
Mohamed Soliman: US judge halts deportation of Boulder firebombing suspect's Egyptian family
A US federal judge on Wednesday ordered the government to immediately stop deportation proceedings against the family of the man charged in the firebombing attack on a Jewish group in Colorado.
US District Judge Gordon Gallagher granted a request from the wife and five children of Mohamed Sabry Soliman, who are Egyptian, to block their deportation.
Immigration officials had taken the family – all Egyptian citizens – into custody on Tuesday.
'The court finds that deportation without process could work irreparable harm and an order must issue without notice due to the urgency this situation presents,' Mr Gallagher wrote.
Mr Soliman, 45, yelled 'free Palestine' during Sunday's attack in the Rocky Mountain city of Boulder, during which he used a makeshift flame-thrower and hurled Molotov cocktails at a group of people gathered to call for the release of the remaining hostages in Gaza.
At least 15 people, ranging in age from 25 to 88, were injured, some of them seriously.
The FBI said Mr Soliman told police he had planned the attack for a year and that it was specifically against what he described as a 'Zionist group'. An affidavit says he confessed to the attack after being taken into custody and told the police he would do it again.
He faces at least eight criminal charges, including a hate crime. His family members have not been charged, and Mr Soliman has told authorities that they knew nothing of his plans.
Federal authorities have said Mr Soliman has been living in the US illegally, and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem said earlier on Wednesday that the family was being processed for removal. It is rare that a criminal suspect's family members are detained and threatened with deportation.
Mr Soliman arrived in California on a non-immigrant visa in 2022, which expired in February the next year, and had recently been living in Colorado Springs. He had applied for asylum in the US.
His wife and their children are listed as dependants on Mr Soliman's asylum application. Eric Lee, one of the lawyers representing the family, said there should not be attempts to deport them in a democracy.
'The punishment of a four-year-old child for something their parent allegedly did, who also has a presumption of innocence, is something that should outrage Americans regardless of their citizenship status,' Mr Lee said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Khaleej Times
2 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Musk, Trump to hold 'peace call' after feud; Tesla shares rise
Tesla shares rose on Friday as investors took some comfort from White House aides scheduling a call with CEO Elon Musk to broker peace after a public feud with US President Donald Trump. Trump threatened to cut off government contracts to Musk's companies, while Musk suggested Trump should be impeached, turning their relationship into an all-out brawl on social media. The electric carmaker's shares were up around 5 per cent in Frankfurt on Friday, having closed down 14.3 per cent on Thursday in New York, losing about $150 billion in market value. "It's unlikely that Trump will end subsidies and contracts with Tesla. Those are obviously threats that are unlikely to come into fruition," said Fiona Cincotta, senior market analyst at City Index. Stay up to date with the latest news. Follow KT on WhatsApp Channels. "I don't expect this to blow out into anything more serious than a war of words for a couple of days." Analysts said some of Thursday's selloff was down to factors beyond Musk's personal relationship with the president. "We think the stock's sell-off reflects a number of other factors: an unjustified run-up following its Q1 earnings release, ongoing market share losses in China and Europe, and a realisation that next week's Robotaxi launch in Austin could disappoint," Garrett Nelson, senior equity analyst at CFRA Research, said in a note. "We remain at Hold, expecting more volatility in the near term. Buckle up!" he said. Tesla shares, which hit record highs when Trump won the election in November, have since been punished harshly, as Musk's cost-cutting role in the US administration hurt Tesla's image with shareholders and consumers alike. The stock is still considered part of Wall Street's elite "Magnificent 7" club of the seven biggest companies by market cap, even though it has now dropped to ninth position in terms of value, behind Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway and Broadcom. It has also dropped out of the $1-trillion club of companies with market value above this level. The broader stock market got hit on Thursday as the feud between Musk and Trump intensified. By Friday, with signs of a possible truce on the horizon, stock futures turned higher as well, with those on the SP 500 up 0.4 per cent. "Elon Musk has already signalled that he is open to a cooling off period with Trump, and stock market futures are higher on Friday morning. Thus, the risk could be more localised with Tesla shares in the short term," Kathleen Brooks, XTB research director, said.


Khaleej Times
4 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Trump-Musk feud: From "bromance" to a social media brawl; when did it all begin?
US President Donald Trump and X owner Elon Musk have long been close allies, with their bond or "bromance" serving as amusement to many social media users. Their affection for each other has now taken a sharp turn into an all-out clash, both using social media as their tools in a tit-for-tat exchange. So, when did it all begin? Trump's "big, beautiful" bill apparently wasn't just so beautiful to Musk. He criticised it, calling it a "disgusting abomination" on the basis that the tax-cut and spending would add even more to the nation's debt, which already reaches a staggering $36.2 trillion. In response, Trump told reporters in the Oval Office he was "very disappointed" in Musk. "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore," Trump said. Trump has also said that Musk's opposition to the bill was because of the elimination of consumer tax credits for electric vehicles. However, Musk has maintained that he does not mind cuts to the EV credits as long as Republicans rid the bill of wasteful spending. The X owner and the US President have harnessed their usual platforms to snub each other. Trump has claimed that he asked Musk to leave as the Tesla owner was "wearing thin". "I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy electric cars that nobody else wanted, and he just went crazy!", Trump posted on Truth Social. Meanwhile, Musk hit back, posting on X that the "real reason the Epstein files have not been made public" are because Trump is in them. "Have a nice day, DJT!", Elon quipped. Musk has also responded "Yes" to a post on X that said Trump should be impeached and called out the US President's "ingratitude". "Without me, Trump would have lost the election," wrote Musk, who spent nearly $300 million backing Trump and other Republicans in last year's election. Trump meanwhile, took a dig at Elon's space businesses, suggesting that "the easiest way to save money in the budget — billions and billions of dollars — is to terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts." "I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!", Trump added. Musk, who owns SpaceX, said the company would "begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately" in light of Trump's statement, which would be a big blow to US space aspirations. Dragon is the only US spacecraft capable of sending astronauts to the International Space Station. The world is watching closely as these two men, both with loud opinions, clash. As the feud unfolds, conveniently written out on social media, it is yet to see how this will impact the White House, and US politics.


Khaleej Times
6 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Pakistan govt begins cancelling passports of deportees
Pakistan's government has initiated cancelling the passports of deportees due to fake documents and beggary to discourage such practices. Data released by the Ministry of Overseas Pakistanis and Human Resource Development showed that over 7,800 Pakistanis were deported from 2019 to 2025 for different charges, including beggary. All of these deportees' passports are being cancelled, the Pakistani media reported. Most of these deportees are from the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, which house a higher number of South Asian diaspora. As reported by Khaleej Times last month, the South Asian government stated that all deportees' passports will be cancelled upon arrival in the country and a first information report (FIR) will be filed against them for illegal practices. In addition, the government also announced that the deportees will be placed on the passport control list, ensuring that they don't travel abroad for five years. The Ministry of Interior has started placing these deportees' names on the passport control list to ensure that they don't travel abroad. The Senate Standing Committee on Overseas Pakistanis and Human Resources earlier this week discussed the matter of deportees and discussed steps taken to prevent such incidents. Millions of skilled Pakistani workers are employed in various countries, contributing immensely to the country's foreign exchange reserves. More than 5.5 million Pakistanis live and work in the UAE and other neighbouring Gulf countries. Millions of South Asian nationals visit Dubai, UAE and other regional countries for tourism. Pakistanis in the UAE have welcomed the government's decision to cancel the passports of deportees and put them on the passport control list for illegal practices because these initiatives will ease travel and visa restrictions for genuine visitors. The Senate Standing Committee recommended that the ministry initiate criminal proceedings against agencies for their involvement in sending deportees abroad. However, the question of legality of cancelling passports for crimes committed in foreign countries was also raised by a senator during the meeting.