logo
Chinese village that is at the central of the US-China AI war

Chinese village that is at the central of the US-China AI war

Time of India3 days ago
China has a new and emerging rival to America's Silicon Valley -- and it is Liangzhu, a quiet suburb on the outskirts of Hangzhou. The city is one of China's fastest-growing centers of artificial intelligence development. Describing a scene on a Saturday afternoon in the city, a report in New York Times said, "...dozens of people sat in the grass around a backyard stage where aspiring founders of tech startups talked about their ideas." A former Facebook and Alibaba employee who hosted the event, Felix Tao told NYT, 'People come here to explore their own possibilities.'
According to The New York Times report, virtually every conversation at startup and corporate gatherings in this city circles back to artificial intelligence — the technology at the heart of China's push to compete with the United States in the global tech arena and the one China and America are fighting for supremacy.
Hangzhou is home to Alibaba, DeepSeek and many other AI giants
Hangzhou has long been a magnet for talent and innovation, home to Chinese tech giants like Alibaba, NetEase, and surveillance technology company Hikvision. More recently, the city has given rise to DeepSeek, a fast-growing AI firm that captured international attention in January after unveiling a powerful open-source model it said cost a fraction of its Western equivalents.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
DeepSeek is one of what Chinese media now call the 'six tigers of Hangzhou' — a group of AI and robotics startups making headlines at home and abroad. Game Science, another member of the cohort, produced Black Myth: Wukong, the first Chinese-made video game to achieve global blockbuster status. Robotics firm Unitree made a splash in January when its robot dogs performed a choreographed dance during the state broadcaster's Spring Festival Gala.
The AI surge in Hangzhou reportedly did not happen by accident. Over the past decade, provincial and local authorities have rolled out tax breaks and subsidies to attract tech startups, a strategy that has helped seed hundreds of companies. On weekends, investors and entrepreneurs fly in from Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen to scout talent — and often end up in Tao's backyard.
Many of Liangzhu's coders are alumni of Zhejiang University, one of China's top engineering schools and the alma mater of DeepSeek's founder. Their technical skills are in such high demand that Chinese media recently covered the defection of a core DeepSeek engineer to electronics giant Xiaomi as front-page news.
Still, many engineers say they are biding their time, waiting for noncompete agreements with firms like ByteDance to expire before launching startups of their own.
Biggest challenge of Chinese companies -- tough to attract foreign capital
Yet Hangzhou's rise as a tech powerhouse has not come without complications. Several founders told The New York Times that the same government support that fueled their early growth now makes it harder to attract foreign capital. International investors are increasingly wary of Chinese tech firms, especially those with ties to the state. Some fear their companies could meet the same fate as ByteDance, the parent of TikTok, whose executives have faced tough scrutiny in the United States over national security concerns.
The dilemma has left founders with limited options. 'You either take government funding and stay focused on China, or raise enough on your own to open an office in Singapore or elsewhere,' one founder said, requesting anonymity to speak candidly. 'Most people can't afford the second route.'
Adding to the uncertainty is the question of access to the chips that power advanced AI models. The U.S. government has imposed increasingly strict export controls on high-performance semiconductors, making it difficult for Chinese firms to buy processors from companies like Nvidia. In response, Chinese tech giants — including Huawei and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation — are racing to build domestic alternatives.
While Chinese-made chips have enabled some companies, such as ByteDance, to offer limited AI services locally, industry experts say it remains unclear whether those supplies can keep up with demand — or how long it will take for China to achieve true chip independence.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Go for IT companies with unique business model; not largecap and me-too midcap IT stocks: Dipan Mehta
Go for IT companies with unique business model; not largecap and me-too midcap IT stocks: Dipan Mehta

Time of India

time21 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Go for IT companies with unique business model; not largecap and me-too midcap IT stocks: Dipan Mehta

Dipan Mehta , Director, Elixir Equities , suggests that the IT sector's future lies in companies with unique business models. He highlights smallcap firms like Newgen and Aurionpro as potential winners. GIS companies and Genesys are also mentioned as interesting prospects. Persistent Systems and Coforge are noted for their aggressive strategies. Mehta believes largecap and me-too midcap IT stocks may not offer significant returns, going forward. We all know that this earning season will not come out with a good set of numbers. But if Accenture numbers are anything to go by, is there light at the end of the tunnel because it is not like this is going to be a dark tunnel for the rest of our life? Dipan Mehta: I think that what has happened is that basically there is a secular slowdown in the entire IT industry. The business model is such that they are going to be just about providing application, development, management, and the entire industry has moved to products and platforms. So, again, there is a structural issue in the Indian IT industry and I was quite hopeful that AI would be a trigger for higher growth but certainly that does not appear to be so. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Lana Green Is Retiring - Her Final Jewelry Pieces Are 80% Off Design Craft Weekly Read More Undo In fact, they may get disrupted because of artificial intelligence. And if you look at the 5-10-year track records, these companies at the end of the day have had high single-digit growth despite rupee depreciation. So, what is going to change it? I really do not know. The way the spend is happening in the tech industry, more and more is towards hardware, especially servers of the type that Nvidia makes or chips that Nvidia makes; more investment into data centres, storage capacity; and more investment into platforms and products. Software as a service is the new buzz word. It is a way to decrease cost and none of the traditional Indian IT companies are in that particular space. So, they are going to get disrupted and we are going to see further slowdown there. So, my view remains extremely negative. Sure, there could be rallies. A surprising quarter with 15-20% growth is possible, but the long-term trajectory is very slow. Even though you are largely negative when it comes to this sector, over the last couple of weeks, during sector churn, it has emerged positive for a couple of days. We have seen that the midcap end has done much better than the largecaps. If at all you had to play IT and if you are seeing any hope in this sector, do you believe it could come from the midcap end? Dipan Mehta: No. In fact, it has to come from companies which have a differentiated business model and which are more into products and platforms. Traditionally we had companies like Oracle and Ramco which were into products. There was Nucleus Software also but those have not done as well. Live Events You Might Also Like: FII selloff in IT stocks tops Rs 16,500 cr in Q1. Time to buy or bail? There's a new set of companies and they are really smallcap companies. Companies like Newgen, Aurionpro, merit a mention over here, usually disclosure, we and our clients may be invested in them, and then there are GIS companies which are also there, as is Genesys, which is quite interesting, at the right place at the right time. Beyond that, there could be a few IT companies like Persistent Systems, or a Coforge, which are aggressive and which are in the right space. They may do well, but at the end of the day, the largecap IT stocks and a whole host of midcap IT stocks, which are doing a me-too type of a business, are not going to give great returns going forward. You Might Also Like: Traditional IT in a spot; betting on 4 midcap platform companies: Dipan Mehta IT stocks hit decade-high 3.2% dividend yield as FIIs flee. Should you buy TCS, Infosys, Wipro before Q1 results?

How U.S. buyers of critical minerals bypass China's export ban
How U.S. buyers of critical minerals bypass China's export ban

The Hindu

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

How U.S. buyers of critical minerals bypass China's export ban

Unusually large quantities of antimony— a metal used in batteries, chips and flame retardants— have poured into the United States from Thailand and Mexico since China barred U.S. shipments last year, according to customs and shipping records, which show at least one Chinese-owned company is involved in the trade. China dominates the supply of antimony as well as gallium and germanium, used in telecommunications, semiconductors and military technology. Beijing banned exports of these minerals to the U.S. on December 3 following Washington's crackdown on China's chip sector. The resulting shift in trade flows underscores the scramble for critical minerals and China's struggle to enforce its curbs as it vies with the U.S. for economic, military and technological supremacy. Specifically, trade data illustrate a re-routing of U.S. shipments via third countries— an issue Chinese officials have acknowledged. Three industry experts corroborated that assessment, including two executives at two U.S. companies who told Reuters they had obtained restricted minerals from China in recent months. The U.S. imported 3,834 metric tons of antimony oxides from Thailand and Mexico between December and April, U.S. customs data show. That was more than almost the previous three years combined. Thailand and Mexico, meanwhile, shot into the top three export markets for Chinese antimony this year, according to Chinese customs data through May. Neither made the top 10 in 2023, the last full year before Beijing restricted exports. Thailand and Mexico each have a single antimony smelter, according to consultancy RFC Ambrian, and the latter's only reopened in April. Neither country mines meaningful quantities of the metal. U.S. imports of antimony, gallium and germanium this year are on track to equal or exceed levels before the ban, albeit at higher prices. Ram Ben Tzion, co-founder and CEO of digital shipment-vetting platform Publican, said that while there was clear evidence of transshipment, trade data didn't enable the identification of companies involved. "It's a pattern that we're seeing and that pattern is consistent," he told Reuters. Chinese companies, he added, were "super creative in bypassing regulations." China's Commerce Ministry said in May that unspecified overseas entities had "colluded with domestic lawbreakers" to evade its export restrictions, and that stopping such activity was essential to national security. It didn't respond to Reuters questions about the shift in trade flows since December. The U.S. Commerce Department, Thailand's Commerce Ministry and Mexico's Economy Ministry didn't respond to similar questions. U.S. law doesn't bar American buyers from purchasing Chinese-origin antimony, gallium or germanium. Chinese firms can ship the minerals to countries other than the U.S. if they have a license. Levi Parker, CEO and founder of U.S.-based Gallant Metals, told Reuters how he obtains about 200 kg of gallium a month from China, without identifying the parties involved due to the potential repercussions. First, buying agents in China obtain material from producers. Then, a shipping company routes the packages, re-labelled variously as iron, zinc or art supplies, via another Asian country, he said. The workarounds aren't perfect, nor cheap, Mr. Parker said. He said he would like to import 500 kg regularly but big shipments risked drawing scrutiny, and Chinese logistics firms were "very careful" because of the risks. Brisk trade Thai Unipet Industries, a Thailand-based subsidiary of Chinese antimony producer Youngsun Chemicals, has been doing brisk trade with the U.S. in recent months, previously unreported shipping records reviewed by Reuters show. Unipet shipped at least 3,366 tons of antimony products from Thailand to the U.S. between December and May, according to 36 bills of lading recorded by trade platforms ImportYeti and Export Genius. That was around 27 times the volume Unipet shipped in the same period a year earlier. The records list the cargo, parties involved, and ports of origin and receipt, but not necessarily the origin of the raw material. They don't indicate specific evidence of transshipment. Thai Unipet couldn't be reached for comment. When Reuters called a number listed for the company on one of the shipping records, a person who answered said the number didn't belong to Unipet. Reuters mailed questions to Unipet's registered address but received no response. Unipet's parent, Youngsun Chemicals, didn't respond to questions about the U.S. shipments. The buyer of Unipet's U.S. shipments was Texas-based Youngsun & Essen, which before Beijing's ban imported most of its antimony trioxide from Youngsun Chemicals. Neither Youngsun & Essen nor its president, Jimmy Song, responded to questions about the imports. China launched a campaign in May against the transshipment and smuggling of critical minerals. Offenders can face fines and bans on future exports. Serious cases can also be treated as smuggling, and result in jail terms of more than five years, James Hsiao, a Hong Kong-based partner at law firm White & Case, told Reuters. The laws apply to Chinese firms even where transactions take place abroad, he said. In cases of transshipment, Chinese authorities can prosecute sellers that fail to conduct sufficient due diligence to determine the end user, Mr. Hsiao added. Yet for anyone willing to take the risk, big profits are available overseas, where shortages have sent prices for gallium, germanium and antimony to records. The three minerals were already subject to export licensing controls when China banned exports to the U.S. China's exports of antimony and germanium are still below levels hit before the restrictions, according to Chinese customs data. Beijing now faces a challenge to ensure its export-control regime has teeth, said Ben Tzion. "While having all these policies in place, their enforcement is a completely different scenario," he said.

Can China compete against US in AI talent war with homegrown minds?
Can China compete against US in AI talent war with homegrown minds?

Business Standard

time29 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Can China compete against US in AI talent war with homegrown minds?

The latest eye-watering artificial intelligence outlays aren't going toward high-end chips or data-center buildouts, but individuals. The competition for AI talent prompted Meta Platforms Inc. to reportedly offer sign-on bonuses of $100 million to lure senior staff from rivals. It feels 'as if someone has broken into our home and stolen something,' OpenAI's chief research officer said of the aggressive poaching in a memo to staff obtained by Wired. The latest victim: Apple Inc., which just lost top executive Ruoming Pang to Meta. It's telling that so many of the superstar players US tech titans are boasting about adding to their rosters are of Chinese origin. Including Pang, eight out of the 12 new recruits to the Meta Superintelligence Labs team graduated from universities on the mainland before pursuing careers abroad. It means that a key driver of the global AI race is an intense scramble for the people building it: Chinese talent. But American business leaders shouldn't assume that the big paychecks alone will win an international talent contest. Researchers at Harvard University last month said that the number of high-impact scientific publications shows that China dominates in 'raw human capital for AI.' This helps drive indigenous research despite US advantages in computing power and investment. Top workers may still be keen on making money overseas, but that doesn't mean a lot of them won't stay at home. Separate researchers at Stanford University in May analyzed data on the more than 200 authors listed on DeepSeek's technical papers. The firm's success story is 'fundamentally, one of homegrown talent,' they found. Half of DeepSeek's team never left China for education or work, and those who did ultimately returned to pursue AI development. This has policy implications for the US. China looks at international experience less as a brain drain and more as a way for researchers to acquire knowledge before returning home, the Stanford paper said. The US 'may be mistakenly assuming it has a permanent talent lead.' It aligns with other data that suggests America has been losing its allure as a destination for top-tier AI researchers. Only 42 per cent of these individuals worked in the US in 2022, compared to 59 per cent in 2019. During that same period, China was closing the gap fast, rising to 28 per cent from 11 per cent. The Chinese government, meanwhile, has been funding AI labs and research at universities as part of industrial policy. It's not clear how well this investment has paid off, but it has helped incubate talent who went on to support breakthroughs at private companies. One of DeepSeek's keystone papers, for example, was co-authored by scholars at Tsinghua University, Peking University and Nanjing University. In this way, China has been building up an ecosystem of innovation that doesn't center around poaching individual star players. Domestic firms are less able to spend so lavishly to attract top talent. US private investment in AI was nearly 12 times the amount in China, according to one analysis. Earlier this year, state-backed news outlet the Global Times reported on the 'high-paying job offers' from DeepSeek, which could amount to annual income of some 1.54 million yuan per year (just under $215,000). It's a significant sum in urban China, but hardly the instant millionaire-minting figures being tossed around in Silicon Valley. DeepSeek is nonetheless in the midst of a recruiting blitz — one that's trying to attract overseas Chinese AI researchers to come back home. It has posted a spate of roles on LinkedIn, a platform that's not used domestically. As my colleague Dave Lee has written, this is about more than just money, but instead convincing workers that their contribution 'will matter most in the history books.' DeepSeek may be hoping that this pitch will work on homesick Chinese talent. Ultimately, just under half of the world's top-tier AI researchers come from China, compared to 18 per cent from the US. Many may be seeking opportunities abroad, but Beijing is pulling all its levers to convince at least some to stay at a time when America isn't signaling a warm welcome. Mind boggling sign-on bonuses from Silicon Valley may be enough to win a cross-border battle for talent, but time will tell if it's enough to win the war.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store