DHS Secretary Kristi Noem taken by ambulance to hospital
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was taken to a Washington, D.C., hospital by ambulance for an allergic reaction on Tuesday, a DHS spokesperson said.
"Secretary Noem had an allergic reaction today. She was transported to the hospital out of an abundance of caution," the spokesperson said. "She is alert and recovering."
Noem's hospitalization was first reported by CNN.
This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
14 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Caris Life Sciences IPO Prices Above Range to Raise $494 Million
Caris Life Sciences Inc., a health-care company that uses technology to help diagnose and treat cancer, raised $494 million in a US initial public offering that priced above the top of its marketed range. The Sixth Street Partners -backed company sold 23.5 million shares at $21 each, according to a statement Tuesday. The medical technology firm had offered shares for $19 to $20 each, above a previous proposed range of $16 to $18, an earlier filing showed.
CBS News
16 minutes ago
- CBS News
Health care premiums for Coloradans on the state exchange expected to double at the end of the year
Health care premiums for Coloradans on the state exchange expected to double at the end of the year Health care premiums for Coloradans on the state exchange expected to double at the end of the year Health care premiums for Coloradans on the state exchange expected to double at the end of the year Republicans' sweeping measure to cut taxes and reduce spending is expected to hit the Senate floor next week. In addition to making big changes to Medicaid, the bill also allows tax credits for those who get health insurance on the state exchange to expire. Connect for Health Colorado says Coloradans on the exchange could see premiums increase by $3,000 a year if that happens. Approximately 80 percent of people who get insurance on the state exchange receive a federal subsidy. While credits were initially tied to income, the American Rescue Plan expanded them to everyone. In rural and mountain communities where insurance can run a family upwards of $30,000 a year, those credits have made insurance affordable for tens of thousands of Coloradans, including Ryan and Robin Wilson. You'd be hard pressed to find a couple more civic-minded. Both work for nonprofits in the town of Fraser. He runs a community radio station. She manages an affordable housing community. CBS Together, they make just enough to make ends meet, which made them eligible for tax credits under the Affordable Care Act -- until this year. To qualify, they can't make more than 400% of the federal poverty level, which is $85,000 for a couple. "We're at 402%, so we're just 2% over," said Robin. She considered quitting a community college teaching job to lower their income until she heard the about another advanced premium tax credit created during COVID. It caps premiums -- regardless of income -- at 8.5% of a household's earnings, which has made insurance affordable and led to record enrollment on the state health exchange. The average premium on Connect for Health is now $115 a month. But CEO Kevin Patterson says when the expanded tax credit expires in December, premiums will more than double to $235-$279 a month. "Across the board, we expect monthly premiums to increase by about 50%. For the folks that have financial assistance - which is about 80% of our 280,000 customers - we anticipate those premiums could increase by about 104%." The Wilsons say instead of expanding their nonprofits, they will now likely have to shrink their income to qualify for the original credit. "It shouldn't be a financial sacrifice to do good work in a good place," said Robin. "We've been able to dedicate our lives to our local community more so than if the tax credits weren't there," said Ryan. "A vote against these premium subsidies is vote against the middle class. It's a vote against the poor." Connect for Health says Coloradans receive about $328 million a year in tax credits. The state Reinsurance program -- which has lowered premiums by about $2 billion over the last five years in Colorado -- would also take a hit if the tax credits expire. The credits are based on the cost of premiums so, when premiums drop, the federal government pays less in tax credits. The feds have passed those savings on to states and Colorado has used the money to bolster the Reinsurance program and lower premiums further. But those savings -- about $100 million a year in Colorado -- would be lost with the elimination of the tax credits. Gov. Jared Polis is lobbying Colorado's congressional delegation to keep the credits rather than allowing them to expire in December.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Alberta government faces mounting pushback to new COVID-19 vaccine policy
The Alberta government is facing fierce and mounting opposition to plans that will reduce access to publicly funded COVID-19 vaccines in the province The province announced late on Friday that it will limit funding of the COVID-19 shots to very specific high risk groups, including Albertans living in care homes and group settings, those receiving home care, people on social programs such as AISH, and immunocompromised individuals. Seniors living in the community, pregnant Albertans and health-care workers will have to pay out of pocket for the vaccine, along with the rest of the population. The province estimates the cost at $110 per dose. "My dominant emotion is sadness because of the people who are going to be affected by this misguided policy," said Dr. James Talbot, a former provincial chief medical officer of health. "This is saying if you want to prevent yourself from getting a serious illness and the serious consequences that go with it, if you have money you're fine. If you're a member of the working poor or a single parent family, you're out of luck." Premier Danielle Smith defended the decision on Monday, saying because vials contain multiple doses that need to be used within hours of opening, over one million doses have been wasted in pharmacies and doctors' offices. "That's $135 million. And so that was very influential in saying, is there a better way for us to do it," Smith said at an unrelated news conference in Calgary. "The national standards now are to prioritize those who have the most likelihood of an adverse affect or adverse outcomes. So we prioritize those who are most at risk. And that's what we decided to do." Talbot, also an adjunct professor at the University of Alberta, suggested the waste should have been identified and addressed much earlier and that options including single-use packaging should be investigated. On Monday, Smith said that is something they're lobbying pharmaceutical companies for. But in the meantime, she said Albertans who want a vaccine will have to sign up for one in advance. "We just have so many priorities in health care, we can't afford to be wasting money," she said. Infectious diseases experts argue Alberta isn't actually following the most recent guidance from the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI). "I think there's some … very significant gaps. I don't think I've ever seen Alberta veer so far away from national recommendations. And I think as a precedent, that's extremely concerning," said Dr. Lynora Saxinger, an infectious diseases specialist at the University of Alberta. NACI recommends all adults 65 years of age and older should receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Groups including pregnant individuals, people with underlying health conditions, First Nations individuals and health-care workers should also get the shot, the guidance states. "Alberta is not taking that first recommendation, it seems," said Saxinger. A secondary recommendation states that everyone else "may" receive a shot. "It still recommends routine COVID-19 vaccination may be given. It's not recommending that it not be given," she said. At the University of Calgary, Craig Jenne is worried Alberta's new policy will result in reduced vaccine uptake in the province. "Which ultimately is going to lead to an increased number of people requiring medical treatment, hospitalizations, ICU visits and — hopefully not, but likely — increased loss of life in the province," said Jenne, a professor in the department of microbiology, immunology and infectious diseases. According to provincial data, 368 Albertans have died due to COVID-19 and there have been more than 3,000 hospitalizations since the end of August 2024. The federal government, which had been paying for the COVID-19 vaccines, is no longer doing so. Until its announcement on Friday, the Alberta government had been tight-lipped about how it would handle coverage moving forward. Premier Danielle Smith addressed the COVID-19 vaccine policy changes on her weekend radio program Your Province, Your Premier. On that show she said the province threw away over a million doses of the COVID-19 vaccine "because people just don't want to get the vaccine [at] the same rate as others." Smith was asked why that is. "I think it's because it doesn't work particularly well, if you want the truth. I mean ... a vaccine is one where you get an injection once or twice, and then you never develop the underlying condition. And so you have to judge vaccines on that basis," she said. Talbot rejects the claim that the COVID-19 vaccine doesn't work very well. "She is absolutely wrong about how effective the vaccine is. And her own Ministry of Health has the data to prove it," said Talbot, who is also an adjunct professor at the University of Alberta. Jenne is also pushing back. "This is a bit frustrating because this continues to lead to confusion and perhaps a little mistrust in the vaccines," he said. "Throughout the various mutations of the virus, throughout the various vaccine updates, they continue to work extremely well at preventing hospitalization, at preventing ICU admission, and — critically — at preventing death." During the 2024-25 respiratory virus season, 697,471 doses of the COVID-19 vaccine were given out. The provincial government said it has purchased 485,000 doses for the upcoming fall and winter season. A spokesperson from the Ministry of Primary and Preventative Health Services told CBC News that vaccine orders are based on several factors, "including expected uptake, previous wastage, and the number of Albertans likely to be at risk for severe outcomes." The Alberta Medical Association is raising the alarm about the provincial government's exclusion of high-risk groups identified by NACI, including seniors in the community and health workers. It's also concerned there is no mention of pregnant individuals, First Nations, Inuit and Métis Albertans, and other racialized groups. "This is counter to what other jurisdictions continue to do and to recommendations from the National Advisory Committee on Immunization," Dr. Shelley Duggan, the Alberta Medical Association president, said in an emailed statement. Calling the decision "irresponsible" and "dangerous," the United Nurses of Alberta (UNA) is demanding the government immediately reverse the decision. The Health Sciences Association of Alberta (HSAA) is also calling on the province to provide COVID vaccines to all front-line health-care workers and "any Albertan who requests them" free of charge. Meanwhile, Talbot said there is an economic argument to be made for providing the vaccine for free to Albertans, because it keeps people healthy — and in the workforce — and reduces health care costs and keeps hospital beds free for other Albertans who need them. And, pointing to ongoing concerns about provincial messaging, he argued the vaccine waste should have been addressed earlier. "The marketing campaign was late. It was ineffective," he said. "You have to wonder what their motivation is when they know they have vaccines, they know they need to be marketing them to Albertans, and they don't bother to do it and then they point their finger to Albertans for not being interested in getting the vaccine."
