HC ultimatum to BMC to install pollution indicators at construction sites
The Bombay High Court on Tuesday said the BMC should ensure pollution indicators are installed within six weeks at construction sites where work is in progress and they should be centrally connected, failing which it would proceed to pass adverse orders against the authorities.
This came after the intervenor in a suo motu PIL, raising concerns over 'alarming' air pollution levels in Mumbai and surrounding areas, claimed no devices were installed despite a January 9 order of the HC. The HC had then directed that 'if such devices are not installed in regard to construction units within a period of one month, action be taken against such units, including closing down of such constructions, till the compliances are achieved.'
On Tuesday, a division bench of Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Makarand S Karnik was informed by senior advocate Milind Sathe, representing the BMC, that it has initiated steps for installation of pollution indicators at construction sites.
Sathe added that to connect such devices or monitors centrally and to evolve surveillance, the civic body has consulted experts from IIT-Bombay and IIT-Kanpur and before the next date of hearing, appropriate steps to implement the HC's January 9 directions will be taken.
Senior advocate Janak Dwarkadas for NGO Vanashakti, intervening in the matter, argued that despite the court directions, the indicators are not yet installed at construction sites.
'We will give them a month's time or else we will proceed against them,' CJ Aradhe orally remarked.
'These devices have to be installed on all construction sites. If they have not done it, stop construction. Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) have to be in place for all constructions. The order is in the form of direction to you. It does not permit you to take time to consult IIT etc,' Justice Karnik orally told the BMC. Sathe clarified that consultation sought was only pertaining to the centrally connecting the indicators and steps are being taken to install the indicators. He also said that the BMC should consult IITs concerned on the issue of desirability of installing CCTVs at construction sites.
'We are inclined to grant six-week further time to implement directions of January 9 order,' the bench noted in its order.
Senior advocate Darius Khambata, appointed as Amicus Curiae to assist the court in the matter, said the MPCB has completed the audit for red-category (highly polluting) industries, however it had not submitted the audit report. Senior advocate Ashutosh Kumbhakoni for the MPCB submitted that the audit report will be placed on record before the next hearing and the board will also proceed to conduct audit in respect of orange category industries.
Khambata further submitted that in the Khairani Nagar area of suburban Chandivali, 'bhattis' are causing severe pollution and in Ulhasnagar area, air quality measuring stations are not properly working or have been reporting outdated data.
Moreover, he said that in Ulhasnagar, fire continues to break out in open dumping ground and garbage burning remains unabated on banks of Waldhuni river and firecrackers are continuously burst in the area.
The MPCB said it will consider the issue regarding the pollution at the two places and will initiate immediate preventive measures to curb pollution. The court asked the authorities to file affidavits in compliance of its orders to be filed by June 12 and posted further hearing to June 17.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
‘Not in line with rationalisation': Interim stay on transfer of one govt school teacher by HC
Raipur: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted an interim stay on the transfer order of a govt primary school teacher. The court directed the authorities to decide on the teacher's representation within seven days. This comes at a time when protests against the state govt's rationalisation policy are ongoing and several teachers have also moved HC against rationalisation orders, There will be a separate hearing for the other petitions. The petition was filed against the transfer order dated 2 June 2025, which moved the petitioner from Government Abhyas Primary School, Mahasamund, to Government Primary School, Fooljhar, in Bagbahara block. The petitioner's counsel argued that the transfer order was not in line with the rationalisation transfer policy and should therefore be set aside. The counsel also stated that the petitioner filed a representation with the competent authority, which was not yet considered. The court was urged to direct the authority to decide the representation within a specific timeframe. State counsel informed the court that the petitioner's representation would be considered and decided in accordance with the law within seven days. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Unglaublich: Der Rechner zeigt sofort den Wert Ihres Hauses an [schauen Sie sich das an] Hauswert Undo After hearing both sides, Justice Arvind Kumar Verma directed the competent authority to decide the petitioner's representation by 10 June 2025, if it was not already decided. Until then, the transfer order of 2 June 2025 will remain in abeyance. The writ petition was disposed of with this observation and direction to the authorities. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Tying the knot tighter: Video proof, priest affidavit now must for marriage certs in UP
Ghaziabad: UP govt has announced significant reforms in its marriage registration policy, mandating video evidence of ceremonies and physical verification of priests. The new directives, issued on Friday following an Allahabad High Court order, said priests must now submit notarised affidavits, appear as witnesses on behalf of couples at registration offices and possess a pen drive containing videos of the marriage. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Marriage registrars would now accept applications from couples only if one of them is a permanent resident of that particular district. The govt move follows an HC order from May 12, seeking to address a rise in forged certificates and false identity documents linked to bogus marriages. The court was hearing a writ petition filed by a Greater Noida couple who claimed to have got married in Arya Samaj Mandir in June last year and secured a registration certificate in Ghaziabad. During the course of the hearing, the court found that the certificate lacked the priest's name, the registered address of the Arya Samaj Mandir, and details of witnesses. The couple also did not appear before the local police, but sent a request seeking protection from their families from the post-office located on the HC premises. The HC ordered a probe into widespread irregularities in the state's marriage registration system, particularly in districts like Ghaziabad, Noida and Prayagraj. The scale of the problem became evident when the probe revealed that Ghaziabad alone recorded 29,022 marriages between Aug 2023 and Aug 2024 – nearly 10 times more than other key districts like Prayagraj (2,019), Gorakhpur (2,284), and Varanasi (2,711). More startlingly, smaller districts like Shrawasti and Chitrakoot registered only 51 and 112 marriages, respectively, during the same period. The investigations also revealed that couples from places like Ahmedabad claimed to have solemnised their marriages in Maharashtra, yet obtained registrations in Ghaziabad to secure court protection orders. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In these cases, supporting documents such as Aadhaar and PAN cards often turned out to be forged or altered. Other fraudulent practices included certificates issued by non-existent societies, fictitious witnesses, and cases where minors were presented as adult brides. The HC also observed that the Uttar Pradesh Marriage Registration Rules, 2017, offered limited safeguards. For instance, these rules did not require applicants to declare specific customs observed during the wedding, while the digital registration portal provided no means for marriage officers to reject suspicious requests or track those denied. Concerned about widespread exploitation of these gaps, the HC recommended amendments to the 2017 rules. Until then, the measures announced by the govt will stay. "Under the new directives, marriage registration applications will only be accepted from couples if any one present with them is a permanent resident of the district where they are applying. This applies to either the bride, groom, or their parents. Temporary accommodation documents, such as unregistered rent agreements, will no longer be considered valid proof of residence," said Pushpendra Kumar, assistant inspector-general (AIG, stamps), Ghaziabad. In cases where a couple register their marriage without parental consent, the priest who performs the ceremony must be physically present at the time of registration. "They need to submit affidavits with complete details and video evidence," Kumar said. The notification, signed by inspector-general (stamps) Sameer Verma, allows marriage officials some flexibility if parents or adult family members from both sides are present. "If parents or adult family members of both parties are present and vouch for the marriage, the marriage registration officer may waive the video and priest affidavit requirements, provided they're satisfied with the marriage's authenticity," the notification read. Each registration performed under the new rules would have a special stamp, while the priest's affidavit and related documents would be subject to thorough verification. District offices would have to maintain a separate register containing credentials of the priest, such as their Aadhaar details, phone numbers, and photographs. "We applied the residency rule locally in Ghaziabad back in April in keeping with the high court's interim directions. The other rules will also be implemented with immediate effect," AIG Kumar told TOI.
India Today
5 hours ago
- India Today
Disputes emerge in Mumbai housing societies over goat sacrifice on Bakri Eid
As Mumbai prepares to celebrate Eid-al-Adha on Saturday, several housing societies in the city are witnessing disputes over permissions to sacrifice al-Adha or Bakri Eid is celebrated by the Muslim community as the festival of sacrifice. On this day, people traditionally sacrifice animals such as goats, sheep, or camels, and distribute the meat among family, friends, and those in issues have arisen following the enforcement of Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) guidelines and growing objections from residents and neighbouring societies. On Thursday, the BMC's P South Ward office revoked the no-objection certificate (NOC) earlier granted to a housing society in Gokuldham, Goregaon East, after receiving objections from nearby civic body cited the presence of another slaughtering location within a 1-kilometre radius as the reason for the Priti Satam, who led a delegation to the BMC, said, 'In Satellite Society, Gokul Dham, permission was given for goat slaughter during Eid in open space. We met the ward officer and told him that you have given permission for slaughter in open space.'She added that the BMC acted according to its guidelines, which prohibit slaughter within 1 km of a religious structure or in an open space. 'We are thankful to BMC for respecting our religious sentiments. Festivals should be celebrated following guidelines,' Satam similar dispute reached the Bombay High Court after BMC denied permission to Maitri Society in Damodar Park, Ghatkopar West. The residents, who have been conducting sacrifices at the same location for years, approached the court. On Friday, the vacation bench directed the society to reapply for permission and instructed the BMC to decide on the application the same Kaif Mujawar, representing Maitri Society residents, said, 'We informed the honourable court that we have been getting permissions at the same location for past many years. Designated place for slaughtering is small and cramped. There is a limitation on number of goats that can be slaughtered there. Court has asked the society to reapply for the permission. We have faith in judiciary. In other cases, as per the guidelines even if there is a mosque nearby, permission is denied. Permissions once given are being revoked under political pressure.'In another case, a senior citizen from Kurla (W) filed a complaint alleging illegal animal slaughter in residential premises in Kurla's Naupada, citing hygiene per High Court directions, the BMC has issued guidelines specifying four categories of places where slaughtering is permitted upon obtaining an NOC — designated marketplaces, community spaces, privately owned premises, and housing if a community slaughtering space, including a religious one, is within 1 km walking distance from a housing society, then the NOC cannot be granted.
