
Sturgeon's ‘Stalinist' approach disastrous for SNP, claims Joanna Cherry
She said that unlike her predecessor Alex Salmond, Ms Sturgeon had shut down debate within the party on strategy and policy discussions, and that 'it was her way or the highway', and dissenters were viewed with 'deep suspicion'.
The former Edinburgh South West MP added that she had never been friends with Ms Sturgeon, but that their differences were political rather than personal.
'I've never been close to her. This is not a personality clash. This is a clash based on the way that we do politics,' she said.
'I believe in open debates and discussion. And I don't think she does. I think she was Stalinist in the way in which she ran the party and the country.'
She also criticised Ms Sturgeon's strategy for securing a Scottish independence in the post-Brexit period, when she said she 'repeatedly' pursued a mandate for a second referendum from the UK Government without considering a plan B.
'The ideal thing would have been to get a second referendum, but it was unwise to close down other options, and we needed to discuss other options,' Ms Cherry said.
'She never wanted to discuss a plan B, and she never wanted to discuss the possibility of treating an election as a de facto referendum.
'And when she eventually decided to do that, it was only because she'd run out of options, and she did it without any debate or discussion.'
She added: 'The reason that I feel that her strategy failed and was so wrong was it was very narrow, and she repeatedly banged her head off the brick wall of the British Government's refusal to grant a section 30 order, rather than having a multi-faceted strategy to put pressure on them to do so, whilst also having a back-up plan if they said no.
'A more skilled politician of the sort of person that Alex Salmond was would have had that kind of a plan, and she didn't have it.'
Ms Cherry also described the independence referendum in 2014 as a 'flowering of ideas' that had come about from the 'grassroots up'.
She said: 'I think Nicola and her husband, as chief executive of the party, set out to undermine that grassroots power because it scared them, and to make everything imposed in the top-down, and that has had disastrous results for the SNP and for the independence movement.'
Ms Cherry also said it was 'irritating' that in her recent autobiography Ms Sturgeon conceded some of the problems with gender self-identification were valid, given, she said, there had been multiple attempts to get her to 'press pause' on the policy at the time.
These included, she said, an open letter in the Scotsman newspaper in 2019 by herself and 'quite a few other SNP MPs, MSPs and councillors', and separate calls from herself for a citizens' assembly to examine the issue.
She said of Ms Sturgeon's response: 'Not only did she close her ears to them, she demonised those of us who raised concerns.
'She said first of all that our concerns weren't valid. And then she actually compared us to the far-right, said we're misogynist, racist, homophobes.'
Joanna Cherry was first elected to the UK Parliament in 2015, and was her party's spokesperson for justice and home affairs until 2021.
She lost her seat to Labour in the 2024 general election.
The Scottish Government and the SNP have been asked for comment.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
17 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Roads are litany of SNP failure
The A1 between Alnwick and Morpeth As thousands of people flooded into Edinburgh for the Festival and Fringe, supplemented by a host of bucket-hatted Oasis fans, the roads have been under more pressure than normal, and on some of the worst it's a daily miracle there have not been more accidents. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The A1 has been notorious for decades, and although upgrading the stretch from Edinburgh to Dunbar to dual carriageway has made a huge difference, little else has been done to improve safety and journey times since the Haddington bypass was opened 21 years ago. Since 2021-22, six people have died and 134 were injured on the A1 between Edinburgh and the border at Lamberton, and while the focus on the need for road improvements has been on the killer A7 – not to mention grossly inadequate links to Stranraer and between Aberdeen and Inverness – does not make the need for A1 reconstruction any less urgent. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Disgracefully, the UK Labour Government only last week announced the development consent order for dualling the A1 between Morpeth and Ellingham will be revoked, putting the dream of a dual carriageway between Newcastle and Edinburgh even further out of reach. Rising costs are to blame, but in any other developed country it would be unthinkable for two major conurbations to be linked with what is at some points little better than a farm road. And anyone who has driven along it will know how often traffic is slowed to a crawl behind tractors. Scottish roads, like ferries, are a litany of SNP failure. Sue Webber is a Scottish Conservative MSP for Lothian


Scotsman
17 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Thankfully chapters of Sturgeon's life that affect us are closed
Nicola Sturgeon's autobiography, Frankly, won't change anyone's minds about her, says Sue Webber I've been away from Edinburgh for the past few days and have missed most of the growing media circus around former first minister Nicola Sturgeon's memoirs, but I can agree with her on one thing: it won't change anyone's minds about her. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... As she moves on, I can understand her desire to paint a different picture from that of a strident and steely political leader to one of human vulnerability amidst the turmoil going on behind the scenes; a real person with real feelings, a sensitive soul who only wants the best for everyone. Who would not have buckled in trying to make the right decisions about the pandemic when flying completely blind because no one understood how to deal with such a new, all-engulfing and deadly crisis? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And I'm sure she was 'shaken to the core' when, in the full glare of inescapable publicity, her house was turned upside down by police investigating alleged embezzlement of SNP funds by her husband. To go from a woman in complete control of her government to being arrested and interviewed in a police station was a public humiliation. Then there are the revelations about her miscarriage and the incident of alleged sexualised bullying. It would be a very hard person indeed who did not have some sympathy with someone coping with crisis after crisis, having to put on a brave face for the public – especially after losing a child. But did she sob with relief, rather than sorrow, at the death her mentor of 30 years, Alex Salmond, with whom her relationship was shredded when the shocking sexual assault allegations against him came to light? Her implausible theory that he leaked the initial story about the complaints, involving prominent female SNP figures, has only reignited the conspiracy theory fires. Let's put it all another way. Poor me, poor me, poor me. Ms Sturgeon wants us to set aside the years of relentless aggression, the snide, snarky dismissal of those who dared to disagree with her, the refusal – right up to this week – to apologise even to members of her own party for the vicious way she set about attacking those who opposed the Gender Recognition Reform Bill which came to define her. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Poor me, poor me, but those who stood up for hard-fought women's rights were, according to her, nothing but transphobes and bigots, and in her mind remain so. Tellingly, her book suggests that what really drove her passion for this dreadful legislation was her ambivalence about her own sexuality. 'I've never considered sexuality, mine own included, to be binary,' she wrote, a personal opinion which turned into the self-identification policy which came within a whisker of becoming law. But never mind the politics and intrigue, what really appalled me – repeated in her ITV interview – was the unnecessarily graphic detail about her miscarriage, and how she flushed the foetus down the toilet. Did we really need to know that? Was there not a more tender and respectful way to write about the loss of a baby? But that she chose such a crass description, is as much a window on her soul as any of her other confessions. She will have other chapters of her life to go but thank goodness the one that affects all of us is closed. Sue Webber is a Scottish Conservative MSP for Lothian


Scotsman
17 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Net zero target blowing in the wind
The SNP is sticking to its target of 2045 to reduce carbon emissions to net zero (Picture:) Six years ago, the SNP set a target of 2045 to reduce carbon emissions to net zero, accompanied with rhetoric of achieving a 'just transition' to renewable energy. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It was an unachievable goal, set only to undercut the UK target of 2050 so the Nationalists could talk up their claims to be more ambitious and more concerned about the planet than the evil Conservative government. They bowed to the inevitable only last year when Energy Secretary Mairi McAllan admitted the interim target of a 75 per cent reduction by 2030 would be missed. But she stuck with 2024, so the plan now appears to be to find someone who can do the actual work, when it might have been presumed that the thousands of civil servants her department employs would already have been hard at work. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Yet the Scottish Government has just started to advertise for a £140,000-a-year 'Director-General Net Zero' who will be expected to 'forge and deliver a coherent, joined-up strategy and subsequent outcomes which bring a just transition of the economy whilst delivering transformational change across the whole of government.' That sounds like a very big job, but isn't that what they've supposed to have been doing for the last six years? Transformational change across the whole government? Phew! Has anyone told the rest of the government? Transforming the economy for £140,000 a year sounds like a bargain, except the SNP has been blowing billions for years and the only thing that's been transformed is thousands of lives for the worse. Sue Webber is a Scottish Conservative MSP for Lothian