HT This Day: May 15, 1976 -- India, Pakistan to exchange ambassadors
Islamabad: India and Pakistan have agreed to re-establish full diplomatic relations between their countries snapped by Pakistan in December 1971 in the wake of India's recognition of Bangladesh.
They agreed that each country should be represented by an Ambassador with supporting staff in the capital of the other country.
The two countries also agreed to resume overflights suspended since the hijacking and subsequent blowing up of an Indian Airlines Fokker Friendship plane in Lahore.
This was disclosed in a joint statement issued today at - the conclusion of the three days of talks between the Pakistan Government and an Indian delegation led by the Foreign Secretary, Mr Jagat S. Mehta. T
hey also agreed to resume goods and passenger traffic by rail through the Wagah-Attari border.
At a joint Press conference after the talks, Mr Mehta and Foreign Secretary Agha Shahi, who led the Pakistan delegation, said that all agreements reached during the talks 'would be implemented in a very short time.'
Diplomatic relations between the two countries were broken off by President Yahya Khan on Dec. 6, 1971, in the wake of India's recognition of Bangladesh.
Question of airlinks and overflights had defied a solution during two rounds of talks held between the two countries in November 1974 in Islamabad and in New Delhi, in May 1975 because of Pakistan's refusal to withdraw its case before the International Civil Aviation Organisation lodged in the wake of India's ban on overflights. India had banned overflights early in February 1971 following the hijacking and subsequent blowing up of an Indian Airlines aircraft in Lahore. T
he agreement by the two Foreign Secretaries was announced at the conclusion of the three-day talks in a joint statement which Mr Agha Shahi described as 'straight, self-explanatory and highly explicit'.
Mr Agha Shahi said they had, in fact, fixed a time limit for the simultaneous Implementation of the various agreements embodied in the joint statement. But this time limit could not be disclosed as Mr Mehta had to seek confirmation from his Government. 'He will let us know in a couple of days,' he said.
Though optimism had been expressed during the last two days of the talks, there was some uncertainty this morning following the cropping up of what Mr Agha Shahi had described as 'delicate differences.'
Mr Agha Shahi had referred to this at a luncheon given by Mr Mehta today. The luncheon itself was delayed by over an hour as the Pakistan Foreign Secretary was apparently trying to contact the Prime Minister, Mr Bhutto who is away in Gilgit.
The joint statement was signed at 7 p.m. (IST) and this was followed by a joint Press conference by the two Foreign Secretaries. Sir Mehta told the Press conference that the agreement took into account all matters referred to in the Simla agreement.
The following in the text of the joint statement issued m Islamabad and New Delhi:
Pursuant to the letter written by Prime Minister Z. A. Bhutto on March 27 and the reply of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi of April 11, the delegations of India and Pakistan met in Islamabad from May 12 to 14 with the objective of resuming normalisation of relations between the two countries as envisaged in the Simla Agreement. The discussions were held in a frank and friendly atmosphere.
Mr. J.S. Mehta, Foreign Secretary, led the Indian delegation. He was assisted by representatives of the ministries of External Affairs, Tourism and Civil Aviation, Finance Home Affairs, Railways, Shipping and Transport and Commerce. The Pakistani delegation was led by Mr Agha Shahi, Foreign Secretary. He was assisted by the representatives of the ministries of Foreign Affairs, Railways, finance, Communications, Commerce, Interior, Information and Broadcasting, Law, Aviation Division, the department of Civil Aviation, Ports and shipping and Pakistan International Airlines Corporation.
In regard to matters relating to civil aviation, the two delegations discussed the modality of withdrawing the cases anti counter claim pending before the Council of tire International Civil Aviation Organisation and agreed to send a joint letter to the council for the purpose. They further agreed to the resumption of overflights and the restoration of airlinks between the two countries. It was decided that expert delegations from the two countries will meet to work out the necessary details.
The two delegations agreed to resume goods and passenger traffic by rail through the Wagah-Attari border. In this connection the Pakistani delegation stated that the rail track on its side was already functional. The Indian delegation undertook to carry out the necessary repairs on its side as soon as possible.
The two sides recognised the advantage that would accrue to trade between the two countries with the resumption of freighting of goods by rail.
It was decided that the experts of the two countries should meet urgently to work out a detailed agreement regarding inter-change, freight rating, compensation claims, custom formalities, creation of a wagon pool and so on for the goods and passenger traffic between the two countries.
The two sides agreed to grant multiple journey visas valid for one year to the members of the railway staff operating on scheduled services along the specified route.
The two delegations agreed that goods meant for the other country could also be transported by road up to the Wagah-Attari border. For this purpose, they undertook to make necessary arrangements for the transshipment, warehousing, bonding and customs clearance.
The two delegations discussed the question of early re-establishment of diplomatic relations between their countries. They agreed that each country should be represented by an ambassador with supporting staff in the capital of the other country. In view of the problems which had been faced in the past in the functioning of their respective diplomatic missions, the two delegations reaffirmed their adherence to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961, to which they were party and agreed on a basis reciprocity, to grant each other's missions all facilities and courtesies for their normal functioning.
The two delegations reviewed the working of the Indo-Pakistan Trade agreement of January 23, 1975, and the shipping protocol of January 15, 1975. They agreed that in terms of article 3 of the trade agreement, in addition to state trading organisations, the private sector be also enabled, with effect from July 15, 1976, to participate in the trade between the two countries subject to the laws, rules, regulations and procedures in force in their respective countries from time to time.
The two delegations also agreed that the joint committee envisaged under article 9 of trade agreement should be constituted immediately to review the working of that agreement and that the first meeting of the joint committee should be held at the commerce secretaries' level as soon as possible and, in any case, before the end of 1976.
The two sides decided that a further meeting of the respective ship-ping experts should be held, as early as possible, to review the protocol on shipping as provided in article 22 of that protocol.
The two delegations reviewed the existing visa agreement for regulating travel between the two countries. They noted that the arrangements envisaged in that agreement were working satisfactorily and required no change.
The two delegations discussed measures for promoting cultural and scientific exchanges as envisaged in the Simla agreement. They agreed that further discussions on these measures could be undertaken in due course.
The two sides held discussions on the question of the detenus and agreed that this humanitarian issue needed to be resolved expeditiously. They also agreed to make efforts to locate persons still untraced and re-patriate them with all possible dis-patch in accordance with the existing working arrangements.
The leader of the Indian delegation. Mr J.S. Mehta, was received by the President of the Islamic Re-public of Pakistan.
The Indian delegation warmly thanked the delegation of Pakistan for its hospitality.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
32 minutes ago
- Economic Times
India's FY25 economic growth hits four-year low of 6.5%, Q4 GDP beats estimates
India's economic growth slowed to a four-year low of 6.5% in FY25, despite a stronger-than-expected Q4 performance of 7.4%. Key officials remain optimistic about India's growth potential, expecting it to remain the fastest-growing major economy. Factors like robust industrial activity, rural demand, and government spending helped navigate global trade disruptions, with the IMF projecting India's economy to surpass Japan's. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads India's economic growth in FY25 hit a four-year low of 6.5 per cent, slowing down sharply from the 9.2 per cent growth recorded in FY24. However, Q4 GDP growth beat estimates after accelerating to 7.4 per cent but it couldn't save the economy from posting its slowest growth since New Delhi's key officials have backed India's growth potential and vouched that the country will retain its title as the fastest-growing major economy in the full-year growth remained within official projections, as private investment remained subdued amid global the quarter ending March 31, 2025, India's growth stood was fastest in the four quarters, on the back of robust industrial activity and sustained global trade tensions grew larger by third quarter had seen growth rise to 6.2 per cent, revised upward from an earlier estimate of 5.6 per cent, showing resilience amid global fourth quarter was marred by global trade disruptions led by Trump's tariffs and escalation of the Russia-Ukraine war. However, the Indian economy powered through the storm on the back of pick up rural demand and healthy government the latest growth figures continue to keep New Delhi in the race of fastest economies in the world. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) also expects India's economic size to surpass Japan's by the end of the year, reaching $4.18 trillion.A notable divergence between GDP and gross value added (GVA) was expected with the latter stripping out taxes and subsidies for a clearer picture of underlying economic activity. The GVA stood at 6.4 per Morgan, for instance, estimated March quarter GDP growth at 7.5%, but GVA growth at a more modest 6.7%.Some analysts said that the higher-than-expected GDP print might be a reflection of a fall in government subsidies, which could inflate the headline number without reflecting equivalent real economic the external challenges, the Indian economy remains relatively healthy due to its limited reliance on global goods trade, recent tax cuts, controlled inflation and a potentially softer interest rate environment.'While external uncertainties—such as supply chain disruptions and energy market volatility—pose challenges, India continues to benefit from strong service sector performance, a stable banking system, and improving manufacturing output under schemes like PLI,' said Dr. Manoranjan Sharma, Chief Economist at Infomerics Valuations and Ratings February 2025, the RBI had, for the first time in five years, cut the repo rate by 25 bps, a move expected to aid India's growth inflation dropped to a near six-year low of 3.16% in April, and a favourable monsoon forecast is expected to help stabilize food prices—factors that could allow the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to consider a rate cut in ahead, the RBI has projected 6.5% growth for the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2025.'On the inflation front, CPI is expected to moderate from 4.9% in FY25 to 4.3% in FY26, aided by easing food prices, prudent monetary policy, and a normal monsoon forecast. However, inflationary risks persist because of global commodity prices and any escalation in geopolitical tensions,' said Sharma.
India Today
33 minutes ago
- India Today
Not just water, money too flowed from India to Pakistan as part of Indus treaty
"I have stuck my neck out to secure funds from various friendly governments," an impatient and anxious World Bank president, Eugene Black, told Indian and Pakistani negotiators in April 1959. He needed to break the impasse over the agreement over the Indus waters. Time was running out, and an agreement could not be reached for the potential Indus Waters Treaty even after eight long years of impasse ended only after India and other donor countries agreed to pay $1 billion ($10 billion today, factoring in inflation). Of this, India paid $174 million ($1.6 billion today) to paved the way for the signing of the Indus Waters Treaty in 1960. Under the agreement, Pakistan was granted exclusive rights over the western rivers, the Indus, Chenab, and Jhelum, while India retained unrestricted use of the eastern rivers, the Ravi, Beas, and billions of gallons of water continued flowing into Pakistan, millions of dollars also flowed from India to Pakistan for the next 10 years, as compensation for India's exclusive access to the eastern almost six decades later, the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) is again in the spotlight. Following the deadly terror attack in Pahalgam, India announced the suspension of the IWT. Pakistani and Pakistan-trained terrorists killed 26 civilians, mostly Delhi said Pakistan's actions violated the treaty's foundational principles of goodwill and friendship. Prime Minister Narendra Modi echoed this stance, saying, "blood and water cannot flow together", as the treaty was kept in abeyance until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably ceased support for terrorism. This marked the first time since its signing in 1960 that India paused the urged India to reconsider the suspension of the pact, citing its critical role in supporting 80% of its agricultural water needs. Despite a ceasefire agreement on May 10 after a mini-war, India has kept the IWT in abeyance, with reports indicating that it will be fast-tracking projects on the western rivers to tap the suspension of the IWT came after India's patience was tested regularly by Pakistan and its gave Pakistan both water and money, but Pakistan returned the favour with this backdrop, it's worth revisiting the treaty's circumstances, how negotiations took shape, the rationale behind India's payment to Pakistan, how the payout of $174 million was arrived at through intense bargaining, and how Pakistan ultimately let India's then Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, down even after the IWT was signed. The Indus Waters Treaty was signed in 1960 by the Government of India, led by Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru (L), and Pakistan's President Ayub Khan. (Image: World Bank) WHY WAS INDUS WATERS TREATY NEEDED?The Partition of India in 1947 split the Indus River System, which had long irrigated vast farmlands, between India (the upper riparian) and Pakistan (the lower riparian). By 1948, India's use of the river waters triggered a panic in the newly-formed Islamic Republic. An interim agreement was signed, but Pakistan said it remained 1956, as PM Nehru prepared to dedicate the Bhakra Dam on the Sutlej River to the nation, tensions with Pakistan escalated sharply. The risk of a war loomed."Take up Arms" and "A Black Day" were the headlines in Lahore's Urdu newspapers, noted Niranjan Das Gulhati, the chief Indian negotiator and technical advisor during the formulation of the World Bank stepped in to mediate a long-term challenge was immense: to divide a single, integrated water system between two hostile neighbours. The solution took shape in the form of the IWT, in what would become one of the most complex international water-sharing agreements. The Indus River originates in Tibet near Lake Mansarovar, flows northwest into Ladakh, then enters Gilgit-Baltistan in Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, then traverses the length of Pakistan from north to south, and drains into the Arabian Sea near Karachi. (India Today File) advertisementFORMAL PROPOSAL AND THE FIRST DEADLOCK OF INDUS WATERS TREATYNegotiations formally began in May 1952, facilitated by the World Bank. The process moved in 1952 to 1954, a working party of engineers from both countries, along with World Bank officials, developed technical proposals. In 1954, the Bank presented its formal proposal, suggesting a division: India would get exclusive use of the Eastern rivers, and Pakistan the Western rivers (Indus, Jhelum and Chenab).Pakistan accepted the principle but insisted on a massive replacement plan to offset the loss of Eastern river said it would not fund this entire plan, leading to a deadlock, noted Niranjan Das Gulhati in his 1973 book, Indus Waters Treaty: An Exercise in International 1955 and 1958, negotiations stalled India and Pakistan remained wasn't until 1959 that a breakthrough seemed year, officials of the World Bank (then called the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development), including its President Eugene Black and Vice President WAB Iliff, undertook intensive shuttle diplomacy between New Delhi, Karachi (Pakistan's capital until 1959), Washington DC and London. The Indus Waters Treaty negotiations spanned eight arduous years, from 1952 to 1960, involving intense mediation by the World Bank. WAB Iliff (R), as Vice-President of the World Bank, played a crucial role in mediating the treaty, and ultimately signed the agreement on behalf of his organisation. (Images: World Bank) INDIA RESISTED SHARING PAKISTAN'S FINANCIAL BURDENPakistan's demand for aid was rooted in the fact that it had lost access to the canals and their networks fed by the Eastern rivers, some of whose headworks were then laid in India. To survive agriculturally, it needed to build new infrastructure to tap the Western rivers: link canals, dams, and barrages. The estimated cost exceeded $1 World Bank began seeking contributions from major powers. The United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Germany pledged funds. But the treaty couldn't move forward unless India, gaining exclusive rights over the Eastern rivers, also agreed to initially the World Bank argued that India was benefiting by securing exclusive rights and therefore should bear part of the replacement cost. The Bank also made it clear that without India's contribution, the treaty would collapse. Camels on a dry riverbed of the Indus River in central Sindh. Pakistan depends on the Indus Basin for nearly 80% of its agricultural water needs, making it the lifeline of the country's farming and food security. (Image: Reuters) WHY PAKISTAN WANTED MONEY AFTER INDUS WATERS TREATY?In May 1959, Iliff told Gulhati, India's chief negotiator, that Eugene Black had put his credibility on the line, saying, "A stage has been reached. If the negotiations are to break down, I should know immediately; otherwise my reputation with these governments would be at stake".The World Bank secured commitments from friendly nations based on India's assumed participation. If India refused to pay, the deal would fall apart."Before I left Washington in the third week of April, Iliff told me that, in New Delhi, Black would propose to the Prime Minister [Nehru] that India should pay $250 million as her contribution towards the cost of works to be built in Pakistan. I said that this was much too high a figure," Niranjan Das Gulhati wrote."However, the horse-trading in New Delhi was to be limited to the range of $158 million, which sum we considered fair, and $250 million, which Iliff regarded as a fair deal. Pakistan was hardly concerned as the Bank was undertaking to underwrite the entire cost of her works from assistance by friendly countries," he closed doors, Iliff and Indian officials, including then Finance Secretary, BK Nehru, debated the numbers. After much back and forth, they settled on $174.8 million (62.06 million pound).India would pay 10 equal annual instalments into the Indus Basin Development Fund, managed by the World Bank, until 1970. The fund financed Pakistan's massive infrastructure projects like the Mangla Dam and various link contribution was earmarked specifically for Pakistan's "replacement works" under the Indus Basin Development Contributions to Indus Basin Development Fund (1960)ContributorFinal Contribution (Approx.)United States$315 millionWorld Bank (IDA & Loan)$250 millionUnited Kingdom$90 millionCanada$70 millionAustralia$20 millionGermany (West Germany)$12 millionNew Zealand$6 millionIndia83 crore (approx $62 million)Pakistan (self-financed)$100 million (approx)Total Estimated CostOver $1 billionPAKISTAN REMAINS HOSTILITIE DESPITE INDUS WATERS TREATYWith the finances sorted, the treaty was finally signed on September 19, Nehru and Pakistan's President General Ayub Khan formalised the agreement in Karachi. World Bank Vice-President WAB Iliff signed it on behalf of his idealist in Nehru hoped that this IWT would usher in a new chapter in India-Pakistan relations. He believed that resolving this vital issue could pave the way for cooperation on other issues, including just months later, Gulhati, in his book, recalled Nehru telling him: "I had hoped that this agreement would open the way to settlement of other problems, but we are where we were".Four years after signing the IWT, in 1964, Pakistan's replacement works exceeded initial estimates. A supplementary agreement was signed to raise additional funds from donor countries. India did not pay again, as its financial obligation had already been fulfilled under the terms of the original treaty in the massive diplomatic and financial effort India put into the IWT, Pakistan continued to challenge and bleed India on several fronts. The Pahalgam attack was the latest of Pakistan's five years after the IWT was signed, Pakistan dragged India into a war after it infiltrated Kashmir and parts of spirit of goodwill that Nehru hoped the treaty would foster quickly retrospect, while the Indus Waters Treaty is still hailed globally as a successful case of water diplomacy, it came at a high cost for India, not just in terms of water allocation, but also in hard just with money, India paid with goodwill and trust too, only for Pakistan to repeatedly betray it. This very pattern of Pakistan's behaviour is what the Narendra Modi-led government, by suspending the Indus Waters Treaty, has now attempted to InMust Watch
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
India's FY25 economic growth hits four-year low of 6.5%, Q4 GDP beats estimates
India's economic growth in FY25 hit a four-year low of 6.5 per cent, slowing down sharply from the 9.2 per cent growth recorded in FY24. However, Q4 GDP growth beat estimates after accelerating to 7.4 per cent but it couldn't save the economy from posting its slowest growth since Covid-era. Nonetheless, New Delhi's key officials have backed India's growth potential and vouched that the country will retain its title as the fastest-growing major economy in the world. The full-year growth remained within official projections, as private investment remained subdued amid global uncertainties. In the quarter ending March 31, 2025, India's growth stood at 7.4 per cent, on the back of robust industrial activity and sustained global trade tensions grew larger by day. The third quarter had seen growth rise to 6.2 per cent, revised upward from an earlier estimate of 5.6 per cent, showing resilience amid global headwinds. Live Events The fourth quarter was marred by global trade disruptions led by Trump's tariffs and escalation of the Russia-Ukraine war. However, the Indian economy powered through the storm on the back of pick up rural demand and healthy government spending. Moreover, the latest growth figures continue to keep New Delhi in the race of fastest economies in the world. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) also expects India's economic size to surpass Japan's by the end of the year, reaching $4.18 trillion. A notable divergence between GDP and gross value added (GVA) was expected with the latter stripping out taxes and subsidies for a clearer picture of underlying economic activity. The GVA stood at 6.4 per cent. JP Morgan, for instance, estimated March quarter GDP growth at 7.5%, but GVA growth at a more modest 6.7%. Some analysts said that the higher-than-expected GDP print might be a reflection of a fall in government subsidies, which could inflate the headline number without reflecting equivalent real economic momentum. Despite the external challenges, the Indian economy remains relatively healthy due to its limited reliance on global goods trade, recent tax cuts, controlled inflation and a potentially softer interest rate environment. 'While external uncertainties—such as supply chain disruptions and energy market volatility—pose challenges, India continues to benefit from strong service sector performance, a stable banking system, and improving manufacturing output under schemes like PLI,' said Dr. Manoranjan Sharma, Chief Economist at Infomerics Valuations and Ratings Ltd. In February 2025, the RBI had, for the first time in five years, cut the repo rate by 25 bps, a move expected to aid India's growth blitz. Retail inflation dropped to a near six-year low of 3.16% in April, and a favourable monsoon forecast is expected to help stabilize food prices—factors that could allow the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to consider a rate cut in June. Looking ahead, the RBI has projected 6.5% growth for the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2025. 'On the inflation front, CPI is expected to moderate from 4.9% in FY25 to 4.3% in FY26, aided by easing food prices, prudent monetary policy, and a normal monsoon forecast. However, inflationary risks persist because of global commodity prices and any escalation in geopolitical tensions,' said Sharma.
