US military stages biggest EVER ‘elephant walk' with supersonic jets, helicopters & drones in show of force to China
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
THE US has staged its biggest military attack formation ever in the South China Sea region - showcasing supersonic stealth jets, attack helicopters and military drones.
The show of power, dubbed "Elephant Walk", was formed using 53 US military aircraft and was put up in a display at the US military base in Kadena Air Base in Okinawa, Japan.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
8
U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy, and U.S. Marine Corps, along with U.S. Army Patriot missile batteries line up on the runway for an elephant walk
Credit: Public Affairs Journeyman / Snr Airman Tyley Meyer
8
The show of power, dubbed "Elephant Walk", was formed using 53 US military aircraft
Credit: Public Affairs Journeyman / Snr Airman Tyley Meyer
8
Pictures of the formation, which was put up just 400miles off the coast of China, captured multiple US fighter jets in a tight formation.
They were put behind advanced military choppers and were flanked by air defence systems on both sides.
Attack drones and naval aircraft were a part of the formation, while larger aircraft were staged behind the fighter jets' formation.
The military spectacle featured a wide array of advanced military aircraft, including 24 US Air Force F-35As, eight U.S. Air Force F-15Es, six HH-60 Jolly Green IIs choppers.
Two MQ-9 Reapers, two MC-130J Commando IIS and six KC-135 Stratotankers were also present.
The formation was guarded by two US Army MIM-104 Patriot air defence systems.
US military's 18th Wing Command Chief Master Sergeant Brandon Wolfgang said: An elephant walk like this sends a message you can't ignore—it shows our Airmen, allies, and adversaries that we're united, capable, and ready.
Meanwhile, 18th Wing Commander Brigadier General Nicholas Evans said the Air Force's ability to 'project airpower' alongside its allies 'demonstrates our commitment to the alliance with Japan and to maintaining stability across the Indo-Pacific.'
The military formation is understood to be one of the largest in recent history.
In 2020, a 52-aircraft formation was put up for display at Hill Air Force Base in Utah.
China's Taiwan invasion plan could trigger WW3 if US gets involved, expert warns
It comes after a top US admiral has warned that China will soon be able to defeat the US in a war over Taiwan.
The chilling warning comes amid fears that China is preparing for a full-scale invasion of the island as it masses warships and submarines.
Commander of the US Indo-Pacific Command, Admiral Samuel Paparo, raised the alarm at the McCain Institute's annual Sedona Forum in Arizona on Friday.
The admiral said that while the US would defeat China in a war over Taiwan now, it may soon lose its advantage, as reported by the Financial Times.
Paparo said: 'The United States will prevail in the conflict as it stands now, with the force that we have right now.'
But he added: 'Our trajectory on . . . really every force element that is salient is a bad trajectory.'
China has ramped up its production of weapons including warships and submarines - and the US doesn't seem to be able to keep up.
According to Paparo, for every 1.8 warships made in the US each year China builds an impressive six.
8
China's aircraft carrier Liaoning takes part in a military drill
Credit: Reuters
8
China's Nanchang Q-5 'Fantans' fighter jets
Credit: Alamy
8
And for every 1.4 submarines made in the US, it builds two.
The warning comes as China continues to expand its military exercises around Taiwan, as fears of an invasion mount.
Paparo fuelled fears of an attack, saying that Beijing is rehearsing "the full spectrum of military operations" - from a direct invasion of the island to a naval blockade.
This comes as Taiwan reported at least 19 Chinese warships as well as the large Shandong aircraft carrier patrolling nearby last month.
When asked whether the US would support military intervention in Taiwan, he responded: 'A lesson in history is that people are always saying America will never get in a fight, but it's not the track record.'
But if China continues to ramp up its weapons production the US may not be able to protect the island.
Why does China want to invade Taiwan?
TAIWAN insists it is an independent nation after splitting from mainland China amid civil war in 1949.
But China claims Taiwan remains a part of its territory with which it must eventually be reunified - and has not ruled out the use of force to take the island and place it under Beijing's control.
The island, which is roughly 100 miles from the coast of south-east China, sees itself as distinct from the Chinese mainland, with its own constitution and democratically-elected leaders.
Taiwan sits in the so-called "first island chain", which includes a list of US-friendly territories that are crucial to Washington's foreign policy in the region.
This also puts it in an ideal situation to slow a Chinese attack on the West.
And with tensions between the two nations high, Taiwan is likely to aid China's enemy if it means keeping its independence.
Taiwan's economy is another factor in China's desperation to reclaim the land.
If China takes the island, it could be freer to project power in the western Pacific and rival the US, thanks to much of the world's electronics being made in Taiwan.
This would allow Beijing to have control over an industry that drives the global economy.
China insists that its intentions are peaceful, but President Xi Jinping has also used threats towards the small island nation.
And China may have more weapons than previously thought.
Google Maps images exposed China's secret submarine fleet back in April.
The shocking pictures showed six nuke boats massed at a Chinese base.
These included two of the deadly Type 091 submarines, two Type 093A and one chillingly unidentified submarine.
The base - dubbed the First Submarine Base - is located 18km east of Qingdao in the Yellow Sea, meaning there's easy access to the East China Sea and the Sea of Japan.
Australian independent naval analyst Alex Luck posted the shocking images to X.
In the post, he said that five nuclear-powered subs seen on the base were conventionally armed.
8
Tensions between China and neighbouring Taiwan have soared in recent years as the threat of war looms
Credit: Getty
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
Hiroshima and the continuing urgency of the atomic age
In August 1945, Group Captain Leonard Cheshire was stationed on the Pacific island of Tinian as an official British observer of the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Two decades later, he wrote for The Spectator about his experience. For him, the attack on the two cities represented 'the 'destruction of the impotent by the invincible'. Nevertheless, he argued that the Allies had been 'undeniably' right to carry out the bombings since the attack ended 'the most terrible war' and prevented an extremely bloody invasion of Japan. By 1965, the emphasis in public discussion had shifted from 'the suffering that the world was spared' to the dead – the 120,000 estimated to have been killed instantly by the blasts, and the many more who died later from burns, radiation sickness and starvation. Although Hiroshima had been a substantial military base, around nine in ten of those killed were civilians. The debate remains intractable. Supporters suggest the bombings ended the war as swiftly as possible against a Japan prepared to fight to the last man; opponents argue that Emperor Hirohito was already considering surrender and that the bombings were uniquely grotesque acts of revenge. Reflecting later, Cheshire argued that the bomb should have been dropped offshore first, as a warning. Not doing so left the 'honour and the justice of our cause… degraded in the eyes of the world'. The bombings remain the only use of nuclear weapons in an armed conflict. Despite the proliferation of other existential threats, the 80th anniversaries of Hiroshima and Nagasaki this week should not only serve as an opportunity to relitigate historical debates, but also as a reminder of the continuing urgency of the atomic age. A third of a century on from the Cold War's end, nuclear weapons remain a live issue. Last week, Donald Trump sent two nuclear submarines towards Russia in response to the former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev grandstanding about his country's lethal capabilities. In June, the US struck three facilities in Iran to hobble Tehran's nuclear programme. The same month, Keir Starmer announced the purchase of F-35 planes capable of delivering nuclear weapons, ending a quarter of a century of reliance on submarine-launched ballistic missiles. Britain is not alone in looking to adapt and expand its nuclear arsenal. Poland, Germany and Japan have all recently toyed with acquiring or hosting nuclear weapons, as the dependability of the US nuclear shield has come into doubt. Fiona Hill, a foreign affairs scholar and former deputy assistant to the president of the United States, recently predicted that the number of nuclear powers could double in the next 20 years. For disciples of deterrence theory, this unprecedented rate of proliferation highlights the enduring relevance of nuclear weapons as a tool of peace. It was the threat of mutually assured destruction that kept the Cold War from turning hot. A similar fear helped nuclear-armed India and Pakistan step back from war over the recent terror attacks in Kashmir. The political scientist John Mearsheimer has argued that Russia would have been deterred from invading Ukraine if Ukraine had not surrendered its nuclear weapons in 1994. The abstractions of international relations tend to obscure the fact that diplomacy and war are practised by irrational, quarrelsome and bigoted human beings. Undoubtedly, nuclear weapons have raised the stakes for any country considering an attack on a fellow nuclear power. But the human appetite for destruction has not been nullified. Even if the Cold War avoided a direct US-Soviet exchange, tens of thousands still perished in proxy wars from Korea to Angola. It was only thanks to the restraint of shrewd statesmen that crises over Cuba and the Middle East did not escalate past the point of no return. Today's leaders may not possess the same perspicacity. The shadow cast by Hiroshima and Nagasaki has prevented the use of nuclear weapons for eight decades. There is no guarantee that it will continue to do so. The US pursuit of the nuclear bomb was expedited by the fear of what would happen if the Nazis acquired such a weapon first. The desire to stall Iran's nuclear programme today stems from a conviction that the ayatollahs are fanatical enough to carry out their threats against Israel. As Cheshire put it, the 'evil is not so much in the bomb itself' but 'in the hearts of men'. The further proliferation of nuclear weapons would mean an increase in the potential for devastation far beyond what the world witnessed at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Disarmament may be an unlikely prospect amid a new age of great power competition. But today's statesmen should heed the words inscribed on the Hiroshima Peace Memorial, erected in what was once the city's busiest commercial and residential district: 'Let all the souls here rest in peace, for we shall not repeat the error.'
Reuters
9 hours ago
- Reuters
Swiss president meets with US Secretary of State Rubio for last-minute trade talks
ZURICH, Aug 6 (Reuters) - Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter met with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Wednesday with Washington potentially seeking more energy and defence exports as part of a deal that would avert a crippling 39% U.S. tariff on Swiss goods. Switzerland was stunned by President Donald Trump's decision last week to apply the steep rate - among the highest announced since he launched his global trade reset - which threatens to inflict major damage on its export-orientated economy. Keller-Sutter and Business Minister Guy Parmelin flew to Washington on Tuesday for last-minute negotiations aimed at reducing the tariffs before they go into effect on Thursday. The Trump administration, meanwhile, is pushing for Switzerland to buy more energy and defence products, according to a Swiss source familiar with the discussions. Parmelin had already raised the possibility of Switzerland buying U.S. liquefied natural gas as one of the options to secure a better deal. "Look at the European Union, they promised to buy LNG. Switzerland imports LNG too — maybe that's one path," Parmelin said over the weekend. Under a deal the EU struck with Washington last month to secure a 15% tariff rate, Brussels agreed to buy $750 billion worth of LNG, oil, and nuclear energy products over the next three years. And while the EU made no formal pledge to buy more U.S. arms, it did indicate to U.S. negotiators that U.S. suppliers would benefit from an increase in defence spending in line with higher NATO commitments agreed under pressure from Trump. Both concessions, along with a pledge to invest more in the U.S., were seen as important in clinching a deal, said a person familiar with the U.S.-EU negotiations. Switzerland already purchases some military hardware from the U.S. and has placed a 6-billion-franc ($7.43-billion) order to buy Lockheed Martin (LMT.N), opens new tab F-35A Lightning II fighter jets. While the Swiss government is focused on sweetening its offer to Washington and says it is not planning countermeasures against the U.S. tariffs, some Swiss politicians have called for the F-35 deal to be scrapped over the trade dispute. Keller-Sutter's meeting with Rubio was expected to last one hour and start at 10:15 a.m. (1415 GMT), according to the State Department's public schedule. "There are currently no plans to meet President Trump, but the situation could change," a Swiss government official said. Earlier on Wednesday, Keller-Sutter and her team met with Swiss business leaders including Roche (ROG.S), opens new tab Chairman Severin Schwan as well as Alfred Gantner and Marcel Erni, founders of Swiss private equity firm Partners Group (PGHN.S), opens new tab. The group, which also included Daniel Jaeggi, president of global energy and commodity company Mercuria, spoke about the tariffs situation, the government said without giving further details. Further meetings are planned with executives from other Swiss companies present in the United States. "We greatly appreciate the tireless commitment of the Federal Council and the Federal Administration," said Noe Blancpain, executive board member of Swiss industry association Swissmem. The U.S. is a leading buyer for Swiss watches, machinery and chocolate. Those industries and others will suffer if the 39% rate - much higher than those secured by the EU, Britain and Japan - is implemented, with business associations warning that tens of thousands of Swiss jobs are at risk. Swiss cheese producers, for example, are bracing for a steep drop in sales in the United States, which bought 11% of Swiss cheese exports like Gruyere and Emmentaler last year, due to the tariffs. "The taxes are enormous," Anthony Margot, a fifth-generation cheese maturer, told Reuters. "We can't replace a market like the United States overnight." The blue chip Swiss Market Index was down 1% in early afternoon trading on Wednesday ahead of the introduction of tariffs. Following talks with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, Switzerland had agreed a draft agreement with the United States in early July that was reported to include a 10% tariff rate. Trump's U-turn on Friday, however, followed what some U.S. officials said was a fraught telephone call with Keller-Sutter. Swiss sources said the call was not a success, but denied there was a falling out between the two leaders. Claude Maurer, chief economist at Swiss think tank BAK Economics, said it did not matter who the Swiss officials met with on the first day, as long as the delegation wins over Trump. "Trump's team and the Swiss negotiators apparently already struck a deal. So it's in their mutual interest to get it over the line with Trump himself," said Maurer. "Whoever is best positioned to make that happen will be important." ($1 = 0.8080 Swiss francs)
Daily Mirror
10 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Putin defies US threats in 'cruel' Ukraine bombing hours before 'peace' talks
Russian President defies US sanctions threats by bombing Ukraine just hours before a crucial face-to-face with US President Donald Trump's 'special envoy' in latest sign of contempt Kremlin forces dropped aerial bombs on Ukraine hours before key talks in Moscow with US President Donald Trump 's peace envoy. The bombs on a recreational base in Ukraine 's Zaporizhzhia region, killed at least two people and injured 12 others, including two children. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said: 'My condolences to the families and loved ones. There was zero military sense in this strike. Just cruelty – to intimidate.' Russian President Vladimir Putin held talks with US President Donald Trump's representative Steve Witkoff in Moscow, the Kremlin confirmed. It was days before the White House's deadline for Russia to reach a peace deal with Ukraine or face severe economic penalties that could also hit countries buying its oil. It comes after NATO scrambled warplanes as Russia shoots down West's F-16 fighter jet in Ukraine onslaught. The meeting between Mr Putin and Mr Witkoff lasted about three hours. Mr Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov said the Russian president and Mr Witkoff had a "useful and constructive conversation" that focused on the Ukrainian crisis. The talks came after Putin recently warned of nuclear war after unleashing several nights of hell on Ukraine In a hint towards improving relations between Washington and Moscow he added that there were "prospects for possible development of strategic co-operation between the US and Russia". Earlier, Mr Witkoff took an early morning walk through Zaryadye Park, a stone's throw from the Kremlin, with Kirill Dmitriev, Putin's envoy for investment and economic co-operation. Mr Dmitriev said later that "dialogue will prevail". The envoy played a key role in three rounds of direct talks between delegations from Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul in recent months. The negotiations made no progress on ending the three-year war following Russia's invasion of its neighbour. US President Donald Trump's deadline for Mr Putin ends on Friday. Washington has threatened "severe tariffs" and other economic penalties if the killing does not stop. Mr Trump claims he is increasingly angry with Mr Putin over Russia's escalating strikes on civilian areas of Ukraine, intended to erode morale and public appetite for the war. The intensified attacks have occurred even as Mr Trump has urged the Russian leader in recent months to relent. Russian forces launched at least four strikes on the Zaporozhzhia area and initially attacked with powerful glide bombs. Russia also struck the Ukrainian power grid and heating gas facilities as Ukraine makes preparations for winter. Western analysts and Ukrainian officials say Mr Putin is stalling for time and avoiding serious negotiations while Russian forces push to capture more Ukraine land. A Russian offensive that started in the spring and is expected to continue through the autumn is advancing faster than last year's push but is making only slow and costly gains and has been unable to take any major cities. The situation on the front line is critical for Ukrainian forces but defences are not about to collapse, analysts say. On Tuesday, Mr Trump said "we'll see what happens" regarding his threat to slap tariffs on nations that buy Russian oil, which could increase import taxes dramatically on China and India. "We have a meeting with Russia tomorrow," the US president said. "We're going to see what happens. We'll make that determination at that time." Mr Putin has strengthened Russia's military ties with China, North Korea and Iran. Nato, meanwhile, said on Tuesday it has started co-ordinating regular deliveries of large Western weapons packages to Ukraine. European allies and Canada are buying most of the equipment they plan to transport from the United States. The Trump administration is not donating any arms to Ukraine. Mr Putin has given no hint that he might be ready to make concessions. Instead, the Russian leader and senior Kremlin officials have talked up the country's military strength. Mr Putin announced last week that Russia's new hypersonic missile, which he says cannot be intercepted by current Nato air defence systems, has entered service. Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev has warned that the Ukraine war could bring Russia and the US into armed conflict. Mr Trump responded to that by ordering the repositioning of two US nuclear submarines. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov on Monday welcomed Mr Witkoff's visit.
