
South Korea's Ex-First Lady Is Arrested on Corruption Charges
Mr. Yoon, who was driven from office after his failed attempt to place South Korea under martial law in December, is already in jail and standing trial on insurrection charges. Four other former presidents of South Korea had been imprisoned before, but this is the first time that both a former president and his wife have been jailed in the country.
When Ms. Kim presented herself for questioning by a special counsel last week, she apologized for 'causing concern to the people' and said she was 'a nobody.' But she has been at the center of a slew of corruption scandals that have plagued her husband's government and undermined his popularity.
Ms. Kim has not directly commented on the accusations against her. But her lawyers have denied them, vowing to prove her innocence in court.
While Mr. Yoon was in power, government prosecutors did not press any charges against Ms. Kim. When the opposition-controlled National Assembly passed bills calling for an independent prosecutor to investigate the allegations against his wife, Mr. Yoon called them politically inspired and vetoed them.
President Lee Jae Myung, who replaced Mr. Yoon after the June 3 election, signed just such a bill and appointed a special counsel. The prosecutor grilled Ms. Kim for 11 hours last Wednesday and later asked a court for a warrant to arrest her.
As soon as the warrant was issued late on Tuesday, Ms. Kim was formally arrested. She did not answer questions from journalists when she arrived at the court earlier in the day to attend a hearing on the warrant.
The special counsel accused Ms. Kim of making hundreds of thousands of dollars through stock-price manipulation. Although the alleged crime took place when Mr. Yoon was a prosecutor and before he was elected, the scandal continued to overshadow his presidency. She was also accused of illegally helping a politician get the governing party's nomination in a parliamentary by-election in June 2022.
The charges against her also included receiving a diamond necklace and two Chanel bags as bribes from a senior official of the Unification Church after Mr. Yoon's election. The official, who has since left the church, is also under arrest. The church, formally known as the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification, said it had nothing to do with whatever might have taken place between Ms. Kim and the official.
The special prosecutor's office could file more charges against Ms. Kim, as it was investigating other corruption allegations.
On Tuesday, the office said that a 60 million won ($43,200) Van Cleef pendant that Ms. Kim wore when she accompanied Mr. Yoon on his trip to the NATO summit in 2022 had been a gift from a South Korean businessman. Ms. Kim lied, the office said, when she said the pendant was a cheap fake. It said it was investigating whether the necklace, which was not listed in the Yoons' financial disclosure as required by law, had been a bribe.
Mr. Yoon, a former prosecutor, became a national figure by investigating high-profile corruption cases that involved former presidents and business tycoons. But his political career has been dogged by scandals involving his wife and mother-in-law. (In 2023, Ms. Kim's mother, Choi Eun-soon, was sentenced to one year in prison after she was convicted of forging her bank records to make a real-estate deal.)
During Mr. Yoon's election campaign, Ms. Kim apologized for inflating her résumé to promote her art exhibition business. At the time, she promised to be a responsible first lady should her husband be elected.
But spy-cam footage later showed her accepting a $2,200 Dior pouch from a visitor to her private office after Mr. Yoon's inauguration. A reporter also released an audio file of conversations he had had with Ms. Kim before Mr. Yoon's election in which she called her husband 'a fool' who 'farts' and 'can't do anything without me.'
Ms. Kim was considered so influential over her husband's government that South Koreans have joked that she was 'V.I.P. No. 1' in his government, while Mr. Yoon was 'V.I.P. No. 2.'
Mr. Yoon's time in office was also marred by a bitter confrontation with the opposition, fueled by its demand for investigation into his wife's activities. As the pressure mounted last October, he vowed to 'take the stones' on her behalf.
When he declared martial law two months later, he said he was taking the measure to fight a 'monster' and 'anti-state forces' in the National Assembly.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tulip Siddiq brands corruption trial in Bangladesh a ‘farce' as case opens
A former Government minister has labelled a trial into her alleged corruption a 'farce' as it got under way in Bangladesh. Tulip Siddiq, who resigned in January as Treasury minister, said the case being heard in Dhaka was 'built on fabricated accusations and driven by a clear political vendetta'. Ms Siddiq is the niece of the former Bangladeshi prime minister Sheika Hasina, who fled the country in August last year after ruling for 15 years. Ms Hasina had previously held the post for five years and she is the daughter of Bangladesh's founding president. She was ousted amid student-led protests that were met with violence by government forces, which saw nearly 300 people killed. She is now exiled in India. In April, it was reported that Bangladesh's Anti-Corruption Commission had sought an arrest warrant for Ms Siddiq over allegations the MP for Hampstead and Highgate illegally received a 7,200sq ft plot of land in the country's capital. Bangladeshi anti-corruption officials gave evidence in court on Wednesday, the Associated Press reports. Ms Siddiq has claimed she has not had any official communication about the trial. In a post on X on Wednesday as the case got under way, Ms Siddiq said: 'The so-called trial now under way in Dhaka is nothing more than a farce – built on fabricated accusations and driven by a clear political vendetta. 'Over the past year, the allegations against me have repeatedly shifted, yet I have never been contacted by the Bangladeshi authorities once. 'I have never received a court summons, no official communication, and no evidence. 'If this were a genuine legal process, the authorities would have engaged with me or my legal team, responded to our formal correspondence, and presented the evidence they claim to hold. 'Instead, they have peddled false and vexatious allegations that have been briefed to the media but never formally put to me by investigators. 'Even my offer to meet Bangladesh's Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus during his recent visit to London was refused. Such conduct is wholly incompatible with the principles of a fair trial that we uphold in the UK. 'I have been clear from the outset that I have done nothing wrong and will respond to any credible evidence that is presented to me. Continuing to smear my name to score political points is both baseless and damaging.' The MP had resigned in January after six months in Government after an investigation by the Prime Minister's ethics adviser Sir Laurie Magnus into her links to Ms Hasina's regime. She came under scrutiny over her use of properties in London linked to her aunt's allies. She stepped down and said she had become 'a distraction' from Labour's agenda. Campaigners from her aunt's party, the Awami League, had campaigned and canvassed for her during previous general elections. In an interview with the Guardian before the trial began, Ms Siddiq said she had been 'collateral damage' in the long-standing feud between Mr Yunus and Ms Hasina. She said: 'These are wider forces that I'm battling against… There's no doubt people have done wrong things in Bangladesh, and they should be punished for it. It's just I'm not one of them.' After an outcry over the deaths of hundreds if not thousands of people demonstrating against what they said was an increasingly autocratic and cruel administration, Ms Hasina and Siddiq's mother, Sheikh Rehana, who was in the country at the time, fled the Bangladeshi capital in a military helicopter to India. It was, Ms Siddiq admits, a scary time. Ms Hasina's entire family, apart from her husband, children and sister, were murdered during the August 15 1975 Bangladeshi coup d'etat in which Ms Siddiq's grandfather, the first president of Bangladesh, was assassinated.

Wall Street Journal
2 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump's Tariffs Stymie India's Bid to Steal Manufacturing From China
Since President Trump's first term, companies grappling for trade certainty have clung to one guiding principle: move production out of China. But months into the president's global tariff barrage, that doesn't always looking to diversify their supply chains saw India's vast population, its strengthening ties with Washington, and its abundance of engineers and scientists as a good hedge against China. But then Trump—who has been trying to pressure President Vladimir Putin into ending Russia's war on Ukraine—grew angry with India over the country's purchases of Russian oil. In recent weeks, Trump has slapped a 25% tariff on Indian imports and has threatened to double that by the end of this month. In that case, tariffs on India would match the roughly 50% duties the U.S. now charges on Chinese goods.


Washington Post
4 hours ago
- Washington Post
US briefly deploys 2 warships to a disputed South China Sea shoal after Chinese collision
MANILA, Philippines — The United States deployed two warships on Wednesday in a disputed South China Sea shoal, where two Chinese navy and coast guard ships collided two days ago while trying to drive away a smaller Philippine ship in a high-seas accident captured on video, alarming several Western and Asian countries.