
What to know about the Trump tariffs upending global trade and markets
Even countries with which the U.S. enjoys trade surpluses – meaning it sells to them more than it buys, such as the United Kingdom and Argentina – are being targeted with a minimum tariff of 10%. And the highest tariffs are landing on two tiny territories that trade little with America — the African kingdom of Lesotho and the French possession of Saint Pierre and Miquelon off Canada's Atlantic coast.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
For decades, global commerce abided by tariff rates agreed to by the U.S. and 122 other countries during the 1980s and 1990s. On Wednesday, Trump detonated that arrangement, saying that other countries had exploited the system and 'ripped off'' the United States for years, causing its once-mighty manufacturing base to shrink.
Advertisement
'Our country has been looted, pillaged, raped and plundered,' the president said in the Rose Garden.
Global financial markets recoiled on Thursday. On Wall Street, the Dow Jones industrial average dropped 1,679 points, or nearly 4%, and the U.S. dollar fell against other major currencies – a sign that investors are worried about the U.S. economy.
Advertisement
'This is a game changer, not only for the U.S. economy but for the global economy,' said Olu Sonola, head of U.S. economic research for Fitch Ratings. 'Many countries will likely end up in a recession. You can throw most forecasts out the door, if this tariff rate stays on for an extended period of time.'
Trump is doing what he said he'd do
During the presidential campaign, Trump repeatedly talked about imposing a 'universal tariff'' of 10% to 20% on all imports -- and the new 10% baseline tariffs fit the description.
He also threatened to hit imports from China with 60% tariffs, and he's now slapping a 'reciprocal'' tariff of 34% on China – on top of the 20% levies he'd announced earlier this year.
Combine the new tariffs on China with the ones left over from his first term, and from President Joe Biden's, and the full tax on Chinese goods will now approach 70%, said Julian Evans-Pritchard of Capital Economics.
'It's extreme, but it aligns with what Trump campaigned on,'' said Erica York, vice president of federal tax policy at the Tax Foundation.
Nobody knows if the tariffs will prove permanent or if the U.S. will lower or drop them in response to other countries negotiating to reduce their own tariffs and other trade barriers.
U.S. tariff rates are going back more than 100 years
Even before Wednesday's bombshell, the president had been lobbing tariffs with abandon in his second term. He restored 25% tariffs from his first term on steel and aluminum, imposed 25% levies on cars and light trucks, hit China with 20% import taxes and levied 25% tariffs on some Canadian and Mexican imports.
The Budget Lab at Yale University estimates that his 2025 tariffs – including Wednesday's – would lift America's effective average tariff rate to 22.5%. That would be up from 2.5% last year and the highest level since 1909 — even higher than the notorious Smoot-Hawley tariffs that Congress passed during the Great Depression.
Advertisement
Before lawmakers ratified the 16th amendment to the Constitution in 1913, introducing a national income tax, tariffs supplied a big share of the federal government's revenue – more than 90% at times in the mid-1800s. The U.S. moved from tariffs to income taxes to raise more money to finance an expanding government, collect more revenue from the wealthy and make the economy more efficient by reducing trade barriers and encouraging competition.
Trump wants to return to those days and replace income tax collections with tariffs. Last year, tariffs accounted for less than 2% of federal revenue, while 51% came from the income tax and 36% from Social Security and Medicare taxes.
Tariffs are likely to damage the U.S. and world economies
The Yale Budget Lab estimates that Trump's 2025 tariffs will increase U.S. consumer prices by 2.3% in the short run, costing American households $3,800 a year.
The tariffs he announced on 'Liberation Day' alone will push up prices by 1.3%, the lab calculates – a $2,100 tax on households. Clothing prices will go up 17% as higher import tariffs hit textiles from Southeast Asia and Bangladesh.
The lab says that Trump's tariffs will reduce U.S. economic growth – which was 2.8% in 2024 -- by 0.9 percentage points this year.
The damage will also extend to Europe, Southeast Asia and China. 'We can expect global economic growth to start plummeting as trade flows decline, prices increase and businesses put off investments,'' said Wendy Cutler, a former U.S. trade official who is now vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute.
Advertisement
Trump hits allies and poor countries
Between the so-called reciprocal and baseline tariffs, Trump hit allies and adversaries, rich and poor countries, and those open and closed to U.S. exports.
Even Singapore, perhaps the freest-trading economy in the world, is getting slugged with the 10% levies, belying Trump's claims to be balancing other countries' protectionist policies, said Scott Lincicome, a trade analyst with the libertarian Cato Institute.
'This is not reciprocal at all,'' Lincicome said. 'Getting to real numbers on foreign trade barriers and their effects on U.S. trade numbers would require lengthy investigations and would take months, if not years, to produce. ... They might as well have pulled the numbers out of a hat.''
Taiwan, a U.S. ally, faces a 32% tariff, not much less than geopolitical rival China's 34%.
Poor countries also bore the brunt of some of Trump's most onerous tariffs.
Lesotho, a tiny country surrounded by South Africa, is facing a 50% 'reciprocal'' tariff, for example, even though its annual economic output per person is less than $2,900 (compared to America's $76,200).
Cambodia, whose annual economic output per person is about $7,200, is absorbing a 49% tariff. That is partly, the White House says, because it has been a conduit for Chinese-made goods eventually headed to the United States to dodge U.S. tariffs on China.
Canada and Mexico got off relatively easy
Trump's trade policies toward America's northern and southern neighbors has been erratic. He has twice announced and then suspended or watered down 25% tariffs on Canadian and Mexican goods, ostensibly to get them to do more than crack down on fentanyl and immigrants crossing into the U.S. illegally.
Advertisement
Last month, Trump suspended the 25% duties on Canadian and Mexican goods that comply with the US-Mexico Canada Agreement, a trade pact he negotiated with the two countries in his first term. On Wednesday, the White House said that USMCA-compliant imports could continue to enter the United States duty free.
Once the two countries have satisfied Trump's demands on immigration and drug trafficking, the tariff on the rest of their imports would drop from 25% to 12%, the White House said.
'The obvious winners were Canada and Mexico,'' Neil Shearing and Paul Ashworth of Capital Economics wrote in a commentary.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EU plan would limit Chinese device makers in Europe
This story was originally published on MedTech Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily MedTech Dive newsletter. European Union member states this week voted to support a plan to adopt measures that would restrict Chinese medical device makers' access to the EU market. The member states took the action, under the EU's International Procurement Instrument, after concluding an investigation in January that looked at China's practices in the public procurement market for medical devices. The investigation found that government practices unfairly encouraged Chinese hospitals to choose domestic manufacturers' products. 'The Commission has identified measures and practices in the Chinese procurement market that lead to discrimination against EU operators and EU-made supplies,' Olof Gill, commission spokesperson, said Thursday in an emailed statement. 'This discrimination also harms both the Chinese healthcare infrastructure, which is deprived of quality equipment, and EU businesses, with a high cost in terms of jobs and economic activity in the EU.' The commission has discussed its concerns with Chinese authorities. However, a satisfactory solution has not been proposed, and the EU had no other option than to tackle the issue through an IPI investigation, Gill wrote. The commission said it could not disclose the content of the draft IPI measure or next steps in the process. Chinese manufacturers would be prohibited from bidding on public procurement contracts worth more than 5 million euros for five years. In addition, no more than 50% of a contract's value may be subcontracted to Chinese entities or include Chinese-origin medical devices, MedTech Europe said in a statement. The trade group said it would provide further updates once the IPI measures are published in the EU's official journal. The EU investigation into China's medical device procurement practices was the first use of the IPI, which was introduced in 2022. Getting fair access to Chinese markets became more challenging for medical device companies after the country launched a program calling for domestically produced medical equipment to achieve 50% market penetration in county-level hospitals by 2020 and 70% by 2025, according to a statement from the European Chamber, which represents European businesses in China. European and Chinese leaders will meet in July at a summit in Beijing. Recommended Reading EU mulls retaliation after showing China's bias against foreign device firms Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


Politico
32 minutes ago
- Politico
Supreme Court limits outside access to DOGE records
The Supreme Court has reined in a lower-court order that allowed a watchdog group wide-ranging access to records of the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency. The high court's majority said a judge's directive allowing Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington to examine DOGE's recommendations for cost savings at executive branch agencies was 'not appropriately tailored.' In a two-page order Friday, the Supreme Court said such access was not a proper way to resolve an ongoing dispute about whether DOGE is a federal agency subject to the Freedom of Information Act or operates as a presidential advisory body that does not have to share its records with the public. 'Separation of powers concerns counsel judicial deference and restraint in the context of discovery regarding internal Executive Branch communications,' the court's majority wrote. All three of the court's liberal justices indicated they disagreed with the decision, but none provided an explanation of her views.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration to pay nearly $5M in wrongful death lawsuit of Jan. 6 rioter shot by police
The Trump administration will pay a $4.975 million settlement in the lawsuit over the wrongful death of Ashli Babbitt, who was killed by a U.S. Capitol Police officer after storming the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Babbitt — a 35-year-old from California and veteran of the Air Force who went to Washington for President Donald Trump's rally — was among an early group of rioters that reached the doors of the Speaker's Lobby, adjacent to the House chamber, while lawmakers were still evacuating. Details of the settlement were released by Judicial Watch, a pro-Trump advocacy group that represented her estate and family members in the lawsuit. The Department of Justice did not immediately respond to request to comment. The settlement is likely to inflame tensions on Capitol Hill over the riot. Outgoing Capitol Police chief Thomas Manger blasted the reported settlement last month, saying it 'sends a chilling message to law enforcement nationwide, especially to those with a protective mission like ours.' As members of the mob standing near Babbitt pounded on the doors and cracked glass window panes, outnumbered police officers stepped aside and ceded the hallway to the rioters. Moments later, Babbitt is seen on video attempting to enter the lobby through a shattered window. That's when Capitol Police officer Michael Byrd fired the fatal shot. Byrd was investigated and cleared by local and federal authorities. Babbitt was the only rioter killed by police, but several others died either during or in the hours immediately after the protest. Over 100 Capitol Police officers were injured during the protest. The lawsuit was filed in California by Babbitt's family in 2024, claiming wrongful death, assault and battery, as well as negligence claims. The lawsuit was set to go to trial in 2026, but both parties agreed to the settlement. A joint filing Friday from government attorneys and Babbitt's acknowledged that a settlement was reached, but did not disclose details. 'This fair settlement is a historic and necessary step for justice for Ashli Babbitt's family. Ashli should never have been killed, and this settlement destroys the evil, partisan narrative that justified her outrageous killing and protected her killer,' said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a press release on the settlement. Trump has repeatedly praised Babbitt, portraying her as an innocent patriot and decrying her death at the hands of Capitol police. It's part of the Trump administration's efforts to repaint the protest on Jan. 6 as a day of patriotism and freedom of expression, rather than an unprecedented insurrection widely denounced in 2021 by Republicans and Democrats. Trump issued sweeping pardons for nearly all of those charged or under investigation for their actions on Jan. 6, including over 300 charged with assaulting the police. Numerous Jan. 6 rioters have been arrested on unrelated charges since. Kyle Cheney contributed to this report.