Former Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis asks Supreme Court to reverse same-sex marriage decision
Davis's attorneys at the Christian nonprofit Liberty Counsel asked the court in a 90-page filing to review a March ruling by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upholding a lower court's finding that Davis violated David Ermold and David Moore's constitutional right to marry when she denied them a marriage license in 2015, shortly after the Supreme Court issued its Obergefell decision.
A federal jury awarded the couple $100,000 in damages in 2023, and a federal judge ordered Davis last year to pay Ermold and Moore an additional $260,000 in attorneys' fees.
Davis argued in 2015 that granting the couple a marriage license would have violated her religious beliefs as a born-again Christian and 'God's definition of marriage.' She and her legal team have argued throughout a decadelong legal battle that, in denying the license, Davis was protected by her First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and religion.
In March, a three-judge panel for the 6th Circuit ruled that Davis cannot raise a First Amendment defense in the case 'because she is being held liable for state action, which the First Amendment does not protect.'
Liberty Counsel is asking the Supreme Court to overturn both the 6th Circuit decision and the high court's ruling in Obergefell.
'Kim Davis' case underscores why the U.S. Supreme Court should overturn the wrongly decided Obergefell v. Hodges opinion because it threatens the religious liberty of Americans who believe that marriage is a sacred union between one man and one woman,' said Mat Staver, Liberty Counsel's founder and chair.
The group's petition argues that the court should revisit and reverse its Obergefell decision 'for the same reasons articulated in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Center,' the case that led to the overturning of Roe v. Wade. 'Obergefell was wrong when it was decided and it is wrong today because it was grounded entirely on the legal fiction of substantive due process.'
Bill Powell, counsel for Ermold and Moore, told The Hill in an email the Supreme Court is unlikely to take up Davis's case.
'Not a single judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals showed any interest in Davis's rehearing petition, and we are confident the Supreme Court will likewise agree that Davis's arguments do not merit further attention,' he said.
The high court declined to intervene in Davis's case in 2020. Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, conservatives who dissented from the court's majority opinion in Obergefell, said they agreed with the court's decision not to accept Davis's appeal but used the occasion to renew their objections to its same-sex marriage decision.
'Davis may have been one of the first victims of this court's cavalier treatment of religion in its Obergefell decision, but she will not be the last,' wrote Thomas, joined by Alito. 'Due to Obergefell, those with sincerely held religious beliefs concerning marriage will find it increasingly difficult to participate in society without running afoul of Obergefell and its effect on other anti-discrimination laws.'
Davis's appeal to the Supreme Court comes as it faces calls from Republican lawmakers to overturn Obergefell. In June, Southern Baptists voted overwhelmingly to approve a resolution endorsing a ban on same-sex marriage and calling for the court to reverse its decision.
National support for same-sex marriage remains at record highs, though a May Gallup poll showed Republican support for marriage equality falling to 41 percent, the lowest in a decade. In a separate survey conducted by three polling firms in June, 56 percent of Republican respondents said they support same-sex marriage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump ally Bukele secures path to indefinite re-elections in El Salvador
El Salvador President Nayib Bukele, an ally of President Trump, scored a Friday win after lawmakers passed constitutional amendments eradicating term limits. The measure was passed in a 57-3 vote just one year after Bukele broke with the law setting term limits by saying he would seek a second term as president. The nation's Supreme Court ruled in 2021 it was his right to run again, foreshadowing the actions by lawmakers. 'This is quite simple, El Salvador: only you will have the power to decide how long you wish to support the work of any public official, including your president,' elected official Ana Figueroa, who proposed the bill, said, according to Reuters. 'You have the power to decide how long you support your president and all elected officials,' she added. The bill backed by Bukele's New Ideas party also extends presidential terms from five years to six and omits the possibility of run-off elections. It also aligns presidential elections with congressional races, ensuring the two occur in the same year. Some decried the move, claiming it would compromise election integrity. 'Democracy in El Salvador has died!' opposing lawmaker Marcela Villatoro of the Nationalist Republican Alliance (Arena) said, according to NPR. 'You don't realize what indefinite reelection brings: It brings an accumulation of power and weakens democracy. . . there's corruption and clientelism because nepotism grows and halts democracy and political participation.' A human rights organization also shared their disapproval for the bill's passage. 'The day before vacation, without debate, without informing the public, in a single legislative vote, they changed the political system to allow the president to perpetuate himself in power indefinitely and we continue to follow the well-traveled path of autocrats,' said Noah Bullock, executive director of rights group Cristosal, said per Reuters. Bukele has overseen the Trump administration's deportation orders by containing immigrants inside the region's notorious CECOT prison. He backed the leader's previous decision to keep a wrongfully removed Maryland man behind bars overseas and mocked Democrats who attempted to have him freed, siding with the president's immigration enforcement policies. Now, he has a chance to remain in office indefinitely after the successful passage of five constitutional amendments, making Bukele an available key figure for the Trump administration's international plans.
Hamilton Spectator
39 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Doug Ford says things that Mark Carney can't as Donald Trump's trade war escalates
Doug Ford says the quiet part out loud. The loquacious Ontario premier has always been quotable, but rarely more so than when he's railing against U.S. President Donald Trump's trade attack on Canada. Helpfully playing the bad cop to partner Mark Carney 's good cop, Ford , as a subnational leader, can get away with saying things the prime minister cannot . To wit, hours before Trump slapped a 35 per cent tariff on goods not covered in the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), the premier came out swinging. 'I told the prime minister, do not roll over. Hit that guy back as hard as we possibly can. And that's what we need to do — and we can do it,' he told reporters Thursday morning in Thunder Bay. 'Prime Minister Carney is trying his best, but this guy (Trump) will say something one day, and he'll wake up — and the cheese slips off the cracker — and then all of a sudden he goes the other way. And you're thinking, 'How do you deal with a guy like this?'' Indeed. Carney, who is in daily contact with Ford, values the premier's counsel so much that he stayed at Ford's Muskoka cottage last week on the eve of the first ministers' meeting at Deerhurst Resort in Huntsville. 'We were up till 12:30 a.m. at night, chatting in front of the fireplace, solving all of the world's problems,' a giddy Ford said the following afternoon. For Canada's economy, the biggest problem in the world right now is Trump. Still, despite all of his 'elbows up' rhetoric during this spring's federal election campaign, Carney left the tough talk to Ford and struck a more measured tone early Friday. 'While the Canadian government is disappointed by this action, we remain committed to CUSMA, which is the world's second-largest free trade agreement by trading volume,' the prime minister said in a statement. 'The U.S. application of CUSMA means that the U.S. average tariff rate on Canadian goods remains one of its lowest for all of its trading partners. Other sectors of our economy — including lumber, steel, aluminum, and automobiles — are, however, heavily impacted by U.S. duties and tariffs,' he noted without mentioning the massive trade pact is up for renegotiation next year. 'For such sectors, the Canadian government will act to protect Canadian jobs, invest in our industrial competitiveness, buy Canadian, and diversify our export markets.' Although Ford backs that approach — acknowledging more than 90 per cent of what Canada sends stateside is covered under CUSMA and therefore won't face the new tariff — he wants the Americans to at least fear a counterstrike. 'The federal government needs to hit back with a 50 per cent tariff on U.S. steel and aluminum. Canadian workers and businesses are desperate for certainty. Let's work together, united, to deliver it,' the premier said on social media Thursday night. There is ample evidence that Ford's warnings — delivered online and in his many appearances on the U.S. cable news channels Trump watches — get noticed in Washington. When he threatened to shut off the export of electricity Ontario sells to 1.5 million customers in New York, Michigan and Minnesota, Howard Lutnick, the excitable U.S. secretary of commerce, was immediately on the horn to complain. After Ford outlawed the sale of U.S. alcohol in LCBO outlets — robbing Kentucky bourbon distillers of their largest single customer — Pete Hoekstra, the American ambassador to Canada, expressed his displeasure publicly and privately. 'They want to ban American alcohol. That's fine. There are reasons why the president and some of his team referred to Canada as being mean and nasty to deal with … because of some of those steps,' Hoekstra said in undiplomatic remarks behind closed doors at a summit in Bellevue, Washington. Four months after the premier reminded American consumers how much Canadian content was in their beloved pickup trucks, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent conceded that point this week. Asked about the Ford Motor Co. announcement that Trump's tariffs cost the firm $800 million (U.S.) in the second quarter this year, Bessent noted the Ford F-150, America's bestselling vehicle, is manufactured using Quebec aluminum. 'I think maybe the aluminum tariffs hit them harder. We will be negotiating with Canada on those,' he said on CNBC. With tariffs on imported products now hovering at around 15 per cent, their highest rate since the Great Depression — and up from two per cent last year under former president Joe Biden — U.S. consumers will feel the pinch sooner rather than later. That's why the Ontario premier's mantra is Trump's tariffs are a tax that will make life more expensive for Americans. So, as Canadian political and business leaders wait for prices to rise south of the border in hopes of making U.S. consumers more ornery about inflation, expect Ford to keep talking smack and Carney to keep quietly encouraging that.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Comer agrees to postpone Maxwell's testimony to House on Epstein
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) on Friday agreed to a request from Ghislaine Maxwell to delay deposing her until after the Supreme Court considers her petition to overturn her conviction for sex trafficking conviction. Comer, however, declined requests from an attorney for Maxwell, the longtime associate of the late Jeffrey Epstein, to grant her immunity or to send her questions in advance. Pursuant to a motion that garnered bipartisan support in the committee last month, Comer had subpoenaed Maxwell for a deposition to occur at Federal Correctional Institution (FCI) Tallahassee on Aug. 11 — though she was quietly moved to Federal Prison Camp (FPC) Bryan in Bryan, Texas, a Bureau of Prisons official confirmed Friday. 'Your testimony is vital to the Committee's efforts regarding Mr. Jeffrey Epstein, including the 2007 non-prosecution agreement and the circumstances surrounding Mr. Epstein's Death,' Comer said in a letter to Maxwell on Friday. 'These investigative efforts may be used to inform potential legislation to improve federal efforts to combat sex trafficking and reform the use of non-prosecution agreements and/or plea agreements in sex-crime investigations.' Maxwell's attorney Attorney David Oscar Markus wrote to the committee on Monday seeking to delay the interview until after the Supreme Court weighs Maxwell's petition. Comer agreed to the delay: 'On July 30, the U.S. Supreme Court noticed that your petition for writ of certiorari will be considered at its conference on September 29. In light of this notice, the Committee is willing to delay your deposition until a date following the Court's certiorari determination,' he wrote. Comer then rejected the immunity request. 'The Committee is unwilling to grant you congressional immunity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 6005 at this time. Further, while the Committee is unwilling to send you questions in advance, the Committee will continue its long-standing practice of engaging in forthright and detailed discussions about scoping,' Comer wrote. In her appeal to the Supreme Court, Maxwell argues her conviction violates a nonprosecution agreement Epstein signed with federal prosecutors in 2007. Lower courts previously ruled that the agreement applied only to the Southern District of Florida and not the New York district where Maxwell was sentenced. Maxwell last week sat for a two-day interview with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. Markus, Maxwell's attorney, said that it was a 'thorough, comprehensive interview' and that 'no person and no topic were off-limits,' adding: 'The truth will come out.'
