Dutch intelligence agencies say Russian hackers stole police data in cyberattack
The agencies said in a report that the group, which they called Laundry Bear, is actively trying to steal sensitive data from European Union and NATO countries and is "extremely likely Russian state supported."
"Laundry Bear is after information about the purchase and production of military equipment by Western governments and Western deliveries of weapons to Ukraine," Vice Adm. Peter Reesink, director of the
military intelligence
agency MIVD, said in a statement.
There was no immediate comment from Moscow on the report.
The Netherlands has been a strong supporter of Ukraine's war effort since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022 and has given military equipment, including F-16 fighter jets to Kyiv.
Live Events
The
Russian hackers
broke into a police account and accessed work-related contact details of all Dutch police officers in September last year, in a cyberattack that sent shockwaves through the force.
Discover the stories of your interest
Blockchain
5 Stories
Cyber-safety
7 Stories
Fintech
9 Stories
E-comm
9 Stories
ML
8 Stories
Edtech
6 Stories
The
Dutch intelligence agencies
published a detailed analysis of methods used by the hacker group to break into computer networks and cloud services.
Erik Akerboom, chief of the domestic intelligence agency AIVD, said that outlining the group's work means that "not only governments, but also manufacturers, suppliers and other targets can arm themselves against this form of espionage. This limits Laundry Bear's chances of success and digital networks can be better protected."
The attack discovered in the Netherlands is one of a growing number around the world.
Last week, the U.S. National Security Agency said that hackers working for Russian military intelligence targeted Western technology and logistics companies involved in shipping assistance to Ukraine.
And last month, the French government accused a hacking group linked to Russian military intelligence of cyberattacks over three years, targeting the Paris Olympics, French government agencies and companies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
10 minutes ago
- India.com
How did Trump 'expose' Putin's 'exclusive' offer on the ceasefire? What is THE plan?
New Delhi: Monday, 19 August, was a crucial day as US President Donald Trump and European leaders discussed the probabilities of reaching a ceasefire on the Russia-Ukraine war that has been going on since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022. After the meeting, it was revealed that Russian President Vladimir Putin and his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky are ready for a peace summit. US President Trump said that after a 'very good' meeting with European and Ukrainian leaders at the White House, he spoke to his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, on the phone. After the meeting, Trump wrote on his Truth social network that everyone is very excited about the possibility of a Russia-Ukraine ceasefire. What was the agenda of the meeting? Trump hosted a multilateral meeting at the White House to come to a logical and fruitful conclusion to the efforts being made to stop the Russia-Ukraine war and ensure security guarantees for Ukraine. The meeting was attended by seven European leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Prime Minister Georgia Meloni, Finland President Alexander Stubb, European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen, and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. How did Trump 'expose' Putin's plan to the world? Meanwhile, Trump inadvertently said something that 'exposed' Putin's plan to the world. Ahead of the meeting, a hot mic recorded Trump telling Macron that he thinks the Russian president wants to make a deal. In a conversation between the two leaders, Trump said, 'I think he (Russian President Vladimir Putin) wants to make a deal. I think he wants to make a deal for me, you understand?' Zelensky ready to meet Putin Zelensky confirmed to reporters outside the White House that he was ready for bilateral talks with Putin. Meanwhile, a Kremlin ally in Moscow said Putin was open to the 'idea' of direct talks with Ukraine. The USA and Russia could not reach a ceasefire during Trump's summit with Putin on August 15, held in Alaska.
Mint
10 minutes ago
- Mint
Donbas question – The most ‘Russian' part of Ukraine between Putin, Zelensky and Trump
As negotiations to end the war in Ukraine gather momentum between Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump, and Volodymyr Zelensky, the focus has once again returned to the Donbas — a region whose history, identity and resources have made it central to Russia's ambitions and Ukraine's struggle for sovereignty. The Donbas — comprising the eastern regions of Donetsk and Luhansk — was once the industrial heartland of the Soviet Union, known for its coal mines, steel mills and fertile farmland. For the Kremlin, however, its significance extends beyond economics. The Donbas has historically been the most 'Russian' part of Ukraine, with a sizeable Russian-speaking population and lingering cultural ties to Moscow. It was here, in 2014, that Russian President Vladimir Putin began destabilising Ukraine after annexing Crimea, supporting armed separatists who swiftly seized control of Donetsk and Luhansk. Since then, the Donbas region has become the epicentre of Russia's claim to defend 'compatriots abroad' and secure what Putin sees as the cornerstone of a 'greater Russia'. For nearly eight years before the full-scale invasion of 2022, fighting raged between Ukrainian forces and Russian-backed separatists. More than 14,000 people were killed, according to Kyiv's figures, while at least 1.5 million fled the region. Today, over three million are estimated to live under Russian occupation. Moscow has entrenched its presence, issuing hundreds of thousands of Russian passports in separatist-controlled areas. Following sham referenda in 2022, the Kremlin illegally annexed Donetsk and Luhansk, along with Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, despite only partial control of the territories. For Vladimir Putin, these annexations represent a point of no return. Unlike previous military withdrawals, giving up 'Russian land' formally absorbed into the Federation would undermine his central narrative of restoring historic Russia. Despite Moscow's advances, Ukraine still controls a strategic 'fortress belt' of industrial cities and transport hubs — including Sloviansk, Kramatorsk and Kostiantynivka — that block further Russian penetration westward. For President Volodymyr Zelensky, surrendering these areas would not only dishonour the sacrifices of Ukrainian soldiers but also expose central Ukraine to fresh offensives. About three-quarters of Ukrainians oppose ceding any territory, according to surveys, making territorial concessions politically toxic in Kyiv. The Donbas cannot be separated from Crimea, another flashpoint in Russia–Ukraine tensions. Moscow seized the peninsula in 2014 after pro-European protests toppled President Viktor Yanukovych. A disputed referendum was staged, claiming overwhelming support for joining Russia, though international governments dismissed it as fabricated. Vladimir Putin has consistently framed Crimea's annexation as correcting a 'historical wrong' dating back to its 1954 transfer to Ukraine. Yet research suggests that many Crimeans identified not as pro-Russian nationalists but as distinctly 'Crimean' or Ukrainian. Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky has repeatedly argued that the West's failure to resist the 2014 annexation emboldened Russia's Putin to expand the war. 'Crimea should not have been given up then,' he said recently, warning that peace must be 'lasting, not temporary'. Analysts believe Russia may need years to consolidate its occupation of Donetsk and Luhansk. Ukraine, meanwhile, faces the dual challenge of defending its remaining positions and persuading allies not to pressure it into territorial concessions. For Europe and the West, the stakes extend far beyond Ukraine's borders. To allow Moscow to keep land seized by force would, in their view, dismantle the very principle of a rules-based international order. As in 2025, the Donbas remains the crucible of Putin's ambitions — and Zelensky's most difficult test in his effort to defend not just territory, but the idea of a sovereign Ukraine.
Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Dressing up for the bully: What Volodymyr Zelenskyy's ‘suit' says about appeasement in the age of Trump
If the art of managing Donald Trump is an exercise in deference, the European leaders gathered in Washington DC this week to discuss an end to the Ukraine-Russia conflict could be said to have achieved some level of mastery. Conversation at the summit hummed along, with a certain degree of cordiality evident in the exchanges, even if there were misgivings about the terms of the 'peace' proposed by the US President. Sufficient gratitude was expressed by all the guests for the host's attempts to end the three-year-long war. And, most notably, as observers of every political hue pointed out, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy wore a suit (or something like one, but we will get to that). Given that Zelenskyy's refusal to dress 'appropriately' was blamed for playing a part in how poorly his February visit to the White House had gone, this could be seen as progress. Six months ago, Trump had been visibly irked by Zelenskyy's appearance in his army green sweatshirt and cargo pants, greeting him with the sarcasm-laden observation, 'Oh, you're all dressed up'. The military-inspired outfit has come to be closely associated with the Ukrainian president since the Russian invasion in 2022, a variation of which he wore each of the five times he met President Joe Biden in Washington during this time. Under the Trump presidency, however, the attire has only caused irritation, being described earlier this year as 'disrespectful to the highest office of the country' by Brian Glenn, a member of the White House press pool who works for the MAGA outlet Real America's Voice. The February episode was, in a way, a clash between two men with an intuitive understanding of spectacle, who know well how to dress to speak to their respective constituencies. Both Zelenskyy and Trump have showbiz history; the former, before he became president in 2019, had been a successful comedian and actor, noted for his lead role in the series Servant of the People (which is also believed to have inspired his political career). The change in his wardrobe, following the Russian invasion in February 2022, reflected his new position as a wartime leader, designed to show solidarity with his country's armed forces — in a December 2022 interview, he told The Financial Times' Christopher Miller that he would go back to wearing a suit and tie (and shave off his beard) only after Ukrainian victory in the war. Trump, the first reality TV star to become US president, also uses costumery to send out a message, garbing himself in the colours of the American flag — blue suit, red tie, white shirt — as a display of his brand of patriotism. This particular combination has, indeed, become something of a uniform for other notable members of the administration, particularly Vice President J D Vance and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth (the women in Trump's orbit have their own 'uniform' of stiff, immaculately waved hair, body-hugging sheath dresses and, frequently, a small gold crucifix around the neck). Under a president who values loyalty above all else, such fealty in costume is a significant non-verbal indication of allegiance to the man himself. Which is why Zelenskyy's decision to suit up for his second meeting with Trump at the White House has been seen as a conciliatory gesture, signalling a great willingness to appease. As to whether the all-black, tie-less outfit with military elements qualifies as a suit at all — there has been considerable debate over this question at least since June 25, when the Ukrainian president attended a dinner before the NATO summit wearing the same outfit. It sparked a massive controversy on Polymarket, a cryptocurrency platform used for betting, where punters were asked to place their money on whether or not Zelenskyy would wear a suit before July. The dispute, with over $200 million at stake at one point, flared up when, after photos of the NATO dinner emerged, the gamble went the way of those who had betted against Zelenskyy wearing a suit. Those who had taken a punt on the opposite position claimed market manipulation and threatened lawsuits. Some sort of final word on the matter came from Derek Guy, editor of the menswear blog Put This On, who said that while the suit met the technical definition of a suit — in that it featured a jacket and pair of pants cut from the same cloth — the military-inspired details like the shape of the collar, lapels and the four patch pockets meant that it did not fit the social expectations of a suit. Ultimately, of course, all that really mattered was that Trump loved the 'suit'. In the Oval Office before the press, with fulsome praise this time from Glenn — 'you look fabulous' — the President touched his Ukrainian counterpart on the shoulder and said, 'I said the same thing.' Perhaps not the ceasefire that the beleaguered Zelenskyy had hoped for, but the only one he's likely to get.
