logo
'M'sia needs a tobacco harm reduction strategy not more confusion and bans'

'M'sia needs a tobacco harm reduction strategy not more confusion and bans'

Focus Malaysia05-07-2025
As the World Health Organisation's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) marks its 20th anniversary, the global conversation about how to reduce smoking-related deaths is reaching a critical turning point. For Malaysia, this isn't just a theoretical debate — it's an urgent policy issue affecting millions of lives and livelihoods.
Last year, Parliament passed the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024, which for the first time provides a legal framework for regulating e-cigarettes, vape liquids, and other alternative nicotine products. The Act, long overdue, was a step forward in recognising that people smoke for nicotine but die from the tar and toxins in burning tobacco.
Yet after the law's passage, state governments like Terengganu, Kelantan and Pahang have announced complete bans on the sale of vape products, sparking legal uncertainty, public confusion, and frustration among stakeholders.
These state-level prohibitions not only undermine the national regulatory framework but also highlight a glaring omission in Malaysia's tobacco control strategy: the lack of recognition for tobacco harm reduction (THR) as a legitimate public health approach.
Harm reduction: A proven strategy, not a loophole
Globally, countries like Sweden, New Zealand, and the UK have made dramatic strides in reducing smoking rates by embracing lower-risk alternatives such as vaping, nicotine pouches, and heated tobacco products. Sweden, for example, is on track to become the first smoke-free country in the EU — thanks largely to its harm reduction strategy using snus, a smokeless tobacco product.
In the UK, Public Health England has repeatedly found that vaping is at least 95% less harmful than smoking.
Meanwhile in the US, a recent study published in Addictive Behaviours found that non-tobacco e-cigarette flavours significantly improved smoking reduction and cessation outcomes compared to tobacco-only flavours.
Among participants, 95% chose non-tobacco flavours, and those using them were more likely to continue vaping (74% vs 55%), reduce cigarette consumption by at least half by the end of the trial (34% vs 14%), sustain that reduction after six months (29% vs 5%), and completely quit smoking (14% vs 5%). These findings suggest that flavours play a crucial role in supporting smokers to reduce or quit smoking through vaping.
Yet here in Malaysia, such evidence is often ignored or dismissed. Instead of leveraging these tools to reduce the country's 4.8 million smokers, policy debates remain trapped in outdated 'quit or die' thinking, where abstinence is the only accepted path — and everything else is framed as a threat rather than an opportunity.
What's at stake for Malaysia?
Smoking remains one of the leading preventable causes of death in Malaysia, claiming an estimated 27,000 lives annually. The economic burden is also massive, costing the public healthcare system billions each year in treatment for smoking-related diseases.
We cannot afford to wait for abstinence-only policies to work — especially when they've failed for decades. Nor should we allow state-level bans to fracture the national approach, sow confusion among consumers, and penalise small businesses trying to operate within legal boundaries.
A clear, national-level commitment to tobacco harm reduction is essential. That means:
Recognising THR in national health strategy documents, including the National Strategic Plan for Non-Communicable Diseases. Investing in research and public education about the relative risks of various nicotine products. Respecting regulatory coherence, so that individual states do not undo the progress made at the federal level.
The FCTC must evolve — and so must we
Much of the reluctance to embrace harm reduction stems from the FCTC's rigid stance on nicotine products. While the treaty has been instrumental in reducing smoking globally, it has become increasingly dogmatic — discouraging innovation and painting all nicotine use with the same brush.
This approach may work in theory, but in practice, it ignores the realities faced by developing countries like Malaysia, where smoking prevalence remains high and healthcare access is uneven.
Harm reduction tools — if properly regulated — offer a low-cost, scalable solution to help millions quit smoking and avoid chronic disease.
Malaysia must assert its policy autonomy and lead with evidence, not ideology. We should not fear criticism from international bodies for charting our own course.
After all, health policy should serve the people of Malaysia — not the preferences of distant bureaucrats.
Conclusion: Time to catch up with the science
The tools to reduce smoking are already here. What's missing is the political courage to embrace them. If we truly want to cut smoking rates, lower healthcare costs, and save lives, then harm reduction must be part of the strategy—not pushed to the margins or banned outright.
We owe it to Malaysian smokers — and future generations — to offer better choices, not fewer. — July 5, 2025
Tarmizi Anuwar is the Country Associate for Malaysia at the Consumer Choice Centre.
The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

WHO raises concern about spread of mosquito-borne Chikungunya virus
WHO raises concern about spread of mosquito-borne Chikungunya virus

Free Malaysia Today

time2 days ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

WHO raises concern about spread of mosquito-borne Chikungunya virus

The mosquito-borne chikungunya virus can cause high fever, joint pain and long-term disability. (Pixabay pic) GENEVA : The World Health Organisation issued an urgent call for action on Tuesday to prevent a repeat of an epidemic of the mosquito-borne chikungunya virus that swept the globe two decades ago, as new outbreaks linked to the Indian Ocean region spread to Europe and other continents. An estimated 5.6 billion people live in areas across 119 countries at risk from the virus, which can cause high fever, joint pain and long-term disability, Diana Rojas Alvarez, a medical officer at the WHO, told reporters in Geneva. 'We are seeing history repeating itself,' she said, drawing parallels to the 2004-2005 epidemic, which affected nearly half a million people, primarily in small island territories, before spreading around the world. The current surge began in early 2025, with major outbreaks in the same Indian Ocean islands which were previously hit, including La Reunion, Mayotte and Mauritius. An estimated one-third of La Reunion's population has already been infected, Rojas Alvarez said. The virus is now spreading to countries such as Madagascar, Somalia and Kenya, and has shown epidemic transmission in Southeast Asia, including India. Of particular concern is the increasing number of imported cases and recent local transmission within Europe. There have been approximately 800 imported chikungunya cases in continental France since May 1, Rojas Alvarez said. Twelve local transmission episodes have been detected in several southern French regions, meaning individuals were infected by local mosquitoes without having travelled to endemic areas. A case was also detected last week in Italy. Chikungunya, for which there is no specific treatment and which is spread primarily by Aedes mosquito species, including the 'tiger mosquito' which also transmits dengue, and Zika, can cause rapid and large outbreaks. As the mosquitoes bite in the daytime, prevention is key, through the use of insect repellent and long-sleeved clothing.

WHO sounds alarm on risk of chikungunya epidemic
WHO sounds alarm on risk of chikungunya epidemic

New Straits Times

time2 days ago

  • New Straits Times

WHO sounds alarm on risk of chikungunya epidemic

GENEVA: The World Health Organisation warned on Tuesday a major chikungunya virus epidemic risks sweeping around the globe, calling for urgent action to prevent it. The WHO said it was picking up exactly the same early warning signs as in a major outbreak two decades ago and wanted to prevent a repeat. Chikungunya is a mosquito-borne viral disease that causes fever and severe joint pain, which is often debilitating. In some cases it can be deadly. "Chikungunya is not a disease that is widely known, but it has been detected and transmitted in 119 countries globally, putting 5.6 billion people at risk," said the WHO's Diana Rojas Alvarez. She recalled how from 2004 to 2005, a major chikungunya epidemic swept across the Indian Ocean, hitting small island territories before spreading globally and affecting almost half a million people. "Today, WHO is seeing the same pattern emerge: since the beginning of 2025, Reunion, Mayotte and Mauritius have all reported major chikungunya outbreaks. One-third of the population of Reunion is estimated to have been infected already," she told a press briefing in Geneva. The symptoms of chikungunya are similar to those of dengue fever and Zika virus disease, making it difficult to diagnose, according to the WHO. Rojas Alvarez said that like 20 years ago, the virus was now spreading to other places in the region, such as Madagascar, Somalia and Kenya. "Epidemic transmission is also occurring in south Asia," she added. In Europe, imported cases have also been reported, linked with the outbreak in the Indian Ocean islands. Local transmission has been reported in France, and suspected cases detected in Italy. "Because these patterns of transmission were seen in the outbreak from 2004 onwards, WHO is calling for urgent action to prevent history from repeating itself," said Rojas Alvarez. She noted that the case fatality rate was less than one percent, "but when you start counting millions of cases, that one percent can be thousands" of deaths. "We are raising the alarm early so countries can prepare early, detect and strengthen all the capacities to avoid going through very large outbreaks." Rojas Alvarez explained that in regions where populations have little or no immunity, the virus can quickly cause significant epidemics, affecting up to three-quarters of the population. Chikungunya virus is transmitted to humans by the bites of infected female mosquitoes, most commonly Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes. The latter, which is known as the tiger mosquito, is venturing farther north as the world warms because of human-driven climate change. They bite primarily during daylight hours, with peak activity often in the early morning and late afternoon. The WHO urged people to protect themselves through measures like using mosquito repellent and not leaving water to stagnate in containers such as buckets, where mosquitoes can breed. - AFP

‘Women don't prioritise their own health'
‘Women don't prioritise their own health'

The Star

time2 days ago

  • The Star

‘Women don't prioritise their own health'

PETALING JAYA: Despite human papillomavirus (HPV) being widespread in Malaysia, many women remain unaware of the serious health risks it poses. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), HPV is a common sexually transmitted infection, with nearly all sexually active individuals contracting it at some point, often without symptoms. High-risk HPV can lead to various cancers, including cervical, anal, oropharyngeal, penile, vaginal and vulvar cancers. Health Minister Datuk Seri Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad recently revealed that over 10,500 women in Malaysia tested positive for HPV through cervical cancer screenings over the past five years, and 65% of women have not undergone any screenings in the past three years. Nurse Venmathi Pradeep Kumar, 24, from Ampang, said women often put others' health before their own. 'I think this is where perhaps the workplace can fund or organise health screenings for female employees. 'There can also be more culturally sensitive and inclusive health promotions or educational programmes, either at workplaces or schools,' she said. Librarian Erin Carina Jauti, 24, from Kuala Lumpur, said many women deprioritise health check-ups, including HPV screening. 'It's not because they don't care, they may not have the means either financially or physically. 'Like if you have to choose between seeing a doctor or paying rent or other commitments, which one would you choose? 'There are also rural women, who may find topics like period or cervical examination shameful,' she said. She called for more open conversations on HPV to break the stigma. She also suggested outsourcing screenings to general clinics at subsidised rates for wider access. Assistant manager Ang Xiwen, 32, from Kuala Lumpur, noted that the lack of urgency stems from poor awareness. 'I think the awareness itself among women is not strong enough, and that's why I don't feel the need to pay for screening. 'But I would appreciate it if the company provides free screenings for their female employees,' she said. Bank employee Alia A., 27, from Kuala Lumpur, admitted she was unaware of HPV-related risks. She urged the Health Ministry to intensify awareness efforts and make screenings part of employee medical benefits. 'I will gladly go to any GP to get a mandatory screening,' she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store