
'Kamala' and 'Jacinda' enlisted in the war on rabbits
A team of tamed ferrets has been making short work of a long-eared problem in the battle against a rampant rabbit population.
The mustelids are part of an unusual pest control operation run by Jim Curry and his partner Jacqui Elson, who believe the best way to fight an introduced pest is with another.
Earlier this week, star ferret Oprah Winfrey took the lead to flush out a warren at a vacant property in Lower Shotover, Queenstown, as detection dogs waited at the ready to catch runaways.
Curry said the premise was simple - fences up, ferret in and "hopefully we'll watch the fireworks as rabbits come flying out both sides".
Over two days of methodical work, the ferrets managed to flush out more than 100 rabbits, which were quickly dispatched with a break of the neck.
Elson said it was just another job in what had become a near non-stop string of requests since relocating their business 'Jim's Bunny Hunters' to Queenstown.
She said they took on work across farms, lifestyle blocks and commercial sites, often booked by curious locals who had seen their rabbit-laden ute.
"They'll stop and follow us into like petrol station or cafe or something, because they've seen what we've got on the ute. People will literally stalk you into a petrol station saying 'I saw your licence plate. We need you,'" she said.
Curry said school pick-ups were especially time-consuming because of the ferrets' popularity - and trips around the country often garnered a lot of attention.
"We're the only people licensed to transport ferrets all around New Zealand, between islands, which gets you some interesting look on the ferries," he said. A safer way to tackle the problem
Each of the ferrets was caught from the wild, mostly by Curry.
They could not be imported or bred because ferrets are classified as an "unwanted organism" under the Biosecurity Act.
While Curry and Elson were not the only ferreters in the region, they had special MPI approval to keep more than the usual limit of three ferrets.
Elson said the ferrets were highly effective hunters and were a safer alternative to poison.
On a recent job, she said their results eclipsed those of professional shooters.
"The commercial shooters were getting, I think they said about 900, 1000 in a year, and we got about that, including young ones, in three-and-a-half days," she said.
"They were getting predominantly males, whereas because we're using the ferrets to get into the holes, we're getting predominantly females with young as well. So it's more efficient, makes a huge difference," she said.
Elson said they made the most of each rabbit caught.
"We can use an introduced pest, to then catch other introduced pests and then use the rabbits to give back to wildlife rescues for hawks and falcons, little owls, or other zoos. Whatever else isn't fed to our animals then goes to trapping programmes for wild cats, other ferrets, stoats, rats," she said.
After each hunt, Elson and Curry filled in the rabbit holes to make sure the area was clear, then if any rabbits remained they would return under the cover of darkness for shooting.
Curry said often the most challenging part of the operation was coaxing the ferrets back out, which were known to linger obstinately underground, despite wearing special tracking collars.
"The stubborn ones can take a bit of work to get out," he said. A dream realised
Ferrets have been a lifelong obsession for Curry, who grew up in the UK.
"I'd been reading all the Farmer's Weekly magazines and various hunting magazines and books and things about ferreting for years. I always wanted to do it, but I didn't have the money or the knowledge or the land," he said.
Seven years ago in Darfield, someone posted on Facebook about a chicken killer and Curry retrieved the culprit - a ferret he dubbed Colin Farrell.
Two more followed and soon Curry was not just rescuing ferrets but putting them to work.
"I just went 'right, sod this, I've always wanted to do it'. I ordered some trackers and then ordered purse nets from the UK. It basically started with me knocking on people's doors saying 'hi, I see you've got some rabbits. Can I come and catch them?'" he said.
The pair began in Canterbury but Elson said it was a no-brainer when the opportunity arose to shift to rabbit-plagued Queenstown.
Curry said the ferret flock had expanded to a star-studded line-up over time.
"We have Oprah Winfrey, Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris, and Jacinda Ardern, an R Kelly, a P Diddy and a Drake. And then we have a Joe Biden," he said. A persistent problem
Otago Regional Council (ORC) considered rabbits one of the area's worst pests, posing a serious threat to the local biodiversity, the environment and economy.
Southern Lakes Sanctuary chief executive Paul Kavanagh said they were known to let other predators thrive and tore up land and ate fertile grass, with 10 rabbits devouring the equivalent of one sheep's requirements.
"In many of our ecosystems in central Otago, predator numbers are controlled by food availability. So where we get a lot of rabbits, we in turn get a lot of feral cats, stoats, ferrets, weasels," he said.
He described the region's rabbit numbers as "relatively out of control".
"Anecdotally, we've heard it's getting worse in some areas, especially Cromwell, places like that," he said.
In 2023 the ORC discovered rabbit densities of up to 16 rabbits per square kilometre in some parts of Otago.
The council said it was undertaking further rabbit night counts across the region and expected to have updated population estimates soon.
Staff regularly carried out inspections across the region to identify rabbit hotspots and had helped to develop five "community rabbit management programmes" across the region, the council said.
The ORC said it could help landowners tackle their rabbit problem but ultimately it was the landowners or occupiers responsibility to manage the problem.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
NCEA changes: Some aspects like 'a step backwards in time'
The National Certificate of Educational Achievement will be gone by 2030. File photo. Photo: 123rf The government's plans to replace the NCEA system are on a tight timeline and will require a lot of support, say teachers. After more than 20 years as New Zealand's official secondary-school qualification, the government has pulled the pin on the NCEA . The National Certificate of Educational Achievement will be gone by 2030, replaced by a basic literacy and numeracy award at Year 11, and the Certificate of Education and Advanced Certificate of Education at Years 11 and 12. 'Achieved', 'not achieved', 'merit' and 'excellence' will be replaced by marks out of 100 and letter grades A, B, C, D and E. The new certificates would be standards-based, like the NCEA is, meaning every student passes if they demonstrate the required knowledge or skills, but they would have to study at least five complete subjects and pass four of them to get their certificate. This year's Year 8s would be the first cohort through the new system, starting with the foundation award in 2028, which might look a lot like the current NCEA literacy and numeracy tests. Teachers in a secondary school staffroom told RNZ they were still getting to grips with the announcement - and while some could see potential in the proposed changes, others were more cautious. "My big concern is around the kids that currently school doesn't really work for them," said one teacher who feared NCEA's flexibility would be lost. "The students are the ones that get harmed when people are just choosing to try things out," said another. Several teachers worried the new system would rely to heavily on end-of-year exams. "I don't think it's an improvement. High-stakes assessment is incredibly stressful for a number of people. The well-being of students has to be considered," said one teacher. Every teacher RNZ spoke to warned the timeline for introducing a new curriculum next year followed by the new qualification from 2028 through to 2030 was incredibly tight and would require a lot of support. Several said their curriculums had still not been written and the ministry was asking teachers to work on the new documents for free. Another pointed out that the government was asking teachers to do a lot of extra work at the same time as it was making low offers in pay talks. "Teachers got a one percent pay offer from this government and then there's four to five years of new and extra work, incredible amount of work, and those two don't marry up," she said. Papakura High School principal Simon Craggs said some aspects of the proposed changes 'such as marks out of 100 and stopping students from choosing standards from many different subjects - looked like "a step backwards in time". Craggs said he was pleased to see the government was looking at a new foundation qualification at Year 11 because the current system of online tests in reading, writing and maths was not working for many students from poor communities. He said it was critical the government listened to schools that served Māori and Pacific communities, because by 2050 they would account for half the population. "If we design a qualification that excludes them from success in our society, then we're going to have a real problem on our hands," he said. "NCEA for all its flaws, it has created a lot more opportunities for people from poorer communities to access qualifications they wouldn't have had access to before." Wellington Girls College principal Julia Davidson said NCEA needed an overhaul and the proposed changes had potential. However, she said whatever came next had to be flexible and provide choices for teenagers, especially those who struggled with exams. "That's the bit that worries me. What happens to your kids who are neuro-diverse, what happens to your kids who have got anxiety issues, what happens to kids who fall apart on the day. There has to be more flexibility," she said. "I have some concerns about the marking-by-number thing. What's the difference between 54 and 58, what does it really tell you?" Davidson said the workload for teachers of introducing a new curriculum and a new qualification system would be significant. "I've had my first teacher tell me that probably they'll leave.. wondering whether this is what they want to do," she said. Consultation on the proposed qualification changes closes on 1 September. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.


Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Raw Milk Faithful Keeps Dairy Farmers On The Hop
Article – RNZ It's a busy time of year for Stacey Faith, calving 300-plus cows, rearing their calves and keeping the Faith Farm's roadside milk dispensing outlet going, providing locals with milk fresh from the cows over the fence – with the cream on top. , for Country Life Heading along the Kāpiti Coast's old state highway, you might spy a black and white cow on top of a shiny red shed. Not a real cow, mind you. It's a sign to pull off and pick up some milk, fresh from the cows grazing just over the fence. The customers come and go from Faith Farm Fresh, filling bottles and loading chilly bins at the fancy automated machines. Keeping the milk flowing here is all in a day's work for dairy farmer Stacey Faith, who, with her husband Andrew and farm workers, milks 360 cows at their farm between Ōtaki and Waikanae. 'You know, it's all about being local and fresh,' one of the Faiths' regulars said, topping up a glass bottle with milk from the dispenser. She was used to unpasteurised milk as a child – brought home in a bucket straight from the udder. Most of the Faith's milk goes to Fonterra, but 20 of the Friesians form the 'raw herd', producing only A2 milk, and milked separately to supply the roadside shop with unpasteurised milk – also known as raw milk. 'We had no clue when we opened well over five, nearly five-and-a-half years ago now. I mean, we sat down with the bank, and they said, 'Oh, well, how much would you like to sell a day?' and we thought 100 litres would be good. And we average now 300 litres a day,' Stacey Faith said. In New Zealand, the milk bought in shops must be pasteurised. Consumers are also allowed to buy raw milk, but producers must be registered, meet hygiene requirements, test milk for pathogens, keep records of sales and make sure consumers are aware of the risks of consuming raw milk. Faith said many of her customers have told her that raw milk helps them with ailments. 'A lot of our customers come here because they're diabetic, they have psoriasis, they have skin conditions. I'm a dairy farmer. I'm not a doctor. 'This is what our customers tell us, it's better for their health.' The demand has surprised them. On the odd occasion, she said they've even had to close their doors, 'because we had no milk until we milked the cows. And then it was just catch up that whole week, trying to get them back to milking three, four o'clock that afternoon.' The big 18-wheeler trucks used to stop before the new highway opened, Faith said. They would take bottles of the milk to Auckland, but that's stopped now that the little red shed is on a side road. 'We're allowed 30 hours to sell the milk, but we sell out sometimes before 24 hours.' With the special hygiene and testing regime required for raw milk, it's all a lot of extra work for the busy dairy farmers. One of them must always be available between 6am and 10pm every day of the year in case there's a coin jam or one of the pumps stops working. 'So, you get a phone call, 'I've only got half a bottle of milk', you've got to come down and sort it out'.' The cows must be specially cleaned at milking time too, taking at least twice as long as the main herd, which supplies Fonterra. The milk from the main herd will be pasteurised – heated to a high temperature to kill bacteria – once it reaches the processing plant. 'As a place that sells raw milk, that's the only thing we don't have control of … people coming in and filling a dirty bottle. We do everything in our power to make it as clean as we can.' Calving a niche The need to keep the milk taps flowing year-round means calving is an extended season for the Faiths. On top of tending to the shed, testing and working as a swim coach, Faith will rear 300-plus calves this season, with the help of some automated feeding machines. Apart from the Friesians reared as replacements for the two herds, her meatier Hereford cross calves are sold to be grown on by lifestyle block owners nearby. While she takes it all in her stride, all the extra work the little red shed involves prompts the question – what's the point? 'I just love the idea that we're getting rid of plastic because we've got glass bottles … how it used to be back in the day. 'It's great to see so many people bringing the bottles back to refill.' She also likes supporting local suppliers and enterprises like the local MenzShed, where the bottle crates are made. 'It's all got to be good for the planet and sustainability, supporting all the local people.'

RNZ News
3 days ago
- RNZ News
Can a partner claim part of my house if we never lived together?
RNZ's money correspondent Susan Edmunds answers your questions. Photo: RNZ Send your questions to I recently separated and managed to buy the house and own it myself with a mortgage ... I have been seeing someone that I don't plan to live with. So my question is if you have a relationship with someone for a length of time that you don't live with or share bills with do I need to protect myself with a prenuptial agreement? When does the relationship need to have documentation of what I own and never want to share? People normally think of relationship property issues arising when a couple lives together but you can sometimes be captured even if you're living apart. Victoria University law professor Nicola Peart said this question came down to whether a relationship would qualify as 'de facto' . She pointed to the Property Relationships Act, which sets out a definition of a de facto relationship. But she said none of the criteria were essential to decide that someone was in such a relationships. The act says that the things taken into account include the nature of the relationship, the extent of common residence, whether you have a sexual relationship, the amount of financial interdependence between the parties, the ownership and use of property, the degree of mutual commitment to a shared life, the performance of household duties and the public aspects of the relationship, as well as the care of children. So it's possible you could tick off those factors while still maintaining separate homes. "Not living in the same house or not sharing finances does not exclude the possibility that a de facto relationship exists. If in doubt, contract out to preserve separate property ," Peart said. My partner of 11yrs received his inheritance last September. Just wondering if I'm entitled to any of it ... we split up just five weeks ago due to an argument. It sort of depends what he did with it when he received it. If it went into a joint bank account you both contribute to and pay bills from, or into a mortgage on your family home, for example, then it's likely to have become relationship property and you would be entitled to a share of it. But if he has kept it separate, you might not be. This would be a good thing to talk to a lawyer about as you work through your separation agreements. If property investors are making a loss, can't they still get something back on taxes? Through a rebate scheme? I thought I heard something about that. It used to be the case that property investors who made a loss on their rental investments could offset that against their other sources of income, such as the salary and wages they received from their job. That would reduce the tax they paid and sometimes meant they got a tax refund at the end of the year. That ended when "residential loss ring fencing" rules were introduced in 2019. "Broadly, these rules quarantine any losses from residential property so they can only be offset against profits from residential property, either carried forward to a future year or offset against other properties in a portfolio. There are some minor exceptions to these rules, for example for property which is or will be taxed on sale, and a property that is also a person's main home," said Robyn Walker, a tax partner at Deloitte. What you might have heard about recently is the reintroduction of interest deductibility. From 2021, investors' ability to include interest payments in their calculation of property profits was phased out. That's returned now, which will usually reduce their tax bills. Walker said another thing you might be thinking of is the Investment Boost policy. "This allows a 20 percent deduction for the cost of new assets which are used for business purposes on or after 22 May 2025. There are some restrictions on this as it does not apply to residential property or improvements to residential property. This restriction covers the building itself, it's possible that Investment Boost can apply to other assets which are included in a residential property but are not part of the property itself - separately identifiable chattels like a fridge. Again, any deductions available under the Investment Boost are also subject to the ring fencing rules." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.