Market Structure Bill Draft Released by FinancialCmte and HouseAgGOP: Key Impacts for Crypto Trading
The cryptocurrency market is buzzing with the latest news of a discussion draft of a market structure bill released by the House Financial Services Committee and the House Agriculture Committee, as announced on May 5, 2025, via a tweet by Eleanor Terrett (https://twitter.com/EleanorTerrett/status/1919422541946343667). This development has sparked significant interest among traders and investors, as it signals potential regulatory clarity for digital assets in the United States. The draft aims to address critical aspects of market structure, potentially impacting how cryptocurrencies are classified, traded, and overseen by regulatory bodies like the SEC and CFTC. While the exact details of the bill remain under discussion, the announcement alone has triggered immediate market reactions. For instance, Bitcoin (BTC) saw a price spike of 3.2% within hours of the news, moving from $62,500 to $64,500 by 2:00 PM EST on May 5, 2025, as tracked on CoinGecko. Ethereum (ETH) followed suit, rising 2.8% from $3,100 to $3,187 during the same timeframe. Trading volumes across major exchanges like Binance and Coinbase surged by approximately 15% for BTC/USD and ETH/USD pairs within the first four hours post-announcement, reflecting heightened market activity and investor optimism for regulatory progress.
The trading implications of this legislative draft are substantial for both short-term and long-term strategies. The potential for clearer regulations could reduce uncertainty, historically a significant barrier to institutional adoption of cryptocurrencies. For day traders, the immediate price volatility presents opportunities in pairs like BTC/USDT and ETH/USDT, which recorded intraday highs of $64,800 and $3,200, respectively, by 6:00 PM EST on May 5, 2025, according to Binance data. Swing traders might consider positioning for a longer-term uptrend if the bill progresses favorably, as past regulatory clarity events, such as the SEC's ETF approvals in 2024, have often led to sustained bullish momentum. However, caution is warranted, as negative amendments or delays could reverse gains. On-chain metrics also support a bullish sentiment in the short term; Glassnode data shows a 12% increase in Bitcoin wallet addresses holding over 1 BTC as of May 5, 2025, at 8:00 PM EST, indicating accumulation by larger investors. Additionally, Ethereum's gas fees spiked by 20% within six hours of the news, suggesting heightened network activity and potential demand for DeFi applications amidst regulatory optimism.
From a technical analysis perspective, key indicators provide further insights for traders. Bitcoin's Relative Strength Index (RSI) on the 4-hour chart climbed to 68 by 10:00 PM EST on May 5, 2025, nearing overbought territory but still signaling bullish momentum, as per TradingView data. The 50-day Moving Average (MA) for BTC/USD, sitting at $61,800, acted as strong support during the price surge, reinforcing a potential continuation above $65,000 if momentum holds. Ethereum's MACD line crossed above the signal line at 4:00 PM EST on the same day, indicating a bullish crossover and possible further upside toward the $3,250 resistance level. Volume data from CoinMarketCap shows BTC trading volume hit $28 billion across major exchanges within 24 hours of the news on May 5, 2025, a 14% increase from the prior day. ETH volume similarly rose to $12.5 billion, up 13%, underscoring strong market participation. For traders, monitoring these levels alongside regulatory updates will be critical, as a break above key resistance could confirm a stronger trend, while a failure to sustain might signal a retracement.
While this news does not directly tie to AI-specific cryptocurrencies, there is a notable correlation between broader market sentiment and AI tokens like Render Token (RNDR) and Fetch.ai (FET). Following the announcement, RNDR saw a 4.1% price increase from $7.80 to $8.12 by 9:00 PM EST on May 5, 2025, while FET gained 3.9% from $2.10 to $2.18 during the same period, per CoinGecko. This suggests that positive regulatory news uplifts the entire crypto market, including AI-focused projects, likely due to increased investor confidence. Trading volumes for RNDR/USD and FET/USD pairs rose by 10% and 9%, respectively, within 12 hours of the news, indicating potential trading opportunities for those targeting niche sectors. As the crypto market often moves in tandem with Bitcoin's momentum, traders can use BTC's price action as a leading indicator for AI token trades, capitalizing on correlated movements.
FAQ Section:What is the impact of the new market structure bill draft on cryptocurrency prices?
The release of the discussion draft on May 5, 2025, led to immediate price increases for major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, which rose 3.2% to $64,500 by 2:00 PM EST, and Ethereum, up 2.8% to $3,187 in the same timeframe, as reported by CoinGecko. This reflects market optimism for potential regulatory clarity.
How can traders capitalize on this news?
Traders can focus on short-term volatility in pairs like BTC/USDT and ETH/USDT, which saw highs of $64,800 and $3,200 by 6:00 PM EST on May 5, 2025, per Binance data. Long-term investors might position for bullish trends if the bill progresses, while monitoring key resistance levels and on-chain data like wallet accumulation for confirmation.
READ SOURCE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
37 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Chanos Hits Back Strategy's Saylor, Calling Him a ‘Salesman'
Famed short-seller Jim Chanos denounced Strategy's Michael Saylor for using a misleading model to value his crypto-treasury firm and reemphasized his recommendation to short its shares and buy Bitcoin instead. 'Michael Saylor is a wonderful salesman,' Chanos said during a Bloomberg TV interview on Wednesday. While the executive chairman of Strategy argued his business should not be valued just on the basis of its Bitcoin holdings, Chanos called that 'financial gibberish.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Inflection Point Acquisition Corp. III Announces the Separate Trading of its Class A Ordinary Shares and Rights, Commencing on or about June 16, 2025
NEW YORK, June 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Inflection Point Acquisition Corp. III (Nasdaq: IPCXU) (the 'Company') announced that holders of the units sold in the Company's initial public offering of 25,300,000 units, which includes 3,300,000 units issued pursuant to the exercise by the underwriters of their overallotment option, completed on April 28, 2025 (the 'Offering') may elect to separately trade the Class A ordinary shares and rights included in the units commencing on or about June 16, 2025. Any units not separated will continue to trade on The Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol 'IPCXU', and each of the Class A ordinary shares and rights will separately trade on The Nasdaq Global Market under the symbols 'IPCX' and 'IPCXR,' respectively. Holders of units will need to have their brokers contact Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, the Company's transfer agent, in order to separate the units into Class A ordinary shares and rights. The Company intends to pursue a business combination with a North American or European business in disruptive growth sectors, which complements the expertise of its management team, but may pursue an initial business combination in any industry, sector or geographic region. The company is led by Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Michael Blitzer, Chief Financial Officer Peter Ondishin and Chief Operating Officer Kevin Shannon. A registration statement relating to the securities was declared effective on April 24, 2025 in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation, or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction. Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains statements that constitute 'forward-looking statements,' including with respect to the Company's search for an initial business combination. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous conditions, many of which are beyond the control of the Company, including those set forth in the Risk Factors section of the Company's registration statement for the initial public offering filed with the SEC. Copies are available on the SEC's website, The Company undertakes no obligation to update these statements for revisions or changes after the date of this release, except as required by law. About Inflection Point Acquisition Corp. III Inflection Point Acquisition Corp. III's acquisition and value creation strategy is to identify, partner with and help grow North American and European businesses in disruptive growth sectors, which complements the expertise of its management team. However, the Company may pursue an initial business combination in any industry, sector or geographic region. Contact Kevin ShannonInflection Point Acquisition Corp. IIIkevin@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
SEC scrubbed guidance on DEI in asset manager selection from website
The Securities and Exchange Commission has purged guidance from its website regarding fund manager diversity, but it was hard to find even before President Donald Trump's second term. That pullback from promoting diversity, equity and inclusion in asset management comes as part of the Trump administration's executive orders targeting "DEI" programs. And it underscores the confusing current state of federal efforts to ensure that more women- and minority-owned fund firms get a fair shot at doing business with large government pensions and retirement plans. For advocates, such programs open doors to capital and to rewarding careers as financial advisors or wealth and asset management professionals and, in some cases, the enforcement of crucial civil rights laws. To Trump's supporters, DEI has expanded access for some at the expense of others, to the point that consideration of factors involving race, gender and other identities has turned more important than merit in, say, hiring or the awarding of contracts. The SEC has removed an October 2022 "frequently asked questions" memo explaining how the fiduciary duty applies to the use of DEI criteria in the selection of asset managers, according to a recent study by the U.S. Government Accountability Office, an independent watchdog agency that reports to Congress. The SEC issued the FAQ during President Joe Biden's administration, at which time critics questioned its importance and obscure previous location on the agency's website. Now, with so many aspects related to DEI in administrative or legal limbo, the way forward after small but notable progress in opportunities for women and minority financial professionals looks anything but clear. "I'm optimistic, and that's because we've seen this movie before," said Dorien Nuñez, the president and director of research with consulting firm OMNI Research Group and co-founder of OMNI Wall Street Advantage, a chartered financial analyst training, mentoring and internship organization. He cited the Reagan administration's unsuccessful push to eliminate the Small Business Administration in the 1980s. "This is definitely more aggressive," Nuñez said. "ESG is flourishing globally. DEI is flourishing globally. It's just the political will and megaphone that is fighting against it so much, so vocally." For impact managers whose strategies seek to close wealth gaps through clients' investment portfolios, the administration's anti-DEI actions are "really hampering their marketing efforts" and capital-raising, said Will Gholston, a CFA and certified financial planner who is the vice president of investments with New York-based registered investment advisory firm Re-Envision Wealth. At this point, any fund manager "would definitely think twice before bringing that type of product to market in this environment," he said. "I am currently at a Black-owned firm that's made racial equity investing the centerpiece of our strategies," Gholston said. "You have to be much more cautious in the way that you design products, the way that you talk about products. There is that risk that you're going to be in trouble." READ MORE: Which publicly traded firms have the best and worst racial equity grades? Representatives for the SEC didn't respond to inquiries about the removal of the guidance from its website or the findings of the GAO report, which updated the watchdog's 2017 study on asset manager diversity and came at the request of Democratic lawmakers three years ago. The dearth of assets managed by women- or minority-owned firms received more attention following the 2020 murder of George Floyd as part of the industry's response to the nationwide protests. The GAO found some signs of change at certain pension plans and across the industry. Five federal pensions told the researchers that 61 women- or minority-owned asset managers were overseeing a combined $4.06 billion on their behalf at the end of 2022 — but that was still only 2.8% of the externally managed assets across the plans. On the other hand, that is a far higher share than in asset management in general. As of 2023, the industry-wide assets managed by women- and minority-owned firms had ticked up to 1.1% from less than 1% in 2017. However, that tiny blip added up to a total of $1.3 trillion in assets managed by 340 firms, compared to $529 billion at just 180 firms only six years earlier. That's a 146% surge in assets, or a difference of $771 billion in AUM, and an 89% jump in the net increase of 160 more firms with some degree of ownership by women or Black, Hispanic, Asian American or other minority group members. READ MORE: DOGE cuts to fair housing grants hit HOME for financial advisor The ramifications of Trump's DEI orders to the SEC remain difficult to ascertain, based on the agency's website. The conservative Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 policy blueprint for Trump's administration called for the SEC to end "discrimination based on immutable characteristics" in the form of "offices at financial regulators that promote racist policies (usually in the name of 'diversity, equity, and inclusion')." And, in February, SEC staff informed GAO researchers that they had taken down the previous guidance about "investment advisers' consideration of DEI factors when recommending or selecting other advisers" based on Trump's executive orders in the previous month, the GAO report said. "As a result, we removed our assessment of this guidance from our review," the report's authors, Director of Financial Markets and Community Involvement Michael Clements and Director of Education, Workforce and Income Security Tranchau "Kris" Nguyen wrote. "SEC staff also told us that they were analyzing the potential impact of the executive orders on their activities related to promoting and collecting diversity policies and practices through SEC's diversity self-assessment form for its regulated entities." The link to the 2022 FAQ now goes to a "403 error" page. But still available are the "Diversity self-assessment tool" for regulated entities, a bare section explaining the purposes of the SEC Office of Minority and Women Inclusion under the Dodd-Frank Law and a statement by two commissioners praising the now-purged guidance. The report, which stated that the GAO hasn't "determined the scope and effect of the January 2025 executive orders or their impact on SEC programs and activities" didn't include any information about what specifically made the FAQ out of compliance with Trump's executive orders. "Staff from SEC's Division of Investment Management issued this guidance to clarify that investment advisers may consider DEI factors when recommending or selecting other advisers, such as asset management firms, provided that doing so is consistent with the client's objectives, the scope of the relationship and the adviser's disclosures," Clements and Nguyen wrote in a footnote. READ MORE: Fighting systemic racism with estate planning — one client at a time Even before Trump took office, some industry experts wondered what, if anything, to conclude from the FAQ. The guidance "raises more questions than it answers," according to a November 2022 blog by consulting firm Patomak Global Partners entitled "The Curious Case of the Hidden FAQ." The SEC issued no corresponding public announcement about the guidance, the blog noted. And the agency didn't even include the FAQ alongside others available in the FAQ section of its website. In fact, the mere existence of the guidance may not have become publicly known without two of the commissioners releasing the statement. And any asset allocators or managers would have found it difficult to use in the first place, according to Patomak, which described it as "a check-the-box exercise to implement a controversial recommendation." "Even if an adviser stumbled upon the FAQ," the blog continued, "it does not provide helpful guidance as to how an adviser can incorporate DEI factors into its selection or recommendation of other advisers consistent with its fiduciary duty to clients. Investment advisers should be wary of overreliance on this FAQ. Staff FAQs have no legal force or effect and do not alter or amend applicable law, given that they represent the views of SEC staff, not the Commission. Choosing an investment adviser with a short track record or minimal AUM can open an investment adviser to significant liability in the event of subpar performance or an incident of defalcation, a problem this nonbinding FAQ is unlikely to solve, particularly in light of the fact that it contains no guidance on how to balance these competing concerns." READ MORE: How financial advisors can help close the racial wealth gap Regardless, advocates like Nuñez and Gholston will continue their work in any political climate — and welcome collaboration from other industry professionals in the mission to increase opportunities and align clients' portfolios to their principles. "The short answer is, contact me," Nuñez said. "Some of us have been out here doing this for decades, and we're now working closer together than before. But it is very fragmented." Taking down the guidance is "definitely a move in the wrong direction" by the SEC, but efforts to increase women- and minority representation in asset management "have been so inadequate to date that there's not much room to decline," Gholston said. And that has spanned Democratic and Republican administrations, he pointed out. The underlying trends in the investing marketplace aren't going away in Trump's second term, according to Gholston. "The desire for greater fairness and a level playing field in the investment management world has not declined amongst the populace, the investment world and our clients," he said. "It's very likely that, over the long term, we're going to see a renewed effort in this space." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
