
Haiti ushers in last phase of transitional government amid color, class tensions
On Thursday, Laurent Saint-Cyr assumed the leadership of Haiti's ruling nine-member Transitional Presidential Council from Fritz Alphonse Jean, a U.S.-educated economist, as part of a rotating presidency. Saint-Cyr represents the private sector on the council, which has some presidential powers and is tasked with restoring law and order to the Caribbean nation.
Ahead of the change over, concerns over a possible coup led to increased security precautions. There was no coup, but on the morning of the swearing-in, armed gangs launched attacks on the road leading to the seat of government after Jimmy 'Barbecue' Cherizier, a leader in the Viv Ansanm gang coalition, announced his intent on social media to attack the prime minister's office and the Villa d'Accueli, where both the prime minister and Transitional Presidential Council work.
Saint-Cyr is slated to remain in power until Feb. 7, 2026, which is supposed to be the end of the transition and a run-up to national elections. His ascension consolidates power in the hands of members of the country's small, lighter-skinned economic elite for the first time in recent memory, and has been for months the subject of political infighting and intense debates about colorism and class that harken back to Haiti's colonial history.
Tensions peaked last week when bribery allegations surfaced amid reports of an attempt to remove Prime Minister Alix Didier Fils-Aimé ahead of the changeover to shift the balance of power. Jean and other council members, along with the head of the Pitit Desalin political party, Jean-Charles Moïse, reportedly held secret talks about replacing Fils-Aimé as prime minister after efforts to dissuade Saint-Cyr from taking the helm failed.
Fils-Aimé was unanimously appointed to the prime minister job in November after the council abruptly fired his predecessor, Garry Conille, after barely six months. Like Saint-Cyr, Fils-Aimé is from the business community and is considered part of Haiti's self-described 'mulatto' class, which, along with the private sector, has historically been a lighting rod for the country's ills.
On Friday, the State Department took to X and, in a highly unusual post, the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs made it known Washington will 'hold accountable anyone who seeks to disrupt' the transition.
'The United States is aware of reported bribery attempts to undermine Haiti's stability,' the post said. 'We commend those [council] members for rejecting corruption and reaffirm our support for their collaborative work with the Prime Minister to work together to stabilize Haiti, in our shared national interests.'
State Department officials, responding to an inquiry from the Herald, did not provide details or say what fueled the post on Haiti. They would only say that they are 'aware of credible reports that malign actors are actively seeking to destabilize the transition government.'
Jean, who took over the council's presidency in March, and Moïse denied the bribery allegations, and argued they were justified in their concerns about the transition, which would place two lighter-skinned men in the two top positions of power in Haiti, because of the country's long, tortuous history in which a small, lighter-skinned minority class has long controlled the majority of the wealth.
'Analyses are pouring in on social media and on radio stations on social rifts that may occur with Saint-Cyr and Fils Aimé occupying the top of the executive branches,' he said.
He also dismissed the allegations of any bribery taking place behind the scenes.
'This question of bribery is a pure narrative manipulation of political entrepreneurs fighting to keep the status quo,' Jean said ahead of Thursday's swearing-in ceremony. 'It is a desperate and trivial effort to attract the sympathy of American congressmen and women, and the U.S. administration.'
The optics are not lost on Haitians, who worry about political fallout from the country's small economic elite taking such a visible role when armed gangs have targeted their properties, and foreign governments have openly accused some of them of financing the gang warfare. But critics and political observers also say that Jean and others who are part of the transition are weaponizing the class and color issue to hide their own failure to put Haiti on the path to stability.
'We have to recognize that nothing is working here,' said Pierre Esperance, a human rights advice who recently issued a scathing report on the council's failings. The presidential council, he added, 'isn't any good, the governance isn't good, and the country is not being governed. You have a group of individuals who are fighting among themselves while at the same time collecting on all the privileges the state gives them each month, and they are not doing anything for the country.'
Espérance warned that if the council and the prime minister fail to take action soon to initiate a political dialogue on governance, Haiti will face even greater instability.
In the 16 months that the transitional council has been in power, Haiti is no closer to holding elections or getting the armed gangs under control. Instead, the country has ceded ground to gangs, which now control up to 90% of Port-au-Prince and are spreading to other regions to the north.
'Every time there is a change on the council, there is this kind of conflict,' said Jacques Ted St. Dic, who calls the infighting a diversion to hide the failings and corruption in the system.
St. Dic acknowledges that given Haiti's history, the country finds itself at a difficult juncture, where the racial conflict between Blacks and lighter-skinned Haitians could resurface at any moment.
'All of those conflicts can emerge into a battle of politicians, a real political fight,' St. Dic said. 'And that's where the danger lies.'
The issue had already broken into the publicly this week, when Moïse, the head of the Pitit Dealin party, pushed back on radio on the State Department's post, and evoked the race and class question in his defense.
Moïse acknowledge he had meetings about two weeks ago with Fils-Aimé about his concerns, as well as with three council members who have been indicted in a bribery scheme in which they are accused of demanding credit cards and cash from the head of a state-owned bank.
Jean, the outgoing head of the presidential council, said he has spoken out about the 'danger' of Saint-Cyr and Fils-Aimé holding power at the same time.
More than two centuries after enslaved Africans defeated their French colonizers, there remain deep and divisions and distrust between Haiti's mostly poor, Black population and the small, mixed-race elite in Haiti. For example, on Wednesday, Jean took to social media to distance himself from the council's support of a contract that gives elements of the private sector 24 years of control of 70% of all the cargo-container traffic coming into Port-au-Prince, after questioning its legitimacy in Haiti's economy, which relies heavily on imports and exports.
Meanwhile, with armed gangs now seizing on the tensions to advance their attacks, Haitians find themselves divided about whether the new political landscape will bring more violence or help to finally pave the way for a return to stability.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
22 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Texts from TV anchor suing station over microaggressions revealed in lawsuit
A former Massachusetts TV anchor is suing the station she worked at after she says she was discriminated against for being white. Kate Merrill filed the federal lawsuit against WBZ-TV, CBS, Paramount and several individuals who worked at the news station. McClatchy News reached out for comment Aug. 7 but did not immediately hear back. Merrill says in the lawsuit that she had worked at WBZ-TV since 2004 and in 2017 was promoted to co-anchor of the station's morning and noon show. While working as an anchor in 2024, she was accused of being racist, discriminated against and demoted, she said in the civil complaint. In September 2023, Jason Mikell, a Black meteorologist, was hired at the station, the lawsuit said. Because Mikell was new to the area and less experienced, Merrill agreed to introduce him to some people and help him at work, the lawsuit said. Merrill said in the lawsuit that she provided positive feedback and constructive criticism to Mikell but that ultimately he accused her of microaggressions and making inappropriate comments. However, Merrill denies this and said after she corrected Mikell for pronouncing a city wrong, he confronted her aggressively, 'loudly yelling at her on the studio floor and asserting that she was being critical of him,' the lawsuit said. The lawsuit includes copies of text message conversations between Merrill and Mikell that start off supportive, as well as conversations between other co-workers discussing the incident. After reporting the incident to the human relations department, Merrill learned that Mikell had already filed complaints accusing her of microaggressions, being critical of him and treating him differently than she did her white co-workers. Another Black anchor and reporter at the station also complained about Merrill, accusing her of saying she should go work in Nashville because it would 'be a better racial fit,' the complaint said. Other allegations made against Merrill said she 'rolled her eyes when talking to people of color and that she did not greet people of color when they entered a room,' the lawsuit said. Merrill denied that any of her comments had racial undertones and in the lawsuit said she is not racist, has Black friends and included photos where she is pictured with them. An investigation determined that 'Merrill's behavior was grounded in microaggressions or unconscious bias and created a very unwelcoming work Environment,' the complaint said. However, Merrill said she was never given a copy of the report. Merrill was given a written warning that required her to complete unconscious bias training, the lawsuit said. Then she was demoted from co-anchor of the weekend morning show to work weekend nights and was told the decision 'had been in the works for some time,' according to the complaint. Merrill was told by colleagues and union leaders that 'WBZ/CBS/Paramount demoted Ms. Merrill to make an example of her, to attempt to make the point that CBS now took seriously complaints of racism allegedly perpetrated by White employees and was (is) not a racist organization,' the lawsuit said. She was also told that her demotion was 'career sabotage' and it would never recover, according to the complaint. Merrill, believing the demotion and racism accusations would harm her career, gave her resignation notice May 24. She maintained the demotion was motivated by other factors. The lawsuit listed several examples of white WBZ-TV and CBS employees who were replaced by non-white co-workers or new hires. Merrill is suing for an amount to be determined at trial.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump isn't 'entitled' to Texas congressional seats
Elections, for some reason, seem to unsettle and unnerve President Donald Trump. Losing is an intolerable outcome; winning is satisfying only if it produces a landslide, whether real or imagined.. We are seeing more evidence of the president's perpetual election neurosis in the run-up to the 2026 midterms. That is why he has pushed red states, like Texas, Missouri and Florida, to gerrymander their congressional districts in hopes of ensuring that Republicans retain their majority in the House of Representatives. Trump's election anxieties were on display on Tuesday during an interview with CNBC. 'We should have many more seats in California. It's all gerrymandered. We have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats,' he said. Four of those seats are currently held by Black or Hispanic lawmakers. Rep. Sylvester Turner, a Black Democrat, occupied the other one until his recent death. The president, as is his wont, did not stop at noting the opportunity to flip those seats. 'We have a really good governor, and we have good people in Texas,' he said. 'And I won Texas. I got the highest vote in the history of Texas, as you probably know, and we are entitled to five more seats.' A Canadian Broadcasting Company report disputes what Trump said about his 2024 margin of victory in Texas: 'George W. Bush won a higher share of Texas (his home state) in both of his successful presidential campaigns (59 per cent in 2000 and 61 per cent in 2004), while Ronald Reagan won an even greater share of Texas in his 1984 landslide presidential win (nearly 64 per cent.)' What really matters here is not the truth of Trump's claim, but that in his view, he and his Republican allies are 'entitled' to seats held by duly elected representatives the Republican-dominated Texas state legislature seems determined to deliver for its party. That's not the way elections are supposed to work — not democratic elections, at least. In authoritarian regimes, leaders may feel entitled to electoral victories and justified in stacking the deck to deliver that result. But in democracies, no one can claim entitlement to any election result before the votes are cast. Americans need to wake up and stop thinking that the 2026 midterm elections will be free and fair. In fact, so long as the president has anything to say about it, the era of free and fair elections in this country will be a distant memory. The only hope we have of preserving whatever is left of our democracy depends on whether Democrats in blue states succeed in matching the Republicans, gerrymander for gerrymander. And even then, the prospects for the Democrats to retake the House of Representatives will not be great. This is because, as the Washington Post reported, 'Republicans have full legislative control of 23 states compared with only 15 for the Democrats — giving them more places to squeeze out a congressional seat here and there. Should there be a call to the barricades, Ohio is expected to quickly follow Texas's lead, and so might Missouri and Florida, for starters.' Beyond that stark fact of political geography, the Democratic brand is seriously tarnished. Polls show that only 33% of the American public has a favorable view of the party, which the Wall Street Journal says is its lowest rating in thirty-five years. That adds to the difficulty Democrats will have in wresting control of the House from the Republicans. And then, the Post observed, there is the fact that 'there are fewer and fewer places where congressional elections are truly competitive. As recently as 1999, fully 164 of the 435 members of the U.S. House represented swing districts.' In 2024, 'only 37 House races were decided by five or fewer percentage points, and only 19 districts flipped between parties.' Looking ahead to 2026, FairVote, a nonpartisan election reform organization, projected that next year '352 of the nation's 435 House seats will be 'safe' for Republicans or Democrats. An additional 45 seats lean red or blue, leaving just 38 true tossup races. This means we can confidently say which party will win the vast majority of congressional districts in 2026.' Despite this daunting reality, the fight to stop our elections from becoming the kind of empty ritual that delivers guaranteed victories to strongmen rulers and their parties in places like Russia, Turkey and Hungary is worth waging. The president has now told us how he feels about the upcoming congressional election — and it's up to citizens and political leaders who value democracy to take him at his word. They cannot fight with one hand tied behind their backs while the president and his MAGA allies pull out all the stops. Standing up for free and fair elections in state legislatures and in lawful, peaceful demonstrations is an urgent matter. As in other areas of our political life, we can thank the Supreme Court for making this fight more difficult than it has ever been, and for propelling the gerrymandering wars that are now raging in this country. Five years ago, long before it granted immunity from criminal prosecution to the president, the court conferred a kind of legal immunity to anyone who wanted to fiddle with the redistricting process. At that time, the court's five conservative justices decided, over the stringent objections of its four liberal members, that partisan gerrymandering was a 'political question beyond the reach of the federal courts.' They did so even though they acknowledged that 'such gerrymandering is 'incompatible with democratic principles'…' Justice Elena Kagan, who dissented, nonetheless agreed with them that 'gerrymandering is, as so many Justices have emphasized before, anti-democratic in the most profound sense. In our government, 'all political power flows from the people.' And that means, as Alexander Hamilton once said, 'that the people should choose whom they please to govern them.'' By its very nature, gerrymandering reverses that relationship, allowing politicians to monkey around with the election process to ensure they get the voters they want in the districts they represent. It feeds the very sense of entitlement to which the president gave voice. Kagan got it right when she called the court's decision 'tragically wrong.' What is now happening in Texas with the president's open encouragement will, as she then wrote, 'create a world in which power does not flow from the people because they do not choose their governors.' That world is the one Trump seems intent on creating. His intention, to paraphrase Kagan, 'imperil(s) our system of government,' the foundation of which is 'free and fair elections.' We have long known that the president believes that elections he wins are free and fair; elections he loses are rigged. We also know that the president believes any election he wins, no matter how small the margin, is a landslide, conveying a mandate to enact whatever policies he chooses. But I don't think many Americans would have ever imagined he would believe that victory in one election creates an entitlement to a particular result in the next one. The cat is now out of the bag. Upon leaving office, former Attorney General Eric Holder founded the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, an organization dedicated to fighting for fair election maps, which has included filing lawsuits against Republican gerrymandering efforts. 'Gerrymandering poses a critical threat to our democracy,' its website reads. But recently Holder changed his tune, if reluctantly, saying Democrats should fight fire with fire. 'We must [do what is necessary to] preserve our democracy now,' he said, 'in order to ultimately heal it.' The post Trump isn't 'entitled' to Texas congressional seats appeared first on
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Jessica Williams Defends Beyoncé: Donald Trump Is ‘Coming After All of Our Greatest Black People'
Donald Trump has been making headlines for his repeated attacks on Beyoncé, but comedian Jessica Williams has a theory as to why he keeps coming for the superstar: to distract from the Jeffrey Epstein files controversy. On the Monday (July 28) episode of The Daily Show, Williams interrupted host Jon Stewart's monologue to come to Bey's defense following the president's latest Truth Social post calling for her prosecution over debunked claims the singer illegally accepted money to endorse Kamala Harris in 2024. Trump also accused Oprah of taking bribes to support the Democratic candidate, and his administration recently released files detailing the FBI's surveillance of Martin Luther King Jr. against the Civil Rights icon's family's wishes. More from Billboard Donald Trump Again Calls For Beyoncé to be 'Prosecuted' Over Debunked Claim of $11 Million Harris Appearance Payment Dropkick Murphys Honor 'First Class Loser' Donald Trump During Warped Tour Set Featuring Jeffrey Epstein Montage Village People Reacts After President Trump Shares 'Offensive' AI Video of Fake Obama Arrest Set to 'Y.M.C.A.' 'Trump is trying to throw every Black person he can think of in front of the scandal to distract us,' Williams said in front of a green screen made to look like she was in Scotland, where the POTUS has been spending time to open a new golf course. 'First, he released the Martin Luther King Jr. files. Then he accused Obama of treason. And now he wants to prosecute Oprah and Beyoncé? The nerve.' 'He's coming after all of our greatest Black people,' the Emmy nominee continued. 'Who's next? Michael Jordan? Michael B. Jordan? Michael C. Jordan?' she continued. 'We're about a week away from him saying that Urkel did 9/11. Urkel? Did he do that?' Both Williams and Stewart emphasized their belief that Trump's objective in targeting stars such as Bey and Oprah is to pull focus away from mounting calls for his administration to release files investigating the crimes of Epstein. Many people suspect that the files will prove the twice-impeached politician previously visited the late sex offender's private island, which served as the hub for Epstein's sex-trafficking operation involving minors. Trump, however, insisted on Monday that he 'never had the privilege' of going to the island during a press junket in Scotland. Williams' Daily Show appearance came one day after Trump wrote on Truth Social, 'I'm looking at the large amount of money owed by the Democrats, after the Presidential Election, and the fact that they admit to paying, probably illegally, Eleven Million Dollars to singer Beyoncé for an ENDORSEMENT (she never sang, not one note, and left the stage to a booing and angry audience!) … all of those that received Endorsement money, BROKE THE LAW. They should all be prosecuted!' It's not the first time the president, who was convicted of 34 felonies in May 2024, has platformed debunked claims that Harris illegally gave campaign money to Beyoncé, who appeared at one of the former VP's rallies in October. In March, he falsely accused both the 35-time Grammy winner and Bruce Springsteen of taking part in an 'illegal election scam,' declaring on Truth Social, 'For these unpatriotic 'entertainers,' this was just a CORRUPT & UNLAWFUL way to capitalize on a broken system.' Both Bey's camp and Harris' campaign have denied the allegation, and public finance records show that the vocalist received no money for her endorsement. Her Parkwood Entertainment company did accept a payment for the production costs of her appearance, but Harris was legally required to cover that fee. Watch Williams defend Bey and Oprah during Stewart's monologue above. Best of Billboard Kelly Clarkson, Michael Buble, Pentatonix & Train Will Bring Their Holiday Hits to iHeart Christmas Concert Fox Plans NFT Debut With $20 'Masked Singer' Collectibles 14 Things That Changed (or Didn't) at Farm Aid 2021 Solve the daily Crossword