David Marr follows Sam Maiden to the exit after Honi Soit withdraws speaking invitation
Before Samantha Maiden was the Gold Walkley award-winning political editor of news.com.au she was editor of the student newspaper On Dit at Adelaide University.
So, in the spirit of collegiality, when she was invited in March to speak at the Student Journalism Conference to be held by Honi Soit at the University of Sydney in August, she accepted the offer. After all, the hosts were fawning, saying they 'would be honoured to hear you speak, and it would really be a highlight of the conference'.
But this week their sentiments changed dramatically. 'We have received community concerns about your political coverage and reporting on the Palestinian genocide,' the organisers said in an email to Maiden.
'As a left-wing newspaper, Honi Soit recognises that Israel is committing an ongoing genocide in Palestine and we do not feel that our values align, or that we can platform your work as a result.'
Maiden had been de-platformed.
'The truly weird aspect of this bizarre cancelling is I don't recall writing anything about Palestine recently at all, let alone anything controversial,' Maiden wrote on Thursday.
'I have literally no idea what they are on about, and regardless, even if I had written something or said something controversial that the Honi Soit editors did not agree with, so what?'
Enter David Marr, another distinguished journalist who had agreed to speak at the conference. When the ABC's new Late Night Live host heard Maiden had been 'de-platformed' he told organisers their decision was 'not my idea of how a good newspaper – let alone a student paper – should behave'.
'Isn't the point of Honi Soit and a conference of this kind to examine different – and perhaps uncomfortable views – about the big issues of the day? I'm out. David Marr.'
Honi Soit replied, telling Marr they wanted to 'create a safe place for our student community'.
'If we had not decided to uninvite Samantha in light of the complaints we have received, there was a high likelihood that there may have been protests or boycotts on the day of the event,' editors wrote in an email seen by Weekly Beast.
This incensed Marr, who has asked them to explain what they mean by 'safe place'.
'Do you fear violence? Who would be to blame if it broke out? Sam Maiden? Are you afraid of boycotts and demonstrations? Haven't they been part and parcel of university politics for ever?'
Marr: 'When the great issue facing universities – here & abroad – is the right to speak freely about Gaza in the face of those determined to outlaw those views, doesn't deplatforming speakers YOU don't want heard show you behaving just as badly as them?'
The Student Journalism Conference's social media account has not caught up with Maiden's cancellation. On Friday it was still promoting Maiden and Marr as speakers.
While factcheckers have debunked claims travellers who intend to visit Australia are accidentally buying tickets to Austria, some journalists are still getting the two countries mixed up. Not even the great New York Times is immune, this week posting on social media that it was an Australian publication which was responsible for a fake 'exclusive' interview with Clint Eastwood. It was of course the German-language Austrian newspaper Kurier which published the cobbled together piece.
'Clint Eastwood has accused an Australian publication of running a fake interview with him,' the NYT Bluesky account claimed. Published on Wednesday, the post was still live on Friday.
It's not often that News Corp and the NRL are not in lockstep. But the Sydney Morning Herald and the Age reported on Friday the top brass at the Murdoch newspapers 'boycotted the offer of NRL hospitality at last week's State of Origin match in Brisbane amid a war of words with Australian Rugby League Commission chairman Peter V'landys'.
V'landys was not happy with a series in the Daily Telegraph, Courier Mail and Code Sports about rugby league player-agents which revealed 62% of agents believed drug use is a problem with players.
The editor of the Telegraph, Ben English, told SMH sports reporter Michael Chammas: 'It was great journalism, it was really topical and it provoked some constructive conversations about the future of the game. It's exactly the sort of journalism we should be doing. If different stakeholders, such as the NRL, didn't have an issue with what we write, we wouldn't be doing our job.' Credit where credit is due.
While editors boycotted the game, the Herald noted, the News Corp chairman, Lachlan Murdoch, was all too happy to take in the Brisbane match from his private suite.
News Corp Australia has embraced the use of AI for its illustrations in recent years.
And not just illustrations. Guardian Australia revealed in 2023 the media company was producing 3,000 articles a week using generative artificial intelligence.
In recent years ChatGPT often replaces newspaper photography or commissioned art on Daily Telegraph opinion pieces, which we told you about last year.
But the use of AI on a news.com.au piece this week caught our eye.
'AI is coming for your job,' the article said. 'You've probably been hearing this for months, or even years, but now it's happening.
'Many questions remain unanswered – how will it happen? And what are the jobs AI is already taking?'
The story quoted University of Technology Sydney professor Giuseppe Carabetta, who said jobs across all levels of the service industries were being offloaded to AI.
Were the editors aware of the irony of the image they chose to illustrate the article?
The caption on the image read: 'Mr Carabetta said the AI job takeover is already happening. Picture: AI generated'.
The Victorian supreme court trial over a beef wellington lunch that left three in-laws dead has attracted intense media interest, extending beyond local media to international outlets and the attendance of celebrated writer Helen Garner. And then there are the podcasts, which are, well, mushrooming.
But the strict rules for reporting the trial of Erin Patterson have slipped up a few media outlets as well as people posting on Facebook. Our reporters on the ground, Nino Bucci and Adeshola Ore, say a suppression order on some names was breached by outlets including Crikey and the ABC. The ABC's popular podcast Mushroom Case Daily with reporter Rachael Brown and producer Stephen Stockwell inadvertently breached the order but it has since been rectified.
The former editor-in-chief of the Australian Financial Review, Michael Stutchbury, took the well-worn path of former conservative leaning editors and joined a centre-right thinktank this week.
Stutch, 68, served less than a year as editor-at-large and left the paper to become the executive director of the Centre for Independent Studies (CIS). He replaces Tom Switzer, a former opinion editor at The Australian and editorial writer at the Australian Financial Review.
Earlier this year, The Australian's former economics editor and Washington correspondent, Adam Creighton, joined the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) as a senior fellow and chief economist. He still writes a column for The Australian.
Joining the AFR this week – but not replacing Stutch – is Kate de Brito, the former editor-in-chief of news.com.au and Kidspot, editor-in-chief of Mamamia and head of digital for the News Corp editorial network.
Until 2023, de Brito was executive editor of Foxtel's news streaming service, Flash. She has been appointed deputy editor news, replacing Jessica Gardner, who has become US correspondent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
European journalists targeted with Paragon Solutions spyware, say researchers
The hacking mystery roiling the Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni's rightwing government is deepening after researchers said they found new evidence that two more journalists were targeted using the same military-grade spyware that Italy has admitted to using against activists. A parliamentary committee overseeing intelligence confirmed earlier this month that Italy used mercenary spyware made by Israel-based Paragon Solutions against two Italian activists. But the same committee, which launched an investigation into the hacking scandal in March, said it was unable to determine who was behind the targeting of a prominent Italian investigative journalist named Francesco Cancellato, whose news outlet has been critical of the Meloni government. Now a report by researchers at the Citizen Lab has revealed that a close colleague of Cancellato, Ciro Pellegrino, who is head of the investigative outlet Naples bureau, was also targeted by a user of Paragon Solution's spyware, which is called Graphite. The Citizen Lab said a third journalist, who chose to remain anonymous and is described as a 'prominent European journalist', had also been targeted with the spyware. The news comes as Paragon and the Italian government have been engaged in an acrimonious public spat. Haaretz reported this week that Paragon had offered to assist the Italian government in investigating Cancellato's case. Italy reportedly rejected that offer, however, with the Italian department of security intelligence saying that it raised national security concerns. Meloni's office did not reply to a request for comment. A debate on the matter, which has prompted outrage among the Italian opposition and MEPs in Brussels, has been scheduled in the European parliament on 16 June. The Guardian approached Paragon for comment on the latest development. It referred to comments it made to Haaretz, in which it confirmed it cancelled its contract with the Italian government after reports first emerged in February that Cancellato had been targeted. The Guardian first reported that Paragon was terminating its contract with Italy in February. Like other spyware vendors, Paragon sells its cyberweapon to government clients who are supposed to use it to prevent crime. The company has said it sells its spyware only to democratic countries and that its terms of service forbids agencies to use the spyware against journalists or members of civil society. The question now remains who is behind the targeting of the two journalists. John Scott-Railton, a senior researcher at the Citizen Lab, said: 'We found that both journalists phones bore Paragon's unmistakable digital fingerprints. Making matters even more interesting, we found fingerprints matching the same Paragon customer in both cases.' A report released by the Copasir parliamentary committee found that Italy's domestic and foreign intelligence agencies had contracts with Paragon in 2023 and 2024, and that the hacking software was used with the permission of a prosecutor and in limited circumstances. The committee said the spyware had been used to search for fugitives, investigate alleged terrorism, organised crime, fuel smuggling and counter-espionage efforts. It said the pro-immigrant human rights activists who were targeted – they included Luca Cassarini and Giuseppe Caccia – had been spied on due to their connection to 'irregular immigration' and not because they were involved in human rights.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Unbelievable feud breaks out over VERY trivial footpath matter in ritzy suburb
Advertisement-plastered bus stops have caused some of Australia's most well-off residents to melt down. Locals in Sydney 's Rose Bay have exploded at their council for installing more than 30 new bus stop shelters around the suburb. The shelters in themselves don't seem to be the problem, however, rather locals have taken issue with the 'giant advertising screen' featured on the side of each one. The large advertisements detract from the natural beauty of the suburb's promenade, argued Deanna Mastellone on Facebook. 'It is absolutely ridiculous. Woollahra Council placing this giant advertising screen outside the Wintergarden, blocking this very busy footpath which is enjoyed by so many,' she said. But Woollahra Council defended its decision to place the money-spinning ads across every bus shelter in the district. A spokesperson for the council said the revenue it raised from these ads helps pay for vital services that assist the entire community. The eye-sores incited a lively debate online where locals offered various takes on the matter. Ms Mastellone vowed to have the issue 'corrected' and had a particular problem with the fact that nobody in Rose Bay was even consulted prior to the rollout. 'It is an absolute disgrace Woollahra Council has signed up for 39 advertising bus shelters with zero community consultation,' she wrote. 'Such an ugly blight on our magnificent Rose Bay Promenade. 'This will be corrected, this is so very wrong.' Ms Mastellone compared her suburb to others in the city's east like Balmoral Beach, which has no bus shelter ads, and Mosman Council which has 22. Before installing its ads Mosman Council at least 'engaged with the entire community', Ms Mastellone said. The ticked-off local even filed a complaint with Woollahra Council's Audit, Risk and Innovation external committee in her quest to have the shelters' ads removed. 'I am not against bus shelters, we must protect and preserve our streetscape and ensure all the community is engaged in the placement of them,' she wrote. Those who chimed into the debate had mixed opinions with some agreeing, but others claiming Ms Mastellone was making a fuss over nothing. 'Rain protection and advertising revenue to keep your council rates lower. What's the issue?' one said. 'Perhaps think of the seniors waiting for a bus who appreciate having somewhere to sit while they wait,' another wrote. Those who did agree with Ms Mastellone found even more reasons to complain. 'No proper access for wheelchairs and mobility aids to pass by and no alerts for vision-impaired members of the community to safely navigate around,' one said. 'These are disgusting eyesores around Rose Bay, I agree,' a second agreed. But despite all the upraor, Woollahra Council said the shelters were here to stay. 'They provide excellent shelter and shade for commuters,' a spokesperson told Yahoo News. 'Each site was assessed to ensure the shelters were placed safely and appropriately and notifications were issued to nearby residents and businesses, providing opportunity for feedback.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump to review Aukus nuclear submarine pact with Australia and UK
The US is reviewing the Aukus nuclear submarine deal with the UK and Australia to assess whether it aligns with Donald Trump 's 'America First' agenda, casting doubt on the trilateral agreement aimed at countering China. A Pentagon official said the 2021 deal was being reviewed to ensure it 'aligned with the president's America First agenda' ahead of his talks with Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese at the upcoming G7 summit in Canada. The £176bn Aukus agreement involving Australia, the US and the UK is a strategic security partnership aimed primarily at helping Australia acquire nuclear submarines using American and British technology, marking a major advancement in the country's military capabilities. Australian defence minister Richard Marles said on Thursday Canberra was confident the pact would proceed and that their government would closely work with the Trump administration. 'I am very confident this is going to happen,' he told ABC News, adding that Aukus was in the strategic interests of all three countries. He claimed that a review of the deal signed under former US president Joe Biden was not a surprise. 'This is a multi-decade plan,' he said. 'There will be governments that come and go, and I think whenever we see a new government a review of this kind is going to be something which will be undertaken.' The statement came after media reports said the US was reviewing its commitment to the pact. It was first reported by the Financial Times, citing six people familiar with the matter. 'The department is reviewing Aukus as part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the president's 'America first' agenda,' a Pentagon official was quoted as saying. 'This means ensuring the highest readiness of our service members, that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defence and that the defence industrial base is meeting our needs.' The Pentagon's top policy adviser, Elbridge Colby, who has previously raised concerns that the US could lose submarines to Australia at a critical time for military deterrence against China, will be a key figure in the review, examining the production rate of Virginia-class submarines, Mr Marles confirmed. Australia and the UK have both faced pressure from the White House to increase their military spending. While the UK has heeded the demand, Australia has resisted it. Mr Albanese is expected to meet Mr Trump for the first time next week on the sidelines of the G7 meeting. They are likely to discuss Washington's demand that Australia increase its defence spending from 2 to 3.5 per cent of its GDP. Mr Albanese has said Australia's defence spending will rise to 2.3 per cent but has declined to commit to America's target. The possibility of the deal collapsing has caused anxiety in London and Canberra but has been met with cheers in Beijing, experts said. John Lee, an Indo-Pacific expert at Washington's conservative Hudson Institute think tank, said the Pentagon review was 'primarily an audit of American capability' and whether it could afford to sell up to five nuclear submarines when it wasn't meeting its own production targets. 'Relatedly, the low Australian defence spending and ambiguity as to how it might contribute to a Taiwan contingency is also a factor,' Mr Lee said. John Hamre, president of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies and a former senior Pentagon official, told a Lowy Institute seminar in Sydney on Thursday there was a perception in Washington that 'the Albanese government has been supportive of Aukus but not really leaning in on Aukus ', with defence spending being part of this.
