
UK landmine charity wins global humanitarian prize
The group, set up in 1989 in Cockermouth, Cumbria, and now based in Manchester, has worked in more than 70 countries across the world to clear and raise awareness of landmines, as well as being part of international efforts to stop the use of the explosives.
Bosses say their work is more important than ever as new and ongoing conflicts have led to a spike in the number of landmine casualties.
MAG chief executive Darren Cormack said eight out of 10 people killed or injured by landmines were civilians and 40% were children.
He said: 'Predominantly, civilians are most at risk where landmines and unexploded ordnance litter communities.
'They pose an immediate risk to life and limb in contexts where war is ongoing, so Syria, Gaza, Sudan, Myanmar, Ukraine, and we're in a desperate race really to get safety messages to those communities who are at risk, to avoid the risk and to clear the landmines and unexploded ordnance from harm's way.'
The group was part of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines, backed by Princess Diana, which in 1997 was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for its work.
Their campaign led to the Ottawa Treaty, an international convention banning landmines, but, some countries are planning to withdraw from the agreement.
Mines Advisory Group chief Darren Cormack pointed to ongoing conflicts (MAG/Dalia Khamissy/PA)
Mr Cormack said the treaty was 'one of the most successful instruments of international humanitarian law' and the group believed it was 'vitally important' it was maintained.
He said: 'We have seen that it is an effective way of ultimately protecting civilians who are at risk many, many years after conflicts have ended.
'Yes, there are pressures right now that some states are certainly under and we're seeing that in Europe and the Baltic states – Poland, Ukraine – who are considering withdrawing.
'Our position is we would regret that and believe it is something that should be upheld.'
Executive director of MAG US, Shari Bryan, said: 'As levels of conflict rise across the world and as several countries have expressed intent to exit the Ottawa Treaty amidst escalating conflict in eastern Europe, our work has never been more important.'
The prize of three million dollars (£2.2 million) will support MAG's work, which has a community-centred approach, with the majority of its 5,500 staff coming from areas affected by conflict.
Mr Cormack said: 'Too often we're in a race to find a landmine before a child does and what this funding will enable us is to find different ways of potentially doing what we do.'
Peter Laugharn, president and chief executive of the Conrad N Hilton Foundation, said: 'The selection of the Mines Advisory Group as this year's Hilton Humanitarian Prize recipient serves as a reminder that compassion and peace should still be at the top of our global agenda.
'Through its extraordinary efforts to help communities return to safety and prosperity after conflict, the Mines Advisory Group exemplifies the kind of humanitarian excellence our prize has sought to celebrate and inspire over the last three decades.'
UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: 'Landmines kill indiscriminately and remain lethal long after conflicts are over, so I was privileged to see how the Mines Advisory Group are tackling this critical issue first-hand during my visit to Laos last year.
'Their expert teams not only clear landmines but also run life-saving educational programmes for returning communities to reduce the risk of injury or death.
'It is a source of great pride to see a UK-based organisation receive this prestigious prize, and to support their vital work in this time of conflict and geopolitical instability.'
A prize ceremony will be held in New York in October.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
5 hours ago
- Metro
Rail fares 'set to soar 5.5% next year' in ‘rip-off' blow for passengers
More pain for rail passengers could be on the way, with fares set to climb another 5.5% next year – a rise campaigners have branded 'outrageous' and a rip-off. Train ticket increases are usually linked to the July Retail Prices Index (RPI), one of the UK's main inflation measures, which will be published on Wednesday. This year fares rose by 4.6%, which was one percentage point above July 2024's inflation figure. Banking group Investec expects the July 2025 RPI to come in at 4.5%, which could mean fares increase by 5.5% in 2026 if the usual approach is taken. While the government has not yet said how it will decide regulated fare rises for 2026, campaigners said that much of an increase would be excessive. Bruce Williamson, spokesman for campaign group Railfuture, told the PA news agency 'it would be outrageous' if fares rose by 5.5%. He said: 'What would be the justification for jacking up fares above inflation? There isn't any. 'It's ripping off the customer, driving people off the trains and onto our congested road network, which is in no-one's interest.' Williamson said he would support fare freezes to mark the government's plans to nationalise train operators over the coming years. He said: 'One would hope that there would be some efficiency savings and economies of scale that you get from having a more integrated railway. 'But of course, I strongly suspect that if there are any savings to be had, they'd be swallowed up by the Treasury and not passed back to the passengers, which I think is wrong.' Ben Plowden, chief executive of lobby group Campaign for Better Transport, said high prices are 'putting people off rail travel'. The government is planning to launch Great British Railways next year, a body that will run the county's rail networks and train companies, as part of plans to eventually nationalise the sector. More Trending Already two regional operators – Southwestern and c2c – have been nationalised under the plans. About 45% of train fares in the UK are regulated by the government. Those include most commuter season tickets, some off-peak long-distance return tickets and flexible tickets for travelling in big cities. The Department for Transport (DfT) said it will update rail fare prices later this year, with a spokesperson saying that 'getting the railways back to a place where people can rely on them' was a priority. 'No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Virgin orders 12 new high-speed trains in biggest challenge to Eurostar yet MORE: The UK's 'prettiest village' is a magical place — but time your visit wisely MORE: Coastal trail crowned Britain's favourite path is a 'crown jewel' with breathtaking views

The National
8 hours ago
- The National
Russia complicating efforts to secure ceasefire in Ukraine
It comes as Prime Minister Keir Starmer prepares to meet with European leaders to discuss the war. The coalition of the willing, the alliance which is planning to police a future peace deal in Ukraine, will meet on Sunday afternoon amid reports Donald Trump favours a Russian land grab to end the war. Following the Alaska summit between Trump and Vladimir Putin on Friday, the American leader suggested he wants to move straight to a full peace deal, rather than negotiating a ceasefire first. READ MORE: Police Scotland 'breaching human rights to subdue Palestine protests' The shift in Trump's position appears to echo the Russians' refusal to agree to ceasefire before engaging in peace talks. Several news outlets have cited sources which claimed that during the negotiations Putin demanded full control of Donetsk and Luhansk – two occupied Ukrainian regions – as a condition for ending the war. In exchange, he would give up other Ukrainian territories held by Russian troops. Other outlets reported that Trump is inclined to support the plan, and will speak to Zelenskyy about it when they meet in the Oval Office. Writing on social media on Sunday morning, the Ukrainian leader railed against Russia's refusal to lay down arms temporarily before agreeing to end the war. (Image: PA) Zelenskyy said: 'We see that Russia rebuffs numerous calls for a ceasefire and has not yet determined when it will stop the killing. 'This complicates the situation.' He added: 'If they lack the will to carry out a simple order to stop the strikes, it may take a lot of effort to get Russia to have the will to implement far greater – peaceful coexistence with its neighbours for decades. 'But together we are working for peace and security. Stopping the killing is a key element of stopping the war.' The Prime Minister, alongside French president Emmanuel Macron and German chancellor Friedrich Merz, will host the coalition of the willing on Sunday afternoon. READ MORE: One man, 26, arrested at Falkirk asylum seeker hotel protests The video conference will see allies who plan to keep the peace in Ukraine gather ahead of Zelenskyy's visit to Washington on Monday. The Ukrainian leader is expected to attend the Sunday afternoon video call, which is scheduled to take place at 2pm UK time. Friday's summit between Trump and Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, ended without any commitment towards a ceasefire. The Russian president described it as 'timely' and 'useful' after he left. Trump afterwards suggested it was time for Zelenskyy to make a deal to end the war. (Image: Kremlin Pool Photo via AP) Starmer commended Trump's 'pursuit of an end to the killing', but insisted Ukraine's leader must not be excluded from future talks to broker a peace in Ukraine. The Prime Minister and European leaders appeared increasingly confident that Trump will offer a 'security guarantee' of air support to back up allied troops on the ground in Ukraine, should they be deployed to keep the peace. Experts have warned that the face-to-face summit has risked legitimising the Russian leader, who has been made a pariah by the international community for invading Ukraine. And, Zelenskyy has warned Russia may ramp up its strikes against his country in the coming days 'in order to create more favourable political circumstances for talks with global actors'.


The Herald Scotland
8 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Moira Salmond resumes legal action over harassment case
Finance for the revived case — which originally sought around £3 million in damages and loss of earnings — has been secured, with wealthy supporters of Mr Salmond understood to be backing the proceedings. READ MORE The case accuses ministers of misfeasance — the wrongful exercise of lawful authority. Before his sudden death from a heart attack in North Macedonia last October, Mr Salmond had warned of a 'day of reckoning'. 'Attacks by the living on the dead will seem to many as deeply unfair.' (Image: PA) A family friend told the Sunday Mail: 'Moira is upset and angered by the continued attempts to smear Alex in the book — much of which is ridiculous and inaccurate. It has only strengthened her resolve to make sure that the full truth comes out and that Alex's name is cleared.' They added: 'Her case against the Scottish Government is now live, the legal team is in place, the finance in place and this will be going ahead, no question of that. Alex may not be here to defend himself but his family are determined to stand up to those who continue to attack him. 'There is an adjustment period ongoing until September where updates can be made by either side to their paperwork. It takes time, but the ball is rolling. Anyone who thinks this is just going to go away is wrong.' Ms Salmond has also previously urged for restraint. 'Attacks by the living on the dead will seem to many as deeply unfair,' she said in January. 'My wish, and sincere hope, is that these attacks will now stop.' The book, in which Ms Sturgeon denies a conspiracy to bring down her predecessor, but paints a damning portrait of him as a bully and a drunk, has prompted angry responses from Mr Salmond's family. His niece, Christina Hendry, branded Frankly "distasteful" and "cruel." She told the Scottish Sun on Sunday: '[Nicola Sturgeon] is using his name for relevance, to promote her book, to earn money — she could have said these things in the past few years. 'She has chosen to wait until he is no longer here to defend himself. It's left to the family to deal with this and there's an element of cowardice to that.' She added: 'My uncle spent his career bigging up Scotland and looking to the future — looking to make change for the better. 'He did not spend his time cashing in on others' legacy or using their name or dragging their name through the dirt.' Ms Hendry added: 'Many people are struggling to understand why she would do this and why she would have such disregard for the family and their feelings. 'Not once have I seen her mention any thought to the family and what they're going through with these headlines about my uncle. 'There's a question of jealousy and bitterness — she was not able to achieve the same and her political career does not have the same legacy as his.' Asked if she believed Ms Sturgeon was cashing in on her infamous fall-out with her uncle, Ms Hendry replied: 'Yes. I can't see any other reason. 'It seems quite a coincidence that the time she is saying this is the time she is selling her book.' Asked if she believed Ms Sturgeon was cashing in on her infamous fall-out with her uncle, Ms Hendry replied: 'Yes. I can't see any other reason. 'It seems quite a coincidence that the time she is saying this is the time she is selling her book.' Ms Hendry said Ms Sturgeon's actions were dissapointing (Image: Supplied) In the memoir, Ms Sturgeon claims Mr Salmond had not read the SNP's 650-page white paper on independence and left her to write much of it alone. She describes her 'cold fury' when he jetted to China, vowing to read the document on the plane, which she believed 'would not survive contact with the first glass of in-flight champagne'. READ MORE She also alleges he was 'implacably opposed' to gay marriage, tolerated rumours of 'consensual affairs' during his marriage, and 'failed to show contrition' for 'inappropriate' behaviour towards women. She suggests he may even have leaked news of the government investigation into him in 2018 to cast himself as a victim — a claim dismissed by his allies. Mr Salmond was acquitted of 13 charges of sexual assault, including attempted rape, at the High Court in 2020. A separate judicial review that year found the Scottish Government's investigation into him had been 'tainted by apparent bias', awarding him more than £500,000 in legal costs. Kenny MacAskill, Mr Salmond's successor as Alba leader, also condemned the memoir, saying: 'What has been published plumbs even lower depths than we ever imagined. Sturgeon has shown she is without honour.'