Apple sues YouTuber over leaked details of unreleased iPhone update
Apple said in the lawsuit filed on Thursday, opens new tab that Michael Ramacciotti used an Apple employee's phone to send details about the forthcoming iOS 26 to Prosser, who outlined the confidential updates in a video on his YouTube page Front Page Tech.
Prosser told Reuters on Friday that he "certainly did not 'plot' to steal information nor did I know how it was obtained originally." He said he looked forward to presenting his side of the case to the court.
Ramacciotti and a spokesperson for Front Page Tech did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the complaint on Friday. A spokesperson for Apple declined to comment.
Prosser first disclosed details of iOS 26, which Apple is set to release this fall, in a YouTube video in January. According to the complaint, Prosser convinced Ramacciotti — a product analyst and video editor who Apple said "needed money" — to break into his Apple employee friend's phone and send Prosser secret information about the new operating system.
Apple said that an anonymous whistleblower told the company about the scheme in April.
The company in its lawsuit requested an unspecified amount of monetary damages and a court order for Prosser and Ramacciotti to stop using its trade secrets.
The case is Apple Inc v. Ramacciotti, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:25-cv-06043.
For Apple: Richard Hung and Mary Prendergast of Morrison & Foerster
For Prosser and Ramacciotti: attorney information not yet available
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Stephen Colbert hit with another insult
Stephen Colbert 's enormous ego has been slammed by a person close to David Ellison, the Oracle billionaire scion soon set to take over Paramount and CBS News. 'The news lost its way - it became extreme, elitist, and performative,' the unnamed insider told The Financial Times Wednesday. 'People like Colbert and others act like they're the IP [intellectual property], the value, when it's the brand and journalism that matter. 'We need to get back to fundamentals,' the source said following a decade of spiels from the left-leaning satirist. 'That's what David and his team believe.' The insider then proclaimed that Ellison plans to 'bring back a performance-based culture' to CBS, as seen during 'the days of Edward R Murrow and Walter Cronkite'. 'Not quotas. Not ideology. Just objective journalism,' the source insisted. Another person close to Ellison said a prominent, right-leaning ex-New York Times opinion writer the company was reportedly in talks with earlier this month, Bari Weiss, could 'be a key voice but not the only voice' to the company's newsroom. Weiss has surfaced a fierce critic of legacy media after leaving the Times in 2020. The Times reported Weiss is seeking $200million for a spot in the company. Ellison, meanwhile, is the 42-year-old son of Larry Ellison, a long-time Republican donor worth roughly $300billion. He is an actor turned producer with no background in news, but is bolstered by his deputy, former NBCUniversal exec Jeff Shell. The talks surrounding Weiss, reported by publications like the New York Times earlier this month, served as the first hint at the type of company both are trying to create. The cancellation of Colbert's show, moreover, had not involved either of them, insiders told the Financial Times. Instead, the decision was made by Paramount co-chief executive George Cheeks, they said - corroborating accounts provided to Puck, who reported last week that The Late Show has been losing at least $40million annually. Shari Redstone, Paramount's controlling shareholder, was only informed the decision before Colbert made the announcement on-air, insiders told the Financial Times. Colbert, meanwhile, was first informed his show was on the chopping block around July 4, Puck reported. He will broadcast his final show in May 2026, after ten years of politically charged content. Such content often came at the expense of the current president, who earlier this month accepted a $16million settlement of his $20billion lawsuit against CBS News. The move was panned by many - Colbert included - as a means to secure FCC approval for a then-still pending merger with Skydance. Colbert, on-air on July 14, called it 'a big, fat bribe'. Days later, he was delivering the news of his show's cancellation. CBS said that after years of declining ratings and ad revenue, the show was losing money. The same can be said about the shows of fellow late night hosts Jimmy Fallon and Seth Meyers, which, when combined with the network's iconic sketch comedy series SNL , loses the network an eye-watering $100 million-plus a year, insiders told CNBC. An insider pushed back against the $100 million loss figure when contacted by the Daily Mail. They insisted the loss figure 'comes down quite a bit' when other revenue streams including digital advertising are factored in, while effectively conceding that the shows still fail to break even. ABC late-night host Jimmy Kimmel 's show remains profitable, when non-traditional TV advertising revenue is taken into account. Colbert, 61, gets paid somewhere between $15 million and $20 million a year to host. Shell - Ellison's de facto consigliere - was ousted from his post as NBCU's CEO in 2023 after his years-long extramarital affair with a then-staffer was exposed. He previously urged then CBS execs Bill Owens and Wendy McMahon to bow to some of Trump's requests following the filing his 60 Minutes lawsuit in October, like providing the full transcript of the 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris in question. They refused, Status first reported. Both have since resigned.
Reuters
9 minutes ago
- Reuters
US securities regulator lays out sweeping plans to accommodate crypto
July 31 (Reuters) - The head of the U.S. securities regulator unveiled sweeping plans to overhaul capital markets regulations on Thursday to accommodate cryptocurrencies and blockchain-based trading, in a major win for the digital asset industry, which has long pushed for tailored rules. Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Paul Atkins said in remarks that he has directed commission staff to craft guidelines to determine when a crypto token is a security as well as proposals for a wide range of disclosures and exemptions. Atkins also said he has asked SEC staff to work with firms looking to offer tokenized securities -- blockchain-based shares of stocks or funds. "This represents more than a regulatory shift — it is a generational opportunity," Atkins said in a speech before the America First Policy Institute, a think tank that was created to support President Donald Trump's policy agenda. If enacted, Atkins' proposals would represent a broad shift for U.S. securities regulation, potentially enabling crypto to become more enmeshed with traditional finance. Details of his plans for crypto come just a day after a cryptocurrency working group formed by Trump called on the SEC to create new rules specific to digital assets and outlined the administration's stances on market-defining crypto legislation. In a landmark report, the White House encouraged the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to use their existing authorities to "immediately enable the trading of digital assets at the federal level." On the campaign trail last year, Trump courted crypto cash by pledging to be a "crypto president" and promote the adoption of digital assets. That is in stark contrast to former Democratic President Joe Biden's regulators, who, in a bid to protect Americans from fraud and money laundering, cracked down on the industry. The Biden administration's SEC sued exchanges Coinbase (COIN.O), opens new tab, Binance, and dozens more, alleging they were flouting U.S. laws. Trump's SEC has since dropped those cases.
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Here's where an Uber ride will cost you the most
Taking Ubers is getting expensive across the nation but a half-hour ride in certain states and cities is going to do far more damage to your wallet than in others, according to a new analysis. Net Credit collected the average price of a 30-minute ride in an Uber in locations across the U.S., and found ride-share passengers in Washington state are paying the most, with a half-hour drive costing on average $53.46. On the other side of the list is Indiana, where the average half-hour ride in an Uber will cost around $30.35. Other states with less expensive rides include Texas at $30.96, Utah at $30.71, and Oklahoma at $31.54. But a ride in plenty of other states is going to cost upwards of $40. The average price of a half-hour Uber ride in California, Oregon, Wyoming, Montana, Louisiana, Alabama, Delaware, New Jersey, and New York are all at least $40, and rides in several other states — South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arkansas, and Nevada — will cost just under that mark. When it comes to individual cities, Seattle tops the list as the most expensive city for a half-hour Uber ride. In Seattle a half-hour ride costs almost $60, according to the analysis. The nine next most expensive cities for Ubers aren't necessarily each the sprawling, wildly expensive, cities one might expect. Those are Cheyenne, Reno, New York City, San Diego, Baton Rouge, Newark, Anchorage, San Jose, and Portland. The cheapest overall city for Uber for a half-hour ride is Indianapolis where it'll cost around $28.33. Following Indianapolis, the most affordable cities for taking an Uber are Fort Worth, Tucson, Mesa, Omaha, Miami, Oklahoma City, Raleigh, Houston, and Memphis. According to Net Credit, the price of Uber rides increased by 7.2 percent across the country in 2024. Net Credit noted that part of what may be driving down prices in Indianapolis is the appearance of a competitor, inDrive, which allows riders to propose a price for their ride, and drivers can counter-bid for a higher fee. 'We're giving both the driver and passenger the freedom to kind of choose their own adventure," Adam Warner, the company's head of U.S. operations, told Net Credit. 'So you get to select the driver. Are you willing to wait 10 minutes for this person to pick you up in a Tesla Model Y, or are you comfortable with the Chevy Malibu that's only two minutes away to pick you up?' Net Credit also worked out which city's Uber costs were the most and least expensive relative to the average wages of its residents. The city with the most affordable Uber rides — relative to its residents' average hourly wage — is Washington, D.C., where a 30-minute trip will still cost riders 106.5 percent of their average hourly wage. Following the nation's capital, the most affordable cities for Ubering relative to residents' average hourly wages include San Jose, San Francisco, Fort Worth, Indianapolis, Stamford, Raleigh, Boston, Mesa, and Baltimore. The least affordable city was determined to be Cheyenne, Wyoming, where a ride is 224 percent of a resident's average hourly wage. Reno, Baton Rouge, New Orleans, Jackson, Seattle, Fresno, Las Vegas, Augusta, and Buffalo made up the rest of the list.
