Musk's X says it won't cooperate with 'politically motivated' French probe
Elon Musk's social media platform X on Monday accused French prosecutors of launching a "politically motivated criminal investigation" that threatens its users' free speech, denying all allegations and saying it would not comply with the probe.
Earlier this month, Paris prosecutors stepped up a preliminary probe into X for suspected algorithmic bias and fraudulent data extraction, enlisting police to investigate alleged wrongdoing by the company or its executives.
"Based on what we know so far, X believes that this investigation is distorting French law in order to serve a political agenda and, ultimately, restrict free speech," the social network posted on its Global Government Affairs account.
For these reasons, X has not acceded to the French authorities' demands, as we have a legal right to do.
In the blistering attack, X also said the probe had been instigated by Eric Bothorel, a French lawmaker, who had accused "X of manipulating its algorithm for 'foreign interference' purposes, an allegation which is completely false".
The Paris prosecutors' office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Neither did Bothorel.
Musk, a former ally of U.S. President Donald Trump, has accused European governments of attacking free speech and has voiced support for some of the region's far-right parties.
The French probe could deepen a rift between Washington and European capitals over what sort of discourse is permitted online, with senior officials from Trump's administration alleging the censoring of right-wing voices around the world.
Previous research
X said Paris prosecutors had requested it hand over "recommendation algorithm and real-time data about all user posts on the platform", for analysis by researchers David Chavalarias and Maziyar Panahi, who it said had both exhibited "open hostility towards X", calling into question the impartiality of the investigation.
Panahi denied any involvement in the investigation.
"My name was mentioned by mistake, based on my previous research projects with David Chavalarias, none of which have ever had any hostile intent toward X," he said in an email.
"The fact my name has been mentioned in such an erroneous manner demonstrates how little regard they have for the lives of others ... I will not hesitate to pursue legal action for defamation should I receive any form of hate speech."
READ | 'Could conflict with Elon's vision': Grok 4 consults with Musk in delivering some responses
Chavalarias did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
X also chafed at the fact that it was being investigated under organised crime charges, which it said would grant the police measures, including wiretapping its employees' personal devices.
Pavel Durov, the Russian-born founder of the Telegram messaging app, is also under judicial supervision in France after being arrested last year and placed under formal investigation for alleged organised crime on the app. He denies guilt.
Early in July, Musk responded "true" to a post on X in which Durov said the French "bureaucrats" investigating X were "waging a crusade against free speech and tech progress".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Inquiry into Afghan data leak to be conducted by Parliament's security watchdog
An inquiry into the Afghan data leak that led to an unprecedented legal gagging order and an £850 million secret relocation scheme is set to be carried out by Parliament's intelligence watchdog. Lord Beamish, chairman of the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament (ISC), said the cross-party group would launch a probe after considering defence assessment documents related to the case. The peer has previously voiced concern over 'serious constitutional issues' raised by the handling of the breach that saw the details of 18,714 applicants for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) scheme released in 2022. The leak prompted an unprecedented superinjunction amid fears the Taliban could target would-be refugees for reprisals, meaning the ISC, which routinely reviews sensitive material, was not briefed. It also saw the establishment of a secret scheme, the Afghanistan Response Route (ARR), to bring some of those affected to the UK at a projected final cost of about £850 million. In a statement on Monday, Lord Beamish said the committee 'has agreed that, once it has considered the requested material, it will conduct an inquiry into the intelligence community's role and activity in connection with the loss of data relating to Arap applicants in February 2022'. The ISC, which is made up of MPs and members of the House of Lords, had asked for the release of defence assessments that formed the basis of the superinjunction, as well as other material relating to the Arap scheme. It hard argued that under the Justice and Security Act 2013, classification of material is not grounds on which information can be withheld from the committee, given its purpose is to scrutinise the work of the UK intelligence community. Thousands of Afghans included on the list of people trying to flee the Taliban are unlikely to receive compensation after their details were accidentally leaked. A spokesman for the Ministry of Defence (MoD) said the Government would 'robustly defend' any legal action or bid for compensation, adding these were 'hypothetical claims'. It has also been reported that the MoD will not proactively offer compensation to those affected. In total, the Government expects 6,900 people to be brought to the UK under the ARR scheme, which was introduced under the previous Tory administration after a defence official leaked the data 'in error' in February 2022. Along with the Afghan nationals, the breach saw details of more than 100 British officials compromised, including special forces and MI6 personnel. The Government has been contacted for comment.
Associated Press
11 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Euro 2025: England coach Wiegman says Jess Carter is ready for semifinal despite online abuse
GENEVA (AP) — England defender Jess Carter is ready to play in the Women's European Championship semifinals after being targeted with racist abuse online, her coach Sarina Wiegman said Monday, adding that it's 'sad' and 'disgusting' that the team has to deal with such an issue. Defending champion England plays Italy on Tuesday, two days after Carter, who is Black, revealed she was subjected to racist abuse this month that was reported to police at home. 'She's ready to perform and to compete. That says also a lot about her and about the team,' Wiegman said at the Geneva stadium. 'Of course, it's really sad that we have to be occupied by this,' the coach added. 'It's ridiculous, it's disgusting what's happening and that goes beyond football.' England trailed by two goals after a rough first half-hour against Sweden in the quarterfinals in Zurich, then rallied late to level the game. England won a memorably chaotic penalty shootout. Carter is 'not the only one that gets this abuse or this racism,' Wiegman said, adding her team was ready to send a 'message to the world.' England midfielder Georgia Stanway said the collective support for Carter 'probably brought us together as a team.' England players talked about the abuse, Stanway said: 'A few people want to come off social media because they're fed up with it.' Tournament organizer UEFA, like world soccer body FIFA and the International Olympic Committee, try to protect athletes with online platforms that flag up abusive posts reported to social media operators. UEFA acknowledged last week this strategy has limited success because of the regulations applied by social networks. 'Although it's a hard situation, Jess is a very strong person,' Wiegman said. 'She also felt, and so did we, that we had to address this. You can't just let it go.' The 27-year-old Carter has played 49 times for England, and came to Euro 2025 after helping her club Gotham FC in New Jersey win the CONCACAF Champions Cup final. Carter's teammates at Gotham include her partner Ann-Katrin Berger, the goalkeeper who was the star of Germany's win over France in the quarterfinals. Germany plays tournament favorite Spain in the other semifinal on Wednesday in Zurich. ___ AP soccer:
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Should You Buy Microsoft's Stock Before July 30?
Key Points Microsoft is much more than just its productivity software like Word and Excel. The greatest excitement now centers around its fast-growing Azure cloud segment. But investors may want to be a tad cautious given the stock' premium valuation. 10 stocks we like better than Microsoft › Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) has been a steady yet quiet outperformer this year. While the market is up around 6%, Microsoft shares have risen an outstanding 20%. Most of Microsoft's strength is derived from its artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities. We'll receive more information regarding the AI arms race on July 30 when Microsoft reports its results for the fourth quarter of its fiscal 2025. These events can bring significant stock price swings. If you're a firm believer that Microsoft will post guidance-beating results, then picking up shares right now seems like the smart move. Microsoft Azure is a huge driving factor for the stock Microsoft is far more than the company that makes Word or Excel. It's also the owner of LinkedIn, Xbox, and Activision Blizzard, the game creator. It divides its business into three units: productivity and business processes (the products most people think of when they hear Microsoft), more personal computing (Microsoft-branded hardware and its gaming platforms), and intelligent cloud. Intelligent Cloud is the primary reason investors are bullish on Microsoft's stock, as it drives significant growth for the company. In its fiscal third quarter (ending March 31), productivity and business processes grew revenue 10% and more personal computing increased sales at a 6% pace. Those two growth rates are common for a mature company like Microsoft, but its Intelligent Cloud is anything but old and boring. It grew revenue at a 21% pace, led by Azure's 33% growth. Azure is Microsoft's cloud computing division, which is the primary beneficiary of all of the AI spending that's going on. Microsoft isn't directly competing in the AI arms race with a generative AI model. Its investment and partnership with OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT, is a key part of Azure's growth, as OpenAI was the first mover in this space and is generally seen as the leader. However, Azure also offers other leading AI models such as Llama from Meta Platforms; China-based DeepSeek, a much cheaper generative AI model; and Grok from xAI, Elon Musk's generative AI company. This library of generative AI models is a key reason why Microsoft is winning on the cloud computing front, as it aims to be an AI facilitator, rather than just promoting a single model. The future is also bright for Azure, as the global cloud computing market is expected to expand from a $750 billion base in 2024 to $2.4 trillion by 2030, according to Grand View Research. This growth stems from both AI and non-AI workloads, serving as a massive tailwind that pushes Azure higher, alongside Microsoft's stock. When Microsoft reports on July 30, I'll be watching management's language regarding Azure, as there is no room for weakness in this critical division. Microsoft's stock has a premium valuation and looks a tad expensive With Microsoft's impressive run and leadership position in the industry, it should come as no surprise that the stock has garnered a premium valuation. At more than 33 times forward earnings, it trades at the top end of its valuation range. This premium valuation has some merit, as Microsoft has consistently grown its earnings per share (EPS) at a market-beating pace. Still, if you look at other companies in Microsoft's valuation range, most are growing their EPS at a much quicker pace. As a result, I think investors should be patient with Microsoft's stock. Microsoft has been and will continue to be an excellent AI stock to own, but there's no denying it has gotten expensive. Investors should wait to see what Microsoft has to say on July 30 before rushing to buy the stock today. Do the experts think Microsoft is a buy right now? The Motley Fool's expert analyst team, drawing on years of investing experience and deep analysis of thousands of stocks, leverages our proprietary Moneyball AI investing database to uncover top opportunities. They've just revealed their to buy now — did Microsoft make the list? When our Stock Advisor analyst team has a stock recommendation, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is up 1,048% vs. just 180% for the S&P — that is beating the market by 867.59%!* Imagine if you were a Stock Advisor member when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Keithen Drury has positions in Amazon, Meta Platforms, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Should You Buy Microsoft's Stock Before July 30? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
