MP supports push for higher illegal parking fines
Lib Dem MP for Mid Dorset and North Poole, Vikki Slade, raised the issue in Parliament, saying towns like Poole and Bournemouth "are blighted with illegal parking".
This comes after Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole (BCP) Council officers towed away a record-breaking number of vehicles over the weekend.
The government has been contacted for a comment.
"The government controlled level of fines clearly does not act as a deterrent," said Lib Dem Jeff Hanna, who represents Bournemouth West.
"Just £35 outside of London, but £80 in a London Borough – if paid within [two] weeks.
"BCP is as suburban as any London Borough."
Mr Hanna said 1,702 penalty charge notices (PCN) had been issued and 18 cars were lifted and removed on 12 and 13 July, despite sufficient spaces available in car parks "within walking distance of the beach".
He said towing came at a cost to the tax payers and the release fee of £105 was "nothing like enough to cover the actual cost". In London the release fee is £280.
"So the difference comes from your council tax", he added.
Mr Hanna said a motion would be coming to the next BCP council meeting from two Boscombe councillors, calling for yet more lobbying of the government on the level of penalties.
Following her question the House of Commons, Ms Slade wrote to Alex Norris, Minister for Local Growth and Building Safety, urging for exploring solutions with local authorities and a review of illegal parking fines that "have been frozen for 20 years".
"I would highlight that these drivers are not just breaking the law—they are endangering public safety," she wrote, citing the blocking of pavements, "depriving disabled people and families of safe passage" and "obstructing residents from accessing their own homes".
"This is a source of growing frustration for residents, who rightly expect their council to act.
You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
'Pavement surfing' fines issued halved in 10 years
Cars parked on roundabouts by heatwave beachgoers
Parking fines set to rise across London
BCP Council
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Amess family ‘deeply hurt' after Home Secretary letter following Prevent review
A 'dismissive' letter from the Home Secretary to the family of murdered MP Sir David Amess following a review into Prevent's contact with his killer is designed to 'protect the Government following its failings' and not support them, their spokesman has said. Radd Seiger said Sir David's family were 'deeply hurt and angered by the utterly dismissive tone' of Yvette Cooper's letter and that her 'piecemeal approach… will never deliver the whole truth, accountability and justice.' He also said the family were given 'next to no notice' of the timing or advance sight of the report, adding media leaks were a further insult to the family. The Amess family have said they will respond in full to the report once they have consulted their legal team. In her written statement laid before Parliament, Ms Cooper said: 'My department remains steadfast in its commitment to keeping the public safe and safeguarding people at risk of radicalisation. 'The victims, their families and those who survived the Southport attack but continue to live with the physical and emotional pain, and Sir David Amess's family remain in our hearts and prayers.' In his review, Independent Prevent Commissioner David Anderson KC said 'intensive' efforts have been made to improve Prevent processes, but the 'jury is out' on some of the changes In the Home Secretary's letter, seen by the PA news agency, Ms Cooper said she realises the 'seriousness' of the failings in Sir David's case and that she hoped the family found Lord Anderson's report to be 'thorough and considered'. Sir David's terrorist killer Ali Harbi Ali was referred to Prevent seven years before the so-called Islamic State fanatic stabbed the veteran MP at his constituency surgery in Essex in October 2021. He was sentenced to a whole-life order the following year. In her letter, Ms Cooper said Lord Anderson had 'conducted an incisive analysis of the perpetrator's case management, the findings of the Prevent Learning Review and the impact of changes made since then'. She added: 'I realise the seriousness of these failings and it reflects the deep concerns you have long held about what went wrong. 'Lord Anderson acknowledges improvements made to Prevent since then but also identifies further important opportunities for change in the wider Prevent system.' Her letter added: 'My determination to make whatever changes are considered necessary is unflinching and a further formal Government response to Lord Anderson's report will follow in the autumn. 'However, I want to be clear that it is without question that where recommendations can be implemented immediately, I will ensure that these are delivered.' Mr Seiger told PA the letter had left the family 'retraumatised, blindsided and feeling marginalised'. He said: 'This is an absolutely appalling letter from the Home Secretary who frankly should know better than to insult the family in this way. 'They are deeply hurt and angered, by the utterly dismissive tone as well as the timing of the Home Secretary's letter accompanying the publication of Lord Anderson KC's report. 'It is difficult to see it as anything other than a calculated exercise in damage limitation, designed not to support the family in their search for answers but to protect the Government following its failings. 'Yet again, we see victims being kicked when they are down. 'This supposed act of courtesy has left the family retraumatised, blindsided, and feeling marginalised in a process that should have had their voices and wellbeing at its heart from the outset. 'The Prime Minister and Home Secretary must understand that a piecemeal approach, which is what they are taking, however well-dressed in public relations, will never deliver the whole truth, accountability and justice for Sir David.' The Home Office has been contacted for comment.
New York Times
9 minutes ago
- New York Times
‘Big logistical issues' to fix before Open Championship returns to Trump Turnberry, says R&A chief
President Donald Trump has been warned that 'big logistical issues' remain a barrier to his Turnberry resort course hosting the Open Championship. The Scottish venue — widely rated as one of the finest in the world — last staged golf's oldest major in 2009 when Stewart Cink famously defeated veteran U.S. star Tom Watson. Advertisement Trump purchased the five-star resort in 2014 and has regularly queried why it has not returned to the rota of courses used for the tournament. A key consideration for the Royal & Ancient Golf Club (R&A), which organises the Open, is infrastructure. Turnberry is revered but also remote and with few transport links, which limits attendance. In 2009, around 123,000 spectators attended the tournament. This week, around 280,000 spectators are expected to descend on Royal Portrush for the 153rd edition of the competition. Asked at a news conference on Wednesday about Turnberry's chances of a return, R&A chief executive Mark Darbon revealed that he has been in dialogue with Trump's son, Eric, but reiterated the problems posed by the course. 'I think we have been extremely clear on our position in regard to Turnberry,' Darbon said. 'We love the golf course but we have some big logistical issues there. 'You've seen the scale of the set-up here (at Portrush) and there's some work to do on the road, rail and accommodation infrastructure around Turnberry. 'We've explicitly not taken it out of our pool of venues but we'd need to address those logistical challenges should we return. 'We need a venue that can accommodate a modern Open Championship from a logistical and commercial perspective and we want to be at venues that enable us to continue to tell the wonderful story that underpins the world's oldest major championship.' He added: 'I met a couple of months ago with Eric Trump and some of the leadership from the Trump golf organisation and from Turnberry. We had a really good discussion. I think they understand clearly where we're coming from. We talked through some of the challenges that we have so we've got a good dialogue with them.' Darbon took over from Martin Slumbers as chief executive of the R&A last year, so this was his first time addressing media ahead of an Open. Advertisement Slumbers had previously suggested Turnberry would not be a host venue while Trump was involved in American politics, as it would create unwanted coverage that would overshadow the tournament. Asked whether that remains the case, Darbon replied: 'It's a somewhat hypothetical question in that unless we address the logistical challenges, it's difficult for us to go back.' While golf fans would welcome a return to Turnberry as many enjoy the variety of Open Championship venues, the focus in more recent years has been on access, availability of tickets and the overall experience. Getting to a major golfing event in the UK is difficult because the demand far outweighs the supply. Venues across England and Scotland have also worked hard to improve public transport links, accommodation and hospitality offerings to cater for the large audience, so there is an expectation that everything is in place when spectators visit. If Turnberry can guarantee all these factors have been improved then it should be a suitable host. After a nearly decade-long absence, Trump National Doral Golf Club is expected to return to the PGA Tour circuit in 2026, according to the Sports Business Journal, so it will be interesting to see if the Scottish venue follows in the future. Turnberry was not the only venue in discussion today, as another Scottish links, Muirfield, has been waiting for a recall since 2013. Darbon added: 'There's some things that we need to evolve at Muirfield, the practice ground in particular is a challenge for us with a modern Open and there's some work we need to do with the venue to facilitate some of the infrastructure that we require, some cabling to enable the scale of the production that we have these days. But it's a good dialogue and we'd love to be back there in the future.' (Top photo of Trump at Turnberry in 2023:)
CNN
9 minutes ago
- CNN
‘Harry Potter' star Emma Watson banned from driving for six months
Former 'Harry Potter' star Emma Watson has been banned from driving for six months after being caught speeding. The 35-year-old British actress and activist was clocked driving her blue Audi at 38 miles per hour in a 30-mph zone in Oxford, England, on the evening of July 31 last year. She did not appear for the brief hearing at High Wycombe Magistrates' Court on Wednesday, where she was fined £1,044 ($1,400) and disqualified from driving, according to PA Media. Shortly after Watson's case was heard, the court considered a separate speeding offense involving her former 'Harry Potter' co-star, Zoë Wanamaker. The celebrated stage actress, who played Quidditch referee Madam Hooch in the franchise's first film, received the same sentence as Watson after she was caught driving at 46 mph in a 40 mph zone in Berkshire, southeast England in August last year, PA reported. According to the news agency, both actresses had nine penalty points on their licenses before the speeding incidents occurred. On Wednesday, District Judge Arvind Sharma endorsed three further points on their licenses for the latest offences, which triggered automatic six-month bans under UK law. CNN has reached out to Watson's representatives for comment. A representative for Wanamaker declined to comment. The parallel rulings mark a curious convergence for two actors whose careers once intersected in the halls of Hogwarts, and who now find themselves off the road at the same time. Watson, who rose to global fame playing Hermione Granger across all eight 'Harry Potter' films, has since pursued a parallel path in academia, filmmaking and women's rights advocacy. Her post-'Potter' screen work includes leading roles in 'Beauty and the Beast' and Greta Gerwig's 'Little Women.'
