
Has national pride and celebration made us forget what war is really about?
Philip Jarman is a 101-year-old Second World War veteran, but he has little truck with the 'celebratory' clamour that accompanies our numerous wartime anniversaries: the bunting, the obligatory fly past, the royal gloss. Eighty years ago, he was still fighting a brutal war in Burma, and his reticence goes beyond mere end dates. 'We've got war all wrong,' he insists, disconsolately chasing crumbs around his plate. 'After 1945, we didn't have these repeated celebrations. We got on with building back Britain. In the years following VE Day, we were in no mood to celebrate.'
The outpouring of joy on that one May day in 1945 – according to Ruth Bourne, a 98-year-old Bletchley Park veteran, 'a feeling that was almost electric' – speaks to the grinding toil of war directly preceding it, a painstaking slog through privation and pain.
In the words of one former female soldier, 'wartime Britain was dull and difficult, spiked with occasional horrible bits of news'.
The country had earned its celebration on 8 May, but the euphoria was not protracted. News archive confirms that the 1950s, Sixties and Seventies slid by with minimal pomp and ceremonial recall – Britain was too busy facing down problems in a post-imperial world to get excited about a war which ended with two new superpowers calling the shots.
Even the fallen had to make do with scaled-down memorialisation. Jarman explains: 'We'd been badly bombed. And we knew war monuments did not work.'
After the First World War, Britain had witnessed an unprecedented public art campaign; in a country scorched by the loss of nearly one million young men, memorials, cenotaphs, and monuments sprang up in market squares and city centres nationwide, but they had not stopped a second war.
'Let's have no more stone crosses or war memorials in the 1918 sense of the word,' insisted one disconsolate soldier. In a country desperate to crack on with the peace after five-and-a-half long years of fighting, the Second World War's 380,000 military casualties were bunched up on pre-existing war memorials. Only outstanding services like the Commandos enjoyed their own iteration in stone.
The real sea change in Second World War commemoration came in the 1980s under Margaret Thatcher, when a full-scale war in the Falkland Islands and an upscaling of the conflict in Northern Ireland ushered in a new era of jingoism and dewy-eyed pride.
Britain needed to remind itself, and the world, of our unequivocal fight for freedom in the 1940s, positing good versus evil in the context of British military encounters. Four decades after the end of the conflict, the nation doubled down on an outstanding victory narrative as, one by one, our great wartime leaders – Churchill, Alanbrooke, Montgomery – died, making way for an elderly rank and file to have their moment in the sun.
By the 1980s, crucial distance had been established; where once the Second World War's death toll had been dwarfed by the First, now in the modern era, few could believe the scale of the devastation and havoc wreaked by a conflict that quickly became a cornerstone of our national identity. Lest we forget, our entire nation bent its neck to an all-consuming war effort in the name of King and Country.
The record-breaking Overlord Embroidery was given its own museum and the gallant efforts of men who risked life and limb on D-Day and beyond were re-remembered. In 1984, the IRA detonated a bomb in Brighton's Grand Hotel during the Conservative Party Conference. Thatcher emerged from the rubble to channel her inner Churchill and face down her attackers. 'The government will not weaken. This nation will meet that challenge. Democracy will prevail.' The martial prime minister had already learnt the value of binary language and military prowess.
Since then, another 40 years have passed and remembering has gathered pace. Commemoration in stone and marble reveres the legions who fought from our former colonies, the millions of women who played their part, and even the animals and children caught up in the mindless wreckage. We live in a modern era when being seen is all-important and living a long life is taken for granted.
Philip Robinson, 99, was balloted (compelled) to serve underground, mining coal as a 'bevin boy'. The absence of a uniform, and later a memorial, burned deep; when finally four Kilkenny stones in the National Memorial Arboretum arrived to honour the bevin boys' war in 2013, he was delighted. But others, like Philip Jarman, are still equivocal about the role of commemoration. He is one of the few remaining survivors from the Second World War; today returning to memories of a war that killed his brother, his sister-in-law and his best friend, is challenging. And he insists we get the tone all wrong.
Reluctantly, Jarman tells me the story of Richard Combes, his childhood friend who joined the navy in 1939: 'I was looking forward to him coming home on leave. But his father said, 'I'm afraid you'll not be seeing Richard this weekend'. I joked, 'Has he been confined to barracks?' Mr Coombes' retort was quietly devastating. 'He was on HMS Hood.'
'That shook me so much that, although his parents lived nearby, I couldn't bear to go and see them for six months. He was their only child.' The quiet parlour, the ticking clock, the terrible pain, the accountant and his wife without their precious boy. Jarman never went back. 'Oh dear,' he says, 'you've made me dredge it all up.'
The Bismarck 's sinking of HMS Hood, the largest battleship of its kind, in May 1941 was felt nationwide. The aft magazine exploded and the ship sank within minutes. From a 1,418-strong crew, there were three survivors. Silently, I wonder how Mr and Ms Combes marked VE Day. Jarman concedes it might be touching after all this time to find his friend's name on a monument; Combes R. A. L. etched in perpetuity, so I plan a trip to the famous Portsmouth Naval Memorial. Apparently, Richard was listed there when they adjusted the monument to make space for thousands more deaths at sea in a devastating Second World War.
I arrived in late May 2024, a week before the 80th anniversary commemorations of D-Day. The whole area had been cordoned off for the King's arrival, so I couldn't access the naval memorial. 'How ridiculous,' said Jarman. It felt ridiculous. A buoyant sounding brass band practised on the shoreline; anticipation in Portsmouth was mounting. A high green metal wall blocked my way to the giant obelisk, and two security guards refused me access. They offered to take a picture of Richard's name instead. One shrugged apologetically. 'It's all a bit celebratory, isn't it? Like we've forgotten what war is about.'
I nodded, and felt strangely gutted. An engraved name isn't much, but it is better than nothing. The Commonwealth Graves Commission insist that the memorial is 'accessible at all times'. I can confirm this is not true.
Eighty years after the D-Day landings, it felt like commemoration had been sidestepped for celebration on an epic scale. I watched the ceremony on TV a week later and wondered if perhaps Jarman had a point. Has confected national pride and triumphalism engulfed our recall of what war is really all about?
Likewise, 80 years after VE Day, it is worth being mindful of what 'victory' meant. Yes, 8 May 1945 saw an extraordinary outpouring of joy: young surviving servicemen and women celebrating a free and peaceful life that now unfolded in front of them, but what of the impact of war not caught on the cameras, beyond the bombed-out houses, hidden in empty bedrooms, and silent sitting rooms? An aching hole that no amount of ticker tape or jitterbugging could bring back. The real cost of war.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Why baby boomers are the backbone of middle-class Britain
Why do so many younger people feel they are disadvantaged relative to older generations? The narrative of intergenerational 'unfairness' – recently explored in a Telegraph piece on whether boomers are the 'victim generation' – pervades social discourse, and I find it really troubling. Pitting one section of society against another, on the basis of perceived 'fairness', damages the fabric of our country. In truth, there are vast differences in income and wealth throughout the population, both across and within age groups. Many young people are well-paid, and they certainly enjoy far more leisure time and holidays than previous generations, along with flexible working and much better employment protections than the baby-boomers could ever have imagined – which we have fought hard to achieve. Indeed, the post-war baby-boomers are the backbone of middle-class Britain, and have been the bastion of trying to safeguard British values while championing progress. Of course, there are vast differences among people in their 60s and early 70s, but in general, they tend to have a strong work ethic – want to support themselves and their families, avoid living on benefits – and will work even when feeling unwell, because they are loyal to their employer or their business. This is the generation that built the country we know and love today – they are disciplined, self-reliant and resourceful, unafraid of competition, and strive to improve themselves and help their families as much as they can. As Anthony New, a Telegraph reader, puts it: ''When we were growing up, many of us were very poor but we worked hard and balanced our budgets carefully.' The baby-boomers are also the heart of many of our charities and volunteering networks. They take responsibility for others, not just themselves, and want to 'give back' to society. They tend to be very community-minded and want to 'do the right thing' – which sometimes requires self-sacrifice, but baby-boomers have been brought up to believe this is how society works well. Their parents, who went through the war years, had real deprivations, while baby-boomers had very little when young but nevertheless worked hard to rebuild the country, taking advantage of post-war industrial and technological improvements. Despite all of this, too many commentators blame baby-boomers for selfishly gathering more than their 'fair share' of national resources, depriving them of their rightful dues. They accuse them of being 'lucky' to afford their own homes, enjoy free university education, and get big pensions. These accusations are much more perception than reality. Of course those at the end of their career will be better off than those just starting their working life. As Deborah Skinner, another Telegraph reader, puts it: 'We worked bloody hard throughout our life. Never had savings or a rich family to fall back on.' The baby-boomers scrimped and saved to afford sky-high mortgage interest. No holidays, spending cut to the bone, and working for years before they could buy a property. Less than ten per cent of baby-boomers went to university. The vast majority started work at 15, 16 or 18 – with many going into apprenticeships, bringing home an income straight from school. So by the time they reached their late twenties, they had already been earning money and saving for ten to fifteen years. Today's younger people, many of whom have higher education, do not reach this point until their early or mid-thirties. And as for pensions. Well, less than half of baby-boomers – and particularly women – were offered an employer pension. There was no auto-enrolment, no automatic right to a pension or any other workplace benefit. Women could be barred from pensions and generous maternity rights. Even basic employment protections against harassment and unfair dismissal were not the norm – we had to fight for women's working conditions to improve. So, it's time to stop this 'oldie bashing' and start to appreciate that each generation contributes to society, and the intergenerational envy that has crept into conventional thinking for too many younger people does not reflect reality. In fact it builds dangerous resentment. There are inequalities everywhere. Rather than trying to take money away from baby-boomers, who did so much to improve our country, let's work together as a society. It is the turn of younger generations now to carry us forward and build an even better future. Will they rise to the challenge?


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
You're eating fish and chips wrong! Scientist reveals the correct way to enjoy the seaside staple - and why you should ALWAYS use a Chip Fork
There's nothing quite like a fresh portion of fish and chips after a long day at the beach. From a side of mushy peas to a splash of vinegar, many Brits are very particular about how they enjoy this seaside staple. But according to one psychologist, the key to the perfect portion is much simpler. Food psychologist, James Cornish, claims that the correct way to eat fish and chips is with a Chip Fork. This unassuming utensil not only makes you feel nostalgic, but also helps to slow you down as you munch on your chips, according to the expert. 'The humble Chip Fork reinforces nostalgia, the natural fitting with the fresh, natural fish in front of you,' he explained. 'Also only being used once they have a big connection with good memories, these are used when eating outside, next to the sea, at the park – essentially the creation of good times. 'Chip forks are the ultimate "mood generator" (you can only consume one chip at a time), so they slow you down, making you savour the moment.' The origins of fish and chips can be traced back to the mid-19th century, with the first chippies opening around 1860. Today, they remain a seaside staple, with a poll of 2,000 Brits by car brand Dacia finding that fish and chips is the UK's favourite holiday treat. Its unwavering popularity is down to a combination of reward, nostalgia, and comfort, according to Mr Cornish. 'There's a certain kind of magic in fish and chips - a simple meal that somehow carries the weight of memory, comfort, and delight,' he explained. 'Maybe it's because we don't expect too much from humble food, but our delight is excelled through the delivering more than we expected.' Beyond using a Chip Fork, there are several ways to boost your enjoyment of fish and chips, according to the pscyhologist. Firstly, if possible, you should eat them by the sea. 'The sound of waves, smell of salt in the air, and slower pace of eating outdoors all prime the brain to savour and enjoy,' Mr Cornish said. 'It's a sensory experience heightened by the setting that increases brain activity to expect tastier fresher fish.' It's also best to enjoy your fish and chips on a Friday, according to the expert. 'There's a reason so many Brits default to fish and chips on a Friday,' he said. 'Part cultural tradition (meat-free Fridays), part psychological rhythm. 'Collecting from the chippy on Friday became a task that signalled the end of the regular week - a task often passed on to a child who was sent to the chippy. 'The child got to do a valued, special and trusted task – a sign of growing independence and trust as well as being able to choose their own dinner. 'The family involvement adds to the feeling of relaxation, mood shift and resetting make food taste better, plus no post consumption regret as enhancement results in setting myself up for a great weekend. 'Same fish, same chips - but Friday just delivers more.' Finally, Mr Cornish advises ditching the plate, and eating your fish and chips straight from the paper. 'Unwrapping the paper forms a feeling of special occasion - a gift to me,' he added. 'Fish and chips provide a break from formality. 'It's a dish where rules are relaxed - you can eat with your fingers, from paper, on a bench, in a pub or a restaurant – it's never out of place.' The formula for the perfect battered fish Dry ingredients 25 per cent wheat dextrin 75 per cent plain flour A pinch of maltodextrin Wet ingredients 100 per cent Guinness Method Combine the wet and dry ingredients in a 60/40 ratio Mix and transfer to a whipped cream syphon Charge with two canisters or either NO2 or CO2 and keep cold until ready to use Preheat neutral oil to 160°C (320°F) Squirt just enough batter to cover your fish into a bowl Coat the fish in batter and lower it into the oil cook until golden brown Serving


BBC News
6 hours ago
- BBC News
Foxton locks to host procession of historic boats
A procession of historic boats will descend Foxton Locks during an event to mark the 75th anniversary of a campaign to save the nation's inland waterways. The Inland Waterways Association (IWA) was set up to protect the nation's rivers and canals in 1946 and held a Festival of Boats and Arts in Market Harborough in 1950, which it says was the "tipping point of a waterways revival". To mark 75 years since the event, the Leicestershire IWA branch has organised an event on Saturday June 7 where a flotilla of historic working boats will descend Foxton Locks from 10:00 procession will then head to Union Wharf, which hosted the 1950 festival, before making its way back to Foxton. The event will continue from 10:00 BST until 16:00 on Sunday June 8, when a Sunday service will be held in the event field at Foxton. The Quorn Ukulele Orchestra will provide live music, while Alarum Productions will tell the stories of the women who worked on the waterways through story-telling theatre and there will also be live traders will be present at the event, while on dry land there will be activities, exhibitions and stalls. Foxton Locks is a Grade II listed site, is set in 34 acres (14 hectares) and is home to the longest staircase flight of locks in Britain. It attracts more than 400,000 visitors a year, according to Canal & River Beaumont, East Midlands director for Canal & River Trust, said: "There's nowhere better to watch boats than at Foxton Locks and we can't wait to welcome people to this fantastic celebration of Leicestershire's rich canal heritage."