David Marr follows Sam Maiden to the exit after Honi Soit withdraws speaking invitation
So, in the spirit of collegiality, when she was invited in March to speak at the Student Journalism Conference to be held by Honi Soit at the University of Sydney in August, she accepted the offer. After all, the hosts were fawning, saying they 'would be honoured to hear you speak, and it would really be a highlight of the conference'.
But this week their sentiments changed dramatically. 'We have received community concerns about your political coverage and reporting on the Palestinian genocide,' the organisers said in an email to Maiden.
'As a left-wing newspaper, Honi Soit recognises that Israel is committing an ongoing genocide in Palestine and we do not feel that our values align, or that we can platform your work as a result.'
Maiden had been de-platformed.
'The truly weird aspect of this bizarre cancelling is I don't recall writing anything about Palestine recently at all, let alone anything controversial,' Maiden wrote on Thursday.
'I have literally no idea what they are on about, and regardless, even if I had written something or said something controversial that the Honi Soit editors did not agree with, so what?'
Enter David Marr, another distinguished journalist who had agreed to speak at the conference. When the ABC's new Late Night Live host heard Maiden had been 'de-platformed' he told organisers their decision was 'not my idea of how a good newspaper – let alone a student paper – should behave'.
'Isn't the point of Honi Soit and a conference of this kind to examine different – and perhaps uncomfortable views – about the big issues of the day? I'm out. David Marr.'
Honi Soit replied, telling Marr they wanted to 'create a safe place for our student community'.
'If we had not decided to uninvite Samantha in light of the complaints we have received, there was a high likelihood that there may have been protests or boycotts on the day of the event,' editors wrote in an email seen by Weekly Beast.
This incensed Marr, who has asked them to explain what they mean by 'safe place'.
'Do you fear violence? Who would be to blame if it broke out? Sam Maiden? Are you afraid of boycotts and demonstrations? Haven't they been part and parcel of university politics for ever?'
Marr: 'When the great issue facing universities – here & abroad – is the right to speak freely about Gaza in the face of those determined to outlaw those views, doesn't deplatforming speakers YOU don't want heard show you behaving just as badly as them?'
The Student Journalism Conference's social media account has not caught up with Maiden's cancellation. On Friday it was still promoting Maiden and Marr as speakers.
While factcheckers have debunked claims travellers who intend to visit Australia are accidentally buying tickets to Austria, some journalists are still getting the two countries mixed up. Not even the great New York Times is immune, this week posting on social media that it was an Australian publication which was responsible for a fake 'exclusive' interview with Clint Eastwood. It was of course the German-language Austrian newspaper Kurier which published the cobbled together piece.
'Clint Eastwood has accused an Australian publication of running a fake interview with him,' the NYT Bluesky account claimed. Published on Wednesday, the post was still live on Friday.
It's not often that News Corp and the NRL are not in lockstep. But the Sydney Morning Herald and the Age reported on Friday the top brass at the Murdoch newspapers 'boycotted the offer of NRL hospitality at last week's State of Origin match in Brisbane amid a war of words with Australian Rugby League Commission chairman Peter V'landys'.
V'landys was not happy with a series in the Daily Telegraph, Courier Mail and Code Sports about rugby league player-agents which revealed 62% of agents believed drug use is a problem with players.
The editor of the Telegraph, Ben English, told SMH sports reporter Michael Chammas: 'It was great journalism, it was really topical and it provoked some constructive conversations about the future of the game. It's exactly the sort of journalism we should be doing. If different stakeholders, such as the NRL, didn't have an issue with what we write, we wouldn't be doing our job.' Credit where credit is due.
While editors boycotted the game, the Herald noted, the News Corp chairman, Lachlan Murdoch, was all too happy to take in the Brisbane match from his private suite.
News Corp Australia has embraced the use of AI for its illustrations in recent years.
And not just illustrations. Guardian Australia revealed in 2023 the media company was producing 3,000 articles a week using generative artificial intelligence.
In recent years ChatGPT often replaces newspaper photography or commissioned art on Daily Telegraph opinion pieces, which we told you about last year.
But the use of AI on a news.com.au piece this week caught our eye.
'AI is coming for your job,' the article said. 'You've probably been hearing this for months, or even years, but now it's happening.
'Many questions remain unanswered – how will it happen? And what are the jobs AI is already taking?'
The story quoted University of Technology Sydney professor Giuseppe Carabetta, who said jobs across all levels of the service industries were being offloaded to AI.
Were the editors aware of the irony of the image they chose to illustrate the article?
The caption on the image read: 'Mr Carabetta said the AI job takeover is already happening. Picture: AI generated'.
The Victorian supreme court trial over a beef wellington lunch that left three in-laws dead has attracted intense media interest, extending beyond local media to international outlets and the attendance of celebrated writer Helen Garner. And then there are the podcasts, which are, well, mushrooming.
But the strict rules for reporting the trial of Erin Patterson have slipped up a few media outlets as well as people posting on Facebook. Our reporters on the ground, Nino Bucci and Adeshola Ore, say a suppression order on some names was breached by outlets including Crikey and the ABC. The ABC's popular podcast Mushroom Case Daily with reporter Rachael Brown and producer Stephen Stockwell inadvertently breached the order but it has since been rectified.
The former editor-in-chief of the Australian Financial Review, Michael Stutchbury, took the well-worn path of former conservative leaning editors and joined a centre-right thinktank this week.
Stutch, 68, served less than a year as editor-at-large and left the paper to become the executive director of the Centre for Independent Studies (CIS). He replaces Tom Switzer, a former opinion editor at The Australian and editorial writer at the Australian Financial Review.
Earlier this year, The Australian's former economics editor and Washington correspondent, Adam Creighton, joined the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) as a senior fellow and chief economist. He still writes a column for The Australian.
Joining the AFR this week – but not replacing Stutch – is Kate de Brito, the former editor-in-chief of news.com.au and Kidspot, editor-in-chief of Mamamia and head of digital for the News Corp editorial network.
Until 2023, de Brito was executive editor of Foxtel's news streaming service, Flash. She has been appointed deputy editor news, replacing Jessica Gardner, who has become US correspondent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Capital Guard Shares Five Key Investment Principles Amid Rising Interest Rates in Australia
SYDNEY, Australia, August 13, 2025 (EZ Newswire) -- As interest rates climb, Australians nearing or in retirement are reconsidering their investment strategies. Many are shifting from growth-focused portfolios toward options that offer income, stability, and reduced exposure to market swings. In response, Capital Guard, opens new tab, an ASIC-authorised financial services provider, has released five principles to guide Australians in building resilient, income-focused, and long-term fixed income investment portfolios. Fixed-income investments such as banking bonds, corporate bonds, and investment-grade bonds are drawing renewed attention. These options provide defined returns and can help investors plan with greater certainty. In periods of rising rates, structured income strategies often become more relevant to those seeking lower volatility and reliable cash flow. 'We often hear, 'Where can I get 5.5% interest without locking away my savings?' or 'How do bond yields compare to term deposit rates?',' said a spokesperson for the Capital Guard. 'Most investors aren't chasing high returns. They want security, access, and predictability. These principles provide a framework to meet those goals.' Five Key Principles for Income-Focused Investors Income investing is not about chasing the highest yield. It involves measured decisions aligned with long term investing goals, income needs, and access requirements. These principles reflect what experienced investors consider when building structured portfolios in a higher-rate environment. 1. Prioritise protecting your principal Preserving capital forms the foundation of a conservative investment strategy. Low-volatility products like secure fixed income bonds, investment bonds, and term deposits can protect principal while generating income. Investors often overlook that predictability in returns can have a greater long-term impact than short-term gains, particularly in retirement when recovery time is limited. Portfolios can be structured to provide both income and access to funds at different intervals. 2. Focus on long-term income, not short-term rates Temporary fluctuations in interest rates can lead to reactive decisions. For those planning retirement income over 10 to 20 years, stability and consistency often matter more than opportunistic rates. Fixed-income strategies such as laddered term deposits or staggered bonds help manage reinvestment risk and provide regular, forecastable income. This approach allows retirees to avoid being forced to reinvest at lower rates if the market shifts. 3. Look past the headline rate A product offering 6% may appear attractive at first glance, but that figure rarely tells the whole story. Terms such as minimum lock-in periods, penalties for early withdrawal, compounding frequency, and the credit quality of the issuer all affect the actual value of a product. Evaluating these factors is essential when comparing fixed-term deposit rates and bond yields. Aligning choices with liquidity needs, risk tolerance, and cash flow planning will often yield better outcomes than pursuing yield alone. 4. Diversify across providers and terms Concentration risk is often underestimated. Relying too heavily on one bank, product type, or maturity date increases exposure to rate shifts or unforeseen changes. Diversifying across different banks, institutions, and maturity horizons can help mitigate this. For example, combining short-term deposits with medium-duration bonds provides flexibility, liquidity, and protection against falling rates. This layered approach also helps investors avoid reinvesting large amounts during unfavourable periods. 5. Consider bonds as a strategic alternative to term deposits Bond investments can offer stable income, capital protection, and greater flexibility than traditional deposits. In a rising rate environment, bonds may deliver higher yields and compare favourably against typical bank term deposit rates, especially for those seeking predictable returns. Capital Guard AU offers a range of Australian fixed-income solutions, including secure fixed-income bonds and tailored portfolios designed to help investors access the best Australian bond rates available. A Cautious Shift Toward Fixed Income Capital Guard has observed a growing preference among Australians for steady, income-generating assets over market-linked growth. This shift reflects both economic conditions and a demographic trend, as more individuals seek to convert accumulated savings into predictable income streams. The firm notes that interest in term deposits, investment in Australia, and other fixed-income investments has increased over the past 18 months. While interest rates remain elevated, the opportunity to lock in secure returns is strong. But investors need to weigh access, taxation, product structure, and timing. A diversified, well-planned fixed-income portfolio can help maintain lifestyle goals without taking on unnecessary risk. To explore how to invest in fixed-income visit Capital Guard's website, opens new tab. About Capital Guard Capital Guard AU Pty Ltd is an ASIC-authorised financial services provider (AFSL 498434, ACN 168 216 742, ABN 48 168 216 742), headquartered at Level 36, 1 Macquarie Place, Sydney NSW 2000. The firm offers services in fixed-income and equity investments, retirement planning, and general financial advice. For more information, visit opens new tab and follow Capital Guard on Facebook, opens new tab, LinkedIn, opens new tab, Instagram, opens new tab, X, opens new tab, and YouTube, opens new tab. Legal Disclaimer Investors are encouraged to review our Financial Services Guide, opens new tab and Risk Disclosure Statement, opens new tab and to consult a licensed adviser before making investment decisions. Media Contact Capital Guard+61 2 8551 2719info@ ### SOURCE: Capital Guard Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire See release on EZ Newswire
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
How German media outlets helped pave the way for Israel's murder of journalists in Gaza
What is the role of journalism when Palestinian reporters are treated as criminals and left to die? Last October, I spoke with the journalist Hossam Shabat. He described families packing what little they had left in northern Gaza as Israel began implementing its 'generals' plan'. Six months later, Shabat was dead – killed by Israel, accused of being a Hamas operative. Israel does not try to hide these killings. Instead, it often smears its victims in advance – branding journalists as 'terrorists', accusations that are rarely substantiated. These labels serve a clear cause: to strip reporters of their civilian status and make their killing appear morally acceptable. Journalists are not legitimate targets. Killing them is a war crime. The latest round shook the world: five Al Jazeera journalists were assassinated in a press tent in Gaza City, among them Anas al-Sharif, whose face had become familiar to anyone following Gaza up close. Both the UN and the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) had warned that al-Sharif's life was in danger. Weeks later, he was dead. Meanwhile, a growing consensus recognises Gaza as the site of a livestreamed genocide. Yet in Germany – a country that prides itself on having learned the lessons of its own genocidal history – some of the most powerful media institutions have played a part in enabling Israel's actions. Some German journalists have even justified the killing of their Palestinian colleagues. The clearest example is Axel Springer, Europe's largest publisher and owner of Bild, Germany's biggest newspaper. Hours after the killing of al-Sharif became public, Bild splashed his image under this headline: 'Terrorist disguised as journalist killed in Gaza' (which was later changed to 'Journalist killed was allegedly a terrorist'). Let that sink in. About a week before, Bild had published another piece: 'This Gaza photographer stages Hamas propaganda.' The article targeted the Palestinian photographer Anas Zayed Fteiha, accusing him of staging images of starving Palestinians as part of a Hamas campaign, despite the evidence that the subjects of the photos were indeed starving and waiting for food. In the article, Fteiha's title as journalist appeared in quotation marks, implying he wasn't a real journalist, and that images of starvation were exaggerated fabrications. The Bild story – along with a similar piece in the liberal Süddeutsche Zeitung (SZ) – was swiftly amplified on X by Israel's foreign ministry, which cited them as proof that Hamas manipulates global opinion. Fteiha was branded an 'Israel- and Jew-hater' serving Hamas. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation quickly piled on, joined by rightwing influencers. In this case, German media had become a direct pipeline for Israeli talking points, quickly recycled into the international arena and repackaged as 'evidence'. Fteiha said in response: 'I don't create suffering. I document it.' Calling his work 'Hamas propaganda', he continued, 'is a felony against the press itself'. Just days before the Bild and SZ articles were published, one of Germany's largest journalists' associations, Deutscher Journalisten-Verband (DJV), issued a statement warning of 'manipulation' in press photography. It specifically cast doubt on images showing emaciated children in Gaza, claiming their condition 'apparently is not attributable to the famine in Gaza'. The DJV offered no evidence for this claim – largely because no such evidence exists. Facing backlash online, the association cited a July article in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, whose author had speculated whether images of emaciated infants were really the result of starvation – or rather of preexisting conditions such as cystic fibrosis. The piece suggested that publications had been either negligent or manipulative in publishing these photos without further detail. Omitted was the fact that hunger and preexisting conditions can't be neatly separated and that no preexisting condition alone could produce such extreme emaciation. Bias isn't new in the German media landscape. At Axel Springer, support for the existence of the state of Israel is second on the list of the company's guiding principles, its so-called essentials. In September last year, Bild helped derail ceasefire negotiations by publishing an 'exclusive' report – excerpts from a Hamas strategy leaked to Bild by Benjamin Netanyahu's aides. In it, Bild claimed Hamas was 'not aiming for a quick end to the war', which neatly absolved Netanyahu of any responsibility for the breakdown in talks at the time. (In response to queries about the story, a Bild spokesperson told +972 magazine that the publication does not comment on its sources.) As it turned out, the Hamas document had been broadly misrepresented by Bild. The timing couldn't have served Netanyahu better: the story landed as mass protests put pressure on his position. Shortly after the Bild report was published, Netanyahu cited it in a cabinet meeting to cast the demonstrators as pawns of Hamas. The Bild article remains online, uncorrected. The problem, however, extends far beyond Bild and Axel Springer. Across legacy German media, failures to provide fact-based, balanced coverage of Israel and Palestine have been far reaching – and became glaringly obvious after the 7 October attacks. Fabricated claims, such as that Hamas had beheaded 40 babies, along with various other pieces of deliberate misinformation, remain uncorrected. Outlets across the political spectrum in Germany routinely omit historical context, frame Palestinian deaths in passive, depoliticised terms, and display a near-blind faith in Israeli military 'verification' – while ignoring a well-documented record of misinformation by Israeli state sources. In January, the ostensibly leftwing Die Tageszeitung ran a piece headlined: 'Can journalists be terrorists?' The article cited the Israeli military four times – and did not quote a single journalist in Gaza. Across the German media landscape, such narratives contribute to stripping Palestinian journalists of credibility, and – in the worst case – handing Israel readymade justifications for targeting them. Germany's 'never again' pledge should carry weight given its deeply genocidal history. Yet it rings hollow when the country's dominant outlets launder or supply propaganda to legitimise mass killing in Gaza. This is not journalism in the service of truth – it is journalism in the service of violence. Breaking this cycle would require a serious reckoning with the editorial cultures and political loyalties that have enabled German journalism to be weaponised in this way. The killing of journalists in Gaza makes one thing painfully clear: Israel does not want a record to be left. When the history of this genocide is written, there will be chapters on the media's role. Germany's section will be uncomfortably large. No one should claim they didn't see it happening. Hanno Hauenstein is a Berlin-based journalist and author. He worked as a senior editor in Berliner Zeitung's culture department, specialising in contemporary art and politics
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
World Business Report Are US tariffs driving stock market highs?
Stocks continue to rally following better-than- expected US inflation data, but what is the global economic picture likely to be longer term? We hear from the US Small Business Association - and the EU's International Trade Committee. Rare earths have been a flashpoint in US–China trade talks, with Beijing restricting global supply earlier this year. Could a project in Australia quell further disruption? And while some countries have eased back on investment in Africa, the UAE has become the continent's largest state investor. Our correspondent in Dubai explains more.
