Trump's war on Harvard shows no sign of stopping
travel ban , barring citizens from seven predominantly Muslim countries from entering the United States. Harvard's then-president, Drew Faust, issued a sharply worded open letter almost immediately, reaffirming the importance of international students and scholars to the university's 'identity and excellence'. Trump didn't respond publicly, but it is well known that he holds grudges.
Advertisement
By September that same year, then-attorney general Jeff Sessions
announced the end of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, a policy from the Obama administration for young undocumented immigrants who came to the US as children. Harvard responded the same day, with Faust writing that 'this cruel policy recognises neither justice nor mercy'. The university offered undocumented students legal counsel and advisory support.
In July 2020, as Covid-19 raged, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency declared that if classes were held online in the autumn, international students would have to leave the US or transfer to a school with in-person instruction. Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
filed a joint lawsuit
In court, Harvard made the case before US District Judge Allison Burroughs, appointed during the Obama administration, that many of its international students could not return home because of global travel restrictions. Only a week after issuing the guidance, the government
withdrew the rule
Fast forward to May 22 this year. The second Trump administration's Department of Homeland Security announced the cancellation of Harvard's eligibility to
enrol international students , citing 'fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus'. The world was stunned.
Advertisement
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
a day ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump's ‘pay-to-play' trade policy sets a dangerous precedent
Any lingering doubts about the extent to which US President Donald Trump has rewritten the rules of global trade should have been laid to rest with reports that chip giants Nvidia and AMD have agreed to pay the US government 15 per cent of the revenue from chip sales in China. The payments are a quid pro quo for approval of the export licences needed to sell semiconductors critical to China's artificial intelligence (AI) ambitions. The previously stalled licences were approved by the Commerce Department on August 8. As the US-China geostrategic rivalry has intensified in recent years, both Democratic and Republican administrations in Washington have tightened restrictions on the sale of sophisticated technologies to China. The export controls on Nvidia's H20 and AMD's MI308 chips were put in place earlier this year in response to US concerns that the chips would find their way into Chinese military applications and give Beijing a leg up in the race for AI superiority. This unprecedented arrangement with Nvidia and AMD does something which until now would have been considered incomprehensible. It monetises US trade policy. Companies are essentially paying the US government for approval to export their products.
South China Morning Post
a day ago
- South China Morning Post
The Europe-China trade relationship: deficits, disputes and de-risking
When Donald Trump took office as US president for the second time in January 2025, many people anticipated trade ties between the European Union (EU) and China to grow closer. The reality has been more complex. As the world's third-largest economy, the EU navigates choppy waters between the US and China, while facing a widening trade imbalance with China and increasingly assertive Chinese trade measures. The EU seeks to 'de-risk' as trade talks with China remain stiff and trade disputes between the European bloc and China remain unsolved. What are the core issues at stake and where is this vital partnership heading?
South China Morning Post
a day ago
- South China Morning Post
At Trump's request, West Virginia sending National Guard troops to Washington
West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrisey is deploying 300 to 400 National Guard troops to the District of Columbia at the request of the Trump administration, the governor's office said on Saturday. The deployment is 'a show of commitment to public safety and regional cooperation' and will include providing equipment and specialised training alongside the 'approximately 300 to 400 skilled personnel as directed', Morrisey's office said in a statement. Drew Galang, a spokesman for Morrisey, said the state's National Guard received the order to send equipment and personnel to Washington late on Friday and was working to organise the deployment. Earlier this week, US President Donald Trump said he was deploying hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington and temporarily taking over the city's police department to curb what he depicted as a crime and homelessness emergency in the nation's capital. A White House official said on Saturday that more National Guard troops would be called in to Washington to 'protect federal assets, create a safe environment for law enforcement officials to carry out their duties when required, and provide a visible presence to deter crime'. A US official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said a formal order was expected to go out that would authorise National Guard troops in Washington to carry firearms. The official said this order would affect mostly military police officers with side arms.
