to moving this bill forward,' Brooks-Powers said.
