Concerns women's equality is 'going backwards'
Three high-profile Welsh women have raised concerns that women's equality could be "going backwards".
Research in 2024 showed 47% of people said when it comes to giving women equal rights with men "things have gone far enough in Great Britain".
Johanna Robinson, Welsh government advisor on violence against women and girls, said of those she speaks to "a significant proportion of men think gender equality has gone too far".
She added although there had been progression and positive change, it had also created anger in some men.
A panel of Welsh women spoke to BBC Walescast to mark International Women's Day, which falls on 8 March.
Women's health hubs for 'every part of Wales'
Diversity backlash: Is 'masculine energy' coming to the UK?
How the miners' strike changed the role of women
For more than a century, people around the world have marked International Women's Day.
The idea to make it an international event came from Clara Zetkin, a communist activist and advocate for women's rights.
However, despite acknowledging successes and changes, Welsh women have raised concerns that equality is regressing.
Johanna has spoken out previously about her own experience as a survivor.
"When I speak to young women I am horrified of their experiences, that actually they're no safer than I was at their age," she said.
"One of the things for me that really demonstrates this is speaking to young women about their day to day experiences - like gym culture, and that they choose safe spots or safe times."
She said despite the progression made, it had created anger in some men.
"In some ways you see that fuelling men, that women are improving and they now feel that gender equality has gone too far."
Helen Molyneux is a lawyer and founder of the Monumental Welsh Women Project - a project to help provide statues of real Welsh women in Wales.
"I worry that there's this push back against women's rights," she said.
"There's almost a bit of hysteria around facts like there are more women doctors than men now or that women are earning slightly more than men in certain age groups."
She said attitudes in places like the US and Afghanistan meant women there "have less rights now than their mothers and grandmothers".
Sian James played a key role in the support networks surrounding the 1984 miner's strike.
Women played a vital role in the dispute, organising food collections, distributions and fundraising, organising pickets and speaking at rallies.
Sian was one of many women to join support groups in south Wales, and said the women were "better organisers".
"I come from a long line of chopsy women, I'm not ashamed to say that. Chopsy women change the world.
"Suddenly in '84, women really were at the forefront, it's very empowering, very liberating."
But while she acknowledges there have been changes in women's equality, she is concerned it is not enough.
"I am really tired of people telling me to stop being woke.
"It's not, it's basic human rights and I'm going to keep fighting for them as long as I possibly can."
Research from the World Economic Forum found at the current rate of progress it would take until 2158 to reach full parity - which is roughly five generations from now.
All three women could give examples of times in their careers where they had been made to feel uncomfortable because they were women.
Sian became a Labour MP for Swansea East in 2005, and told BBC Wales about an interaction that happened to her in Westminster.
"I had a big brooch on and somebody said 'oh [you] won first prize in the heifer class have you, at the local agricultural fair'.
"That was a member of parliament that said that to me."
Johanna said: "I got harassed in my first job when I was washing pots, and then I got harassed later on in life as well."
Johanna spoke of when she was harassed at a football match.
She said a man sitting behind her repeatedly grabbed her after she had told him to stop.
Helen described a time as a young solicitor when she was called a witch.
"I was accused of organising a coven because I invited three other female solicitors out for lunch," she said.
She also said she was horrified telling her daughter about some of her experiences.
"I'm embarrassed to say that I would tell my daughter stories of things that happened and [laugh], because at the time, it was just what you put up with if you wanted to fit in and get on."
All three women highlighted the importance of education to ensure men are part of the solution to tackling gender inequality.
You can catch up on Thursday's episode of Walescast on BBC Sounds
Coercive control to be treated like other domestic abuse offences
The women killed by men in Wales since 2020
Curfew - is there a radical fix for violence against women?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Let us tax visitors on overnight stays in England, mayors say
A coalition of mayors has called for powers to be given to local authorities to create visitor levies across England, in an attempt to boost tourist infrastructure and regional growth. The group of mayors from around the country, led by Liverpool City Region Mayor Steve Rotheram, is calling on the government to grant devolved powers to allow regions to create a visitor levy, which could see a small charge added to overnight stays. Mr Rotheram said the overnight charges are 'the kind most of us wouldn't think twice about when travelling abroad' and 'would give us the power to reinvest directly into the things that make our area so special'. Other mayors have echoed his sentiment. Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, said: 'A modest overnight accommodation levy, similar to other international cities, would boost our economy, deliver growth and help cement London's reputation as a global tourism and business destination.' A similar law is already in place in Scotland, passed in 2024, which allows councils to tax overnight accommodation if they wish to do so. Edinburgh has already made headway with this power, voting in January to add a five per cent surcharge on visitors' overnight stays by 2026. A bill has also been proposed by Welsh lawmakers to introduce a small visitor levy that could see visitors to the country paying up to £1.25 per night by 2027. The mayors say England is 'at risk of falling behind' as Scotland and Wales move ahead with their own tourism levies, so are calling for rapid action from the central government. The mayors have argued that the powers to create a visitor levy would unlock 'vital' funding for tourism and cultural infrastructure and drive regional growth, as well as reduce dependence on funding from the central government. English legislation does not allow cities to create a visitor levy; however, using legal workarounds has meant Liverpool and Manchester have introduced a form of tourism levy. The city councils both introduced a tourism-based Business Improvement District (BID), using existing legal power to establish a form of tourist tax that allows hoteliers to charge £1 (in Manchester) or £2 (in Liverpool) per night as part of a 'city visitor charge'. The mayors said that the BID visitor levy in Liverpool has received strong backing, while in Manchester, a recent survey revealed 70 per cent of tourists are willing to pay a small charge if it is used to visibly enhance tourism services. However, the local authorities are hoping to see devolved powers to create visitor levies written into law. The campaign is backed by the mayors of the Liverpool City Region, Greater Manchester, London, the North East, the West Midlands and West Yorkshire. 'These regions collectively attract hundreds of millions of visitors annually and contribute billions to the UK economy,' the group said. 'Yet none currently benefit from a dedicated funding stream to reinvest in tourism resilience and growth.' The Liverpool City Region predicts that a visitor levy could raise nearly £11 million per year for the area from the over 60 million visitors it receives annually. Greater Manchester says that a £1 to £5 overnight tax could raise between £8 million and £40 million per year, which could help fund key infrastructures such as the regeneration of Old Trafford or airport development. Over in the capital, the group said tourism accounts for one in seven jobs and nearly 12 per cent of London's economy, whereas visitor economies stand at £6.1 billion in the North East and £16.3 billion in Birmingham.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ospreys pressing on with plans despite WRU dispute
Ospreys chief executive Lance Bradley says pressing ahead with plans to move to a new ground shows they are confident of a positive outcome in their dispute with the Welsh Rugby Union (WRU). The Welsh region announced in 2024 they would be moving from Stadium to the smaller St Helen's venue for the 2025-26 season. Ospreys have made the official planning application submission for the redevelopment of St Helen's to Swansea Council which they say is a "significant milestone". The move comes at a time when Ospreys and Scarlets are involved in a dispute with the WRU about future funding. "We are still talking with the WRU about the situation and if we were not confident of a positive outcome that would make things a lot more difficult," said Bradley. "The fact we are proceeding full steam ahead with the development does shows a level of confidence." Speaking on BBC Radio Wales Breakfast, Bradley went on: "It [not having a deal] makes planning more difficult and frustrating because we think this could have been avoided. "Life isn't always a smooth road and there are sometimes road bumps. "This is one of those and we are managing our way through that." Ospreys sign Wales back row Moriarty from Brive URC to support WRU decision on number of regions - Anayi Ospreys apply for St Helen's stadium planning permission Ospreys and Scarlets are at loggerheads with the WRU after the two professional sides did not sign the new Professional Rugby Agreement (PRA) by the deadline of 8 May. The WRU has since announced it will move away from a model of four evenly funded professional sides which will result in a new tiered funding system. It is a move Ospreys and Scarlets described as a U-turn that has "created more destabilising and debilitating uncertainty in our game". The agreement has been signed by Dragons and also by Cardiff, who were last month taken over by the WRU after they temporarily went into administration. The WRU insisted the new PRA offered a better deal for the regions but Ospreys and Scarlets said they had asked the governing body for assurances the takeover "will not disproportionally benefit Cardiff and disadvantage the independent clubs". "We were ready to sign a contract, we had agreed and confirmed to the WRU in April," said Bradley. "So in terms of the actual PRA contract there isn't anything to discuss. "The issue arose when Cardiff went into administration and now being owned by the WRU. "That's the conversation now. I am hoping we are getting closer to a resolution. "We are not there at the moment but hoping it will be reasonably shortly. There isn't another deadline and talks are ongoing." Reports have suggested the WRU are considering cutting a team from its professional tier, something the governing body has not publicly confirmed or denied is part of its plans. They have said they will "work closely with all four professional clubs to agree the way forward beyond June 2027, with an open mind to all constructive and realistic proposals" and they hope a long-term resolution will be decided by September. The four professional sides play in the United Rugby Championship (URC) with its chief executive Martin Anayi stating it would support the WRU in whatever decision was made. "I saw those comments and that's what you would expect," said Bradley "The WRU is a shareholder of URC and you would expect them to be talking to each other and be supportive. "I don't think you should necessarily read into that we will be definitely going into three regions and the conversations are ongoing." Bradley said the uncertainty was unsettling for everybody involved in the Welsh game. "I completely understand the nervousness and unsettling nature of where we all are at the moment," said Bradley. "We try to keep fans informed as much as possible and we will do that as soon as we can in this situation." Bradley says the dispute with the WRU has brought Ospreys closer with their local rivals. "We are working very closely with Scarlets and we have the same questions about the levels of fairness about what the WRU are doing with Cardiff," he added. "There is not a divide between us. We talk regularly about how jointly we can come to a good solution about this." Bradley also insisted the Ospreys have not contemplated a future without a deal with the WRU: "The WRU oversee rugby in Wales and our future will be a part of that. "Whatever it turns out to be, it will be as part of a discussion and agreement with the WRU."
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Is Wales on track for new rail money? It might be
We look to be edging slowly further down the tracks towards confirmation of new rail funding in Wales. Transport Secretary Ken Skates – who appears to be growing in certainty that something is about to arrive - told the Senedd on Wednesday that he has been trying to persuade the UK government to pay for five new stations between Cardiff and the Severn Tunnel. All will be revealed at Chancellor Rachel Reeves's spending review next week, but a fortnight ago Skates was "very very confident" Wales would do well and on Tuesday he said that a "pipeline" of work had been agreed with the UK government. The Welsh government is also thought to be pushing for investment in north Wales including improvements at Padeswood and just over the border in Chester – vital for improving services on this side of the border. The south Wales plans would involve stations at Cardiff East, Newport West, Somerton, Llanwern, and one serving the villages of Magor and Undy. Morgan said back in January that talks were taking place on investing in new stations between Cardiff and the Severn Tunnel, the cost of which was put at around £335m by a transport commission. The Welsh government has also recently published – largely unfunded – plans for a metro service in north Wales. Providing funding would make logical sense - Reeves wants to invest in big infrastructure projects – and political sense too with Welsh Labour up against it in the polls 11 months from the Senedd election. UK government sources are not pushing back against the prospect that funding for rail improvements might be forthcoming and BBC Wales has been told that next steps on transport infrastructure spending will be set out at the spending review. It is understood that the Welsh Secretary, Jo Stevens, has been pressing hard to get the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, and the Treasury, and I am using Eluned Morgan's words here, to "cough up" on rail. But, even if Morgan were to get the money needed for those schemes, she will still face accusations from opposition parties and many within Welsh Labour that Wales continues to be short-changed. They argue that Wales should be funded with anywhere between hundreds of millions and billions more pounds, as a consequential for schemes being built in England but which are designated England and Wales projects. And they would like the classification of some of the most prominent, and controversial ones, changed. Anger as Oxford rail line classed as England and Wales project I won't get all the money I want from Starmer - FM £2.1bn north Wales rail overhaul plans unveiled On Wednesday, billions of pounds for schemes across northern England and the Midlands, which on first glance prompted the question: what about Wales and what about consequential funding? The simple answer to part one is - wait until next Wednesday; to part two - there should be consequential funding for bus and light rail schemes but not heavy rail, which is classified as England and Wales, with funding details to come. On Tuesday a separate announcement on heavy rail sent familiar arguments hurtling back down the tracks. Confirmation that Wales will not get a single consequential penny from a proposed new line between Oxford and Cambridge have led to accusations that it is HS2 "all over again". HS2 is the long-running and high profile rail-funding sore. Plaid Cymru says that Wales is owed £4bn pounds, a figure previously used by Welsh ministers who now say it is £350m and rising. The Liberal Democrats put the figure in the hundreds of millions - and the Welsh Conservatives call for "fair funding" too. Back in January the first minister herself called the England and Wales classification of HS2 a "fundamental injustice". At the same time a UK government source said they could not "fix" an injustice they had inherited from the previous Conservative government. Another scheme with similar issues to HS2 has allowed opposition parties – and some Labour politicians – to build up a head of steam before Reeves' announcement next week, although they would have been likely to make points about underfunding in the aftermath in any case. On rail Eluned Morgan might get something from one hand next week, but have something held back by the other. Throw in UK Labour decisions on welfare reform, National Insurance contributions for public sector employers and potential changes to farming funding - all likely to disproportionately affect Wales – and it does not make the first minister's job any easier. And all this is before we get the expected confirmation of a squeeze on day-to-day public spending. Morgan has adopted a new strategy to "call out" her Westminster colleagues when they, in her view, harm Wales, but she also needs them to deliver. If they do not – or are not judged to have delivered – then it presents the first minister with some issues when she tries to convince voters next May. Waiting in the sidings after the chancellor's speech are eager opposition parties, buoyed in some cases by recent polling, to tell you that two Labour governments working together are not on track.
