logo
US Sharpens Spy Plane Tactics With Pacific Ally

US Sharpens Spy Plane Tactics With Pacific Ally

Miami Herald7 days ago

The United States recently deployed a spy plane to Australia-its South Pacific ally-to strengthen its ability to conduct intelligence gathering from a forward-deployed location.
The late-May deployment was part of Exercise RECCE-Edge 25, the U.S. Air Force 18th Wing-host unit at Kadena Air Base in Japan-announced in a news release on Tuesday, which reinforced the role of delivering "timely, reliable intelligence" from any location.
The U.S. Air Force has been actively conducting surveillance missions in the western Pacific Ocean, particularly over waters bordering China. It has deployed various reconnaissance aircraft to Kadena Air Base, a strategic hub for projecting U.S. airpower in the region.
The recent temporary deployment to Australia follows a Pentagon report on Chinese military power, which assessed that Beijing has expanded its ballistic missile force capable of striking U.S. military bases in Japan-including airfields lacking fortifications to protect aircraft.
Newsweek has reached out to the Chinese Defense Ministry for comment by email.
A team of 55 airmen and an RC-135V Rivet Joint reconnaissance aircraft were deployed to an air force base in Darwin, northern Australia, from May 19 to 23, according to the 18th Wing. The airmen were assigned to the 82nd Expeditionary Reconnaissance Squadron.
Although the squadron is part of the 55th Wing at Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska, it has operated out of Kadena Air Base since January 1968. It is responsible for conducting aerial intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance missions across the Indo-Pacific region.
RECCE-Edge 25 focused on "enhancing agile force capabilities, intelligence gathering, and joint interoperability," according to the news release, allowing the unit to strengthen tactics and sustain reconnaissance operations while operating from a forward-deployed location.
The forward-deployed team demonstrated its ability to rapidly deploy and sustain "high-tempo reconnaissance missions" from the remote location by achieving full operational capability in just under 12 hours after arriving in Darwin from Japan, the 18th Wing said.
U.S. Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Michael Ellsworth, director of operations of the 82nd Expeditionary Reconnaissance Squadron, described Darwin as an ideal location for such forward deployment, adding that the Australian ally offers a "close and secure" location.
By operating out of Darwin, this ensured the squadron's capabilities reach across the Indo-Pacific region, said U.S. Air Force Major Robert Anglin, assistant director of operations of the 82nd Expeditionary Reconnaissance Squadron, "no matter how far we are from home."
The RC-135V Rivet Joint is equipped with a sensor suite to detect, identify, and geolocate electronic signals, according to a U.S. Air Force fact sheet. This "highly specialized signals intelligence platform" is capable of delivering real-time intelligence, the 18th Wing added.
U.S. Air Force Major Robert Anglin, the 82nd Expeditionary Reconnaissance Squadron assistant director of operations, said: "The Rivet Joint is a high-value asset and crucial to maintaining our reconnaissance capabilities, so it's very important that we're able to get it up and running quickly."
The U.S. Air Force 18th Wing commented: "The [82nd Expeditionary Reconnaissance Squadron] demonstrated its ability to operate and perform their duties in any location while proving the importance of cooperation with trusted partners to uphold regional stability and maintain intelligence superiority."
In addition to Australia, it remains to be seen whether U.S. spy planes stationed in Japan will operate from other forward locations in allied territories across the western Pacific region.
Related Articles
'Game-Changing' Anti-Ship Weapon Tested by US Stealth BomberIran to Counter US Nuclear Offer as Trump Sends New WarningHooters Closing Locations Across US: Full List of Restaurants Shutting DownJeffrey Epstein Video Release: What Footage Shows of His Death
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Global Times: Japanese textbooks contain misleading descriptions regarding the causes of WWII, says Japanese civil group
Global Times: Japanese textbooks contain misleading descriptions regarding the causes of WWII, says Japanese civil group

Associated Press

time44 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Global Times: Japanese textbooks contain misleading descriptions regarding the causes of WWII, says Japanese civil group

06/11/2025, Beijing, China // KISS PR Brand Story PressWire // A Japanese civil group said in an exclusive interview with the Global Times on Tuesday that Japanese junior high school history textbooks contain inaccurate descriptions regarding the causes of World War II. The group warned that Japan's current lack of responsibility in addressing historical issues could make it difficult for Japanese young people to understand the true history of the war and to critically examine the essence of contemporary social issues. Since April, junior high schools across Japan started to use new textbooks. The changes to the way World War II is described have sparked concern and unease among the Children and Textbooks Japan Network 21, a non-governmental organization formed in 1998 that has long been focusing on issues surrounding textbook approval and the presentation of war history in Japan. 'We reviewed junior high school history textbooks published by Tokyo Shoseki, Kyoiku Shuppan, Teikoku-Shoin, Yamakawa Shuppansha, Nihon Bunkyo Shuppan, and Manabisha. Among them, only Manabisha's version explicitly writes that 'Japan started the war,' while most textbooks used descriptions like 'the war began,'' Yoko Kojiya, secretary-general of the organization, told the Global Times on Tuesday via email, noting this expression makes it difficult for students to understand and contemplate why Japan started the war and how it proceeded with colonial rule. Kojiya pointed out particularly that the descriptions in textbooks about Japan's invasion of China are not sufficiently detailed. Also, the content about why Japan went to war with the US and the UK in 1941 is problematic because it is described as 'Japan had to go to war due to being isolated by the ABCD [America, Britain, China and Dutch] encirclement.' Kojiya said to better teach history and allow Japanese students to grasp war history more fully and impartially, it's vital to enable discussions on why Japan started the wars and how Japanese people should prevent such conflicts from happening in the future. 'Therefore, it is necessary to provide a large amount of historical material to help understand the nature of war.' Kojiya also highlighted the changes concerning the 'Nanjing Massacre' and 'comfort women,' slamming Japanese government's textbook screening policy as political interference in educational content. 'The term 'Nanjing Massacre' is used in fewer textbooks nowadays, with many referring to it as the 'Nanjing Incident' instead. And the number of people massacred is accompanied by caveats such as 'there are various opinions' or that the number 'is being researched,'' Kojiya said. The Nanjing Massacre is one of the darkest chapters of World War II. The atrocities began on December 13, 1937, when Japanese troops captured the then-Chinese capital Nanjing, unleashing six weeks of devastation that claimed the lives of an estimated 300,000 civilians and unarmed soldiers, according to Xinhua. Regarding 'comfort women,' Kojiya said that the removal of the term 'accompanying the military' in the textbooks aims to hide the fact that these women were forced into sexual servitude by the Japanese military. 'The National History Textbook published by ReiwaShoseki even writes 'There is no evidence of Japanese troops forcibly taking away women.' I consider it a serious problem that this passed the government screening without any objections,' Kojiya said. The 'comfort women' system was a military sexual slavery regime enforced by the Japanese government and its military during World War II. It resulted in at least 400,000 innocent women worldwide being forced into sexual slavery. Nearly half of them were Chinese, according to Xinhua. According to Xinhua, in 2021, the Japanese government decided through a cabinet meeting to deem expressions such as 'comfort women accompanying the military' as 'inappropriate textbook terminology.' Japan's education authority subsequently requested modifications to related teaching materials, including those already distributed. Kojiya told the Global Times that it is a serious problem that the descriptions in Japanese history textbooks can be greatly influenced by the policies of the government at any given time. 'The current textbook screening in Japan is not focusing on pointing out academic errors, but rather on whether the descriptions align with government inclinations,' said Kojiya. This year marks the 80th anniversary of victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War. On May 31, the organization held a seminar in Tokyo to discuss the proper role of Japanese history education eight decades after the war. According to the seminar material Kojiya sent to the Global Times, during the seminar, Hisao Ishiyama, former chairman of the History Educationalist Conference of Japan, said that since 2014, forces that glorify war and distort history started to utilize the deteriorated textbook system and government power to launch a government-wide effort to distort the entire population's understanding of history. In response to this challenge, Kojiya told the Global Times that she is especially worried about the rise of conservative forces, such as the 'Tsukurukai,' which attack reflection on the war and the pacifism of the constitution, advocate for a constitutional amendment, and push forward policies aimed at expanding military capabilities to build Japan into a country that can wage war. 'Thus, it is crucial to squarely face the historical facts of aggression on the basis of the reflection that led to the creation of the Japanese Constitution, and to gather the strength of people who wish to stop policies that will make Japan a 'war state',' Kojiya said. This story first appeared in Global Times:

What do tariffs on fireworks mean for July Fourth and America's 250th in 2026?
What do tariffs on fireworks mean for July Fourth and America's 250th in 2026?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

What do tariffs on fireworks mean for July Fourth and America's 250th in 2026?

Tariffs on China, which produces the vast majority of the world's fireworks, aren't expected to noticeably affect this year's Fourth of July displays in Maryland. However, the companies behind the shows are already worried about supply — and even their own viability — as the U.S. prepares to mark its 250th birthday in 2026. Before President Donald Trump drastically increased tariffs on Chinese imports in February, Tim Jameson was looking to 2026 to be a 'once in a lifetime hit' for his Charles County firework company, promising 'the largest revenue stream we could possibly have.' But now he says that his company of five full-time employees and 60 part-timers, Innovative Pyrotechnic Concepts, will be forced to close after exhausting its inventory on semiquincentennial displays, unless tariffs on China are lifted by late summer. China manufactures about 90% of professional display fireworks and 99% of consumer fireworks used in the United States, according to the American Pyrotechnics Association. Historically, fireworks imported from China have faced duties of about 5%. As part of a broader trade war, this year President Donald Trump placed large tariffs on goods from China – going as high as 145% with combined tariff rules. While the highest tariffs are under a 90-day pause through August, the fireworks industry has remained fragile with 30% tariffs on imports from China since mid-May. Just this week, Trump announced a deal with China that would include a 55% tariff on all Chinese goods coming to the United States. 'It's the uncertainty that really makes it a challenge for small businesses,' said Julie Heckman, executive director of the American Pyrotechnics Association. Despite the uneasiness for the industry during its busiest time of year, tariffs did not change how much organizers are paying for large Baltimore-area public displays next month like those over Baltimore's Inner Harbor, Annapolis' Spa Creek, and Columbia's Lake Kittamaqundi. Spectators shouldn't notice anything different about the displays, organizers said. The fireworks for Baltimore City's display were ordered before the tariffs hit, said Michaela O'Gallagher, the creative services director for Image Engineering, the firework company working with the city. An Annapolis spokesperson said the city got the quote from its contractor in December. Contracts made months in advance have meant that some firework companies across the country have had to absorb costs from tariffs. This year and next year, some will likely have to do slightly shorter firework shows or use fewer shells to make their displays still happen with limited budgets, according to Heckman and Steve Houser, a former president of the National Fireworks Association and current counselor to the organization. But these changes, Heckman said, will likely be undetectable to the average viewer. Some companies, including Jameson's, have multi-year contracts with municipalities and worry about tariffs affecting their ability to deliver shows at the same budget. 'I can't just go in and raise prices,' Jameson said. 'It's going to be a dead loss if we ship this stuff.' Because of the dependence on China, the fireworks industry operates about a year in advance, starting with ordering product, according to Houser. Contracts for big Independence Day displays are signed in the fall and product ships from about mid-February to May, he said. When the heavy tariffs went into effect, many businesses told their suppliers in China not to ship, creating a backlog. Stock filled up in warehouses, leading manufacturers to stop production. As some firework businesses have started to accept having to pay the 30% tariffs to get their product in, they are also dealing with higher shipping costs as companies compete for the limited space for hazardous cargo on container ships. Jameson said he has paid for two containers' worth of fireworks that are sitting in China waiting to ship. He usually sells four to five containers worth of fireworks per year – used for displays in Montgomery County, Prince George's County, Maryland's Eastern Shore and Northern Virginia. For next year, he says he likely will only be able to sell the two currently idled containers. 'We're going to be able to take whatever shows we can get with that amount of product and call it a day,' Jameson said. 'There's just no way to recoup.' In 2026, Houser predicts a 30% to 40% increase in demand for fireworks as municipalities and individuals prepare to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the United States. Big businesses and small businesses, Jameson said, won't be able to fulfill that demand. When Trump went up against China in a trade war in 2019, there was an exception for firework imports. This year's tariffs, however, were made under an emergency declaration which provided no opportunity for the industry to formally apply for exceptions. The American Pyrotechnics Association and the National Fireworks Association have jointly asked the Trump administration for a similar exemption or a reduced tariff rate. Houser, from the NFA, said the tariffs don't help the fireworks industry because the United States has never been a major manufacturer of fireworks. U.S. regulatory standards, lack of supplies and labor costs prevent the industry from pivoting to domestic manufacturing, according to a joint letter to Trump from the APA and NFA. 'There's no other place to get them from, no other countries we can run to,' Houser said. Have a news tip? Contact Katharine Wilson at kwilson@

Joint House panel puts the screws to Marshall battery plant project
Joint House panel puts the screws to Marshall battery plant project

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Joint House panel puts the screws to Marshall battery plant project

Christin Armstrong and Josh Hundt of the Michigan Economic Development Corporation take questions at a joint meeting of the House Oversight Subcommittees on Homeland Security and Foreign Influence, Corporate Subsidies and State Investments on June 11, 2025. | Kyle Davidson Members of two separate House Oversight subcommittees joined together on Wednesday as representatives continued their interrogation of incentives for battery manufacturing projects across the state. Up for discussion was the Marshall BlueOval Battery Park. Announced in 2023, the $3.5 billion project was initially expected to create 2,500 jobs, though Republicans have raised alarms about the project due to a licensing agreement between plant-owner Ford and a Chinese battery company. Earlier this year, Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd. or CATL – who has agreed to license its battery technology to Ford for production at the facility – was placed on the U.S. Department of Defense's list of 'Chinese military companies' found to be operating directly or indirectly within the U.S. As a result the company is barred from entering contracts with the Department of Defense. When Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin rejected Ford's bid to establish the plant in his state due to its ties to CATL, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer said he made a political determination and emphasized that Michigan would continue to compete for every economic opportunity. She later celebrated when Michigan was selected as the site for the project calling it a 'generational investment.' While the Michigan Economic Development Corporation was aware of the project's ties to CATL prior to awarding funding to Blue Oval for the project, the Chinese company's involvement was not a secret, the corporation's Chief Operating and Performance Officer Christin Armstrong said. Armstrong and the corporation's Senior Project Marketing Advisor Josh Hundt each noted China's near-monopoly on battery technology, with Ford aiming to bring that technology to the U.S. to break their control of the electric vehicle market. However, members of the committees questioned why the automaker hadn't simply partnered with companies from non-hostile nations like Japan or South Korea instead. Ford did not respond to an emailed request for comment. While it would greatly benefit the U.S. to develop its own technology to boost America's electric vehicle manufacturing, the Economic Development Corporation views the project as a way for Ford to make its vehicles more competitive, providing it with access to battery technology and employment for American workers, Hundt said. With U.S. Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Holly) introducing legislation to subject vehicles and vehicle parts manufactured in countries of concern like China to a security review, Rep. Luke Meerman (R-Coopersville) asked whether concerns at the national level factored into the economic development corporation's decision making. Hundt explained that by utilizing CATL's tech, Ford avoids the alternative of importing batteries from China, allowing the automaker to reduce its dependency on China and other foreign manufacturers. 'Our role is to help make sure that we are seeing a disruption of this current Chinese monopoly that, frankly, nobody wants to see,' Hundt said. 'We need to see both the technology and the manufacturing take place here, and this is a way to begin to make that happen.' Joe Cella, who served as the U.S. Ambassador to Fiji during President Donald Trump's first term, raised further concerns about potential threats from the Chinese government. 'I will preface my remarks by stating that China is on the hunt, and our footing nationally and the states is not commensurate with this threat,' Cella said, referencing three Chinese citizens with ties to the University of Michigan who were arrested for smuggling biological agents into the country. He pointed to requirements in Chinese law demanding Chinese-based companies, no matter where they are located, to surveil, collect and report as directed. 'In other words, conduct espionage,' Cella said, previously noting that CATL had begun hiring for positions at the Marshall plant through its U.S.-based subsidiary. Should this deal ever come to fruition in Michigan, it would only be a matter of time until espionage begins, Cella said, noting that Battle Creek Air National Guard Base and Fort Custer are located nearby. Alongside questions on Ford's deal with CATL, Armstrong and Hundt fielded questions on the specifics of the project following Ford's decision to downsize the effort. Now expected to deliver 1,700 jobs rather than 2,500, Armstrong said the project is still underway, with plans to wrap construction and start hiring by 2026. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store