Post Office scandal: Stockton former sub-postmaster receives compensation
A former sub-postmaster who was wrongly convicted amid the Horizon scandal said he could finally do the things he should have done for 20 years, after receiving a £600,000 settlement.Keith Bell, 76, was a sub-postmaster in Stockton, Teesside, between 1987 and 2002, when he was convicted of false accounting.He was among hundreds of others wrongly prosecuted due to faulty accountancy software used by the Post Office, which showed errors that did not exist."Because of that conviction I lost jobs, I was unable to find work that could support my family, basically, and I became bankrupt," he said.
Last May, the government quashed all convictions which were part of the Post Office scandal and Mr Bell said the U-turn had been a "huge relief".He added daily life had been a "struggle" over the past 20 years, but he was very lucky his customers and friends had been "very kind", while he was aware other sub-postmasters had a "terrible time".
'TV drama inspired me'
Mr Bell had to do 200 hours of community services when he was convicted.He said it was hard to know what compensation he should have received and he did not feel entirely vindicated."There's parts of my life I'll never be able to have over, but now I've got a chance to do things I haven't been able to do," he said."I decided that at my age I wanted to accept the offer that was given to me, I could have appealed for more, but that would have meant the process going on for years."
Mr Bell, who told the BBC in December he had still not received "a penny", said he was inspired to fight for compensation by the ITV drama Mr Bates vs The Post Office.He said: "I never, ever, thought I'd be in a position to challenge the Post Office, I didn't know enough about IT, I didn't have enough legal knowledge, nor did I have the funds to do it - I just decided I needed to put my weight behind the cause.Chairman Nigel Railton has previously said the Post Office was "learning from the serious failings of the past".Parliament's Business and Trade Select Committee has called for changes to the way compensation was being delivered, due to the ongoing delays.Post Office Minister Gareth Thomas told the BBC in January the amount being paid out had doubled in the last six months and the government was trying to make schemes "less legalistic, less adversarial".
Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram. Send your story ideas here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
28 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Divorces delayed by disputes as quickie divorce search grows
But, there may be more to this interest than casual celebrity interest, with many who are looking to split concerned about financial disclosures and money disputes slowing down the process. The latest ONS figures show 80,057 divorces were granted within a year in the UK. But how long do these proceedings tend to take? How long should you expect to wait to finalise a divorce and what can speed up the process? Is there such a thing as a "quickie divorce"? DONT MISS IT. The 9 huge hidden financial benefits of marriage and how to take advantage of them A Martin Lewis Money Show Valentines special Tonight (Thur) 8pm ITV Oh & how to cut divorce costs too — Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) February 13, 2025 A divorce cannot be concluded in less than 26 weeks, and according to the average divorce in England and Wales takes at least seven months to process. Lucy Phipps, a family lawyer from Weightmans, says: "Different factors can influence the length of time it can take, including court delays, but mainly it can take longer because of the time needed to resolve disputes over finances. "It can be extremely important not to finalise your divorce until a financial settlement is reached. This also needs to be recorded in a court order, and so, however keen you are not to remain married, it is always worthwhile checking this point with a solicitor before you apply for the final order of divorce." It's important to be aware that whether you apply for a divorce on your own or as part of a joint application, the process will still be expected to take the same amount of time. The rise of the 'quickie divorce' - does it exist? With over 1,000 searches each month for the term 'quickie divorce' in the UK, popularised by mainstream media, the terminology is often synonymous with celebrity divorces. Although a 'quickie divorce' gives the impression of a fast turnaround, there is no way to hurry along proceedings within the boundaries of the law. The phrase arose years ago, when it was necessary to cite the fault of one of the parties if you wished to avoid waiting for at least 2 years post-separation before being allowed to apply for a divorce. What's a no-fault divorce? Since 2022, there has been a 'no fault' divorce system. All legal divorces are subject to the same minimum timeframe of 26 weeks. Lucy says: "There are also clear risks in proceeding without legal advice. Without proper representation, issues can arise that seriously jeopardise financial security, such as prematurely divorcing before a financial settlement is reached. "This potentially can cause hardship if a party passes away prior to that settlement being converted into a legally binding order, because spousal pension benefits are lost. "Other mistakes can include remarrying prior to a settlement being reached, which may prevent your seeking any settlement at all, or divorcing in the wrong divorce jurisdiction, resulting in your obtaining a settlement worth less than that you might have obtained if you were divorced somewhere else." Understanding your legal rights and responsibilities is essential to achieving the best possible outcome post-divorce. Financial and parental disputes can cause delays When preparing for a divorce, several factors can delay the process beyond the typical timeframe. "One common issue is incomplete paperwork. For example, the initial application for a divorce or dissolution, the D8 form, must be properly completed before proceedings can start," says Lucy. The most frequent delays involve disputes over finances or children. Although the divorce itself can proceed without resolving these matters, courts and expert family law solicitors recommend that financial arrangements are addressed first. Financial disclosure issues in divorce cases Disputes regarding property, pensions, or maintenance. Other potential delays may stem from court backlogs, a change of solicitors by either party, or particularly complex financial circumstances. How to prepare for the process - or get your 'ducks in a row' "The first step would be to get your documents in order to prepare for the divorce proceedings; this can include your marriage certificate, filling in the required D8 form, and starting to think about financial arrangements by gathering together information such as property agreements and bank statements," says Lucy. Recommended reading Beware destination weddings Couples who get divorced after tying the knot on a sandy beach in a far-flung location could face 'difficult delays' if important paperwork has been mislaid. James Brien, Founder of Easy Online Divorce says: 'Whether it's the sunshine or a better deal that makes a couple decide to go overseas for their wedding, it's an exciting and romantic experience. 'Like all relationships, things can go wrong and you might decide to separate. No matter where you get married, to start divorce proceedings in the UK, you need your marriage certificate. 'Things happen and marriage certificates can get lost, or a partner might withhold it if things have taken a bitter turn. 'In the UK, it can take four weeks to get a new certificate. But if you need a copy sent over from the authorities in another country, this can cause a difficult delay to proceedings.'
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
There are no ‘journalists' in Gaza. Just Hamas propaganda operatives
Britain and the world's views of the rights and wrongs of the Gaza war are so often shaped by what the BBC reports. That's mattered more than ever in recent weeks, amid the feverishly heated coverage of Israel's new Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) scheme to deliver aid to the Palestinian people and bypass allegedly Hamas-controlled NGOs. Hamas-linked sources claim Israeli soldiers have repeatedly shot and killed Palestinian civilians waiting for GHF food with their families. Stories bearing the bylines of BBC 'journalists' in Gaza largely tell this version of events, albeit including the denials of the IDF. News organisations using Gazan reporters say they have no choice, given the IDF's refusal to allow in outside journalists. But that's no reason not to exercise care and employ the same editorial standards as they would on any other story. For critics of the BBC, the results have been a disaster for the Corporation and its standards. They point to the stories that have not been told, or have been largely overlooked, by these reporters almost throughout the war: of Hamas's tyranny over the people of Gaza, its torture and murder of opponents, and of the courageous Palestinians who defy its rule. And why is there such scant coverage of Hamas using the civilian population as a human shield by placing tunnels under civilian buildings and military bases in hospital? Where are the stories of Israeli hostages being moved across Gaza? Why is there no footage of Hamas firing rockets or their gunmen on the move? There is an obvious answer: it appears that these reporters are either pro-Hamas, or too afraid of reprisals from terrorist gunmen to tell the truth. It is a charge that BBC Global News Director Jonathan Munro entirely rejects. Almost spluttering in disbelief recently at the suggestion that 'some of the people you're using in Gaza might be under pressure, might be restricted in what Hamas allows them to see,' resulting in a 'partial view', he insisted: 'There's no restriction on what they can see, what they can show and what they can film when they're on location. 'There's no suggestion at all that any of those very brave people are under any political influence.' Munro's denial shows an astonishing disregard for the well-documented reality of life in Gaza. Take a recent report from the well regarded NGO the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ). It tears apart the notion that press freedom exists in Gaza. According to the CPJ, journalists there have been subject to 'detentions, assaults, obstruction and raids' going back to the start of Hamas rule almost twenty years ago. While detailing numerous violent assaults on members of the press in Gaza, the analysis warns that violations by Hamas are 'underreported'. Some journalists who have been assaulted are believed to be too afraid to say anything at all; others have gone to the Palestinian Journalists Syndicate (PJS) but say they do not want to go public for fear of retaliation. Note that both the CPJ and PJS are the staunchest critics of Israel. There can be no doubting the credibility and accuracy of their accounts on this matter. The picture they paint is light years removed from Munro's suggestion of unencumbered press freedom in Gaza. Some of the journalists in Gaza used by the BBC have been exposed as having deeply hateful views of Israel and Jews, making them entirely unsuitable as journalists. Yet there is a problem that goes far beyond any individual, if Munro and other executives cannot understand the reality of reporting from Gaza. TV producer Leo Pearlman has proposed the solution: 'The BBC make a huge deal of adding to every news script from Gaza by saying that Israel doesn't allow independent access for journalists. 'What it never says – and maybe should start doing – is that no journalist can operate freely in Gaza under Hamas control.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Windows smashed at BBC building and daubed with ‘Free Gaza' graffiti
The BBC's Newcastle headquarters has been sprayed with graffiti saying 'Free Gaza', had its windows smashed and glass doors damaged. Northumbria Police has appealed for information following the attack on the building in the early hours of Tuesday. The BBC's Look North lunchtime programme said people used hammers to smash their way into the reception area before they fled when a security guard spotted them. A post shared on social media showed graffiti on the building which said: 'Liars' and 'Free Gaza' in red paint. The force said: 'Shortly before 2.50am today, we received a report of criminal damage at a premises on Barrack Road in Newcastle. 'It was reported that red paint had been sprayed on the outside of the building earlier that morning, and damage had been caused to the front entrance doors. 'Enquiries into the report are ongoing, and anyone with information should send us a direct message on social media, or by using live chat and report forms on our website.' BBC North East and Cumbria accurately and impartially, and will continue to do so. 'We are working closely with the police who are investigating.' A clean-up operation had wiped off the graffiti by Tuesday lunchtime and workmen had made repairs to the smashed doors and windows, sweeping up glass and boarding up the damage. The BBC building, nicknamed the Pink Palace, is the home of its Look North (North East and Cumbria) TV news output and BBC Radio Newcastle.
