Teal independents prove they're no one-hit wonders
Independents are here to stay with teal MPs retaining their seats, largely with more support after making history at the last election.
So-called "teals" Allegra Spender in Wentworth, Zali Steggall in Warringah, Sophie Scamps in Mackellar, Monique Ryan in Kooyong, Zoe Daniel in Goldstein and Kate Chaney in Curtin will return to parliament.
All received swings toward them, apart from Ms Daniel, whose just over three per cent margin was whittled down 1.1 per cent by the Liberals.
They could also be joined by Nicolette Boele, who is ahead with more than half the vote counted after taking a slight swing toward her in the former Liberal heartland of Bradfield in Sydney's north.
Crossbench stalwarts Andrew Wilkie, Helen Haines, Bob Katter and Rebekha Sharkie retained their seats.
Independent candidate Jessie Price is also in the lead in the formerly safe Labor seat of Bean in Canberra, where she claimed a more than 13 per cent swing with more than 70 per cent of the vote counted.
The numbers were looking positive, Ms Scamps told AAP.
The Liberals took a near six per cent swing out of their primary vote in her seat on Sydney's northern beaches while Ms Scamps' primary vote stayed relatively stable on nearly 39 per cent.
"I think it comes down to people seeing that I have been there working hard, doing what I said I would do," she said.
"The Liberal Party threw everything at this seat but when it came down to it ... people wanted hope and positivity."
Independent senator David Pocock claimed a large surge in support to take first spot on the ACT Senate ticket and win a quota in his own right.
He placed ahead of Finance Minister Katy Gallagher, who took the gold last time.
He made history in 2022 by becoming the first independent to unseat a majority party senator in the ACT with the two seats traditionally split one apiece between Labor and the Liberals.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canberra Times
2 hours ago
- Canberra Times
Liberals back embattled premier, election call looms
Battlelines have already been drawn for an election - set to be the state's fourth in seven years - with ousted Liberal federal MP Bridget Archer to run for the party in the seat of Bass.
Perth Now
3 hours ago
- Perth Now
‘Unbelievable': Crackdown on housing rort
The Queensland government is cracking down on the income of social housing tenants, as figures reveal people earning far above income thresholds are benefiting from subsidised housing. 'Labor turned a blind eye for years,' Housing Minister Sam O'Connor said on Monday. 'They stopped checking if people still qualified for social housing, and they let rent reviews fall by the wayside. 'It's unbelievable they let people on six-figure incomes stay in social homes for years while others in urgent need were left on the social housing waitlist.' Information released by the state government on Monday showed a small number of notable rorts were being carried out by social housing tenants. Queensland Housing Minister Sam O'Connor says pandemic-era social housing allowances need to be unwound. NewsWire / John Gass Credit: News Corp Australia A Brisbane couple who earnt $200,000 (before tax) were living in a subsidised rental paying $200 a week, Mr O'Connor said in a statement. The government says it has identified a household in Moreton Bay, being paid almost $3500 a week (before tax), occupying a large social housing property and paying $270 a week – this property would rent for $650 a week on the open market. In another example, a Townsville family earning more than $160,000 a year (pre-tax) paid less than $190 a week in rent when Townsville median rents were $500 per week. A statement from the minister said these tenants were 'earning' these salaries – NewsWire has confirmed with his office that the figures are pre-tax. In Queensland, a single person with no kids must take home less than $610 a week to qualify for social housing. A couple with two kids cannot be earning more than $1000. As it stands, social housing tenants must pay 25 per cent of their income on rent; this will remain under the new shake-up. People earning far more than the social housing threshold have been uncovered across Queensland. NewsWire / Dan Peled Credit: News Corp Australia However, under the crackdown, all social housing tenants will be subject to annual rent reviews. If someone is paying less than 25 per cent, annual rent hikes will be capped at $15. Any tenant who cannot verify their income will then have to pay market rent and then will be evicted. The crackdown has a focus on households with spare bedrooms. Figures provided by the minister say 8000 social housing households are 'under-occupying' their homes by two or more bedrooms. People would not be forced to downsize, Mr O'Connor said. Instead, removalist costs or rent-free periods would be offered as incentives. 'We're empowering our housing officers to do what they do best – support the Queenslanders who most need a roof over their heads,' Mr O'Connor said. 'These are long overdue changes to fix the system so it's better targeted to help the people who need housing most.' There are more than 52,000 people on Queensland's social housing waitlist. The previous state government paused social housing evictions and yearly rent reviews during the pandemic.
West Australian
3 hours ago
- West Australian
‘Unbelievable': Qld cracks whip on social housing rorters
The Queensland government is cracking down on the income of social housing tenants, as figures reveal people earning far above income thresholds are benefiting from subsidised housing. 'Labor turned a blind eye for years,' Housing Minister Sam O'Connor said on Monday. 'They stopped checking if people still qualified for social housing, and they let rent reviews fall by the wayside. 'It's unbelievable they let people on six-figure incomes stay in social homes for years while others in urgent need were left on the social housing waitlist.' Information released by the state government on Monday showed a small number of notable rorts were being carried out by social housing tenants. A Brisbane couple who earnt $200,000 (before tax) were living in a subsidised rental paying $200 a week, Mr O'Connor said in a statement. The government says it has identified a household in Moreton Bay, being paid almost $3500 a week (before tax), occupying a large social housing property and paying $270 a week – this property would rent for $650 a week on the open market. In another example, a Townsville family earning more than $160,000 a year (pre-tax) paid less than $190 a week in rent when Townsville median rents were $500 per week. A statement from the minister said these tenants were 'earning' these salaries – NewsWire has confirmed with his office that the figures are pre-tax. In Queensland, a single person with no kids must take home less than $610 a week to qualify for social housing. A couple with two kids cannot be earning more than $1000. As it stands, social housing tenants must pay 25 per cent of their income on rent; this will remain under the new shake-up. However, under the crackdown, all social housing tenants will be subject to annual rent reviews. If someone is paying less than 25 per cent, annual rent hikes will be capped at $15. Any tenant who cannot verify their income will then have to pay market rent and then will be evicted. The crackdown has a focus on households with spare bedrooms. Figures provided by the minister say 8000 social housing households are 'under-occupying' their homes by two or more bedrooms. People would not be forced to downsize, Mr O'Connor said. Instead, removalist costs or rent-free periods would be offered as incentives. 'We're empowering our housing officers to do what they do best – support the Queenslanders who most need a roof over their heads,' Mr O'Connor said. 'These are long overdue changes to fix the system so it's better targeted to help the people who need housing most.' There are more than 52,000 people on Queensland's social housing waitlist. The previous state government paused social housing evictions and yearly rent reviews during the pandemic.
