Average UK house price increased by nearly £900 in April
Halifax recorded a 0.3% month-on-month price rise in April, following a 0.5% monthly fall in March.
The annual house price growth rate ticked up to 3.2% in April, from 2.9% in March, Halifax said.
The average property price in April was £297,781, up from £296,899 in March.
Amanda Bryden, head of mortgages, Halifax, said: 'UK house prices rose by 0.3% in March, an increase of just under £900.
'We know the stamp duty changes prompted a surge in transactions in the early part of this year, as buyers rushed to beat the tax-rise deadline.
'However, this didn't lead to a significant increase in property prices, with the last six months characterised by a stability in prices rarely seen since the pandemic.'
Halifax's figures are in contrast to Nationwide Building Society's latest house price index, released last week.
Nationwide reported that house price growth had softened, with prices dipping by 0.6% month on month in April and price growth also slowing on an annual basis, at 3.4% in April, down from 3.9% in March.
Stamp duty 'nil rate' bands have become less generous from April, with some buyers facing higher costs for moving home. Stamp duty applies in England and Northern Ireland.
Ms Bryden said 'modest price growth' is expected this year, adding: 'Overall, the market continues to show resilience, despite a subdued economic environment and risks from geopolitical developments.'
Looking across the UK, Halifax recorded strong house price growth in Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland, with a more subdued picture in south-west England and London.
Nathan Emerson, chief executive of property professionals' body Propertymark, said of the Halifax figures: 'This is a sign of sustained confidence in the UK's housing market following a recent stamp duty surge in home buying, and it should give those sellers hoping to take advantage of the traditionally busier spring and summer months motivation to move up the housing ladder.'
Iain McKenzie, chief executive of the Guild of Property Professionals, said: 'We're seeing mortgage rates continue their welcome descent, with sub-4% deals now reappearing, which is a clear boost for buyer affordability and confidence.'
Jonathan Handford, managing director at estate agent group Fine & Country, said: 'The rebound in prices suggests the market may be finding its footing after a turbulent few months.'
Matt Thompson, head of sales at London-based estate agent Chestertons, said: 'In April, some house hunters paused their search amid the Easter holidays, but sellers remained motivated which resulted in an uplift in the number of properties put up for sale.'
Tom Bill, head of UK residential research at Knight Frank, said: 'Demand has increased as more mortgage rates drop below 4%, which will underpin prices while the momentum is maintained.
'Tariff turbulence has helped push interest rate expectations lower but buyers could be put off if it gets too bumpy.'
Jason Tebb, president of OnTheMarket, said: 'With property prices remaining relatively steady, this suggests that affordability is having an impact on the amount buyers are willing and/or able to pay.'
Babek Ismayil, founder and chief executive at homebuying platform OneDome, said: 'This increase masks ongoing affordability pressures and the longer-term hangover from the stamp duty changes in April.'
Tomer Aboody, director of specialist lender MT Finance, said: 'The end of the stamp duty holiday in March saw a big push in transactions completing by the end of the month so that buyers could avoid the tax increase.
'We are now seeing the fallout, with transactions and mortgage approvals falling, although prices are holding steady.'
Here are average house prices and the annual increase, according to Halifax. The regional annual change figures are based on the most recent three months of approved mortgage transaction data:
East Midlands, £245,884, 3.0%
Eastern England, £335,619, 2.0%
London, £543,346, 1.3%
North East, £175,207, 2.1%
North West, £240,975, 4.1%
Northern Ireland, £208,220, 8.1%
Scotland, £214,011, 4.6%
South East, £391,830, 2.0%
South West, £304,451, 0.9%
Wales, £229,079, 4.7%
West Midlands, £261,098, 3.3%
Yorkshire and the Humber, £214,844, 3.8%
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Lutnick says US-China trade framework should resolve rare earth issue
LONDON, June 11 (Reuters) - U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Wednesday that a trade framework and implementation plan agreed with China in London should result in restrictions on rare earths and magents being resolved. Lutnick told reporters the U.S. negotiating team would take the framework back to President Donald Trump to get his approval, and then hope to implement the new agreement.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
China's Li says US-China reach framework on trade, will report back to leaders
LONDON, June 10 (Reuters) - China's Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang said on Tuesday that the Chinese and the U.S. negotiating teams had agreed a framework on trade after two days of talks, and would take that back to their leaders. "The two sides have, in principle, reached a framework for implementing the consensus reached by the two heads of state during the phone call on June 5th and the consensus reached at the Geneva meeting," Li told reporters.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Model Katie Price ‘objectified' in Diesel clothing advert
An advertisement for Diesel featuring Katie Price has been banned for being irresponsible and likely to cause serious offence by objectifying women. The ad, which appeared on The Guardian 's website in March, featured Price wearing a bikini and holding a handbag. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received 13 complaints that the ad objectified women and featured a model who appeared to be unhealthily thin. Diesel said the ad was part of a campaign called 'The Houseguests', which was designed to challenge stereotypes and support diversity and inclusion by reflecting a wide range of body types. The brand said Price is 46 years old and has a body type that is not usually included in high fashion campaigns, explaining that the average age for editorial models is between 16 and 23. Diesel believed the ad was compliant with advertising rules but removed it from The Guardian. Diesel believed the image was a 'celebration of Ms Price's sexuality and empowerment and was not objectifying, degrading or sexualising', and 'showed Ms Price clearly in control in an active and dynamic pose where she proudly showed off her body and the handbag'. Diesel added that Price was 'well-known for her exaggerated appearance and larger-than-life personality and her large lips and breasts formed part of her curated public image', and this 'exaggerated, eccentric and altered appearance' formed part of the creativity of the campaign. Finally, Diesel said although Price was slender, she had excellent muscle tone and was not unhealthily underweight. The Guardian said it received a complaint directly about the ad on April 4 and blocked it from appearing again because it did not consider it complied with their policies. Partly upholding the complaints, the ASA said the bikini only partially covered Price's breasts, and it considered the positioning of the handbag, in front of her stomach with the handle framing her chest, drew viewers' attention to, and emphasised, that part of her body. The ASA said: 'While we acknowledged that Ms Price was shown in a confident and self-assured pose and in control, we considered that because of the positioning of the handbag, which had the effect of emphasising and drawing attention to her breasts, the ad sexualised her in a way that objectified her. 'We therefore considered the ad was likely to cause serious offence, was irresponsible and breached the Code.' The ASA did not uphold complaints about Price appearing to be unhealthily thin, and concluded that the ad was not irresponsible on that basis. The watchdog ruled that the ad must not appear again, adding: 'We told Diesel to ensure their future ads were socially responsible and did not cause serious or widespread offence.'
