US military stages biggest EVER ‘elephant walk' with supersonic jets, helicopters & drones in show of force to China
STRENGTH & STEEL US military stages biggest EVER 'elephant walk' with supersonic jets, helicopters & drones in show of force to China
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
THE US has staged its biggest military attack formation ever in the South China Sea region - showcasing supersonic stealth jets, attack helicopters and military drones.
The show of power, dubbed "Elephant Walk", was formed using 53 US military aircraft and was put up in a display at the US military base in Kadena Air Base in Okinawa, Japan.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
8
U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy, and U.S. Marine Corps, along with U.S. Army Patriot missile batteries line up on the runway for an elephant walk
Credit: Public Affairs Journeyman / Snr Airman Tyley Meyer
8
The show of power, dubbed "Elephant Walk", was formed using 53 US military aircraft
Credit: Public Affairs Journeyman / Snr Airman Tyley Meyer
8
Pictures of the formation, which was put up just 400miles off the coast of China, captured multiple US fighter jets in a tight formation.
They were put behind advanced military choppers and were flanked by air defence systems on both sides.
Attack drones and naval aircraft were a part of the formation, while larger aircraft were staged behind the fighter jets' formation.
The military spectacle featured a wide array of advanced military aircraft, including 24 US Air Force F-35As, eight U.S. Air Force F-15Es, six HH-60 Jolly Green IIs choppers.
Two MQ-9 Reapers, two MC-130J Commando IIS and six KC-135 Stratotankers were also present.
The formation was guarded by two US Army MIM-104 Patriot air defence systems.
US military's 18th Wing Command Chief Master Sergeant Brandon Wolfgang said: An elephant walk like this sends a message you can't ignore—it shows our Airmen, allies, and adversaries that we're united, capable, and ready.
Meanwhile, 18th Wing Commander Brigadier General Nicholas Evans said the Air Force's ability to 'project airpower' alongside its allies 'demonstrates our commitment to the alliance with Japan and to maintaining stability across the Indo-Pacific.'
The military formation is understood to be one of the largest in recent history.
In 2020, a 52-aircraft formation was put up for display at Hill Air Force Base in Utah.
China's Taiwan invasion plan could trigger WW3 if US gets involved, expert warns
It comes after a top US admiral has warned that China will soon be able to defeat the US in a war over Taiwan.
The chilling warning comes amid fears that China is preparing for a full-scale invasion of the island as it masses warships and submarines.
Commander of the US Indo-Pacific Command, Admiral Samuel Paparo, raised the alarm at the McCain Institute's annual Sedona Forum in Arizona on Friday.
The admiral said that while the US would defeat China in a war over Taiwan now, it may soon lose its advantage, as reported by the Financial Times.
Paparo said: 'The United States will prevail in the conflict as it stands now, with the force that we have right now.'
But he added: 'Our trajectory on . . . really every force element that is salient is a bad trajectory.'
China has ramped up its production of weapons including warships and submarines - and the US doesn't seem to be able to keep up.
According to Paparo, for every 1.8 warships made in the US each year China builds an impressive six.
8
China's aircraft carrier Liaoning takes part in a military drill
Credit: Reuters
8
China's Nanchang Q-5 'Fantans' fighter jets
Credit: Alamy
8
And for every 1.4 submarines made in the US, it builds two.
The warning comes as China continues to expand its military exercises around Taiwan, as fears of an invasion mount.
Paparo fuelled fears of an attack, saying that Beijing is rehearsing "the full spectrum of military operations" - from a direct invasion of the island to a naval blockade.
This comes as Taiwan reported at least 19 Chinese warships as well as the large Shandong aircraft carrier patrolling nearby last month.
When asked whether the US would support military intervention in Taiwan, he responded: 'A lesson in history is that people are always saying America will never get in a fight, but it's not the track record.'
But if China continues to ramp up its weapons production the US may not be able to protect the island.
Why does China want to invade Taiwan?
TAIWAN insists it is an independent nation after splitting from mainland China amid civil war in 1949.
But China claims Taiwan remains a part of its territory with which it must eventually be reunified - and has not ruled out the use of force to take the island and place it under Beijing's control.
The island, which is roughly 100 miles from the coast of south-east China, sees itself as distinct from the Chinese mainland, with its own constitution and democratically-elected leaders.
Taiwan sits in the so-called "first island chain", which includes a list of US-friendly territories that are crucial to Washington's foreign policy in the region.
This also puts it in an ideal situation to slow a Chinese attack on the West.
And with tensions between the two nations high, Taiwan is likely to aid China's enemy if it means keeping its independence.
Taiwan's economy is another factor in China's desperation to reclaim the land.
If China takes the island, it could be freer to project power in the western Pacific and rival the US, thanks to much of the world's electronics being made in Taiwan.
This would allow Beijing to have control over an industry that drives the global economy.
China insists that its intentions are peaceful, but President Xi Jinping has also used threats towards the small island nation.
And China may have more weapons than previously thought.
Google Maps images exposed China's secret submarine fleet back in April.
The shocking pictures showed six nuke boats massed at a Chinese base.
These included two of the deadly Type 091 submarines, two Type 093A and one chillingly unidentified submarine.
The base - dubbed the First Submarine Base - is located 18km east of Qingdao in the Yellow Sea, meaning there's easy access to the East China Sea and the Sea of Japan.
Australian independent naval analyst Alex Luck posted the shocking images to X.
In the post, he said that five nuclear-powered subs seen on the base were conventionally armed.
8
Tensions between China and neighbouring Taiwan have soared in recent years as the threat of war looms
Credit: Getty
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
18 hours ago
- The National
UK plans for 'fighter jets carrying nuclear bombs' slammed
If the Labour Government went through with the purchase, reportedly to counter the growing threat by Russia, it would be the biggest expansion of the UK's so-called nuclear deterrent since the Cold War. The Sunday Times reports that the Government is taking part in 'highly sensitive' talks and that US firm Lockheed Martin's F-35A Lightning stealth fighter jet and other aircrafts are under consideration. READ MORE: Scottish independence support at 58 per cent if Nigel Farage becomes PM However, Defence Secretary John Healey refused to comment on the talks during a media round on Sunday, instead stating that the strategic defence review, due to be published on Monday, would contain further details about the UK Government's plans. It's understood the strategic defence review will not go so far as to back the purchase of the jets, but will suggest the UK looks at expanding its nuclear capability. The newspaper reports that the F-35A can carry the B61 thermonuclear bomb, the kind primarily used by the US, which has a stockpile of more than 3700. It's understood that as part of Nato's nuclear-sharing arrangements, the UK jets, if purchased, would carry these rather than its own nuclear weapons. Before they were decommissioned after the Cold War, Britain previously had a stockpile of tactical nukes and V-bomber aircraft. Now, the Vanguard submarine programme is the only nuclear arsenal the UK has. Healey was asked on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg if the UK should have a 'new, extra way of delivering nuclear weapons'. (Image: PA/BBC) He told the programme that the strategic defence review would 'talk about the new threats that we face, won't get into the sort of discussions that need to remain private, not public". Healey insisted the UK's nuclear deterrent was the 'ultimate guarantee of security in this country'. 'It's what Putin fears most,' he added. David Kelly, member of the executive of the Scottish Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (SCND), said he was 'not surprised, but shocked' at the possibility of an expansion of the UK's nuclear weapons. 'The British government drones on and on and on about independent nuclear deterrent,' he told The National. READ MORE: Scots minister hits back at Defence Secretary 'student union politics' jibe 'And now the next way of strengthening that apparently is to use American airplanes, which we suspect have a kill switch, with American nuclear weapons, which unquestionably would have a kill switch, to be launched by standoff missiles. 'It's just not very well thought through, like the rest of our defence policies." He added that discussions of war were 'astonishing'. SNP MSP Bill Kidd said: "Many Scots will have concerns about Labour spending billions of pounds of taxpayer money to expand the UK's nuclear arsenal at a time when many families continue to face the impact of the cost of living crisis. "The UK's nuclear capability is not independent, has leaked in recent years putting workers and wildlife at risk, frequently fails in safety tests and is highly unlikely to ever be used. We want an end to these dangerous weapons in Scotland, but Labour are determined to write them another blank cheque. "Any further expansion of the UK's nuclear arsenal must therefore come before parliament for democratic scrutiny.' Alba party leader Kenny MacAskill was also scathing in response to reports about the potential nuclear expansion. The former Scottish justice secretary said: "When we need cool heads, Labour are lurching towards war. READ MORE: SNP criticise Labour's plans to increase UK's defence spending "The UK is already an onshore aircraft carrier for the United States and now British planes are to carry American nuclear weapons. Scotland is already endangered by Trident on the Clyde and the last thing we need is nuclear weapons in our skies. "It's time for peace and investment in jobs, health and housing, not in machines of war and certainly not weapons which would see the annihilation of the human race." Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie also pointed to reports of leaks of radioactive material into Scotland's lochs and rivers around Faslane. 'In the 30 years since it was first deployed, with constant stories of accidents and poor maintenance, Trident has posed a greater threat to people in Scotland than it has to anyone else," he said. 'The simple fact is that nuclear armaments are indiscriminate weapons of mass slaughter, an immoral and unsafe waste of hundreds of billions of pounds that could be far better spent. (Image: Andrew Milligan) 'And relying on US technology at a time when the US president is not only proving to be an unreliable ally, but is an actively hostile threat to our allies in Canada and Greenland, make this an even more bizarre choice. 'I look forward to the day when an independent Scotland can join the 70 other nations who have already signed and ratified the Treaty on the Prohibition on Nuclear Weapons.' It comes as the UK Government is to set up at least six munitions factories, with one rumoured, but not confirmed, to be in Scotland. Ministers pledged £1.5 billion for the factories and will support the procurement of up to 7000 UK-built long-range weapons in response to the strategic defence review, to be published on Monday. The new funding will see UK munitions spending hit £6bn during this parliament. Healey said the additional funding for defence was a 'message to Moscow'.
South Wales Guardian
2 days ago
- South Wales Guardian
Hegseth: US will stand by Indo-Pacific allies against ‘imminent' China threat
He said Washington will bolster its defences overseas to counter what the Pentagon sees as rapidly developing threats by Beijing, particularly in its aggressive stance towards Taiwan. China has conducted numerous exercises to test what a blockade would look like of the self-governing island, which Beijing claims as its own and the US has pledged to defend. China's army 'is rehearsing for the real deal', Mr Hegseth said in a keynote speech at a security conference in Singapore. 'We are not going to sugarcoat it — the threat China poses is real. And it could be imminent.' China has a stated goal of having its military have the capability to take Taiwan by force if necessary by 2027, a deadline that is seen by experts as more of an aspirational goal than a hard war deadline. But China also has built sophisticated man-made islands in the South China Sea to support new military outposts and developed highly advanced hypersonic and space capabilities, which are driving the US to create its own space-based Golden Dome missile defences. Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue, a global security conference hosted by the International Institute for Security Studies, Mr Hegseth said China is no longer just building up its military forces to take Taiwan, it's 'actively training for it, every day'. Mr Hegseth also called out China for its ambitions in Latin America, particularly its efforts to increase its influence over the Panama Canal. He urged countries in the region to increase defence spending to levels similar to the 5% of their gross domestic product European nations are now pressed to contribute. 'We must all do our part,' Mr Hegseth said. He also repeated a pledge made by previous administrations to bolster US military capabilities in the Indo-Pacific to provide a more robust deterrent. While both the Obama and Biden administrations had also committed to pivoting to the Pacific and established new military agreements throughout the region, a full shift has never been realised. Instead, US military resources from the Indo-Pacific have been regularly pulled to support military needs in the Middle East and Europe, especially since the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. In the first few months of president Donald Trump's second term, that has also been the case. In the last few months the Trump administration has taken a Patriot missile defence battalion out of the Indo-Pacific in order to send it to the Middle East, a massive logistical operation that required more than 73 military cargo aircraft flights, and sent Coast Guard ships back to the US to help defend the US-Mexico border. Mr Hegseth was asked why the US pulled those resources if the Indo-Pacific is the priority theatre for the US. He did not directly answer but said the shift of resources was necessary to defend against Houthi missile attacks launched from Yemen, and to bolster protections against illegal immigration into the US. At the same time, he stressed the need for American allies and partners to step up their own defence spending and preparations, saying the US was not interested in going it alone. 'Ultimately a strong, resolute and capable network of allies and partners is our key strategic advantage,' he said. 'China envies what we have together, and it sees what we can collectively bring to bear on defence, but it's up to all of us to ensure that we live up to that potential by investing.' The Indo-Pacific nations caught in between have tried to balance relations with both the US and China over the years. Beijing is the primary trading partner for many, but is also feared as a regional bully, in part due to its increasingly aggressive claims on natural resources such as critical fisheries. Mr Hegseth cautioned that playing both sides, seeking US military support and Chinese economic support, carries risk. 'Economic dependence on China only deepens their malign influence and complicates our defense decision space during times of tension,' Mr Hegseth said. China usually sends its own defence minister to this conference, but Dong Jun did not attend this year in a snub to the US and the erratic tariff war Mr Trump has ignited with Beijing, something the US delegation said it intended to capitalise on. 'We are here this morning. And somebody else isn't,' Mr Hegseth said. Mr Hegseth was asked by a member of the Chinese delegation, made up of lower level officers from the National Defence University, how committed it would be to regional alliances. In some, China has a more dominant influence. Mr Hegseth said the US would be open to engaging with any countries willing to work with it. 'We are not going to look only inside the confines of how previous administrations looked at this region,' he said. 'We're opening our arms to countries across the spectrum — traditional allies, non-traditional allies.' Mr Hegseth said committing US support for Indo-Pacific nations would not require local governments to align with the West on cultural or climate issues. It is not clear if the US can or wants to supplant China as the region's primary economic driver. But Mr Hegseth's push follows Mr Trump's visit to the Middle East, which resulted in billions of dollars in new defence agreements.
Leader Live
2 days ago
- Leader Live
Hegseth: US will stand by Indo-Pacific allies against ‘imminent' China threat
He said Washington will bolster its defences overseas to counter what the Pentagon sees as rapidly developing threats by Beijing, particularly in its aggressive stance towards Taiwan. China has conducted numerous exercises to test what a blockade would look like of the self-governing island, which Beijing claims as its own and the US has pledged to defend. China's army 'is rehearsing for the real deal', Mr Hegseth said in a keynote speech at a security conference in Singapore. 'We are not going to sugarcoat it — the threat China poses is real. And it could be imminent.' China has a stated goal of having its military have the capability to take Taiwan by force if necessary by 2027, a deadline that is seen by experts as more of an aspirational goal than a hard war deadline. But China also has built sophisticated man-made islands in the South China Sea to support new military outposts and developed highly advanced hypersonic and space capabilities, which are driving the US to create its own space-based Golden Dome missile defences. Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue, a global security conference hosted by the International Institute for Security Studies, Mr Hegseth said China is no longer just building up its military forces to take Taiwan, it's 'actively training for it, every day'. Mr Hegseth repeated a pledge made by previous administrations to bolster US military capabilities in the Indo-Pacific (Anupam Nath/AP) Mr Hegseth also called out China for its ambitions in Latin America, particularly its efforts to increase its influence over the Panama Canal. He urged countries in the region to increase defence spending to levels similar to the 5% of their gross domestic product European nations are now pressed to contribute. 'We must all do our part,' Mr Hegseth said. He also repeated a pledge made by previous administrations to bolster US military capabilities in the Indo-Pacific to provide a more robust deterrent. While both the Obama and Biden administrations had also committed to pivoting to the Pacific and established new military agreements throughout the region, a full shift has never been realised. Instead, US military resources from the Indo-Pacific have been regularly pulled to support military needs in the Middle East and Europe, especially since the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. In the first few months of president Donald Trump's second term, that has also been the case. In the last few months the Trump administration has taken a Patriot missile defence battalion out of the Indo-Pacific in order to send it to the Middle East, a massive logistical operation that required more than 73 military cargo aircraft flights, and sent Coast Guard ships back to the US to help defend the US-Mexico border. Mr Hegseth was asked why the US pulled those resources if the Indo-Pacific is the priority theatre for the US. He did not directly answer but said the shift of resources was necessary to defend against Houthi missile attacks launched from Yemen, and to bolster protections against illegal immigration into the US. At the same time, he stressed the need for American allies and partners to step up their own defence spending and preparations, saying the US was not interested in going it alone. 'Ultimately a strong, resolute and capable network of allies and partners is our key strategic advantage,' he said. 'China envies what we have together, and it sees what we can collectively bring to bear on defence, but it's up to all of us to ensure that we live up to that potential by investing.' The Indo-Pacific nations caught in between have tried to balance relations with both the US and China over the years. Beijing is the primary trading partner for many, but is also feared as a regional bully, in part due to its increasingly aggressive claims on natural resources such as critical fisheries. Mr Hegseth cautioned that playing both sides, seeking US military support and Chinese economic support, carries risk. 'Economic dependence on China only deepens their malign influence and complicates our defense decision space during times of tension,' Mr Hegseth said. China usually sends its own defence minister to this conference, but Dong Jun did not attend this year in a snub to the US and the erratic tariff war Mr Trump has ignited with Beijing, something the US delegation said it intended to capitalise on. 'We are here this morning. And somebody else isn't,' Mr Hegseth said. Mr Hegseth was asked by a member of the Chinese delegation, made up of lower level officers from the National Defence University, how committed it would be to regional alliances. In some, China has a more dominant influence. Mr Hegseth said the US would be open to engaging with any countries willing to work with it. 'We are not going to look only inside the confines of how previous administrations looked at this region,' he said. 'We're opening our arms to countries across the spectrum — traditional allies, non-traditional allies.' Mr Hegseth said committing US support for Indo-Pacific nations would not require local governments to align with the West on cultural or climate issues. It is not clear if the US can or wants to supplant China as the region's primary economic driver. But Mr Hegseth's push follows Mr Trump's visit to the Middle East, which resulted in billions of dollars in new defence agreements.
